1
|
Zheng Y, Xue F, Ou D, Niu X, Hu C, He X. Deletion of concurrent chemotherapy on the basis of sequential chemoradiotherapy for non-metastatic stage T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma in IMRT era. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6578. [PMID: 38457191 PMCID: PMC10922019 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with concurrent chemotherapy is deemed as the mainstay treatment in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Nevertheless, the tolerance of severe acute toxicity of concurrent chemotherapy was unsatisfied. In addition, T4 is the predicting factor of poor prognosis for NPC patients. In this retrospective analysis, the long-term outcomes IMRT combined by induction chemotherapy deleting concurrent chemotherapy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy for T4 non-metastatic NPC were analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2005 to November 2016, a total of 145 biopsy-proven non-metastatic T4 NPC was treated with IMRT combined by induction chemotherapy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. The survival and side effects of the patients were analyzed. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 74 months (ranges, 8-186 months). 10.0%, 61.3%, 27.3%, and 1.3% developed grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 mucositis during IMRT, respectively. 5.5% and 2.0% patients experienced grade 1 and 2 nausea and vomiting; no patients developed grade 3 or 4 nausea and vomiting. Of 145 patients enrolled, 5-year and 10-year overall survival(OS) rates were 73.7% and 53.9%, local progression-free survival(LPFS) rates were 86.1% and 71.6%, regional progression-free survival(RPFS) rates were 96.7% and 92.8%, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 86.7%, 78.2%, respectively. At the last follow-up, five patients developed cranial nerve injury, one patient developed mandibular bone necrosis, four patients developed temporal lobe injury, four patients developed nasopharyngeal massive hemorrhage (three cases after recurrence and one case without recurrence), and five patients developed second primary tumor. CONCLUSION The survival outcomes of treating T4 NPC IMRT combined by induction chemotherapy deleting concurrent chemotherapy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy are encouraging. Moreover, mucosal reaction, nausea, and vomiting reaction were reduced during IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuming Zheng
- Department of Radiation OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of OncologyShanghai Medical CollegeShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
| | - Fen Xue
- Department of Radiation OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of OncologyShanghai Medical CollegeShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
| | - Dan Ou
- Department of Radiation OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of OncologyShanghai Medical CollegeShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
| | - Xiaoshuang Niu
- Department of Radiation OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of OncologyShanghai Medical CollegeShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
| | - Chaosu Hu
- Department of Radiation OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of OncologyShanghai Medical CollegeShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
| | - Xiayun He
- Department of Radiation OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of OncologyShanghai Medical CollegeShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Caminha RDG, Fuzisaki TT, Siosaki ATF, da Silva Santos PS. Case-control study analyzing the relationship between oral microcirculation and oral mucositis and pain in patients under antineoplastic therapy. Lasers Med Sci 2023; 38:118. [PMID: 37154854 DOI: 10.1007/s10103-023-03777-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
The study aimed to evaluate the relation between microcirculation of the genian region using laser Doppler flowmetry and oral mucositis (OM) and pain in individuals undergoing antineoplastic therapy. A case-control clinical study was conducted with the participants divided into three groups: chemotherapy (CTG), radiation therapy and chemotherapy group (RCTG), and control group (CG). Pain was assessed by visual analog scale; OM was classified by oral mucositis assessment and WHO scales. The blood flow was assessed by laser Doppler flowmetry. Kruskal-Wallis statistical test, Friedman test, and Spearman test were used for statistical analysis of this study. CTG (7 individuals/25.93%) showed the worst manifestations of OM between 2nd and 4th evaluations (OM-WHO: T2, p = 0.006; T3, p = 0.006; T4, p = 0.003; OM-OMAS: T2, p = 0.004; T3, p = 0.000; T4, p = 0.011), and increased blood flow over time, with the exception of the 3rd evaluation (p = 0.138). The RCTG (9 individuals/33.33%) showed the worst manifestations of oral mucositis on the 4th week (OM-WHO and OM-OMAS: p = 0.000) with a decrease in blood flow (p = 0.068). The decreased blood flow is associated with greater severity of oral mucositis and greater pain intensity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel D'Aquino Garcia Caminha
- Department of Surgery, Stomatology, Pathology and Radiology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
| | | | | | - Paulo Sérgio da Silva Santos
- Department of Surgery, Stomatology, Pathology and Radiology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Morbidity in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma and Radiation-Induced Skin Lesions: Cause, Risk Factors, and Dermatitis Evolution and Severity. Adv Skin Wound Care 2021; 34:1-8. [PMID: 34807900 DOI: 10.1097/01.asw.0000797952.41753.f4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Radiation-induced skin injuries such as lesions (RSLs) and dermatitis are the most common complication during radiotherapy (RT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, but little is known about risk factors unique to oncology. This study sought a greater understanding of these risk factors to stratify patients based on risk and guide clinical decision-making. METHODS Investigators analyzed the data of 864 consecutive patients referred to the RT center of the Southern Theater General Hospital for a new RSL from 2013 to 2019. These patients were followed up for an average of approximately 16 months until their death or March 30, 2020, whichever came first. