1
|
Prospective Multicentric Assessment of 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in Grade 1-2 GEP-NET. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020513. [PMID: 36672462 PMCID: PMC9856693 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this multicentric study was to prospectively compare 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT versus somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) with SPECT/CT, combined with multiphasic CT scan and MRI in patients with grade 1 or 2 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET). Patients with histologically proven grade 1 or 2 GEP-NET with suspicion of recurrence or progression, or with typical aspects of GEP-NET on morphological imaging, were explored with conventional imaging (CI): SRS with SPECT/CT, multiphasic CT scan and/or liver MRI followed by 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT. The gold standard was based on histology and imaging follow-up. The data of 105 patients (45 woman and 60 men; median age) were analyzed. 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT sensitivity was significantly higher than CI sensitivity in per-patient (98.9% vs. 88.6%, p = 0.016) and per-region (97.6% vs. 75.6%, p < 0.001) analyses, in the detection of the primary (97.9% vs. 78.7%; p = 0.016), peritoneal carcinomatosis (95% vs. 30%, p < 0.001), and bone metastases (100% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.041). 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT had an impact on the therapeutic management of 41.9% (44/105) patients compared to decisions based on CI explorations. Our data confirm the superiority of 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT over CI in the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis and bone metastasis, as well as its strong therapeutic impact on the management of patients with grade 1-2 GEP-NETs.
Collapse
|
2
|
Dahir K, Zanchetta MB, Stanciu I, Robinson C, Lee JY, Dhaliwal R, Charles J, Civitelli R, Roberts MS, Krolczyk S, Weber T. Diagnosis and Management of Tumor-induced Osteomalacia: Perspectives From Clinical Experience. J Endocr Soc 2021; 5:bvab099. [PMID: 34286168 PMCID: PMC8282217 DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvab099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome of abnormal phosphate and vitamin D metabolism caused by typically small endocrine tumors that secrete fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23). TIO is characterized clinically by progressive musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, proximal muscle weakness, and multiple fractures, leading to long-term disability. Misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis are common because of the nonspecific symptoms, and several years may elapse before patients receive an accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Thus, it is vital that awareness of the appropriate recognition and management of TIO is increased among healthcare professionals who may encounter patients with suspected TIO. Methods A roundtable meeting was held on 10 January 2020 in Dallas, TX, USA, to gather perspectives on the diagnosis and treatment of TIO. The following topics were considered: clinical presentation, patient history, differential diagnosis, laboratory assessment, imaging, venous sampling, and treatment. Results This report provides a summary of our collective experiences in the management of TIO. Main conclusions Laboratory tests are mandatory to expedite TIO diagnosis and should include measurement of fasting serum phosphorus, renal phosphate reabsorption, serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, and serum FGF23 levels. Functional and anatomical imaging are essential to locate the FGF23-secreting tumor(s) causing TIO. Surgical resection is often a curative treatment when the tumor can be localized; however, better management of patients who cannot be operated on with targeted therapies is needed. Further efforts to increase awareness of TIO within the medical community, and education on recommended diagnostic and treatment pathways are required to improve the management of this debilitating disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Dahir
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | | | - Irinel Stanciu
- Panorama Orthopedics and Spine Center, Golden, CO 80401, USA
| | - Cemre Robinson
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Janet Y Lee
- University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Ruban Dhaliwal
- State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
| | - Julia Charles
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | | | - Stan Krolczyk
- Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc., Novato, CA 94949, USA
| | - Thomas Weber
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Muehler MR, Rendell VR, Bergmann LL, Winslow ER, Reeder SB. Ferumoxytol-enhanced MR imaging for differentiating intrapancreatic splenules from other tumors. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:2003-2013. [PMID: 33377995 PMCID: PMC8131292 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02883-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Ferumoxytol is an ultra-small superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) agent that is taken up by splenic tissue. This study describes our initial institutional experience of ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI (feMRI) for differentiating intrapancreatic splenules (IPS) from other pancreatic lesions. Methods In this retrospective study, patients with computed tomographic imaging that identified small enhancing lesions in the tail of the pancreas subsequently underwent feMRI for further characterization. The feMRI protocol included T2-weighted (T2w) imaging with and without fat suppression (FS), R2* mapping, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and T1-weighted (T1w) imaging with FS, prior to contrast injection. Immediately after slow intravenous infusion with 3 mg/kg body weight ferumoxytol, T1w was repeated. Delayed imaging with all sequences were obtained 24–72 h after ferumoxytol administration. Results Seven patients underwent feMRI. In two patients, the pancreatic lesions were presumed as pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) from feMRI and in the remaining 5 IPS. One of the two patients with PNET was symptomatic for NET. In another symptomatic patient with pathologically proven duodenal NET and suspected PNET, the pancreatic lesion was proven to be an IPS on feMRI. IPS demonstrated strong negative enhancement in feMRI on T2w and increased R2* values consistent with splenic tissue, while the presumed PNETs did not enhance. T2w FS was helpful on the pre-contrast images to identify IPS, while R2* did on post-contrast images. Neither DWI nor T1w contributed to differentiating PNETs from IPS. Conclusions This study demonstrates the potential utility of feMRI as a helpful adjunct diagnostic tool for differentiating IPS from other pancreatic lesions. Further studies in larger patient cohorts are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R Muehler
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
| | - V R Rendell
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - L L Bergmann
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - E R Winslow
- Medstar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - S B Reeder
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
