Diagnostic accuracy of colposcopy with dynamic spectral imaging for cytology-negative/high-risk HPV positive (failed test of cure) after large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) of the cervix: Results of the DySIS colposcopy 1 study

Value of colposcopy with dynamic spectral imaging in the detection and evolution of high-grade cervical lesions

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the performance of colposcopy assisted with dynamic spectral imaging (CC-DSI) compared to conventional colposcopy (CC) in diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ (CIN2+).

METHODS

: 973 consecutive women were referred for colposcopy between 2012 and 2016 and were examined simultaneously by CC and CC-DSI; 877 were eligible. Comparisons between CC and CC-DSI were performed against the histological diagnosis performed by either punch biopsy or loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).

RESULTS

: In final histology, 494 women had no CIN, 250 had CIN1 and 133 had CIN2+. The sensitivity to identify women with CIN2+ was significantly higher for CC-DSI compared to CC for the entire group and in the subgroup of 675 women referred with ASCUS or LSIL. In women with HPV16/18 infections, the sensitivity of CC increased with the addition of DSI from 53% to 79% (p<0.001). Using a multivariant Cox regression model, CC-DSI was an independent factor for progression of the cervical lesions (HR: 2.29, 95%CI 1.07-4.90). Other predictive factors were the number of sexual partners (HR: 1.05, 95%CI: 1.01-1.09) and anal intercourse (HR: 2.45, 95%CI 1.23-5.02).

CONCLUSION

CC-DSI improves the ability to detect cervical lesions compared to CC and could help predict their potential to progress.

Diagnostic value of colposcopy in patients with cytology-negative and HR-HPV-positive cervical lesions

PURPOSE

High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV)-positive but cytology-negative cervical cancer screening results are not uncommon. This study aimed to investigate colposcopy's accuracy and diagnostic value in patients with cytology-negative HR-HPV-positive screening results.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with HR-HPV-positive cytology-negative screening results who underwent electronic colposcopy with acetic acid and multi-point cervical biopsy, HPV typing (24 HPV subtypes), and quantitative HPV detection.

RESULTS

Among 229 patients, 130 had chronic cervicitis, and 99 had cervical lesions (CIN1, n = 37; CIN2/3, n = 55; invasive carcinoma, n = 7). Using colposcopy as a reference, the cervical cytology false-negative rate was 43.2% (99/229). Colposcopy was more accurate in patients with HR-HPV16/18 or high viral loads. Multivariable analyses showed HPV viral load and childbearing history were the independent factors affecting the accuracy of colposcopy (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Colposcopy in HR-HPV-positive cytology-negative patients has a moderate diagnostic accuracy. The type of cervical transformation zone and HPV viral load are independent factors affecting the accuracy of colposcopy-based diagnosis.

Can the dynamic spectral imaging (DSI) color map improve colposcopy examination for precancerous cervical lesions? A prospective evaluation of the DSI color map in a multi-biopsy clinical setting

Background

Colposcopy serves as a subjective examination of the cervix with low sensitivity to detect cervical intraepithelial dysplasia (CIN) grade 2 or worse (CIN2 +). Dynamic spectral imaging (DSI) colposcopy has been developed to provide an objective element to cervix examinations and has been proven to increase sensitivity of detecting CIN2 + . We aimed to assess the performance of the DSI color map and compared it to histological diagnoses of cervical biopsies in determining the CIN grade present.

Methods

Women were included in a consecutive, prospective manner at Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark. Women were eligible to participate if they were referred for colposcopy due to abnormal cervical smear (threshold:  ≥ ASCUS) or follow-up after previously diagnosed CIN. All women had four biopsies taken, one directed by colposcopists alone prior to viewing the DSI color map, one directed by the worst color on the respective DSI color map, and two additional biopsies. All biopsies were analyzed separately. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values (NPVs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

A total of 800 women were recruited. Of these, 529 (66.1%) were eligible for inclusion. The sensitivity of the DSI color map was found to be 48.1% (95% CI 41.1–55.1) in finding CIN grade 2 or worse (CIN2 +) when compared to the histological diagnosis of the DSI directed biopsy. This was 42.5% (95% CI 36.7–48.5) when compared to the final histological diagnosis of all four cervical biopsies and with an NPV of 53.5% (95% CI 50.5–56.5).

Conclusion

The worst color indicated by the DSI map might not consistently reflect the true grade of cervical dysplasia present. Thus, even though the DSI color map indicates low-grade changes, colposcopists should still consider taking biopsies from the area as high-grade changes might be present.

Trial registration: NCT04249856, January 31 2020 (retrospectively registered).

