Staplers or clips?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of vessel controlling devices for renal pedicle ligation in laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy

The learning curve for pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy by using cumulative sum analysis

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to identify a precise learning curve for pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (RDN).

METHODS

Data from 172 consecutive kidney donors who underwent pure RDN between January 2010 and July 2019 were prospectively collected and evaluated. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used for testing the operation time. Changepoints were determined by using the r program and BINSEG method. The cohort was divided into three groups - group 1: competence, including the first 10 cases; group 2: 11-48 cases as proficiency; and group 3: the subsequent 124 cases as expert level. Continuous variables were evaluated using one-way ANOVA, and categorical data were evaluated using the Chi-squared test.

RESULTS

Right RDN was performed in 39 (22.7%) donors. The eighth patient was converted to open surgery due to vena cava injury and excluded from the CUSUM analysis. Depending on experience in pure RDN, a significant decrease was detected in operative time (p<0.001), warm ischemia time (p=0.006), and blood loss (p<0.001). Recipient complications and graft function were found to be statistically comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, the attainment of expertise in pure RDN was observed after performing 50 cases. The transperitoneal technique, which is a feasible alternative, is far more widely used than pure RDN. We believe that understanding the learning curve associated with pure RDN could facilitate the adoption of this approach as a viable alternative to the transperitoneal approach.

Examination of resistance of various methods of pulmonary vessel occlusion to hydrostatic pressure

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare pressure resistance of the most common methods of vessel occlusion during thoracic surgical procedures: ligations, clips, and vascular endostaplers.

Methods

Pulmonary vessels were obtained during routine thoracic surgeries. A ball-tipped cannula was inserted through an opening in the side wall and secured with a linen ligature from slipping out. Subsequently, saline was infused into the vessel. We recorded the pressure on which a leakage occurred.

Results

A total of 65 vessels, divided between 3 groups, were enrolled in the study. In the endostaplers group, median bursting pressures were 262.5 mmHg and 300 mmHg for arteries and veins, respectively. In the case of clips, it was over 750 mmHg in both types of the vessels. The same results were observed in the ligation group. Minimal bursting pressures in endostapler occlusion were 187.5 mmHg and 225 mmHg in arteries and veins, respectively. In the case of clips, it was 600 mmHg for arteries and 675 mmHg for veins. A total of 525 mmHg (arteries) and 750 mmHg (veins) were the minimal leaking values observed in vessels occluded with ligations. Comparative analysis showed statistically significant differences in endostapler-clips and endostapler-ligations pairs (p < 0.001). There were no differences between clips and ligations.

Conclusions

The examined methods are capable of occluding pulmonary vessels under physiological conditions. Furthermore, ligations and clips are resistant to pressures highly exceeding physiological values.

Vascular closure devices in living-donor nephrectomy: a much-needed systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on safety

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety of vascular closure devices in living-donor nephrectomy (LDN), as staplers and non-transfixion techniques (polymer locking and metal clips) are the methods employed to secure the renal vessels during laparoscopic and robotic LDN, but the use of clips has come into question since the United States Food and Drug Administration and manufacturers issued a contraindication.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the safety of vascular closure devices (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews [PROSPERO] registration: CRD42022364349). The PubMed, Scopus, the Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), and the Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS) databases were searched in September 2022. For comparative and non-comparative studies, incidence estimates and odds ratios (ORs), respectively, for the main variables regarding safety of vascular closure devices were pooled by using random effects meta-analyses. Quality assessment of the included comparative studies was conducted using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool.

RESULTS

Of the 863 articles obtained, data were retrieved from 44 studies, which included 42 902 patients. In non-comparative studies, the pooled estimate rates for device failure, severe haemorrhage rate, conversion to open surgery, and mortality were similar for both clips and staplers. Regarding the meta-analyses for comparative studies (three studies), there were no significant differences between the two groups for the severe haemorrhage rate (OR 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-1.75; P = 0.33), conversion to open surgery (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.08-1.54; P = 0.16), or death rate (OR 3.64, 95% CI 0.47-28.45; P = 0.22). Based on weak evidence, device failure was lower in the polymer clip group (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23-0.75; P = 0.00).

CONCLUSIONS

This study has confirmed that there is no evidence for the superiority of any vascular closure device in terms of safety in LDN. Standardised recommendations for vascular control in this context should be carefully designed and prospectively evaluated.

Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation

This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees.

