Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on survival prognosis and pathological downstaging in patients presenting with high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy in patients undergoing nephroureterectomy for urothelial cancer: a multidisciplinary systematic review and critical analysis

INTRODUCTION

The benefit of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) is not yet supported by randomized controlled trials in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), but the evidence is increasing. This narrative systematic review was conducted to evaluate the available evidence on the role of NAST in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for UTUC.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We searched for all relevant articles or conference abstracts published and indexed in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus on July 19, 2021. The study was reported according to the PRISMA criteria and designed within the PICOS framework. We included studies comparing patients with non-metastatic UTUC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or immunotherapy (NAI) with patients who underwent definitive surgery alone or surgery plus adjuvant systemic therapy. Prospective uncontrolled studies were also included.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We identified 27 reports (NAC, N.=24 and NAI, N.=3) published between 2010 and 2021. Twenty of the 24 studies on NAC were retrospective comparative analyses, whereas the remaining four were prospective single-arm studies. One of the three NAI studies exclusively enrolled patients with UTUC. NAC was associated with improved survival and better pathological response relative to surgery alone, but there was no clear advantage when compared to surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy. Overall, the drug-induced toxicity and risk of disease progression were acceptable but the inherent bias across study designs, inadequate reporting and heterogeneous definition of primary outcomes render it difficult to synthesize results, compare centers, and inform practice.

CONCLUSIONS

The current level of evidence supporting NAST for UTUC is relatively low and the inability to predict responsiveness and thereby pinpoint the optimal candidates remains a major challenge. There is a need to compare NAST to adjuvant therapies using clearly defined primary endpoints as minimum reporting standards developed by a multidisciplinary team.

Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Population Based Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We examined pathologic complete response (pCR) and pathologic downstaging (pDS) rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma, as well as their predictors. We further sought to determine their effects on overall survival and examine prognosticators of survival after NAC. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify all patients from 2004 to 2016 with nonmetastatic high grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma who received NAC followed by nephroureterectomy. pCR and pDS rates were examined, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify clinical predictors. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard methods were used to estimate overall survival. RESULTS: 309 patients met inclusion criteria. 27 patients (8.74%) had pCR, and 92 (29.77%) had pDS. pCR and pDS rates for N+ subgroup were 6.82% and 47.73% respectively, and for N0 subgroup, 9.50% and 22.62%. Female sex (OR 2.94, p = 0.010) was the only predictor of pCR. Node-positive disease (cN1 vs. cN0: OR 6.40, p < 0.001; cN2 vs. cN0: OR 7.46, p < 0.001) was a positive predictor of pDS, and the presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (OR 0.14, p < 0.001) was a negative predictor of pDS. The median OS for all patients was 45.5 months. pCR and pDS were both associated with improved OS, (p < 0.001 for both); median was 99.1 months for both. LVI was the strongest negative prognostic factor for OS (HR 2.85, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall pathological complete response and downstaging rates were 8.74% and 29.77% respectively after multi-agent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Node-negative and node-positive disease had equivalent rates of complete response, but node-positive disease had a significantly higher rate of downstaging. The presence of LVI was associated with worse overall survival.

Prognostic value of PD-L1 combined positive score in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma

PURPOSE

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is relatively rare in Western countries. The impact of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on UTUC remains unclear because previous studies have focused on bladder UC. We investigated the association of PD-L1 expression with clinicopathological features and prognosis in patients with UTUC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the patients with UTUC that we treated at our institute from 2013 to 2018. In total, 105 patients with UTUC undergoing radical nephroureterectomy were analyzed to evaluate the PD-L1 expression on representative whole-tissue sections using the Combined Positive Score (CPS; Dako 22C3 pharmDx assay). A PD-L1 CPS ≥ 10 was considered positive.

RESULTS

Among the 105 UTUC cases, 17.1% exhibited positive PD-L1 expression. A CPS ≥ 10 was significantly associated with higher tumor stage (≥ T2, p = 0.034) and lymph node invasion at diagnosis (p = 0.021). A multivariable analysis indicated that a CPS ≥ 10 was an independent prognostic predictor of shorter cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.66 - 12.7, p = 0.003) and overall survival (HR = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.19 - 5.27, p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

A PD-L1 CPS ≥ 10 in UTUC was associated with adverse pathological features and independently predicted worse cancer-specific and overall survival.

Association of the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) with Cisplatin Resistance

Therapy resistance is a characteristic of cancer cells that significantly reduces the effectiveness of drugs. Despite the popularity of cisplatin (CP) as a chemotherapeutic agent, which is widely used in the treatment of various types of cancer, resistance of cancer cells to CP chemotherapy has been extensively observed. Among various reported mechanism(s), the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) process can significantly contribute to chemoresistance by converting the motionless epithelial cells into mobile mesenchymal cells and altering cell–cell adhesion as well as the cellular extracellular matrix, leading to invasion of tumor cells. By analyzing the impact of the different molecular pathways such as microRNAs, long non-coding RNAs, nuclear factor-κB (NF-ĸB), phosphoinositide 3-kinase-related protein kinase (PI3K)/Akt, mammalian target rapamycin (mTOR), and Wnt, which play an important role in resistance exhibited to CP therapy, we first give an introduction about the EMT mechanism and its role in drug resistance. We then focus specifically on the molecular pathways involved in drug resistance and the pharmacological strategies that can be used to mitigate this resistance. Overall, we highlight the various targeted signaling pathways that could be considered in future studies to pave the way for the inhibition of EMT-mediated resistance displayed by tumor cells in response to CP exposure.