Comparison of rigid versus foldable iris-fixed phakic intraocular lens implantation for high myopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Effect of capsule treatment on visual acuity and quality after phacoemulsification lens implantation in myopic patients with cataract

BACKGROUND

Cataracts pose a significant clinical burden due to their complex pathogenesis. In recent years, an increase in cataracts coexisting with myopia has heightened the incidence of retinopathy and posterior vitreous detachment. Additionally, symptoms of ocular axis elongation, lens nucleus hardening, and vitreous liquefaction have become more prevalent. While conventional extracapsular cataract extraction is commonly employed, it often yields suboptimal visual outcomes. Subsequent advancements in cataract phacoemulsification and lens implantation surgeries have gained widespread acceptance for their ability to improve refraction and significantly improve uncorrected visual acuity.

AIM

To investigate the effect of capsular treatment after phacoemulsification lens implantation in myopic patients with cataract.

METHODS

We selected 110 patients (with 134 eyes) with myopia and cataracts treated. These patients were categorized into two groups: an observation group (57 patients with 70 eyes) and a control group (53 patients with 64 eyes). The control group underwent cataract phacoemulsification and lens implantation, while the observation group received a refined capsular treatment based on the control group's procedure. We assessed the differences in visual acuity and quality between the two groups before and after surgery.

RESULTS

At six months post-operation, the observation group exhibited significantly improved far vision, intermediate vision, near vision, lower objective scattering index, higher Modulation transfer function cut-off frequency, and overall vision metrics at different contrast levels (100%, 20% and 9%) compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The total score of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire in the observation group at 6 months after operation was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). No significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions was observed between the observation group and control group (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Capsular treatment demonstrates efficacy in improving visual acuity and quality after phacoemulsification lens implantation in myopic patients with cataracts, warranting its clinical application.

Comparison of Iris-Claw Phakic Lens Implant versus Corneal Laser Techniques in High Myopia: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study

Background. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Femto-LASIK, PRK, and Artiflex/Artisan phakic lens implantation in the surgical correction of myopia at different moments of postoperative follow-up; to propose a linear predictive model of visual acuity without correction at five years of refractive procedures; and to evaluate its validity. Methods. A retrospective observational analysis was performed. Patients were clinically reviewed after three months, one year, two years, and five years. Univariate and bivariate analyses and a multivariate linear regression model were performed. Results. Six hundred seventy-nine eyes were analyzed: 18.9% Artiflex, 2.8% Artisan, 42.3% Femto-LASIK, and 36.1% PRK. There were significant differences in effectiveness and safety after five years when comparing Artiflex/Artisan versus PRK and Femto-LASIK (p < 0.01). The linear regression model explained 30.32% of the patients’ visual acuity variability after five years. Conclusions. PRK surgery, Femto-Lasik, and Artiflex/Artisan type phakic lens implantation are effective, safe, and predictable techniques with stable refractive results. Phakic lenses magnify myopic patients who improve their UCVA and BCVA. Concerning phakic lens implantation, corneal endothelial cells remain stable. The predictive model calculated that surgery with a phakic lens increased the UCVA result at five years, and surgery with PRK slightly decreased the long-term results.

Long-term efficacy and safety profiles of iris-fixated foldable anterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation in eyes with more than 10 years of follow-up

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety, predictability, and stability of a foldable anterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) (Artiflex) implantation in eyes with more than 10 years of follow-up.

SETTING

Instituto de Microcirugía Ocular, Barcelona, Spain.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

Patients who underwent Artiflex pIOL implantation during 2008 to 2011 and with more than 10 years of follow-up were included. Variables analyzed were as follows: uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, spherical equivalent (SE), endothelial cell count (ECC), and intraocular pressure (IOP) preoperatively and at 1 month, 1 year, 5 years, and the final follow-up. Descriptive statistics were performed and results reported following the Standard for Reporting Refractive Surgery Outcomes.

RESULTS

76 eyes (40 patients) were analyzed, and the mean follow-up was 10.67 ± 0.64 years. The mean preoperative SE was -8.26 ± 2.47 diopters (D), and the mean preoperative cylinder was -0.95 ± 0.86 D. At the final follow-up, efficacy and safety indices were 0.82 and 1.11, respectively. In total, 58 eyes (76%) achieved a UDVA of ≥20/40. 30 eyes (39%) gained ≥1 line of CDVA, and no eye lost ≥2 lines of CDVA. At the final follow-up, 46 (61%) and 58 (76%) eyes were within ±0.50 D and ±1.00 D of attempted SE correction, respectively. 72 eyes (95%) had ≤1.00 D of postoperative astigmatism, and 46 eyes (61%) were within ±15 degrees from the intended correction axis. At the last visit, a statistically significant myopic progression of -0.56 ± 0.83 D was observed ( P = .01). The mean ECC loss at the final follow-up was 12.2 ± 12.5%. IOP remained stable. Two eyes (2.63%) developed cataract after 10.3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term results demonstrated that Artiflex pIOL implantation was effective, predictable, stable, and safe.

Artisan versus Artiflex phakic intraocular lens implantation in the treatment of moderate to high myopia: meta-analysis

Background

To compare the postoperative safety, efficacy, predictability, visual quality and biomechanics after implantation of Artisan vs. Artiflex phakic intraocular lenses (PIOLs).

Methods

Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library were conducted up from January 2000 to February 2020. Comparative clinical studies reporting in accordance with the eligibility criteria were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled weighted mean differences (WMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

Results

Comparative trials with myopia patients were selected in this review. The pooled WMD and OR estimates statistical significance in terms of postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), efficacy, postoperative spherical equivalence (SE), predictability, contrast sensitivity and mean intraocular higher-order aberrations (HOA) (mm) for a 6-mm pupil, manifesting that Artiflex PIOL showed evident beneficial effect for correcting myopia compared to Artisan PIOL. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups.

Conclusion

Both of two techniques were safe and effective for myopia and compared to Artisan PIOL, Artiflex PIOL had significant improvement in efficacy, predictability, contrast sensitivityand HOA, except safety and complications in the treatment of moderate to high myopia.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-021-01930-6.