Treatment of Bing-Neel syndrome with first line sequential chemoimmunotherapy: A case report

Evaluation and Management of Bing-Neel Syndrome

Bing-Neel syndrome is a rare manifestation of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), which is caused by infiltration of the malignant lymphoplasmacytic cells in the central nervous system. Patients can present with a diverse range of neurologic symptoms, and differentiation with other comorbidities seen in WM, such as immunoglobulin M-related polyneuropathy, can be challenging. Both the rarity of this disorder and the heterogeneity of the clinical presentation often cause a significant diagnostic delay with the risk of permanent neurologic damage. This review summarizes current knowledge regarding diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of Bing-Neel syndrome.

Beyond monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, clinical spectrum of immunoglobulin M gammopathy: a case series with focus on the diagnostic and management challenges

Immunoglobulin M monoclonal gammopathy is detected in Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), a rare lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma with serum immunoglobulin M. We report three rare presentations with focus on diagnostic and management challenges of type I cryoglobulinemia, type II cryoglobulinemia, and Bing-Neel syndrome. In approximately 10% of WM cases, macroglobulins can precipitate to cryoglobulins. Type I and II cryoglobulinemia, representing 10-15% and 50-60% of WM cases, respectively, present with vasculitis and renal failure. Bing-Neel syndrome, representing 1% of WM patients, is a rare neurological complication with lymphoplasmacytic infiltration in the brain. WM diagnosis includes bone marrow biopsy, immunophenotypic analysis, and MYD88 L265P mutation. We initiated management of cryoglobulinemia with dexamethasone, rituximab, and cyclophosphamide; in Bing-Neel, bortezomib and dexamethasone, followed by a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Diagnosing, imaging, and successfully treating a debilitating case of Bing-Neel syndrome: A multidisciplinary feat

Key Clinical Message

We present a case of Bing-Neel syndrome a rare central nervous system lymphoplasmocytic lymphoma associated with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. Diagnosis should be considered in the context of unexplained neurological symptoms in the presence of macroglobulinemia.

Abstract

Waldenstroms macroglobulinaemia (WM) is a rare B-cell lymphoma representing ~2% of all hematological malignancies. While most neurological complications of WM are secondary to the overproduction of immunoglobulin M (IgM), Bing-Neel syndrome (BNS) is an extremely rare direct central nervous system (CNS) infiltration by malignant lymphoplasmocytic lymphoma (LPL) cells. Limited information on BNS exists in the literature with sparse case reports and case series. Here, we present a diagnostically challenging BNS case successfully treated with systemic chemoimmunotherapy and ibrutinib, with remarkable clinical response.

Bing–Neel Syndrome: Update on Diagnosis and Treatment

Bing–Neel syndrome (BNS) is a rare neurological complication of Waldenström macroglobulinaemia. We highlight key issues in clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment while focusing on new and emerging therapies available for patients diagnosed with BNS. It is anticipated that further development of Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitors and less toxic chemoimmunotherapies will improve treatment delivery and response.

Primary central nervous system diffuse large B-cell lymphoma masqueraded as Bing-Neel syndrome: Steps in management and review of future directions

Bing-Neel syndrome (BNS) remains a rare complication of Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia. Given the paucity of this disease, treatment guidelines are based on small clinical trials with limited participants. Here, we present a case of primary CNS diffuse large B-cell lymphoma masqueraded as BNS that developed while on ibrutinib therapy.

Managing complications secondary to Waldenström's macroglobulinemia

Introduction: Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare lymphoma characterized by the accumulation of IgM-secreting lymphoplasmacytic cells in the bone marrow and other organs. Clinical sequelae relate to direct tissue infiltration by malignant cells but also to the physicochemical and immunological properties of the monoclonal IgM, resulting in a variety of disease-related complications.Areas covered: This narrative review, following a thorough Pubmed search of pertinent published literature, discusses complications secondary to WM, related to direct tumor infiltration, monoclonal IgM circulation, and deposition, as well as other less common ones. The description and pathophysiology of these complications were described together with their specific management strategies and in the context of available treatment options for WM (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody-based combinations, proteasome inhibitors, BTK inhibitors, and other emerging ones).Expert opinion: The availability of many novel, active and less toxic regimens for the treatment of WM allows the management of the disease with strategies that depend on clinical presentation and disease-related complications, age, toxicity considerations, and presence of comorbidities.

Current and novel BTK inhibitors in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia

The current therapeutic approach in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM) is being driven by insights in disease biology and genomic landscape. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) plays a key role in signaling pathways for the survival of WM clone. BTK inhibition has changed the treatment landscape of the disease. Ibrutinib has resulted in deep and durable responses both as an upfront and salvage treatment with a manageable toxicity profile. However, the need for fewer off-target effects and deeper responses has resulted in the clinical development of second-generation BTK inhibitors. Zanubrutinib has resulted in clinically meaningful antitumor activity, including deep and durable responses, with a low discontinuation rate due to treatment-related toxicities. Cardiovascular adverse events seem to be milder compared with ibrutinib. Interestingly, the efficacy of zanubrutinib in WM is significant both for MYD88^L265P and MYD88^WT patients. Although the randomized, phase III ASPEN clinical trial did not meet its primary endpoint in terms of showing a superiority of zanubrutinib in deep responses compared with ibrutinib, secondary efficacy and safety endpoints underscore the potential clinical role of zanubrutinib in the treatment algorithm of WM independent of the MYD88 mutational status. Combination regimens and non-covalent BTK inhibitors are emerging as promising treatment strategies. Long-term data will determine whether next-generation BTK inhibitors are more potent and safer compared with ibrutinib, and whether they are able to overcome resistance to ibrutinib, either alone or in combination with inhibitors of other interrelated molecular pathways.