In vivo measurement of cytoplasmic organelle water fraction using diffusion-weighted imaging: Application in the malignant grading and differential diagnosis of gliomas

A three-component multi-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging might be a useful biomarker for detecting microstructural features in gliomas with differences in malignancy and IDH-1 mutation status

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the study was to explore the performance of a three-component diffusion model in evaluating the degree of malignancy and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH-1) gene type of gliomas.

METHODS

Overall, 60 patients with gliomas were enrolled. The intermediate and perfusion-related diffusion coefficients (D_int and D_p) and fractions of strictly limited, intermediate, and perfusion-related diffusion (F_very-slow, F_int, and F_p) were obtained with a three-component diffusion model. Parameters were also obtained from a diffusion kurtosis model and mono- and biexponential models. All parameters were compared between different tumor grades and IDH-1 gene types. Diagnostic performance and logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

High-grade gliomas (HGGs) had significantly higher F_int, F_very-slow, and D_p values but significantly lower F_p and D_int values than low-grade gliomas (LGGs), and F_int and F_p differed significantly among grade II, III, and IV gliomas (p < 0.05 for all). F_int achieved the highest AUC of 0.872 in differentiating between LGGs and HGGs. Logistic regression analysis revealed that in each model, F_int, diffusion coefficient (D), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), mean diffusivity (MD), and mean kurtosis (MK) were associated with glioma grading. After multiple regression analysis, F_int remained the only differentiator. Additionally, F_int and F_p showed significant differences between IDH-1 mutated and IDH-1 wild-type gliomas (p = 0.007 and 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The three-component DWI model served as a useful biomarker for detecting microstructural features in gliomas with different grades and IDH-1 mutation statuses.

KEY POINTS

• The three-component model enables the estimation of an intermediate diffusion component. • The three-component model performed better than the other models in glioma grading and genotyping. • F_int was useful in evaluating the grade and genotype of gliomas.

Glioma grading, molecular feature classification, and microstructural characterization using MR diffusional variance decomposition (DIVIDE) imaging

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential of diffusional variance decomposition (DIVIDE) for grading, molecular feature classification, and microstructural characterization of gliomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants with suspected gliomas underwent DIVIDE imaging, yielding parameter maps of fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), anisotropic mean kurtosis (MK_A), isotropic mean kurtosis (MK_I), total mean kurtosis (MK_T), MK_A/MK_T, and microscopic fractional anisotropy (μFA). Tumor type and grade, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1/2 mutant status, and the Ki-67 labeling index (Ki-67 LI) were determined after surgery. Statistical analysis included 33 high-grade gliomas (HGG) and 17 low-grade gliomas (LGG). Tumor diffusion metrics were compared between HGG and LGG, among grades, and between wild and mutated IDH types using appropriate tests according to normality assessment results. Receiver operating characteristic and Spearman correlation analysis were also used for statistical evaluations.

RESULTS

FA, MD, MK_A, MK_I, MK_T, μFA, and MK_A/MK_T differed between HGG and LGG (FA: p = 0.047; MD: p = 0.037, others p < 0.001), and among glioma grade II, III, and IV (FA: p = 0.048; MD: p = 0.038, others p < 0.001). All diffusion metrics differed between wild-type and mutated IDH tumors (MK_I: p = 0.003; others: p < 0.001). The metrics that best discriminated between HGG and LGGs and between wild-type and mutated IDH tumors were MK_T and FA respectively (area under the curve 0.866 and 0.881). All diffusion metrics except FA showed significant correlation with Ki-67 LI, and MK_I had the highest correlation coefficient (r_s = 0.618).

CONCLUSION

DIVIDE is a promising technique for glioma characterization and diagnosis.

KEY POINTS

• DIVIDE metrics MK_I is related to cell density heterogeneity while MK_A and μFA are related to cell eccentricity. • DIVIDE metrics can effectively differentiate LGG from HGG and IDH mutation from wild-type tumor, and showed significant correlation with the Ki-67 labeling index. • MK_I was larger than MK_A which indicates predominant cell density heterogeneity in gliomas. • MK_A and MK_I increased with grade or degree of malignancy, however with a relatively larger increase in the cell eccentricity metric MK_A in relation to the cell density heterogeneity metric MK_I.

Comparison of Amino Acid PET to Advanced and Emerging MRI Techniques for Neurooncology Imaging: A Systematic Review of the Recent Studies

Introduction

Standard neuroimaging protocols for brain tumors have well-known limitations. The clinical use of additional modalities including amino acid PET (aaPET) and advanced MRI (aMRI) techniques (including DWI, PWI, and MRS) is emerging in response to the need for more accurate detection of brain tumors. In this systematic review of the past 2 years of the literature, we discuss the most recent studies that directly compare or combine aaPET and aMRI for brain tumor imaging.

Methods

A PubMed search was conducted for human studies incorporating both aaPET and aMRI and published between July 2018 and August 2020.

Results

A total of 22 studies were found in the study period. Recent studies of aaPET with DWI showed a superiority of MET, FET, FDOPA, and AMT PET for detecting tumor, predicting recurrence, diagnosing progression, and predicting survival. Combining modalities further improved performance. Comparisons of aaPET with PWI showed mixed results about spatial correlation. However, both modalities were able to detect high-grade tumors, identify tumor recurrence, differentiate recurrence from treatment effects, and predict survival. aaPET performed better on these measures than PWI, but when combined, they had the strongest results. Studies of aaPET with MRS demonstrated that both modalities have diagnostic potential but MET PET and FDOPA PET performed better than MRS. MRS suffered from some data quality issues that limited analysis in two studies, and, in one study that combined modalities, overall performance actually decreased. Four recent studies compared aaPET with emerging MRI approaches (such as CEST imaging, MR fingerprinting, and SISTINA), but the initial results remain inconclusive.

Conclusions

aaPET outperformed the aMRI imaging techniques in most recent studies. DWI and PWI added meaningful complementary data, and the combination of aaPET with aMRI yielded the best results in most studies.