A previously published propofol-remifentanil response surface model does not predict patient response well in video-assisted thoracic surgery

Simulation-Based Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Sedations: A Novel Validation to Multidrug Pharmacodynamic Modeling

Pharmacodynamic models have described the interactions between anesthetics. Applying the models to clinical practice is still problematic due to inherent limitations: 1. modeling conditions are different from practice. 2. One model can only describe one endpoint. To tackle these, we propose a new method of model validation for recovery and intraprocedural sedation adequacy with a three-drug pharmacodynamic model using six published clinical studies that contain midazolam, opioid, and propofol. Mean drug dose, intraprocedural sedation level, procedure, and recovery time are extracted from each study. Simulated drug regimens are designed to best approximate study conditions. A published deep sedation model is used for simulation. Model-predicted recovery time and intraprocedural sedation scores are compared with the original clinical study outcomes. The model successfully predicted recovery times in eight out of nine regimens. Lower doses of midazolam are associated with faster recovery. Model prediction of intraprocedural sedation level was compatible with the clinical studies in five out of seven regimens. The three-drug pharmacodynamic model describes the course of gastrointestinal endoscopy sedations from clinical studies well. Model predictions are consistent with the results from clinical studies. The approach implies that large scale validation can be performed repeatedly.

Enhanced recovery after surgery: Prediction for early extubation in video-assisted thoracic surgery using a response surface model in anesthesia

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a growing tendency in modern perioperative period management, but no protocol has been established for a strategy that optimally facilitates rapid recovery from anesthesia. We hypothesized that applying a total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) method to the response surface model (RSM) would allow prediction of the emergence and endotracheal tube extubation in cases undergoing video-assisted thoracotomy surgery (VATS).

METHODS

Thirty patients who were scheduled to undergo VATs under TIVA were enrolled. Pharmacokinetic profiles were calculated using a Tivatrainer. Emergence from anesthesia was observed and the exact time point of the regained response (RR) was recorded. The effect of concentration was analyzed and applied to a response surface model.

RESULTS

The cumulative prediction curve of the RR was closer to the 50% probability as set by the OAA/S ≥ 4 than by the OAA/S ≥ 2 model. The median, averages, and standard deviations of the time differences were 14.5, 22.05 ± 19.23 min for the OAA/S ≥2 model and 10.4, 14.26 ± 10.40 min for the OAA/S ≥ 4 model.

CONCLUSION

The OAA/S ≥ 4 model could identify the target concentration in propofol-remifentanil pairs that predicted the time of emergence from VATS in 10 min. Our results indicate that RSM can be used to derive an ERAS protocol for VATS under TIVA. Further studies should investigate application of RSM to predict ERAS for various types of procedures.

Investigation of analgesic dose of nalbuphine combined with remifentanil after radical gastrectomy

Clinical analgesic effect of different doses of nalbuphine combined with remifentanil on postoperative gastric cancer patients was explored. One hundred cases of gastric cancer patients treated from December 2014 to December 2016 in the Xiangyang No. 1 People's Hospital were selected and separated into group A and group B. The dose in group A was 0.2 mg/kg of nalbuphine plus 0.2 µg/kg of remifentanil, and 0.3 mg/kg of nalbuphine plus 0.1 µg/kg of remifentanil in group B. Analgesia was performed by self-controlled intravenous injection. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores and the Brinell Comfort Score (BCS) at 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after operation, and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. The VAS scores in group A were higher than those in group B, but the BCS scores in group A were lower (P<0.05). Postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) press times in group A were lower than those in group B (P<0.05); the incidence of adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting in group A was higher than that in group B (P<0.05). The analgesic effect of intravenous analgesia scheme of 0.3 mg/kg of nalbuphine and 0.1 µg/kg of remifentanil on gastric cancer patients after operation is better than that of 0.2 mg/kg of nalbuphine and 0.2 µg/kg of remifentanil, which reduces the incidence of adverse reactions, has greater security, and can be promoted.

Efficacy and safety of remifentanil for analgesia in cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of remifentanil as a general anesthetic during cesarean delivery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty women with singleton pregnancies undergoing cesarean delivery were randomly divided into intervention and control groups, each group containing 25 subjects. Participants in the intervention group received remifentanil (infused at 2 μg/kg/h), whereas subjects in the control group were given dexmedetomidine (infused at 0.4 μg/kg/h). Outcome measurements included mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), bispectral index (BIS), Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes, and the pH, PCO2, PO2, and base excess (BE) of umbilical venous and arterial blood.

RESULTS

Forty-four participants completed the study. Patients in the intervention group did not experience greater effect and safety than those in the control group (P > .05), although MAP and BIS values decreased significantly immediately before laryngoscopy (P < .05). In addition, BIS values were reduced significantly at the time of skin incision, at uterine incision, and immediately after fetal delivery when compared with baseline values in both groups (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

This study concluded that remifentanil and dexmedetomidine exhibited similar efficacy and safety during general anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Erratum: A previously published propofol-remifentanil response surface model does not predict patient response well in video-assisted thoracic surgery: Erratum

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006895.].