The prognostic value of lymph node ratio for local advanced gastric cancer patients with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after D2 gastrectomy

Long-Term Prognostic Analysis of Chemoradiation Therapy Versus Chemotherapy after D2 Resection for High-Risk Gastric Cancer: Results From a Prospective Randomized Control Study

PURPOSE

To explore the population of patients who could benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) and investigated the value of postoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in patients with gastric cancer after D2 resection.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This randomized clinical trial enrolled patients between October 1, 2011, and December 31, 2019. Patients with gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy were randomized (1:1) to receive postoperative CRT or adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. The adjuvant chemotherapy group received 8 cycles of SOX (S-1 + oxaliplatin) chemotherapy. RT was given after 4 to 6 cycles of SOX chemotherapy. RT comprised 45 Gy in 25 fractions of 1.8 Gy over 5 weeks by intensity modulated RT concurrently with S-1 chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

A total of 312 patients (median [IQR] age, 58 [50-64] years) were enrolled, including 157 patients randomized to the adjuvant chemotherapy group and 155 patients randomized to the adjuvant CRT group. The 3-year DFS was 66.7% for the control arm and 70.7% for the experimental arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.54-1.25; P = .35). We defined patients with pN stage ≥ N2 and extraperigastric lymph node metastasis as the high-risk group and the remaining patients as the low-risk group. The 3-year DFS rates for the high-risk group and the low-risk group were 59.3% and 76.8%, respectively (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.39-3.22; P < .01). For high-risk patients, the 3-year DFS rates in the adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant CRT groups were 53.0% and 71.0%, respectively (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.97; P < .05). More grade 3 and 4 acute toxic effects were observed in the adjuvant chemotherapy group than in the CRT group (41 patients [26.1%] vs 28 patients [18.5%]; P = .11), but the difference was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Subgroup analysis of this randomized clinical trial revealed that high-risk patients can benefit from adjuvant CRT.

Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage III Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer After D2/R0 Resection

PURPOSE

To compare the survival benefit in the adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) group and chemotherapy (CT) group for stage III gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer after D2/R0 resection.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From January 2011 to May 2018, 819 patients (CRT group: 215 patients, CT group: 604 patients) diagnosed as pathological stage III after D2/R0 resection were retrospectively collected and the survival and recurrence patterns were analyzed. The baseline characteristics were balanced based on propensity score matching (PSM). The survival benefit was compared between two groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression model.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate in the CRT group was significantly higher than that in the CT group whether before or after the PSM. The multivariate Cox regression analysis identified the significant poor OS in patients with advanced TNM stage (P < 0.001) and patients who did not receive the adjuvant CRT (P = 0.008). For the recurrence patterns, 85 (39.5%) patients in the CRT group and 300 (49.7%) patients in the CT group were diagnosed as recurrence (P = 0.011). The regional recurrence in the CRT group was less than that in the CT group (20.5% vs. 35.1%, P = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

For patients diagnosed as stage III gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer, the addition of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy will significantly improve the overall survival and regional control.

Which Lymph Node Staging System Better Predicts Prognosis in Patients With Gastric Carcinoma? A Comparative Study Between 3 Different Lymph Node Classifications for Resected Gastric Cancer in a Western Tertiary Center

INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer (GC) is an aggressive disease with high mortality rates. Lymph node (LN) staging of GC is a major source of controversy. The aim of this study is to compare the prognostic value of 3 different LN classifications for patients with resected GC: the eighth TNM staging system, lymph node ratio (LNR, ratio between positive and total LN) and a new anatomic-based classification (Choi classification).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of all cases of GC resected in a tertiary hospital in Spain (n=377). Clinical data were collected; histologic slides were reviewed; and univariate and multivariate analyses of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed.

RESULTS

In all, 315 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria. Univariate analysis showed that all classifications were significantly associated with tumor death and progression (P<0.001). All staging systems were independent prognostic factors for DFS. Area under the curve ratios for Choi, N stage, and LNR classifications were 0.738, 0.730, and 0.735, respectively. TNM and LNR classifications were independent prognosticators for OS, while Choi classification was an independent factor only in patients with ≥16 LN resected. Area under the curve ratios for Choi, N stage, and LNR classifications were 0.707, 0.728, and 0.732, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves depending on LNR classification showed the best patient stratification for both OS and DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-staging systems had similar prognostic performance, but LNR-based classification stratified patients better. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of the number of LN examined, cutoff values, and anatomic extent of LN disease in GC.