Death as a Complication of Urologic Surgery-2 Cases Identified at Autopsy

ABSTRACT

While routine medical procedures often impose some level of risk for the patient, death after routine urologic care is rare. In this series, we present 2 cases in which a relatively healthy patient ultimately died after complications, one from a prostate biopsy and one from a total nephrectomy. In case 1, a 58-year-old male died due to a 1500-mL to 2000-mL left retroperitoneal hemorrhage that occurred during insertion of a central line for sepsis treatment that resulted from an infection after a transrectal prostate biopsy. In case 2, a patient who underwent a total nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma expired on postoperative day 7. Autopsy revealed a 1500-mL hemoperitoneum and an "unclasped" vascular surgical clip with the likely source of origin being the surgical resection site. Performance of an autopsy is essential to ascertain the cause and manner of death after medically related deaths because autopsy results can have implications on patient care, patient safety, and quality improvement.

Feasibility and safety of renal artery closure with advanced bipolar energy device during nephrectomy

Introduction:

Many devices are available to control the renal pedicle during nephrectomy but the gold standard is still a matter of debate. Nanotechnology has evolved to include vessel-sealing systems; companies guarantee an efficacy for vessels until 7 mm. The aim of our study is to evaluate feasibility and safety of closure of the renal artery with radiofrequency energy during nephrectomy.

Methods:

We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients undergoing nephrectomy between November 2016 and July 2020. Inclusion criteria were: renal artery diameter <7 mm and no significant arterial wall calcification. The EnSeal device was used in all cases for dissection, hemostasis and to secure the renal artery when feasible.

Results:

Overall 101 patients underwent nephrectomy, in 68 cases the radiofrequency alone was used to close the renal artery; in 45 patients during a laparoscopic procedure and in 23 during an open surgery. Conversion to open surgery was never necessary. No patients had major hemorrhagic complications. Mean operative time was 75 min, mean intraoperative blood loss was 85 ml. Overall 11 patients had postoperative complications, according to Clavien-Dindo: five grade I, three grade II, three grade III.

Discussion:

In our experience the closure of the renal artery with a radiofrequency energy device is a feasible and safe procedure. It allows a safe manipulation of the renal hilum, free from clips, which could limit surgeons’ maneuvers and be dislocated. We believe that a deep knowledge of the available technologies is fundamental for the surgeon and guarantees the best achievable results.

Robotic versus hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: comparison of two minimally invasive techniques in kidney transplantation

Robot-assisted donor nephrectomy (RDN) is increasingly used due to its advantages such as its precision and reduced learning curve when compared to laparoscopic techniques. Concerns remain among surgeons regarding possible longer warm ischemia time. This study aimed to compare patients undergoing robotic living donor nephrectomy to the more frequently used hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy (HLDN) technique, focusing on warm ischemia time, total operative time, learning curve, hospital length of stay, donor renal function and post-operative complications. Retrospective study comparing RDN to HLDN in a collaborative transplant network. 176 patients were included, 72 in RDN and 104 in HLDN. Left-sided nephrectomy was favored in RDN (82% vs 52%, p < 0.01). Operative time was longer in RDN (287 vs 160 min; p < 0.01), while warm ischemia time was similar (221 vs 213 secs, p = 0.446). The hospital stay was shorter in RDN (3.9 vs 5.7 days, p < 0.01).Concerning renal function, a slightpersistent increase of 7% of the creatinine ratio was observed in the RDN compared to the HLDN group (1.56 vs 1.44 at 1-month checkup, p < 0.01). The results show that RDN appears safe and efficient in comparison to the gold-standard HLDN technique. Warm ischemia time was similar for both techniques, whereas RDN operative time was longer. Patients undergoing RDN had a shorter hospital stay, this being possibly mitigated by differences in center release criteria. Donor renal function needs to be assessed on a longer-term basis for both techniques.

Renal pedicle control in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: Evaluation of a single-center experience

Introduction and Study Purpose:

Renal pedicle control is a crucial period in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). Till now, there is no standardized technique for renal pedicle control. Proper evaluation and investigation of the different ways of renal vessel control have to be done to avoid any calamitous event. We aim to prove the safety and reliability of the Hem-o-Lok clips for the renal vascular control in transperitoneal LDN.

Methods:

All LDNs or hand-assisted LDNs done between January 2016 and December 2018 were collected. The primary outcome was the safety of the Hem-o-Lok clips. The secondary outcomes were blood loss, ischemia time, hospital stay, cost, and operative time. The data were analyzed using SPSS 20, and a statistical package was conducted.

