Association of clopidogrel high on-treatment reactivity with clinical outcomes and gene polymorphism in acute ischemic stroke patients: An observational study

Thromboelastographic and Gene Polymorphism Bimodality Detection for Dual Antiplatelet Aggregation Therapy in Individuals with Clopidogrel-resistant Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis

BACKGROUND

Recent research indicates that clopidogrel resistance is connected with a patient's future ischemia risk, hence increasing the likelihood of recurrent ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Thromboelastographic and clopidogrel gene polymorphism testing can be used to see how a person responds to antiplatelet therapy and change the treatment plan accordingly. This may be a good way to make antiplatelet aggregation therapy more effective and safer.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of dual antiplatelet aggregation therapy in patients with symptomatic intracranial large artery stenosis being resistant to clopidogrel tablets. The thromboelastographic and gene polymorphism bimodality detection techniques were used to analyze the clopidogrel resistance influencing factors.

METHODS

89 patients with symptomatic intracranial large arterial stenosis who were admitted to our hospital from February 2021 to February 2022 were selected, classified as large artery atherosclerotic type by TOAST, and confirmed as having severe intracranial large arterial stenosis (70 % to 99 %) by magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), computed tomographic angiography (CTA), and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). All patients were treated with dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel, and thromboelastography and clopidogrel gene polymorphism were monitored 1 week later.

RESULTS

44 of 89 patients were clopidogrel-resistant. Among 44 patients, 20 were ticagrelorresistant and 24 were cilostazol-resistant. Clopidogrel had a resistance rate of 49.4%. The recurrence of ischemic cerebrovascular disease in the three groups was statistically significant (P<0.05) after 3 months of follow-up treatment, but bleeding (intracranial, gastrointestinal, respiratory, urinary, and mucocutaneous) and dyspnea were not. The clopidogrel-resistant group had a higher number of females, as well as higher levels of hypertension, diabetes, and platelet count than the sensitive group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in age, smoking, alcohol consumption, previous stroke, glycosylated haemoglobin, creatinine, or low-density cholesterol.

CONCLUSION

Using thromboelastographic and gene polymorphism bimodality detection, we found switching to ticagrelor antiplatelet aggregation therapy as better than switching to cilostazol in patients with symptomatic intracranial large artery stenosis being resistant to clopidogrel tablets. The results may be biased due to the study being a single-centre study and having a limited sample size.

Baseline P2Y12 reactivity, kidney function, and CYP2C19 genotype determine clopidogrel responsiveness in acute stroke

Clopidogrel is the most-widely used platelet P2Y12-inhibitor for secondary-prevention of ischemic stroke. Platelet P2Y12 reactivity before and after inhibitors can be measured with blood sampling by commercialized system. We aimed to evaluate (1) whether high-on-clopidogrel platelet P2Y12 reactivity (HCPR) is associated with short-term vascular events and (2) the predictors of HCPR in acute stroke. The inclusion criterion was patients with acute stroke who received clopidogrel within 12-48 h after the onset. Platelet reactivity was assayed at baseline and after clopidogrel treatment using the VerifyNow system. The primary endpoint was recurrent ischemic events within 21 days after stroke. Among 190 patients, 32(16.9%) had recurrent ischemic stroke. Multivariate analyses showed that HCPR was significantly associated with the short-term events with an odds-ratio of 2.5 (95% CI 1.1-5.7, p = 0.027). Patients with HCPR had significantly higher frequencies of high baseline platelet P2Y12 reactivity, impaired kidney function, and carrying one or two CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles. A poor clopidogrel response score combining these factors was developed. Ten percent of patients with score 0, 20.3% of those with score 1, 38.3% of those with score 2, and 66.7% of those with score 3 had HCPR (χ²-test, p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that, compared with the score-0 group, the score-2 and -3 groups had higher risks of HCPR with hazard-ratios of 5.4 (95% CI 1.5-20.3, p = 0.012) and 17.4 (95% CI 3.4-88.9, p = 0.001) for developing recurrent ischemic strokes. The study emphasized the role of HCPR in ischemic stroke. We also developed an HCPR risk score, which could be used in clinical practice or trials, potentially with more precision, to weigh the clinical benefit of a tailored antiplatelet-strategy for patients with stroke.

A Systematic Review of Clopidogrel Resistance in Vascular Surgery: Current Perspectives and Future Directions

BACKGROUND

Clopidogrel resistance is a well-described phenomenon that has been linked to adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. The impact of clopidogrel resistance in patient outcomes after vascular and endovascular surgery is not well-established.

