Bone graft versus non-bone graft for treatment of calcaneal fractures: A protocol for meta-analysis

Is it necessary to graft the void defect during open reduction and internal fixation of calcaneal fractures?

PURPOSE

There are still controversies on the effect of grafting during open reduction and internal fixation of calcaneal fractures. The aim of this study was to compare the radiological and functional outcomes in patients with or without intraoperative grafting.

METHODS

In a comparative retrospective study, among 442 operatively-treated calcaneal fractures, 60 patients with unilateral closed sanders type II intraarticular calcaneal fracture who underwent ORIF via lateral extensile approach using locking anatomical plates with at least 1 year follow-up without any postoperative wound complication were enrolled. The patients were separated into 2 groups: with bone allograft and without bone allograft. The functional outcome of the patients was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale, foot function index (FFI), and short-form (SF-36) health survey. Radiographic variables included Böhler angle, Gissane angle, calcaneal width, calcaneal height, and talar declination angle. Also, the differences (delta) of these values in comparison to the uninjured foot were calculated.

RESULTS

The mean age was 39.1 ± 12.7 (range, 13-67) years with 54 males, 90.0%. No statistically significant differences were detected in age, gender, affected side, and subtypes of calcaneal fractures between the two groups (p > 0.05). The average follow-up was 25.1 (range, 12-48) months. The differences for all radiographic measurements and also, the delta values between the groups were not statistically significant, except talar declination angle which was more in cases without grafting (p = 0.007). Although the differences between the two groups regarding AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scale (p = 0.257), VAS for pain (p = 0.645), and FFI (p = 0.261) were not statistically significant; the group with bone graft experienced less pain (19.7 ± 22.0) than the other group (26.7 ± 22.8). The difference between the groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.87) according to the SF-36 questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating allografts into the void defects during ORIF of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures may not improve functional outcomes and recover postoperative radiological parameters. Therefore, routine use of allograft to fill the defects during ORIF of calcaneus may not be recommended. Of note, that these findings solely relate to the treatment of Sanders type II fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

Comparative retrospective study.

[Calcaneoplasty with radiofrequency cementing following balloon reduction]

The standard surgical procedure for complex calcaneal fractures is open reduction, internal reduction and internal stable angle plate osteosynthesis via a lateral approach. More recently, options for minimally invasive and percutaneous surgical strategies have been presented [4, 7]. As a possible procedural alternative for a covered, surgical treatment of calcaneal fractures, calcaneoplasty is discussed and applied in this context [5]. In this case series of five complex calcaneal fractures presented here, a balloon catheter was used for percutaneous reduction to restore the alignment of the calcaneus.This was followed by placement of PMMA cement in radiofrequency application and osteosynthesis using percutaneous cannulated screws. This Vicenti technique allows stable reduction and retention with early partial weight bearing with an overall low complication rate [17].

[Surgical treatment of intra-articular calcaneus fractures with plate osteosynthesis via the sinus tarsi approach]

OBJECTIVE

Surgical treatment of intra-articular calcaneus fractures via a minimally invasive approach.

INDICATIONS

Intra-articular dislocated calcaneus fractures.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Fracture older than 14 days; poor soft tissue quality in the surgical area.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Patient in lateral position. Identifying the anatomic landmarks. Incision (3-5 cm) from the tip of the fibula to metatarsal IV. Preparation through the subcutis. Retraction of the peroneal tendons. Preparation of the lateral calcaneal wall and later plate position via raspatory. Placement of a Schanz screw in the calcaneal tuberosity from lateral or posterior as a reduction aid for restoring of the calcaneal length and reduction of the hindfoot varus. Reduction of the sustentaculum fragment with the help of fluoroscopy from lateral. Elevation of the subtalar articular surface. Positioning of the calcaneal plate and fixation of the sustentaculum fragment by placing a cannulated screw through the long hole. Afterwards, definite internal fixation of the reduction with locking screws. Completion of the operation with final X‑rays and, if available, an intraoperative computed tomography. Wound closure with closing of the peroneal sheath.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Lower leg-foot orthoses. Mobilization with partial weight-bearing of the injured foot with 15 kg for 6-8 weeks; subsequently increased load bearing.

RESULTS

Due to the smaller incision and the associated lower soft tissue trauma, the risk of wound healing complications can be reduced. Radiographic and functional outcomes are comparable to the outcomes of calcaneal fractures treated via the extended lateral approach.

Investigating Weekend Effect in the Management of Upper and Lower Extremity Degloving Injuries

Background

Weekend presentation has been associated with adverse outcomes in emergent conditions, including stroke, myocardial infarction, and critical limb ischemia. We examine whether a weekend effect exists in the management of and outcomes after extremity degloving injuries.

Methods

The cohort included adults presenting with open extremity degloving injuries to a tertiary level one trauma center between June 2018 and May 2022. We collected demographics, comorbidities, injury information, interventions, and complications. Propensity score weighting was used to minimize confounding differences between those presenting on weekends (Sat-Sun) versus weekdays (Mon-Fri). Weighted regressions were used to examine differences in interventions by day of presentation. Multivariable weighted regressions accounting for differences in interventions received were used to examine whether weekend presentation was associated with amputation risk, complications, or functional deficits.

