Hemodynamic stability during adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma: A case control study of posterior retroperitoneal vs lateral transperitoneal approaches

Caring for Patients With Pheochromocytomas in the Perioperative Setting: Earn 1.4 Contact Hours

Pheochromocytomas are rare, complex catecholamine-secreting tumors of the adrenal medulla. Patients with pheochromocytomas may experience episodes of life-threatening hypertension, and untreated tumors can be fatal. The nonspecific signs and symptoms (eg, headaches, palpitations, sweating) make diagnosing these tumors difficult. A comprehensive patient history, clinical evaluation during episodic hypertension, and biochemical test results can facilitate a definitive diagnosis. The only curative treatment is minimally invasive tumor removal. Because the tumor may recur, patients require follow-up visits for approximately 10 years after surgery. Preoperative evaluations can include cardiac and imaging studies and genetic testing. Preoperative preparation involves controlling hypertension and planning for hypotension after tumor removal. Perioperative nurses should be prepared to assist anesthesia professionals with placing invasive hemodynamic monitors and responding to blood pressure changes. An interdisciplinary team can create a guideline or protocol for nurses to follow to enhance outcomes when caring for patients with pheochromocytomas.

Feasibility of laparoscopic adrenalectomy in adrenal masses greater than 5 centimeters: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has emerged as the primary treatment for adrenal masses. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed LA's feasibility, safety, effectiveness, and complications for adrenal masses exceeding 5 cm.

Methods

The study was conducted using PRISMA guidelines with PROSPERO registration No. CRD42023462901. Adults with unilateral adrenal masses >5 cm who underwent unilateral LA were included. Intraoperative and postoperative measurements and complications were assessed. A systematic literature review employed a comprehensive search strategy which was last searched on September 8, 2023, through PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases. Meta-analysis was utilized to analyze the outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

Results

This systematic review encompassed 25 studies involving 963 patients who underwent LA. Tumor size varied 7.05 cm [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.24-7.70], with 50% on the right and 45% on the left. The subgroup meta-analysis comparing the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches revealed the transperitoneal approach h was utilized for the largest tumor size with a mean of 12.10 cm (95% CI: 11.30-12.96), compared to the retroperitoneal approach 5.83 cm (95% CI: 5.52-6.14). Notably, the mean operative time across studies was 137.4 minutes (95% CI: 113.36-150.94), bleeding prevalence was 0.02% (95% CI: 0.01-0.03%), and average blood loss was 110.6 mL (95% CI: 78.2-156.3). Postoperative complications such as pulmonary edema, pulmonary embolism, gastric dysfunction, and wound infection were very low, ranging from 0.03% to 0.4%. Out of 963 patients, only 49 were converted to open surgery. Patient hospital stay averaged 3.72 days (95% CI: 2.97-4.66); blood transfusion was required in 1.3% (95% CI: 0.30-8.88%).

Conclusions

The feasibility and safety of LA for tumors exceeding 5 cm in size have notable implications for intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. Underreporting in the included studies may impact the generalizability of findings.

Perioperative management of phaeochromocytoma with stress cardiomyopathy and aberrant vascular drainage

The following case discusses the surgical considerations for a patient presenting with cardiogenic shock secondary to a phaeochromocytoma crisis with stress cardiomyopathy. The patient underwent an interval laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Pneumoperitoneum insufflation was performed at lower pressures; manipulation of the adrenal tumour was minimised, and the adrenal vein was ligated early. However, as intraoperative blood pressure (BP) remained elevated and rising, further gentle dissection revealed an aberrant inferior phrenic vein draining the adrenal nodule. BP was finally reduced following ligation of the inferior phrenic vein, demonstrating the clinical significance of an unusual dual venous drainage from the adrenal nodule in this patient.

A 1:1 matched comparison of posterior retroperitoneal and lateral transabdominal adrenalectomy using a robotic platform

BACKGROUND

Posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy is considered less invasive compared with lateral transperitoneal counterpart. There is controversy in the literature about how the two approaches compare regarding perioperative outcomes. Moreover, no studies have compared both approaches while incorporating the use of a robotic platform. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of robotic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy and lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy using a 1:1 matched propensity analysis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent robotic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy were matched 1:1 to patients who underwent robotic lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy between 2008 and 2022 at a single center. Matching factors included diagnosis, tumor size, Gerota's fascia-to-skin distance, and perinephric fat thickness. Perioperative outcomes were compared between groups using the χ2 analysis and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test.