Results:

The data showed that 238 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies were done. The renal pedicle control during the 1^st year was done using a vascular stapler for the artery (63 cases) and two polymer self-locking clips extra-large (XL) for the vein. Two events were reported in the form of mechanical failure. In the following 2 years, the artery was controlled using polymer self-locking clips large (L) few millimeters distal to the aorta and two metallic clips distal to it to increase the safety and stability of the vascular stump (175 cases). However, the vein was controlled by the two polymer self-locking clips XL. There was no reported intraoperative complications or events related to this way of pedicle control; there was no open conversion or blood transfusion required. There was no postoperative complication or collection in ultrasound.

Conclusion:

Using a combined polymer self-locking clip few millimeters distal to the aorta and two metallic clips distal to it for renal artery control in laparoscopic donor nephrectomies is cost-effective and safe. However, further and broader evidenced base studies are still needed to establish a standard technique for renal pedicle control.

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: technique and outcome, a single-center experience

Background

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) has been established as a surgical standard for living kidney donation. The aim of this work is to report our own experience with LDN regarding outcome and technique.

Methods

We prospectively identified 110 LDN cases between May 2017 and April 2020. Donor case files and operative notes were analyzed for age, sex, laterality, body mass index, warm ischemia time (WIT), intraoperative and postoperative complications, operative time, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 10 (SPSS: An IBM Company, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, the USA).

Results

The mean age was 38 years, and 77% were males. Three cases (2.72%) required conversion to conventional open donor nephrectomy (ODN). Nevertheless, none of cases required intraoperative blood transfusion. The mean WIT was 2.6 min. Two cases (1.8%) developed major vascular injury (Clavien grade IIIb) and required conversion to ODN. Postoperatively, one patient (0.9%) needed transfusion of one unit of packed RBCs (Clavien grade II). The mean LOS was 2 days. Most common early postoperative complication was ileus (Clavien grade II) that developed in 4 (3.6%) cases. Incisional hernia (Clavien grade IIIb) was encountered in two (1.8%) cases. Two (1.8%) cases developed wound infection at the incision site and treated conservatively (Clavien grade I).

Conclusions

LDN is a safe technique with accepted intraoperative and postoperative morbidity. It offers short hospital stay, better cosmesis and early convalescence. In experienced hands, it can effectively deal with various vascular and ureteral anomalies without compromising early graft function.

Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy

In addition to its established advantages, laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (RN) poses a unique set of challenges over traditional open surgery. In this study, we discuss preoperative considerations and detailed steps for laparoscopic RN. We review the transabdominal approach in detail, including patient positioning, equipment, and port placement in addition to the surgical steps. Intraoperative decisions such as adrenal management, renal preservation, and tumor identification are reviewed. Common complications of laparoscopic renal surgery are also summarized.

Common haemostatic techniques used in surgical practice

Intraoperative bleeding can be difficult to manage and is associated with worse patient outcomes. Good intraoperative haemostasis by the surgeon is a key factor in ensuring a bloodless field and reducing intraoperative blood loss. There is a myriad of mechanical, thermal and energy-based techniques available to use, each of which has their own benefits and drawbacks. The decision of which to use will depend on patient and procedural factors as well as the surgeon's preference. This article reviews techniques commonly used in surgical practice to maintain intraoperative haemostasis.

Midline Rotation of the Right Renal Hilum During Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN) of the right kidney is currently considered as part of standard of care; however, dealing with the renal hilum when performing ligation/division of its renal vessels is still a main concern. Here, we describe a simple-to-perform technique, i.e., flipping the fully mobilized right kidney to the midline so that the renal artery becomes anteriorly, which offers better visualization and easier dissection of the renal vessels (achieving maximized lengths) when performing hand-assisted LLDN of the right kidney.

METHODS

Living donors who underwent hand-assisted LLDN of the right kidney, along with their respective renal transplant recipients, were included in this report. Donor characteristics included renal artery and vein lengths; recipient characteristics included creatinine at months 12 - 36. Graft vein and arterial anastomosis data were also reported.

RESULTS

Nineteen living donors and 19 recipients, with median donor and recipient ages being 39 (24 - 60) and 53 (3 - 81) years, respectively, were included. None of the 38 patients had intra- or postoperative complications. Donor renal vein was anastomosed to the right external iliac vein (n = 16), right common iliac vein (n = 2), and inferior vena cava (n = 1). Gonadal vein (n = 1) and deceased donor iliac vein (n = 2) were used to increase the right renal vein length in 3 cases. Four donor kidneys had 2 arteries reconstructed side by side. None of the recipients developed any vascular or urological complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The laparoscopic technique described is safe and allows better visualization of the right hilum, mainly the renal artery, and helps in stapling the renal vein and renal artery.