Factors Correlated with the Accuracy of Colposcopy-Directed Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE/AIM OF THE STUDY

Colposcopy-directed cervical biopsy has played a major role in diagnosing cervical lesions. The precision of colposcopy-guided biopsy has been questioned. We analyzed several factors that may be correlated with the accuracy of biopsy.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE were searched from January 1, 1998 to March 1, 2020. Odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Included studies evaluated factors correlated with the accuracy of biopsy and patients' final diagnosis was established by histological examination of the specimen obtained by conization, loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), or colpohysterectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies were selected for the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled analysis indicated that the diagnostic inaccuracies of colposcopy-directed cervical biopsy were magnified in women who were 50 years of age or older. Postmenopausal status and transformation zone 3 type were also associated with the diagnostic inaccuracies of colposcopy-directed biopsy. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions had better concordance rates than low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. The number of vaginal deliveries, number of biopsies, and HPV type were associated with biopsy underdiagnosis and biopsy overestimation.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis found that the correlation between the histological findings at biopsy and after surgical treatment was influenced by women's age, menopausal status, and the transformation zone type. The diagnostic efficacy was also better for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions than for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Further large-scale randomized clinical trials are required to analyze the factors correlated with biopsy underdiagnosis and biopsy overestimation.

Adjunctive colposcopy technologies for assessing suspected cervical abnormalities: systematic reviews and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Dynamic Spectral Imaging System (DySIS)map (DySIS Medical Ltd, Edinburgh, UK) and ZedScan (Zilico Limited, Manchester, UK) can be used adjunctively with conventional colposcopy, which may improve the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy, clinical effectiveness and implementation of DySISmap and ZedScan as adjuncts to standard colposcopy, and to develop a cost-effectiveness model.

METHODS

Four parallel systematic reviews were performed on diagnostic accuracy, clinical effectiveness issues, implementation and economic analyses. In January 2017 we searched databases (including MEDLINE and EMBASE) for studies in which DySISmap or ZedScan was used adjunctively with standard colposcopy to detect CIN or cancer in women referred to colposcopy. Risk of bias was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool. Summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy were calculated using bivariate and other regression models when appropriate. Other outcomes were synthesised narratively. A patient-level state-transition model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DySISmap and ZedScan under either human papillomavirus (HPV) triage or the HPV primary screening algorithm. The model included two types of clinics ['see and treat' and 'watchful waiting' (i.e. treat later after confirmatory biopsy)], as well as the reason for referral (low-grade or high-grade cytological smear). Sensitivity and scenario analyses were undertaken.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included in the diagnostic review (nine of DySISmap and two of ZedScan), three were included in the clinical effectiveness review (two of DySISmap and one of ZedScan) and five were included in the implementation review (four of DySISmap and one of ZedScan). Adjunctive DySISmap use was found to have a higher sensitivity for detecting CIN grade 2+ (CIN 2+) lesions [81.25%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 72.2% to 87.9%] than standard colposcopy alone (57.91%, 95% CI 47.2% to 67.9%), but with a lower specificity (70.40%, 95% CI 59.4% to 79.5%) than colposcopy (87.41%, 95% CI 81.7% to 91.5%). (Confidential information has been removed.) The base-case cost-effectiveness results showed that adjunctive DySISmap routinely dominated standard colposcopy (it was less costly and more effective). The only exception was for high-grade referrals in a watchful-waiting clinic setting. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for ZedScan varied between £272 and £4922 per quality-adjusted life-year. ZedScan also dominated colposcopy alone for high-grade referrals in see-and-treat clinics. These findings appeared to be robust to a wide range of sensitivity and scenario analyses.

LIMITATIONS

All but one study was rated as being at a high risk of bias. There was no evidence directly comparing ZedScan with standard colposcopy. No studies directly compared DySIS and ZedScan.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of adjunctive DySIS increases the sensitivity for detecting CIN 2+, so it increases the number of high-grade CIN cases that are detected. However, it also reduces specificity, so that more women with no or low-grade CIN will be incorrectly judged as possibly having high-grade CIN. The evidence for ZedScan was limited, but it appears to increase sensitivity and decrease specificity compared with colposcopy alone. The cost-effectiveness of both adjunctive technologies compared with standard colposcopy, under both the HPV triage and primary screening algorithms, appears to be favourable when compared with the conventional thresholds used to determine value in the NHS.

FUTURE WORK

More diagnostic accuracy studies of ZedScan are needed, as are studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy for women referred to colposcopy as part of the HPV primary screening programme.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017054515.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.