RESULTS

A total of 511 robotic adrenalectomies were performed during the study period, of which 77 patients in each group were matched. There was no difference between posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy and lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy groups, respectively, in terms of operative time (134 vs 128 min, P = .64), conversion to open (0% vs 0%, P = .99), pain level on a postoperative day 1 (visual analog scale 5 vs 6, P = .14), morphine milligram equivalents used (18 vs 20 morphine milligram equivalents /day, P = .72), length of stay (1 vs 1 day, P = .48), and 90-day complications (2.6% vs 3.9%, P = .65). Estimated blood loss for posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy was statistically lower (5 vs 10 mL, P = .001) but not considered to be clinically significant.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative outcomes of lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy, including those related to recovery, were similar to those of posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy when matched for tumor and patient anthropometric parameters.

Perception versus reality: A case-matched study assessing the intraoperative hemodynamics of minimally invasive retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach to pheochromocytomas

BACKGROUND

Pheochromocytomas produce excess catecholamines that can result in intraoperative hemodynamic instability. Centers have reported variations in intraoperative hemodynamics with the retroperitoneoscopic versus the laparoscopic transperitoneal approach to adrenalectomies. When the retroperitoneoscopic approach was initiated for pheochromocytomas at our institution, the perception was of improved intraoperative hemodynamics, hypothesizing that increased retroperitoneoscopic insufflation pressures caused decreased venous return and less fluctuation in circulating catecholamines. The purpose of this study was to examine if a difference in intraoperative hemodynamics exists between a size-matched cohort of laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneoscopic pheochromocytoma patients.

METHODS

Unilateral adrenalectomies for pheochromocytoma performed via laparoscopic transperitoneal or retroperitoneoscopic approaches from 2015 to 2021 were identified from a surgical database. As larger tumors often underwent a laparoscopic transperitoneal approach, cases were matched 1:1 by tumor size. All patients received phenoxybenzamine. Groups were compared by patient characteristics, preoperative blockade, intraoperative hemodynamics and management, and early postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 13 laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy cases matched to 13 retroperitoneoscopic cases according to tumor size. Both groups (laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneoscopic) were similar for age (53 years), body mass index (28.5 vs 29.7), sex (69% female), and side (8 vs 7 right). There was no difference in preoperative 24-hour urine metanephrines/normetanephrines (9.9/8.0 vs 2.4/5.7 μmol/day). The phenoxybenzamine dose was similar in both groups (112 vs 114 mg/24 hours), as were baseline heart rate, blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure. There was no difference in any intraoperative hemodynamic parameters or vasoactive interventions. Operative time, length of stay, and 30-day emergency visits were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

This matched cohort study did not find a difference in intraoperative hemodynamics between laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy approaches for pheochromocytoma in appropriately selected and blocked patients.

Comparison of lateral transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma: a single-centre retrospective study

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has became the standardized treatment for pheochromocytoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of lateral transperitoneal and retroperitoneal LA for pheochromocytoma. Between January 2011 and December 2021, 142 patients with pheochromocytoma underwent LA via lateral transperitoneal (123 patients) or retroperitoneal (19 patients) approaches. Data of these patients were assessed to investigate the differences in perioperative outcomes and intraoperative haemodynamic parameters between the two procedures. Clinical parameters at presentation were comparable between the two groups, except for tumour size, which was larger in the transperitoneal group (50 [10-115] mm vs 35 [7-110] mm, P = 0.012). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operation time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative transfusion rate, incidence of complications, conversion to open surgery, postoperative analgesic requirement, time to first oral intake, or mean hospital stay. Intraoperative haemodynamic parameters of the two groups were similar. After adjusting for tumour size using propensity score matching, both perioperative outcomes and haemodynamic parameters were still comparable. Lateral transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomies provide similar perioperative and haemodynamic outcomes for surgical resection of pheochromocytoma.

Risk factors for hemodynamic instability during laparoscopic resection of pheochromocytoma

Background

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma is associated with high risk of intraoperative hemodynamic instability. Our study aimed to identify predictive factors for hemodynamic instability during laparoscopic resection of pheochromocytoma.

Methods

Between January 2011 and December 2021, 136 patients underwent unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. The patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the presence or absence of hemodynamic instability during surgery. Intraoperative hemodynamic parameters were compared between the 2 groups. Patient demographic characteristics and preoperative evaluations were assessed for their prognostic relevance with respect to intraoperative hemodynamic instability via both univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

There was greater blood pressure fluctuations and higher maximum blood pressure and heart rate in the hemodynamic instability group. More patients need intraoperative administration of vasoactive drugs in the hemodynamic instability group. In the univariate analysis, presence of coronary artery disease, tumour size, and previous hypertension history were significantly associated with intraoperative hemodynamic instability. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that tumour size and previous hypertension history were independent risk factors for intraoperative hemodynamic instability.