Introduction of Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: Challenges, Outcomes and Success Strategies

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LLDN) has become the standard of care and is popular among most of the transplant centers across the globe. Despite proven advantages of LLDN, some transplantation centers hesitate to start the program because of issues concerning donor safety and allograft function.

OBJECTIVE

To discusses the main barriers for creating a successful LLDN program, strategies that allowed us to start a successful LLDN program along with the study results.

METHODS

The donors undergoing LLDN from December 2016 to February 2018 were enrolled in the study and prospectively evaluated. LLDN were performed by two senior surgeons alternately with assistance by the laparoscopic urologist in all cases. Also, in the present study, two technical alterations were done in the standard surgical technique of transperitoneal LDN. The first important modification made was the use of two additional ports for use by laparoscopic urologists. The second modification involved dissection on both poles of the kidney before hilar dissection.

RESULTS

A total of 112 transperitoneal LLDN were performed during the study period. The mean (range) of operation time was 117.5 (81-158) min; the ischemia time was 194 (171-553) sec. Only one patient needed conversion to open surgery. No other major peri-operative or posto-perative complications occurred. All kidney grafts were functioning well.

CONCLUSION

With proper planning, team approach, and few technical modifications, introduction of LLDN is safe and effective.

[The first 50 robot-assisted donor nephrectomies : Lessons learned]

Hintergrund

Die minimal-invasive Donornephrektomie (DN) ist inzwischen operativer Standard, bezüglich der Rolle von roboterassistierten Verfahren gibt es bisher keinen Konsens.

Fragestellung

Die ersten 50 transperitonealen roboterassistierten Donornephrektomien (RDN) einer urologischen Universitätsklinik in Deutschland wurden retrospektiv ausgewertet.

Material und Methoden

Patientencharakteristika, intra- und postoperative Parameter wurden erfasst und die Nierenfunktion in einem 5‑jährigen Follow-up ausgewertet. Signifikante Prädiktoren für die Nierenfunktion bei Entlassung und ein Jahr postoperativ wurden in einem multivariablen Regressionsmodell bestimmt.

Ergebnisse

Die RDN hat exzellente Ergebnisse mit niedriger Komplikationsrate, kurzer warmer (WIZ) und kalter Ischämiezeit (KIZ) sowie geringem Blutverlust und kurzer Patientenverweildauer. Die Seite der Nierenentnahme hat hierauf keine Auswirkungen. Nach RDN sind etwa 50 % der Spender formal niereninsuffizient, was aber zumeist ohne Relevanz ist, weil sich die Nierenfunktion der Spender im Follow-up nicht weiter verschlechtert. Die postoperative Nierenfunktion lässt sich bei der RDN mithilfe der präoperativen eGFR (errechnete glomeruläre Filtrationsrate) und dem Spenderalter sehr gut vorhersagen.

Schlussfolgerungen

Die robotische DN stellt eine sehr gute Alternative zu anderen minimal-invasiven Operationsverfahren dar, die von Beginn an exzellente operative Ergebnisse ermöglicht.

Clips Can be Safely Used for Vascular Control of the Renal Vessels During Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To review our experience using clips to control the renal vessels during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) and determine the safety of this practice.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent LDN at our centre January 1, 2007-September 17, 2019. The primary outcome was the rate of complication associated with vascular control of the renal vessels, which included (1) conversion to open to manage bleeding, (2) additional procedures for bleeding, and (3) major bleeding requiring blood transfusion. Secondary outcomes included the rate of renal artery/vein clip dislodgement or crossing, change in hemoglobin, warm ischemia time and the incidence of intra-operative complications and postoperative in-hospital complications.

RESULTS

We included 503 patients who underwent LDN, of which 497 were left sided. The main renal artery was controlled with 3 titanium clips in 489 (97%) cases. The main renal vein was controlled with 2 polymer-locking clips in 478 (95%) cases. For our primary outcome, there were no conversions to open to manage bleeding, no secondary procedures due to bleeding and no major bleeding requiring blood transfusion. Additionally, there were no donor deaths. Regarding our secondary outcomes, there were 5 intraoperative events related to the titanium clips being placed on the renal artery and 1 intraoperative event related to the polymer-locking clips on the renal vein, none of which resulted in any morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Using 3 titanium clips on the renal artery and 2 polymer-locking clips on the renal vein during left LDN is safe and provides excellent vascular control.

