Comparison of coblation annuloplasty and radiofrequency thermocoagulation for treatment of lumbar discogenic pain

Therapeutic effect of intradiscal pulsed radiofrequency on internal disc disruption: A case report

RATIONALE

Discogenic low back pain often persists despite medication and medical intervention. In this study, intradiscal pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) was performed in a patient with discogenic low back pain who did not respond to oral medication, posterior medial branch block, epidural steroid injection, and percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 28-year-old woman visited a pain clinic complaining of low back pain that was scored 8 out of 10 on a numerical rating scale. Her pain was present in any position throughout the day and worsened in the sitting position.

DIAGNOSES

Magnetic resonance imaging showed L5-S1 internal discal disruption. Based on the medical history, physical examination, and magnetic resonance imaging, we determined that her pain originated from the L5-S1 disc.

INTERVENTIONS

We performed an intradiscal PRF on the affected disc under C-arm fluoroscopy guidance. PRF was performed at 5 Hz, 20-ms pulse width, and 70 V for 15 minutes while ensuring that the electrode tip temperature was maintained below 42°C.

OUTCOMES

Immediately after the procedure, the patient's pain subsided. At the 1-month follow-up visit, the patient reported complete relief of her low back pain. The Oswestry disability index, which indicates the degree of disability, improved significantly. She also reported that she could sit for long periods because the pain was reduced. No adverse effects from the procedure were found.

LESSONS

Applying intradiscal PRF seems an effective and safe technique for treating discogenic low back pain.

Clinical and Radiological Comparisons of Percutaneous Low-Power Laser Discectomy and Low-Temperature Plasma Radiofrequency Ablation for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Study

Background

Minimally invasive techniques, such as percutaneous low-power laser discectomy (PLLD) and low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation (coblation) can be applied to treat degenerative cervical radiculopathy. However, less evidence supports the superiority of distinct minimally-invasive therapy. Our study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological characteristics of the PLLD and coblation for cervical radiculopathy.

Methods

This was a prospective, multicenter, cohort study (ChiCTR-ONC-17010356). The modified Macnab criteria was performed to assess the clinical improvement pre- and post-surgery. To evaluate the radiological effect, the Pfirrmann grading system and disk herniation index were applied with MRI.

Results

In this study, 28 patients were enrolled in the coblation group and 30 patients in the PLLD group. The mean good-excellent rate at 3-month follow-up was 82.1% for PLLD group, and 66.7% for coblation group, respectively (p = 0.179). The PLLD group achieved higher good-excellent rate 6 and 12 months after discharge (92.9 vs. 70.0%, p = 0.026). Radiological data revealed that PLLD but not coblation treatment achieved significant reduction of disk herniation index (p < 0.0001). Coblation treatment did not change the Pfirrmann grades of cervical radiculopathy patients (n = 18), and 7 out of 17 (41.2%) patients achieved improvement after PLLD therapy. None obvious adverse event was observed in this study.

Conclusion

Both PLLD and coblation are effective and safe option for patients with cervical radiculopathy. Better long-term clinical outcomes may be potentially associated with the improvement of disk degeneration after PLLD treatment.

Use of Pulsed Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Discogenic Back Pain: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Low-back pain (LBP) is one of the most frequently reported symptoms of patients who visit pain clinics, and a significant proportion of them have discogenic pain. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) stimulation is an effective treatment for various types of pain.

PURPOSE

We reviewed articles which investigated the effectiveness of intradiscal PRF for controlling discogenic LBP.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We searched PubMed for papers published prior to August 7, 2020, in which intradiscal PRF was used for treating discogenic LBP. The key search phrase was (intradiscal PRF) for identifying potentially relevant articles. We included articles in which intradiscal PRF was used for controlling LBP. Review articles were excluded.

RESULTS

Nine publications were included in this review. Except for one study, all other studies showed positive therapeutic outcomes after treating discogenic LBP using intradiscal PRF. However, the quality of these studies was not high.

CONCLUSIONS

This review showed that intradiscal PRF appears to be a helpful treatment method for patients with discogenic LBP. Our review provides insights into the degree of evidence of the therapeutic effects of intradiscal PRF for alleviating discogenic LBP. For confirmation of the effectiveness of intradiscal PRF on discogenic LBP, more high-quality studies are necessary.

Sphenopalatine ganglion-targeted low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of refractory cluster headache

Introduction

Cluster headache (CH) is a refractory headache. Low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation is a relatively novel technique with promising applications in neuropathic pain. It may improve the treatment of CH.