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazards model were used to identify predictors of grade 3 or 4 dermatitis. RESULTS The main causes of treatment interruption included dermatitis and oral mucositis. Significant patient-specific risk factors for RSLs included current smoking, current drinking, and lower Karnofsky Performance Scale score and significant procedure-specific risk factors included receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), hyperfractionated RT, induction chemotherapy, multicycle chemotherapy, and taxol- and cisplatin-based drugs. The three factors that independently predicted risk of RSL were IMRT, lower Karnofsky Performance Scale score, and multicycle chemotherapy. Comparing predictive factors among patients with severe RSL revealed that patients who received IMRT were more likely to develop grade 3 or 4 dermatitis. CONCLUSIONS Oncology providers should note that IMRT is an aggressive technique with a trend toward increased RSL. Providers should pay special attention to adverse effects to skin in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang Q, Xu G, Xia Y, Zuo J, Zeng G, Xue Z, Cao R, Xiong W, Li W. Comparison of induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy and induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2020; 111:104925. [PMID: 32721816 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Revised: 07/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (IC + CCRT) is a standard treatment regimen for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). However, the increased acute toxicity of this intensified chemotherapy may counteract its efficacy. The results of studies focusing on the omission of concurrent chemotherapy (CC) regimens are controversial. Therefore, we carried out a meta-analysis to elucidate the efficacy and toxicity of IC + CCRT versus IC plus radiotherapy alone (IC + RT) for LA-NPC. METHODS Studies available on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrails.gov were independently searched by two investigators from inception to March 1, 2020. Review Manager software 5.3 (RevMan 5.3) was employed to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs), risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Eight studies with a total of 2605 patients were analysed. The results showed that no significant difference between IC + RT and IC + CCRT for disease-free survival (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0,85-1.39, P = 0.50), overall survival (HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.78-1.09, P = 0.34), local recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.95-1.67; P = 0.10), or distant metastasis-free survival (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.84-1.26, P = 0.79). Notably, the incidence of treatment-related grade 3/4 acute haematological toxicity during radiation was higher in the IC + CCRT group. Subgroup analysis showed similar survival outcomes for IC + CCRT and IC + RT with and without the two-dimensional RT technique. CONCLUSIONS IC + RT was as effective as IC + CCRT for the management of LA-NPC. The IC + RT regimen has the possibility of replacing the IC + CCRT regimen for LA-NPC in the future due to the lower toxicity, although more high-level evidence is urgently needed for verification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiaoli Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650118, Yunnan, China.
| | - Guoqiang Xu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650118, Yunnan, China.
| | - Yaoxiong Xia
- Department of Radiotherapy, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650118, Yunnan, China
| | - Jia Zuo
- Department of Radiotherapy, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650118, Yunnan, China
| | - Guilin Zeng
- Department of Oncology, Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital, Chendu 611130, Sichuan, China
| | - Zhihong Xue
- Department of Oncology, Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital, Chendu 611130, Sichuan, China
| | - Ruixue Cao
- Department of Radiotherapy, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650118, Yunnan, China
| | - Wei Xiong
- Department of Radiotherapy, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650118, Yunnan, China.
| | - Wenhui Li
- Department of Radiotherapy, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650118, Yunnan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang F, Jiang C, Wang L, Yan F, Piao Y, Ye Z, Xu M, Liu J, Fu Z, Jiang Y. Different Risk Target Volumes for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated with Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy. J Cancer 2020; 11:5210-5222. [PMID: 32742467 PMCID: PMC7378934 DOI: 10.7150/jca.45767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Although intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) provides promising survival advantages and fewer late complications in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC), appropriated target volumes and prescribed doses are still being explored. This study aimed to propose different risk target volumes and corresponding prescribed doses in our center and to evaluate the physical basis and efficacy of this protocol based on the long-term survival of NPC patients. Methods and Materials: We retrospectively assessed patients with histology-proven non-metastatic NPC treated with definitive IMRT using our protocol of different risk target volumes and corresponding prescribed doses based on the orderly stepwise pattern of tumor spread. We described the delineation for different risk target volumes and the design of IMRT planning for an NPC case. Additionally, we compared the dosimetric distributions between the China protocol and our protocol through two NPC cases. The patterns of failure and locoregional control were the primary endpoints. All survival outcomes were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: From January 2013 to December 2014, a total of 335 patients were treated; the median follow-up for patients who survived was 70 months. All patients completed IMRT using our protocol. Twenty-five patients developed locoregional recurrence, and all recurrences occurred within the high-dose target volumes. The rates of locoregional recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival at 5 years were 92.2%, 92.1%, 85.9%, and 86.3%, respectively. The biological effective doses of the prescribed doses in our protocol were similar to those of the China and 0615 protocols. Moreover, our protocol offered a reduction in D1 and D2 in the primary gross tumor volume (GTV), while V30 and V40 in normal tissues were lower. Conclusion: Our protocol of different risk target volume delineations and corresponding prescribed doses based on the stepwise pattern of tumor spread resulted in favorable locoregional control with no relapse outside the GTV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangzheng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Chuner Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Breast Tumor Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Breast Tumor Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Lei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Fengqin Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Yongfeng Piao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhimin Ye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Min Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Breast Tumor Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Breast Tumor Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiping Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Breast Tumor Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Breast Tumor Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhenfu Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Yangming Jiang
- Department of Digital Earth, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, CAS, Beijing, 100101, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|