Ex vivo comparison of sliding knot ligatures vs. haemostatic clips for equine small intestinal mesenteric vessel occlusion

BACKGROUND

In equine abdominal surgery, resection and anastomosis of strangulated intestine is a commonly performed procedure. To date, ligatures, vessel sealing devices and the ligate-divide stapler have been described for this use in horses. The objective of this study was to compare the application of haemostatic clips and ligatures to occlude equine mesenteric vessels. Portions of jejunum with ten associated mesenteric vessels were collected from 12 horses at a local abattoir and divided into two groups. Portions of intestine were divided into two sections comprising five vessels each and assigned to Group A or Group B. Each vessel was occluded with a triple ligature. In Group A, vessels were ligated with three circumferential ligatures tied with a sliding knot with two overthrows. In Group B, vessels were occluded with application of three haemoclips. The procedures were performed by the same experienced surgeon. Intestinal length, construction time and vessel leaking pressure were measured and compared between groups.

RESULTS

The intestinal length (mean ± SD) was 3.78 ± 0.43 m in Group A and 3.04 ± 0.83 m in Group B. The difference was not significant (p = 0.297). The construction time (mean ± SD) was 7.03 ± 0.34 min in Group A and 2.40 ± 0.43 min in Group B. The difference was significant (p < 0.0001). The leaking pressure was 1000 (750-1050) mmHg (median, IQ range) in Group A and 1050 (800-1050) mmHg (median, IQ range) in Group B. The difference was not significant (p = 0.225).

CONCLUSIONS

Haemoclip application is comparable in terms of leaking pressure but quicker than sliding knots to apply.

Robotic assisted nephrectomy for living kidney donation (RANLD) with use of multiple locking clips or ligatures for renal vascular closure

Background

Robotic assisted nephrectomy for living donation (RANLD) is a rapid emerging surgical technique competing for supremacy with totally laparoscopic and laparoscopic hand assisted techniques. Opinions about the safety of specific techniques of vascular closure in minimally invasive living kidney donation are heterogeneous and may be different for laparoscopic and robotic assisted surgical techniques.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed perioperative and short-term outcomes of our first (n=40) RANLD performed with the da Vinci Si surgical platform. Vascular closure of renal vessels was performed by either double clipping or a combination of clips and non-transfixing suture ligatures.

Results

RANLD almost quintupled in our center for the observed time period. A total of n=21 (52.5%) left and n=19 (47.5%) right kidneys were procured. Renal vessel sealing with two locking clips was performed in 18 cases (45%) Both, clips and non-transfixing ligatures were used in 22 cases (55%). Mean donor age was 53.075±11.68 years (range, 28–70). The average total operative time was 150.75±27.30 min. Right donor nephrectomy (139±22 min) was performed significantly faster than left (160.95±27.93 min, P=0.01). Warm ischemia time was similar for both vascular sealing techniques and did not differ between left and right nephrectomies. No conversion was necessary. Clavien-Dindo Grade ≤IIIb complications occurred in (n=5) 12.5%. Grade IV and V complications did not develop. In particular no hemorrhage occurred using multiple locking clips or suture ligatures for renal vascular closure. Mortality was 0%. Thirteen kidneys (32.5%) were transplanted across the AB0 barrier.

Conclusions

RANLD is an emerging minimally invasive surgical technique which facilitates excellent perioperative and short-term outcomes also when using multiple locking clips or suture ligatures for renal vascular closure.

Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: Evaluation of the Learning Curve

BACKGROUND

Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDN) has rapidly become the best alternative to open nephrectomy for living kidney donation. As more centers continue to adopt the laparoscopic technique, the safety of the initial transplants must be ensured while ascending the learning curve (LC). This study looks to determine the safety of HALDN and to describe the results of the LC in our center.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 500 HALDNs performed in our center from July 2003 to July 2017. We analyzed demographic and perioperative characteristics and complications during the first postoperative month. We divided HALDNs into 2 groups: before and after completing the LC (50 nephrectomies). For each group, we assessed operating room time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, and complication and conversion rates.

RESULTS

A total of 500 HALDNs were performed in the study period. Of those, 454 were analyzed in the 2 groups. The median operating room time was 2 hours, length of stay was 2 days, and blood loss was 50 cc. The overall rate of complication was 6.8%. There were significant differences between the 2 groups in operating time, blood loss, and length of stay (P < .05). No differences were found in terms of complication (P = .42) and conversion (P = .28) rates.

CONCLUSION

There was a significant decrease in operating time, blood loss, and length of stay in patients who underwent laparoscopic donor nephrectomy by an experienced laparoscopist. However, no differences were found in complication and conversion rates, which suggests that improvement in surgical training can be accomplished without altering the donor safety.