METHODS

Using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a literature review with the medical subject headings (MeSH) terms "(clopidogrel resistance) and (vascular)", "(clopidogrel resistance) and (vascular surgery)", "(clopidogrel resistance) and (endovascular)", and "(clopidogrel resistance) and (endovascular surgery)" was performed in PubMed and Cochrane databases, to identify all peer-reviewed studies performed on clopidogrel resistance in vascular and endovascular surgery. Studies written in the English language from inception to 2022 were included. Case reports, studies with limited information, nonhuman studies, and studies not pertaining to vascular or endovascular surgery were excluded from analysis. Each study was independently reviewed by 2 qualified researchers to assess eligibility.

RESULTS

Of the 691 studies identified through the MeSH strategy, 16 studies met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed and summarized. These studies focused on extracranial cerebrovascular disease (n = 5) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD, n = 11), encompassing a total of 1,716 patients. The prevalence of clopidogrel resistance ranged from 0% to 83.3%, depending on the diagnostic assay and cutoff values used. In cerebrovascular disease, clopidogrel resistance may be associated with cerebral embolization, ischemic neurologic events, and vascular-related mortality. In PAD, clopidogrel resistance has been linked to recurrent stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization, amputation-free survival, and all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review provides an up-to-date summary of clopidogrel resistance in vascular and endovascular surgery. The impact of clopidogrel resistance remains incompletely investigated, and future studies are needed to clarify the role of resistance testing in patients with vascular disease.

Analysis of CYP2C19 genetic variants with ischaemic events in UK patients prescribed clopidogrel in primary care: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LoF) alleles increase risk of ischaemic stroke and myocardial infarction (MI) in UK primary care patients prescribed clopidogrel.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis.

SETTING

Primary care practices in the UK from January 1999 to September 2017.

PARTICIPANTS

7483 European-ancestry adults from the UK Biobank study with genetic and linked primary care data, aged 36-79 years at time of first clopidogrel prescription.

INTERVENTIONS

Clopidogrel prescription in primary care, mean duration 2.6 years (range 2 months to 18 years).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Hospital inpatient-diagnosed ischaemic stroke, MI or angina while treated with clopidogrel.

RESULTS

28.7% of participants carried at least one CYP2C19 LoF variant. LoF carriers had higher rates of incident ischaemic stroke while treated with clopidogrel compared with those without the variants (8 per 1000 person-years vs 5.2 per 1000 person-years; HR 1.53, 95% CIs 1.04 to 2.26, p=0.031). LoF carriers also had increased risk of MI (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.26, p=0.008). In combined analysis LoF carriers had increased risk of any ischaemic event (stroke or MI) (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.29, p=0.002). Adjustment for aspirin coprescription produced similar estimates. In lifetables using observed incidence rates, 22.5% (95% CI 14.4% to 34.0%) of CYP2C19 LoF carriers on clopidogrel were projected to develop an ischaemic stroke by age 79 (oldest age in the study), compared with 15.4% (95% CI 11.4% to 20.5%) in non-carriers, that is, 7.1% excess stroke incidence in LoF carriers by age 79.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of the UK population carry genetic variants that reduce metabolism of clopidogrel to its active form. In family practice patients on clopidogrel, CYP2C19 LoF variants are associated with substantially higher incidence of ischaemic events. Genotype-guided selection of antiplatelet medications may improve outcomes in patients carrying CYP2C19 genetic variants.

Frequency and impact of DHODH, ABCG2 and CYP2C19 SNPs on the therapeutic efficacy, tolerability and toxicity of leflunomide

Introduction: Leflunomide is one of the commonly used drugs in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), which on administration is converted into its active metabolite teriflunomide. Aim: Our aim is to evaluate the frequencies of dihydrooroate dehydrogenase (DHODH) (rs3213422), ABCG2 (rs2231142) and CYP2C19 (rs4244285) allele distribution among patients receiving leflunomide for RA and their possible impact on leflunomide performance in disease control. Patients & methods: Patients (>18 years) who fulfilled the 2010 ACR classification criteria for RA receiving leflunomide (20 mg/day) were included in the study. Disease activity score 28 was used to assess patients disease activity. Blood samples were collected for full blood count and blood chemistry. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood. The selection of SNPs was based on the criteria of minor allele frequency among Caucasians. Results: A significant association between the therapeutic outcome of leflunomide and DHODH genotyping was observed but not with CYP2C19 and ABCG2. Importantly, there is a significant association between DHODH (rs3213422) CC genotype and the number of patients with controlled disease. Conclusion: We strongly suggest that polymorphisms in the DHODH are the major factor affecting leflunomide pharmacogenetics and therapeutic efficacy.

