Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary chronic total occlusions with versus without type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Impact of diabetes mellitus on all and successful percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes for chronic total occlusions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally and can affect numerous vital organs, including the kidney, liver, heart, nervous system, and vascular system.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) on outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO).

METHODS

Academic databases were screened for eligible studies published prior to January 2021. Study quality was assessed using Cochrane's risk of bias tool and the Newcastle Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

Pooling studies that met inclusion criteria, we carried out a meta-analysis with a random-effects model and reported pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of ten studies featuring 8,276 participants met eligibility criteria. Type 2 DM patients had significantly higher odds of mortality (pooled OR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.10 to 2.37), revascularization (pooled OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.74) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (pooled OR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.18 to 1.63) relative to non-DM patients following PCI for CTO (regardless of PCI success or failure). Similarly, even when only looking at patients who underwent successful PCI, type 2 DM patients had significantly higher odds of revascularization (pooled OR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.20 to 1.97) and MACE (pooled OR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.63).

CONCLUSION

Type 2 DM significantly impacts the risk for adverse clinical outcomes even after successful PCI for CTO. As such, clinicians need to develop a comprehensive intervention package for DM patients with cardiovascular disease.

Long-term prognosis of chronic total occlusion treated by successful percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with or without diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is highly prevalent among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO). Therefore, the purpose of our study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of CTO-PCI in patients with or without DM.

Methods

All relevant articles published in electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) from inception to August 7, 2020 were identified with a comprehensive literature search. Additionally, we defined major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) as the primary endpoint and used risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to express the pooled effects in this meta-analysis.

Results

Eleven studies consisting of 4238 DM patients and 5609 non-DM patients were included in our meta-analysis. For DM patients, successful CTO-PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACEs (RR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.55–0.82, p = 0.0001), all-cause death (RR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.38–0.56, p < 0.00001), and cardiac death (RR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.26–0.48, p < 0.00001) than CTO-medical treatment (MT) alone; however, this does not apply to non-DM patients. Subsequently, the subgroup analysis also obtained consistent conclusions. In addition, our study also revealed that non-DM patients may suffer less risk from MACEs (RR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.02–1.56, p = 0.03) than DM patients after successful CTO-PCI, especially in the subgroup with a follow-up period of less than 3 years (RR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.22–1.67, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Compared with CTO-MT alone, successful CTO-PCI was found to be related to a better long-term prognosis in DM patients but not in non-DM patients. However, compared with non-DM patients, the risk of MACEs may be higher in DM patients after successful CTO-PCI in the drug-eluting stent era, especially during a follow-up period shorter than 3 years.

Impact of Hyperinsulinemia on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients without Diabetes Who Have Acute Myocardial Syndrome

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hyperinsulinemia plays a key role in the development of cardiovascular impairment in patients with metabolic syndrome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of hyperinsulinemia on long-term clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients without diabetes mellitus who have acute myocardial syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

Between March 2016 and January 2019, we enrolled 468 patients with ACS and without diabetes mellitus who received primary PCI. Patients were divided into a low-insulin group (n = 157), medium-insulin group (n = 154), and high-insulin group (n = 157) according to tertiles of fasting insulin level. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE; all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization [TVR]) at 24 months. The secondary endpoint was angina hospitalization.

RESULTS

Patients in the high-insulin group had an unfavorable prognosis, with a higher rate of MACE (34.39%) than the low-insulin group (22.29%) and medium-insulin group (23.37%) at 24 months (P < 0.05). This difference was mainly driven by the increase in TVR. The high-insulin group also had a higher rate of angina hospitalization than the low-insulin group. Cox proportional hazards regression showed that high-insulin level (hazard ratio [HR] 1.870, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.202-2.909), small-vessel lesion (HR 1.713, 95% CI 1.111-2.642), bifurcation lesion (HR 3.394, 95% CI 2.033-5.067), SYNTAX score (HR 1.084, 95% CI 1.039-1.130), and stent length (HR 1.017, 95% CI 1.002-1.032) increased the incidence of MACE in patients with ACS and without diabetes who underwent PCI.