- Department Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lodge MA, Solnes LB, Chaudhry MA, Wahl RL. Prospective Within-Patient Assessment of the Impact of an Unlabeled Octreotide Pre-dose on the Biodistribution and Tumor Uptake of 68Ga DOTATOC as Assessed by Dynamic Whole-body PET in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors: Implications for Diagnosis and Therapy. Mol Imaging Biol 2021; 23:766-774. [PMID: 33829361 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-021-01600-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NETs) are often associated with high expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) which allows for PET/CT imaging with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs such as 68Ga-DOTATOC. The interplay between 68Ga-DOTATOC and the synthetic somatostatin analogs commonly used to manage patient symptoms may lead to competition between the labelled and unlabeled peptides for receptor binding sites and current product labelling recommends patients be taken off somatostatin analogs before imaging. In this study, we prospectively investigated in human patients the effect of a pre-dose of octreotide, a short-acting somatostatin analog, on the distribution of 68Ga-DOTATOC in GEP NETs and normal organs. PROCEDURE Research participants with GEP NETs were studied on two occasions using dynamic whole-body 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. The two imaging studies were performed within 21 days of each other, using an identical acquisition protocol except for the administration of 50 μg of short-acting octreotide (pre-dose) immediately before the second PET/CT. Paired t-tests were used to compare tracer uptake with and without octreotide, for tumor and various normal organs. RESULTS Seven participants with a mean age of 53 ± 10 years were studied. Octreotide pre-dosing decreased radiotracer uptake in the normal liver and spleen by 25 % (p = 0.04) and 47 % (p = 0.05) respectively but did not significantly change uptake in tumor (p = 0.53), red marrow (p = 0.12), kidneys (p =0.57), or pituitary gland (p = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate SSTR imaging can be improved with a pre-dose of unlabeled octreotide given just prior to injection of the radiotracer. These data suggest there may be no need to discontinue somatostatin analog therapy prior to PET/CT with 68Ga-DOTATOC, allowing for a simpler, less disruptive patient protocol. This approach warrants further study in a variety of settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin A Lodge
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| | - Lilja B Solnes
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Muhammad A Chaudhry
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Richard L Wahl
- The Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Froelich MF, Schnitzer ML, Holzgreve A, Gassert FG, Gresser E, Overhoff D, Schwarze V, Fabritius MP, Nörenberg D, von Münchhausen N, Hokamp NG, Auernhammer CJ, Ilhan H, Todica A, Rübenthaler J. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of 68Ga DOTA-TATE PET/CT, 111In-Pentetreotide SPECT/CT and CT for Diagnostic Workup of Neuroendocrine Tumors. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11020334. [PMID: 33670457 PMCID: PMC7922846 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11020334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are relatively rare neoplasms arising from the hormone-producing neuroendocrine system that can occur in various organs such as pancreas, small bowel, stomach and lung. As the majority of these tumors express somatostatin receptors (SSR) on their cell membrane, utilization of SSR analogs in nuclear medicine is a promising, but relatively costly approach for detection and localization. The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT (Gallium-68 DOTA-TATE Positron emission tomography/computed tomography) compared to 111In-pentetreotide SPECT/CT (Indium-111 pentetreotide Single Photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography) and to CT (computed tomography) alone in detection of NETs. A decision model on the basis of Markov simulations evaluated lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) related to either a CT, SPECT/CT or PET/CT. Model input parameters were obtained from publicized research projects. The analysis is grounded on the US healthcare system. Deterministic sensitivity analysis of diagnostic parameters and probabilistic sensitivity analysis predicated on a Monte Carlo simulation with 30,000 reiterations was executed. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) was determined to be $ 100,000/QALY. In the base-case investigation, PET/CT ended up with total costs of $88,003.07 with an efficacy of 4.179, whereas CT ended up with total costs of $88,894.71 with an efficacy of 4.165. SPECT/CT ended up with total costs of $89,973.34 with an efficacy of 4.158. Therefore, the strategies CT and SPECT/CT were dominated by PET/CT in the base-case scenario. In the sensitivity analyses, PET/CT remained a cost-effective strategy. This result was due to reduced therapy costs of timely detection. The additional costs of 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT when compared to CT alone are justified in the light of potential savings in therapy costs and better outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Frank Froelich
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (M.F.F.); (D.O.); (D.N.); (N.v.M.)
| | - Moritz Ludwig Schnitzer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.L.S.); (E.G.); (V.S.); (M.P.F.)
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (C.J.A.); (H.I.); (A.T.)
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (C.J.A.); (H.I.); (A.T.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Felix Gerhard Gassert
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany;
| | - Eva Gresser
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.L.S.); (E.G.); (V.S.); (M.P.F.)
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (C.J.A.); (H.I.); (A.T.)
| | - Daniel Overhoff
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (M.F.F.); (D.O.); (D.N.); (N.v.M.)
| | - Vincent Schwarze
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.L.S.); (E.G.); (V.S.); (M.P.F.)
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (C.J.A.); (H.I.); (A.T.)
| | - Matthias Philipp Fabritius
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.L.S.); (E.G.); (V.S.); (M.P.F.)
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (C.J.A.); (H.I.); (A.T.)
| | - Dominik Nörenberg
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (M.F.F.); (D.O.); (D.N.); (N.v.M.)
| | - Niklas von Münchhausen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (M.F.F.); (D.O.); (D.N.); (N.v.M.)
| | - Nils Große Hokamp
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Christoph J. Auernhammer
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (C.J.A.); (H.I.); (A.T.)
- Department of Internal Medicine 4, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (C.J.A.); (H.I.); (A.T.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Andrei Todica
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (C.J.A.); (H.I.); (A.T.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Rübenthaler
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.L.S.); (E.G.); (V.S.); (M.P.F.)
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (C.J.A.); (H.I.); (A.T.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|