High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity as Predictor of Long-term Clinical Outcomes in Stroke Patients with Antiplatelet Agents

The purpose was to explore the value of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in predicting long-term clinical outcomes for stroke patients. The platelet reactivity was assayed after being treated with either 75 mg clopidogrel or 100 mg aspirin daily with VerifyNow System in stroke patients. HTPR for clopidogrel was defined as PRU ≥ 208, and that for aspirin was defined as ARU ≥ 550. CYP2C19 genotyping was performed using the Sequenom MassARRAY iPLEX platform. The primary endpoint was a composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, or ischemic vascular death. The safety endpoint was bleeding. In the clopidogrel group, among 345 patients recruited, 174 of them were categorized as HTPR. A total of 270 patients were followed up for 54 months. There was a significant association between HTPR and the primary endpoint (HR_adj 2.13 [95% CI, 1.43-3.15], p < 0.001). Among the 314 participants genotyped for CYP2C19, 187 (59.6%) were classified as CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele carriers. Patients with at least 1 loss-of-function allele were more likely to present with HTPR (OR_adj 2.61 [95%CI, 1.43-4.77], p = 0.008), and had a higher risk of the primary endpoint (HR_adj 2.05 [95% CI, 1.30, 3.25], p = 0.002). In the aspirin group, among 140 patients recruited, 28 of them were categorized as HTPR. A total of 121 patients were followed up for 30 months. Similarly, there was a significant association between HTPR and the primary endpoint (HR_adj 3.28 [95% CI, 1.52-7.71], p = 0.002). HTPR is an independent risk factor for ischemic events during long-term follow-up in stroke patients. Platelet function testing is helpful to evaluate the effect of antiplatelet therapy for stroke patients.

Risk of stroke in CYP2C19 LoF polymorphism carrier coronary artery disease patients undergoing clopidogrel therapy: An ethnicity-based updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Antiplatelet agent clopidogrel has been widely used for stroke management for many years, although resistance to clopidogrel may increase the chance of stroke recurrence. CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LoF) polymorphism is assumed to be responsible for the poor metabolism of clopidogrel that ultimately turns to resistance. Previous publications could not provide firm evidence due to highly conflicting and heterogeneous outcomes.

AIM

To get clear evidence from an updated meta-analysis on CYP2C19 LoF polymorphism association with stroke risk in clopidogrel treated patients, this study has been performed.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis with 72 selected studies from authentic databases, including 40,035 coronary artery disease patients treated with clopidogrel.

RESULTS

This analysis showed that the worldwide carrier of one or more CYP2C19 LoF alleles had a significantly higher risk of stroke and composite events than the non-LoF carriers (RR=1.78, 95% CI=1.52-2.07, p<0.00001 and RR=1.39, 95% CI=1.26-1.54, p<0.00001, respectively). Besides, subgroup analysis showed that Asian CYP2C19 LoF carriers had a significantly increased risk of stroke (RR=1.91, 95% CI=1.60-2.28, p<0.00001) while the risk of composite events was significantly higher in all ethnic populations (Asian: RR=1.58, 95% CI=1.32-1.89, p<0.00001; Caucasian: RR=1.27, 95% CI=1.08-1.50, p=0.003; Hispanic and others: RR=1.21, 95% CI=1.09-1.34, p=0.0003).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis confirmed that the presence of CYP2C19 LoF alleles increases the risk of stroke and composite events recurrence in the worldwide population, especially in Asians undergoing clopidogrel treatment. Alternative antiplatelet therapy should be investigated thoroughly for the intermediate and poor metabolizers.

Biomarkers for Antiplatelet Therapies in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Clinical Review

Stroke is one of the world's leading causes of disability and death. Antiplatelet agents are administered to acute ischemic stroke patients as secondary prevention. Clopidogrel involves biotransformation by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes into an active metabolite, and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can influence the efficacy of this biotransformation. Despite the therapeutic advantages of aspirin, there is significant inter-individual heterogeneity in response to this antiplatelet drug. In this clinical review, the recent advances in the biomarkers of antiplatelet agents in acute ischemic stroke are discussed. The studies reviewed herein highlight the clinical relevance of antiplatelet resistance, pharmacotherapy of antiplatelet agents predicting drug response, strategies for identifying aspirin resistance, pharmacogenetic variants of antiplatelet agents, miRNAs, and extracellular vesicles (EVs) as biomarkers toward the personalized approach in the management of acute ischemic stroke. The precise pathways contributing to antiplatelet resistance are not very well known but are presumably multi-factorial. It is essential to understand the clinical relevance of clopidogrel and aspirin-related single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) as potential predictive and prognostic biomarkers. Prasugrel is a next-generation antiplatelet agent that prevents ADP-platelet activation by binding irreversibly to P2Y12 receptor. There are sporadic reports of prasugrel resistance and polymorphisms in the Platelet endothelial aggregation receptor-1 (PEAR1) that may contribute to a change in the pharmacodynamics response. Ticagrelor, a direct-acting P2Y12-receptor antagonist, is easily absorbed and partly metabolized to major AR-C124910XX metabolite (ARC). Ticagrelor's primary active metabolite, ARC124910XX (ARC), is formed via the most abundant hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5. The integration of specific biomarkers, genotype as well as phenotype-related data in antiplatelet therapy stratification in patients with acute ischemic stroke will be of great clinical significance and could be used as a guiding tool for more effective, personalized therapy.