CONCLUSION

Hyperinsulinemia might be a valid predictor of clinical outcomes in patients with ACS undergoing PCI.

Long-term outcomes of medical therapy versus successful recanalisation for coronary chronic total occlusions in patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus

Background

In this study, we compared the outcomes of medical therapy (MT) with successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in chronic total occlusions (CTO) patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods

A total of 2015 patients with CTOs were stratified. Diabetic patients (n = 755, 37.5%) and non-diabetic patients (n = 1260, 62.5%) were subjected to medical therapy or successful CTO-PCI. We performed a propensity score matching (PSM) to balance the baseline characteristics. A comparison of the major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was done to evaluate long-term outcomes.

Results

The median follow-up duration was 2.6 years. Through multivariate analysis, the incidence of MACE was significantly higher among diabetic patients compared to the non-diabetic patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09–1.61, p = 0.005). Among the diabetic group, the rate of MACE (adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42–0.87, p = 0.006) was significantly lower in the successful CTO-PCI group than in the MT group. Besides, in the non-diabetic group, the prevalence of MACE (adjusted HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.64–1.15, p = 0.294) and cardiac death (adjusted HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.51–1.70, p = 0.825) were comparable between the two groups. Similar results as with the early detection were obtained in propensity-matched diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Notably, there was a significant interaction between diabetic or non-diabetic with the therapeutic strategy on MACE (p for interaction = 0.036).

Conclusions

For treatment of CTO, successful CTO-PCI highly reduces the risk of MACE in diabetic patients when compared with medical therapy. However, this does not apply to non-diabetic patients.

Impact of coronary collateralization on long-term clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients after successful recanalization of chronic total occlusion

Background

To assess the prognostic role of coronary collaterals in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO).

Methods

Coronary collateralization was graded according to Rentrop scoring system in 198 type 2 diabetic patients and 335 non-diabetics with stable angina undergoing PCI for at least one CTO lesion. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was determined and major adverse cardio-cerebral events (MACCE) were recorded during follow-up.

Results

Poor collateralization was more common in patients with T2DM than in non-diabetics (40% vs 29%, p = 0.008). At 13.5 ± 4.1 months, the rate of composite MACCE (17.3% vs 27.6%, p = 0.034) and repeat revascularization (15.2% vs 25.5%, p = 0.026) was lower and the increase in LVEF (3.10% vs 1.80%, p = 0.024) was greater in patients with good collaterals than in those with poor collaterals for non-diabetic group. The associations were in the same direction for T2DM group (35% vs 44%; 30% vs 36%; 2.14% vs 1.65%, respectively) with a higher all-cause mortality in diabetic patients with poor collaterals (p = 0.034). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that coronary collateralization was an independent factor for time to MACCE (HR 2.155,95% CI 1.290–3.599, p = 0.003) and repeat revascularization (HR 2.326, 95% CI 1.357–3.986, p = 0.002) in non-diabetic patients, but did not enter the model in those with T2DM.

Conclusions

T2DM is associated with reduced coronary collateralization. The effects of the status of coronary collateralization on long-term clinical outcomes and left ventricular function appear to be similar in size in type 2 diabetic patients and non-diabetics after successful recanalization of CTO.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Chronic Total Occlusions in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: a Treatment-Risk Paradox

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is highly prevalent among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTOs). This review aims to summarize the available evidence on CTO recanalization in patients with DM.

RECENT FINDINGS

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery is the recommended revascularization modality for patients with DM and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the optimal management strategy in diabetic patients with CTO and single-vessel disease or prior CABG remains a clinical dilemma. Contemporary, large-scale, observational registries support the notion that CTO PCI, if performed at high-volume CTO PCI centers by highly experienced operators, conveys similar high procedural success and low complication rates in patients with and without DM. Although DM patients have more frequently CTOs and may derive greater benefit from complete revascularization, they are less frequently exposed to CTO PCI than non-DM patients (treatment-risk paradox). CTO PCI performed by highly experienced operators constitutes a safe and effective treatment option for selected diabetic CTO patients who are not candidates for CABG. Randomized studies are warranted to compare long-term outcomes of CTO PCI and medical therapy in this high-risk subset.