Conclusion

Tumour size and previous hypertension history were associated with hemodynamic instability during laparoscopic resection of pheochromocytoma.

Hypotension in Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Versus Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy

INTRODUCTION

Despite preoperative optimization, hemodynamic instability can be a major challenge during adrenalectomy. Even brief episodes of intraoperative hypotension can be associated with ischemia-reperfusion injury. This study aimed to compare intraoperative hemodynamic parameters between posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA) and transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (TPA).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing PRA and TPA without conversion or concomitant intraabdominal pathology from 2008 to 2019. The primary outcome was intraoperative hypotension defined by mean arterial pressure <60 mm Hg or the need for ≥1 intravenous vasopressors at least 30 min after anesthetic induction.

RESULTS

Overall, 108 patients met the inclusion criteria; 33 (30.6%) had pheochromocytoma, 26 (24.1%) had aldosterone excess, 8 (7.4%) had corticosteroid excess, and 41 (38.0%) had nonfunctioning adrenal tumors. Of these, 68 (63.0%) underwent PRA and 40 (37.0%) underwent TPA. Age, sex, body mass index, preinduction blood pressure, number of preoperative antihypertensives, and histopathological diagnosis were similar in the two groups. Tumor size was greater in the TPA group. The presence of pheochromocytoma was an independent risk factor for hypotension. Multivariate analysis revealed that PRA was associated with a higher risk of experiencing a mean arterial pressure <60 mm Hg (odds ratio 4.44, 95% confidence interval 1.27-15.54, P = 0.02) and the need for ≥1 intravenous vasopressors (odds ratio 9.97, 95% confidence interval 3.34-29.78, P < 0.001) compared with TPA.

CONCLUSIONS

Although PRA offers several advantages over TPA, it carries a greater risk of intraoperative hypotension. A prospective trial is required to validate these findings. Nevertheless, institution of risk reduction strategies is encouraged to be considered for individuals undergoing PRA.

The association between the type of anesthesia and hemodynamic instability during pheochromocytoma surgery: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pheochromocytoma often carries a risk for perioperative hemodynamic instability (HDI). The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk factors of intraoperative HDI during minimally invasive posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy (PRA) for pheochromocytoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed the prospectively collected data of 172 patients who underwent laparoscopic PRA or robotic PRA for pheochromocytoma between January 2014 and December 2020 at a single tertiary center. The patients were divided into two groups according to the intraoperative hypertensive event of systolic blood pressure (> 160 mmHg). The clinical manifestations and perioperative hemodynamic conditions were analysed.

RESULTS

In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the tumor size (> 3.4 cm) [OR 3.14, 95% confidence intervals (CI) (1.48-6.64), p = 0.003], type of preoperative alpha-blocker (selective type) [OR 3.9, 95% CI (1.52-10.02), p = 0.005], preoperative use of beta-blockers [OR 3.94, 95% CI (1.07-14.49), p = 0.039] and type of anesthesia [total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) vs. balanced anesthesia (BA)] [OR 2.57, 95% CI (1.23-5.38), p = 0.012] were determined as independent risk factors of intraoperative hypertensive events during minimally invasive adrenalectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The type of anesthesia was independently associated with intraoperative HDI along with larger tumor size, type of preoperative alpha-blocker and the use of preoperative beta-blockers. TIVA increased the risk of intraoperative hypertensive events compared with BA. Thus, the consideration of the type of anesthesia prior to adrenal surgery for pheochromocytoma along with the use of preoperative non-selective alpha-blockers may be beneficial in minimizing the risk of intraoperative HDI.

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: comparison of outcomes between posterior retroperitoneoscopic and transperitoneal adrenalectomy with 10 years' experience

Background

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is widely used for treating various adrenal tumors. Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy was introduced after transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy. The comparability and superiority of posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy have been widely investigated. We aimed to compare the outcomes of posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy and transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy using 10 years' data. The changes in outcomes over time were also analyzed.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study. A total of 505 patients who underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy between 2009 and 2018 were included. The patients were divided into two groups: transperitoneal (n=114) and retroperitoneal (n=391) groups. Patients who underwent posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy were further classified into sub-groups (sub-group 1: 2009-2012; sub-group 2: 2013-2015; and sub-group 3: 2016-2018) based on time periods. Clinicopathological factors and postoperative outcomes were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.