Results

Ninety-five patients with 100 open extremity degloving injuries were included. In total, 39% of injuries were weekend-presenting. There was a higher rate of noninsulin-dependent diabetes among patients presenting on weekends (P = 0.03). Weekend-presenting injuries had higher median Injury Severity Scores (P = 0.04). Propensity-weighted regression analysis revealed differences in interventions received on weekends, including lower rates of pedicled and free flaps and bone graft, and increased rates of negative-pressure wound therapy (P ≤ 0.02). Multivariable regression analysis revealed weekend presentation was a significant independent risk factor for amputation of the affected extremity [odds ratio 2.27, 95% CI (1.01-5.33), P = 0.05].

Conclusion

Weekend presentation may impact interventions received and amputation risk in patients presenting with open extremity degloving injuries.

Midterm outcomes of midfoot and hindfoot arthrodesis with strut allograft for Müller-Weiss disease

Background

Müller–Weiss disease (MWD), a rare dysplastic disorder of the foot, is characterized by deformity, sclerosis, and fragmentation of the lateral part of navicular bone. Arthrodesis is the mainstay treatment for MWD. Generally, arthrodesis can be achieved through internal fixation with metallic implants, and morselized chip bone may be packed into the gap for better bone union. However, with this procedure, the original foot size is not maintained and support for the foot arch is not provided. Sequela of short foot, or flatfoot is commonly observed even though these complications of surgery had not been reported with cases of MWD treated by arthrodesis. Herein, we present a retrospective analysis of treating MWD through midfoot and hindfoot arthrodesis combined with strut allograft.

Methods

From August 2006 to June 2019, 20 patients with MWD (mean age, 59.6 years; range, 40–80 years) underwent midfoot and hindfoot arthrodesis with strut bone allograft and were followed for at least 24 months. The patients were able to ambulate and participate in rehabilitation programs 3 months postoperatively.

Results

The used four radiographic parameters (Meary’s angle in anteroposterior and lateral view, talonavicular coverage angle, calcaneal pitch) demonstrated significant differences (P < .05) preoperatively and postoperatively, but those between the postoperative values and the values at the last follow-up session did not, indicating that strut allograft was able to maintain normal alignment. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot scores at 2 years postoperatively revealed significant improvement from baseline, from 60.2 to 84.2 (P < .05). The 12-item Short Form Health Survey scores also improved significantly (P < .05). All patients reported substantial pain relief and exhibited improved functional outcomes and gait patterns.

Conclusions

For advanced-stage MWD, arthrodesis with a precisely shaped, size-matched strut allograft provided strong support for biomechanical alignment and enhanced functional performance.

An evaluation of the efficacy of percutaneous reduction and screw fixation without bone grafting in Sanders Type-II and Type-III displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures

BACKGROUND

The aim of this retrospective monocentric study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous reduction and screw fixation without bone grafting in Sanders Type-II and Type-III displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs).

METHODS

The medical records of calcaneal fractures patients who were admitted to our department from January 2018 to January 2020 were retrospectively reviewed, and those meeting the inclusion criteria were fnally included for analysis. All patients were treated with percutaneous reduction and screw fixation, and no patients received bone grafting. The radiologic parameters evaluated included the BÖhler angle and the calcaneal height. In addition, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot scores, Maryland Foot Score (MFS), and visual analog scale (VAS) score were determined.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients with Sanders Type-II and Type-III DIACFs were finally included, including 30 males and 8 females aged 21 to 61 years [(42.6 ± 9.6) years]. According to the Essex-Lopresti classification, 27 of the fractures were the tongue type, and 11 were the joint compression type. According to the Sanders classification, 27 of the fractures were type II, and 11 were type III. Immediately postoperatively, the calcaneal height had recovered to 39.8 ± 2.1 mm, the BÖhler angle had recovered from 4.2° ± 13.6° preoperatively to 27.2° ± 3.4° (P = 0.000). All patients were followed up for 18-42 months [(25.2 ± 9.5) months]. All fractures healed. No differences were found in the outcome measures six-months postoperatively (BÖhler angle, p = 0.24; calcaneal height, p = 0.82) or at final follow-up (BÖhler angle, p = 0.33; calcaneal height, p = 0.28) compared to the immediately postoperative values. At the final follow-up, the AOFAS score was 91.7 ± 7.4 points, with an excellent and good rate of 92.1%; the MFS was 90.3 ± 7.8 points, with an excellent and good rate of 92.1%; and the VAS score was 2.2 ± 1.5 points. None of the patients had incision complications, and one patient developed traumatic arthritis.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous reduction and screw fixation without bone grafting in Sanders Type-II and Type-III DIACFs can achieve good recovery and maintenance of the BÖhler angle and calcaneal height. Moreover, it has the advantage of a low complication rate.