The prognostic value of the lymph node ratio for local advanced gastric cancer patients with intensity-modulated radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy after radical gastrectomy in China

BACKGROUND

Nearly 50% of new gastric cancer cases and gastric cancer-related deaths worldwide occur in China. No global consensus has been reached about the optimal management of locally advanced gastric cancer. Although the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastric Cancer from the National Health Commission of China, which has been updated three times since 2010, explicitly emphasize the necessity of adjuvant chemoradiation, few clinical institutions in China routinely adhere to the recommended radiotherapy guidelines. This study aimed to examine the efficacy, in terms of locoregional control and long-term survival, and the safety of adjuvant radiotherapy using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with concurrent and adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

This was a retrospective evaluation of 156 patients with high-risk gastric cancer who underwent adjuvant chemoradiotherapy between September 2008 and May 2019. The prescribed planning target volume median dose was 45 Gy in 1.8 Gy daily fractions, and all patients received concurrent and adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. Locoregional control, distant metastasis, and overall survival rates were estimated. Clinicopathological characteristics and patterns of failure were retrospectively reviewed to identify factors associated with survival and recurrence.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 56 months (range 3-130 months) for all patients. Of the patients, 11 (7.1%) were lost to follow-up, and 49 (31.4%) and 104 (66.7%) had stage II or III disease according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis staging criteria. The frequencies of acute grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal and hematological toxicity were 9.6% and 10.9%, respectively. In total, 152 patients (97.4%) completed the entire chemoradiation regimen. No toxicity-related deaths occurred. Nineteen patients (12.2%) had locoregional recurrence, 26 (16.7%) had distant metastases, and 12 (7.7%) had peritoneal metastasis. The overall survival (OS) rates were 83.5%, 65.0%, and 59.5%, while the disease-free survival rates were 75.1%, 61.0%, and 55.6% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, age, pathological T stage and lymph node ratio (LNR) were found to be independent predictors of OS.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative concomitant IMRT and chemotherapy were well tolerated, with acceptable toxicities and encouraging locoregional tumor control and long-term survival. The LNR can be used as an important prognostic indicator for OS. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy should be considered for all patients with a high risk of locoregional recurrence, especially in China.

Association Between Lymph Node Ratio and Survival in Patients with Pathological Stage II/III Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Lymph node ratio (LNR), defined as the ratio of metastatic nodes to the total number of examined lymph nodes, has been proposed as a sensitive prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer (GC). We investigate its association with survival in pathological stage (pStage) II/III GC and explore whether this is a prognostic factor in each Union for International Cancer Control pStage (7th edition).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively examined 838 patients with pStage II/III GC who underwent curative gastrectomy between June 2000 and December 2018. Patients were classified into low-LNR (L-LNR), middle-LNR (M-LNR), and high-LNR (H-LNR) groups according to adjusted X-tile cutoff values of 0.1 and 0.25 for LNR, and their clinicopathological characteristics and survival rates were compared.

RESULTS

The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates postsurgery showed significant differences among the groups (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that LNR was a significant predictor of poor RFS [M-LNR: hazard ratio (HR) 3.128, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.254-4.342, P < 0.001; H-LNR: HR 5.148, 95% CI 3.546-7.474, P < 0.001] and OS (M-LNR: HR 2.749, 95% CI 2.038-3.708, P < 0.001; H-LNR: HR 4.654, 95% CI 3.288-6.588, P < 0.001). On subset analysis stratified by pStage, significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of the RFS curves of pStage II and III GC (P < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively) and OS curves of pStage II and III GC (P = 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

High LNR is a predictor of worse prognosis in pStage II/III GC, including each substage.

Recurrence outcome of lymph node ratio in gastric cancer after underwent curative resection: A retrospective cohort study

Introduction

D2 dissection has been regarded as the standard procedure for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). Number of lymph nodes (LN) harvested is an important factor for accurate staging. The number of LN retrieved and the metastasis LN status are also important factors to determine the prognosis. This study aims to evaluate whether lymph node ratio (LNR) could be a prognostic indicator of GC patients following curative resection.

Patients and methods

Single center retrospective cohort study of GC patients underwent curative resection from January 1995 to December 2016 was conducted. The patients were categorized into 3 groups based on LNR (0.00-0.35, >0.35-0.75, and >0.75-1.00) and 2 groups based on number of LN retrieved (<15 and ≥ 15). Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate recurrence-free survival. Cox-regression were used to determine the association between LNR/other factors and the disease recurrence.

Results

One-hundred fifty-three patients were included in analysis. Univariate analysis showed that LNR >0.35, pathologic LN stages (pN) 2-3, higher number of LN metastasis, and TNM stage III were significantly recurrence risk factors. After adjusting for several covariates, LNR >0.35 still was significant predictor (adjusted HR [95%CI], 8.53 [1.97, 36.86]; p = 0.004) while number of LN retrieved or number of metastasis LN were not.

Conclusion

LNR could be a strong indicator for the recurrence of GC after curative resection while the number of LN retrieved or metastasis did not predict the recurrence. Future studies, such as prospective studies, are needed to confirm and identify the optimum LNR cut-off.