Aim

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sphenopalatine ganglion-targeted low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of patients with refractory CH.

Material and methods

A retrospective cohort study including seventy-five patients with refractory cluster headache who underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided sphenopalatine ganglion-targeted low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation between January 2015 and December 2017 at the Beijing Xuanwu Hospital was conducted.

Results

Effective pain relief rate 3 months after the procedure was 96% with 40 (53.3%) patients achieving complete relief; 32 (42.7%) patients obtained partial relief and 3 (4%) patients showed no relief. The effective pain relief rate two years after the procedure remained as high as 85.3% with 29 (38.6%) achieving complete relief, 35 (46.7%) partial relief and 11 (14.7%) no relief. The procedure proved equally effective for both episodic and chronic cluster headache. Complications including facial numbness, masseter weakness, facial hypoesthesia and cheek hematoma were observed, but all were mild and disappeared within 6 months.

Conclusions

CT-guided low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation is an effective and safe strategy for refractory cluster headache. For patients who have not responded to conservative treatment, this minimally invasive intervention is a reliable alternative.

Reoccurring discogenic low back pain (LBP) after discoblock treated by oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF)

Objective

To determine the efficacy of OLIF in the treatment of reoccurring discogenic low back pain (LBP) after discoblock

Methods

We included 108 patients with LBP that was suspected to be discogenic (such as high intensity zone, Schmorl’s nodes, Modic changes Type I, etc.), from August 2015 to August 2017. All patients underwent discography, and patients whose LBP was confirmed to be discogenic received discoblock. Patients who had reoccurring pain after discoblock underwent OLIF. Perioperative parameters and complications were recorded. The VAS and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were assessed at preoperation, and 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the surgery. The fusion rate was evaluated.

Results

Of 108 patients, 89 were confirmed to have discogenic LBP, and 32/89 patients with reoccurring LBP pain after discoblock underwent OLIF. Twenty-eight patients were followed up for ≥ 1 year. The OLIF operation lasted for 92 ± 34 min. Blood loss during the operation was 48 ± 15 ml. The mean incision length was 3.0 ± 0.6 cm. The average length of stay was 4.8 ± 1.9 days. The VAS and ODI scores decreased from 8.1 ± 1.7 preoperatively to 0.9 ± 0.4, and from 71.2 ± 11.3 to 9.3 ± 3.1, 12 months postoperatively, respectively. The total incidence of complications was 15.6%, including 2 cases of cage subsidence, 2 cases of ipsilateral hip flexor weakness, and 1 case of ipsilateral anterior thigh pain. All symptoms relieved or disappeared during follow-up. The fusion rate was 96.9%.

Conclusions

Reoccurring discogenic LBP after discoblock should be considered as a suitable group for treatment by OLIF.

Comparison of the short-term outcomes after low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation (coblation) in the Gasserian ganglion for the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia

Background: Low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation (coblation) is a relatively novel technique with promising applications in neuropathic pain. A nerve stimulator was modified and connected to a plasma knife head to solve the problem of accessing the Gasserian ganglion for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Objective: To compare the therapeutic effects and short-term outcomes of coblation vs radiofrequency thermocoagulation for the treatment of primary TN. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 217 inpatients who had undergone surgical treatment for primary TN between September 2017 and June 2018 at the Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University. The patients were grouped according to the procedure they selected after an informed comprehensive discussion with their surgeon: the coblation group and the radiofrequency group. Pain, numbness, and muscle atrophy were evaluated before surgery, on the day of surgery, and at 3 days, 5 days, and 3 months after surgery. Results: In the coblation and radiofrequency groups, the pain relief rates were 74.7% and 85.5% on day 1 (P=0.066), 85.3% and 97.3% on day 3 (P=0.003), and 97.7% and 88.2% at 3 months (P=0.134). At 3 months after surgery, 69.3% of the patients in the coblation group and 42.7% in the radiofrequency group had no pain (P<0.001). The multivariable analysis showed that the risk of numbness in the coblation group was independently lower than in the radiofrequency group at 3 months after surgery and (OR=0.243, 95%CI: 0.122-0.484, P<0.001). Three months after the surgery, no recurrence was found in both of the coblation group and the radiofrequency group. Postoperative pain score ≥4 points was considered as a sign of failure this series at 3 months after surgery. The failure rate in coblation group is 2.7% (n=2) and a radiofrequency group is 4.5% (n=5), but there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P=0.703). Conclusion: Coblation could reduce the risk of postoperative numbness in patients with primary TN.