C5 palsy after C5/6/7 posterior foraminal decompression: A case report

[Cause analysis and clinical intervention of C 5 palsy after cervical surgery]

Objective

To review the research progress of C 5 palsy (C 5P) after cervical surgery, providing new clinical intervention ideas for the C 5P patients.

Methods

The relevant literature domestically and abroad was extensively consulted and the latest developments in the incidence, risk factors, manifestations and diagnosis, prevention, and intervention measures of C 5P were systematically expounded.

Results

C 5P is characterized by weakness in the C 5 nerve innervation area after cervical decompression surgery, manifested as limited shoulder abduction and elbow flexion, with an incidence rate more than 5%, often caused by segmental spinal cord injury or mechanical injury to the nerve roots. For patients with risk factors, careful operation and preventive measures can reduce the incidence of C 5P. Most of the patients can recover with conservative treatment such as drug therapy and physical therapy, while those without significant improvement after 6 months of treatment may require surgical intervention such as foraminal decompression and nerve displacement.

Conclusion

Currently, there has been some advancement in the etiology and intervention of C 5P. Nevertheless, further research is imperative to assess the timing of intervention and surgical protocol.

Nerve Transfers After Cervical Spine Surgery: Multi-Institutional Case Series and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Up to 10% of cervical spine surgeries are complicated by postoperative weakness. Although many patients recover with nonoperative management, some require surgery for restoration of function.

OBJECTIVE

To present the indications and outcomes of patients undergoing nerve transfers after developing weakness secondary to cervical spine decompression.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients from 2 academic medical centers who underwent nerve transfer for C5-6 root injury after cervical spine surgery was performed.

RESULTS

Of the 10 treated patients, 9 experienced recovery at last follow-up, demonstrating improvements in strength and motion in the affected muscles. Successful nerve transfers occurred between 3 and 8 months after the index spinal surgery and included spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve, triceps branch to anterior division of the axillary nerve, and/or ulnar or median fascicles to motor branches of the musculocutaneous nerve. The unsuccessful patient underwent nerve transfer surgery approximately 11 months after the index operation and failed to obtain functional recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who experience C5-6 weakness after cervical spine surgery should be evaluated and considered for nerve transfer surgery if they have continued severe functional deficits at 6 months postoperatively. Earlier referral for nerve transfer is associated with improved functional outcomes in this cohort.

Preoperative electrophysiologic assessment of C5-innervated muscles in predicting C5 palsy after posterior cervical decompression

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility of both needle electromyography (EMG) and proximal nerve conduction studies (NCS) in predicting C5 palsy after posterior cervical decompression.

METHODS

This study included 192 patients with cervical myelopathy undergoing laminoplasty or laminectomy. Preoperatively, all patients accepted bilateral needle EMG detection and proximal NCS that consisted of supramaximally stimulating Erb's point and recording compound muscle action potential (CMAP) from bilateral deltoid.

RESULTS

In the present study, 11 (11/192, 5.7%) patients developed unilateral C5 palsy after operation, and more patients with C5 palsy showed abnormal spontaneous activity in C5-innervated muscles compared to those without C5 palsy (8/11 vs. 16/181, p < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of spontaneous activity in C5-innervated muscles in predicting postoperative C5 palsy were 72.7% and 91.2%, respectively. Furthermore, there were significant left-to-right differences of deltoid CMAP amplitudes between the patients with and without C5 palsy (p < 0.05), and this measurement was also demonstrated to be useful for distinguishing patients with C5 palsy from cases without C5 palsy by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (cut-off value: 2.1 mV, sensitivity: 63.6%; specificity: 95.0%). In addition, the sensitivity and specificity of a series application of these two measurements were 63.6% and 100.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study support the hypothesis that pre-existing progressive C5 root injury may be a risk factor for C5 palsy after posterior cervical decompression. Clinically, the estimation of NCS and needle EMG in C5-innervated muscles may provide additional useful information for predicting C5 palsy after cervical spinal surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with the consistently applied reference standard and blinding.