Results

The retroperitoneal group showed significantly shorter operation time, diet initiation time, and hospital stay compared to the transperitoneal group (P=0.000, 0.000 and 0.000, respectively). Analgesics were used less frequently in the retroperitoneal group than in the transperitoneal group (P=0.048). In the retroperitoneal group, the time to postoperative diet initiation shortened over time (P=0.000).

Conclusions

Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy is a favorable surgical method that results in patient outcomes that are comparable to those of conventional transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy, without compromising patient safety.

Comparison of Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy Versus Lateral Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy for Adrenal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To discuss the differences in the effectiveness and security for adrenal tumors by posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA) and lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LTA).

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus database and Cochrane Library, and the date was from above database establishment to November 2020. Stata 16 was used for calculation and statistical analyses.

Results

Nine studies involving eight hundred patients were included. The following differences were observed in favor of PRA vs LTA: less operative time (MD: -22.5; 95% CI -32.57 to -12.45; P=0.000), Fewer estimated blood loss (MD: -15.17; 95% CI -26.63 to -3.72; P=0.009), lower intensity of postoperative pain (MD: -0.56; 95% CI, -1.05 to -0.07; P=0.026), shorter length of hospital stay (MD: -1.15; 95% CI -1.94 to -0.36; P=0.04). No differences were shown in conversion rate (OR 2.07; 95%CI 0.71 to 6.03; P=0.181) and complications (OR 0.85;95% CI 0.46 to 1.56; P=0.597).

Conclusions

Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy was clinically superior to lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal tumors in operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and postoperative pain. Only in term of conversion rate and complications, both were similar.

Minimally Invasive Adrenal Surgery

Since the introduction of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic adrenalectomy has become the main treatment option for adrenal masses. Various studies have reported that laparoscopic adrenalectomy showed fewer postoperative complications and faster recovery than conventional open adrenalectomy. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy can be performed through either the transperitoneal approach or the retroperitoneoscopic approach, which are widely used in most adrenal surgical procedures. Furthermore, with the development of minimally invasive surgery, organ-sparing adrenalectomy has recently emerged as a way to conserve functional adrenal gland tissue. According to recent data, organ-sparing adrenalectomy shows promising surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes including less intraoperative blood loss, maintenance of adrenal function, and low recurrence. Partial adrenalectomy was initially proposed for bilateral adrenal tumors in patients with hereditary disease to avoid chronic adrenal insufficiency. However, it has also gained popularity for the treatment of unilateral adrenal disease involving a small adrenal tumor because even patients with a unilateral adrenal gland may develop adrenal insufficiency in stressful situations. Therefore, partial adrenalectomy has become increasingly common to avoid lifelong steroid replacement and recurrence in most cases, especially in bilateral adrenal disease. This review article evaluates the current evidence on minimally invasive adrenalectomy and organ-preserving partial adrenalectomy.

Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Versus Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Adrenalectomy: A Systematic Review by an Updated Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Two main minimal access adrenalectomy techniques are available: laparoscopic transperitoneal (LTA) and posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA). This study aims to compare these approaches in an updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled (RCT) and non-randomised comparative (NRT) trials.

METHODS

A systematic search of comparative LTA and PRA studies was performed. Standard demographic and surgical data were recorded. Outcome measures compared included: operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), conversion to open, post-operative pain, time to oral intake and ambulation, early morbidity, hospital length of stay (HLOS) and mortality. Quality of RCTs and NRTs was assessed using Cochrane and ROBINS-I, respectively, and heterogeneity using the I² test. Dichotomous and continuous variables were compared using odds ratios and mean/standard difference. Studies were then combined using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Meta-analysis was performed by fixed- and random-effect models.

RESULTS

Following exclusions, 12 studies were included in the analysis: 3 RCTs and 9 NRTs. These reported a total of 775 patients: 341 (44%) PRA and 434 (56%) LTA. Demographics were similar except for tumour size which was smaller (by 0.78 cm) in PRA (p = 0.003). Significant differences in outcome were seen in EBL (18 mls less in PRA, p = 0.006), time to oral intake (3.4 h sooner in PRA p = 0.009) and HLOS (shorter in PRA by 0.84 day, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis demonstrates that while PRA tends to be performed for smaller tumours it allows for less EBL, earlier post-operative oral intake and shorter hospital stays. In appropriately selected patients, it represents an invaluable tool in the endocrine surgeon's armamentarium.