The 2020 breakthroughs in early secondary prevention: dual antiplatelet therapy versus single antiplatelet therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Single antiplatelet therapy represents an established treatment in secondary prevention of ischemic strokes and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs). In contrast with coronary artery disease, the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for secondary prevention in patients with acute cerebral ischemia (ACI) remains under debate. In this narrative review, we present and analyse the most recent findings concerning the potential efficacy and safety of DAPT therapy after ischemic strokes or TIA.

RECENT FINDINGS

Following the publication of the three (CHANCE, POINT and THALES) large, randomized-controlled, clinical trials (RCTs) that showed efficacy of early DAPT for the secondary prevention after minor AIS or TIA, short-term DAPT use is becoming the most prevalent choice of treatment. Notably, DAPT is even more popular after AIS attributed to large artery atherosclerosis given randomized data from small RCTs supporting the use of DAPT in patients with extracranial or intracranial atherosclerosis and microembolization detected by transcranial Doppler. Recent subanalysis of data from the randomized trials aim to identify specific patient subgroups, which are determined by genetic, imaging or clinical characteristics, and for whom DAPT appears to be more beneficial. The potential role of different antiplatelet agents (aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor) is also discussed.

SUMMARY

DAPT has recently proven its efficacy for the early secondary prevention of AIS patients with minor stroke severity and high-risk TIA patients. However, the length of DAPT is still controversial, as well as the individualized selection of AIS or TIA patients with the lower risk of bleeding and with the greater benefit in prevention of ischemic cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events.

Multifactorial Background for a Low Biological Response to Antiplatelet Agents Used in Stroke Prevention

Effective platelet inhibition is the main goal of the antiplatelet therapy recommended as a standard treatment in the secondary prevention of non-embolic ischemic stroke. Acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) and clopidogrel are commonly used for this purpose worldwide. A low biological response to antiplatelet agents is a phenomenon that significantly reduces the therapeutic and protective properties of the therapy. The mechanisms leading to high on-treatment platelet reactivity are still unclear and remain multifactorial. The aim of the current review is to establish the background of resistance to antiplatelet agents commonly used in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke and to explain the possible mechanisms. The most important factors influencing the incidence of a low biological response were demonstrated. The similarities and the differences in resistance to both drugs are emphasized, which may facilitate the selection of the appropriate antiplatelet agent in relation to specific clinical conditions and comorbidities. Despite the lack of indications for the routine assessment of platelet reactivity in stroke subjects, this should be performed in selected patients from the high-risk group. Increasing the detectability of low antiaggregant responders, in light of its negative impact on the prognosis and clinical outcomes, can contribute to a more individualized approach and modification of the antiplatelet therapy to maximize the therapeutic effect in the secondary prevention of stroke.

The Phenomenon of Clopidogrel High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity in Ischemic Stroke Subjects: A Comprehensive Review

Clopidogrel is increasingly being used for the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke according to the updated guidelines on acute stroke management. Failure to achieve a drug response is referred to as clopidogrel resistance. Similarly, a higher activation of platelets during clopidogrel therapy—high on-treatment platelet reactivity—is equivalent to a reduced effectiveness of a therapy. Clopidogrel resistance is considered to be a common and multifactorial phenomenon that significantly limits the efficacy of antiplatelet agents. The aim of the current study is to review the latest literature data to identify the prevalance and predictors of clopidogrel high on-treatment platelet reactivity among stroke subjects and to establish the potential impact on clinical outcomes and prognosis. Clinical databases were searched by two independent researchers to select relevant papers on the topic, including all types of articles. Several important predictors contributing to clopidogrel resistance were identified, including genetic polymorphisms, the concomitant use of other drugs, or vascular risk factors, in particular nonsmoking and diabetes. Clopidogrel high on-treatment platelet reactivity has a negative impact on the clinical course of stroke, worsens the early- and long-term prognoses, and increases the risk of recurrent vascular events. Platelet function testing should be considered in selected stroke individuals, especially those predisposed to clopidogrel resistance, for whom an improvement in the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy is essential. This particular group may become the greatest beneficiaries of the modification of existing therapy based on platelet function monitoring.