Multiple neurological manifestations in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus and anti-NXP2-positive myositis: A case report

Case report: Case analysis of multiple sclerosis with preclinical systemic lupus erythematosus presenting as rare bilateral horizontal gaze palsy

We present an analysis of a case initially manifesting as bilateral horizontal gaze palsy, eventually diagnosed as multiple sclerosis (MS) with preclinical systemic lupus erythematosus (p-SLE). The patient, a 25-year-old male, exhibited restricted movement in both eyes. Cranial MRI revealed multiple demyelinating lesions; serum analyses indicated elevated levels of antinuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-Sm antibodies, and anti-nRNP antibodies. Oligoclonal bands were identified in the cerebrospinal fluid. Neurophysiological assessments demonstrated damage to the optic, auditory, and facial nerves. Given the clinical presentation, laboratory findings, and the progression of the disease, the final diagnosis was confirmed as MS associated with p-SLE. The onset of MS with oculomotor disturbances is rare and may be easily confused with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE). Furthermore, the differentiation of p-SLE from undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD) in the early stages presents significant challenges. Early identification of risk factors and close monitoring of disease activity is crucial for an accurate diagnosis.

Research progress on the dermatomyositis specific autoantibodies and malignancy associated dermatomyositis

Dermatomyositis (DM) is an autoimmune disease often complicated with malignant tumors. More than 50% of DM patients have myositis specific autoantibodies in their bodies. DM specific autoantibodies [including anti-migration inhibitory factor (Mi)-2 antibody, anti-nuclear matrix protein (NXP)-2 antibody, anti-transcription intermediary factor (TIF) 1-γ antibody, and anti-small ubiquitin like modifier activating enzyme (SAE) antibody] play important roles in the pathogenesis of malignancy associated DM. Revealing the role of DM specific autoantibodies in the development of malignant tumors in DM patients can provide important evidence for accurately assessing the risk of developing malignant tumors in DM patients, and also provide new ideas for clinical diagnosis of DM and precise treatment.

Clinical value of chemiluminescence method for detection of antinuclear antibody profiles

BACKGROUND

Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are crucial in diagnosing autoimmune diseases, mainly systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This study aimed to compare the performance of chemiluminescence assay (CLIA) and line immunoassay (LIA) in detecting ANAs in patients with autoimmune diseases, evaluate their diagnostic accuracy for SLE, and develop a novel diagnostic model using CLIA-detected antibodies for SLE. Specimens from patients with autoimmune diseases and physical examination specimens were collected to parallel detect specific antibodies. Individual antibodies' diagnostic performance and a model combining multiple antibodies were assessed. The findings provide valuable insights into improving the diagnosis of SLE through innovative approaches.

AIM

To compare the performance of CLIA and LIA in detecting ANAs in patients with autoimmune diseases, assess their accuracy for SLE, and develop a novel diagnostic model using CLIA-detected antibodies for SLE.

METHODS

Specimens have been obtained from 270 patients with clinically diagnosed autoimmune disorders, as well as 130 physical examination specimens. After that, parallel detection of anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibody, anti-histone (Histone) antibody, anti-nucleosome (Nuc) antibody, anti-Smith (Sm) antibody, anti-ribosomal P protein (Rib-P) antibody, anti-sicca syndrome A (Ro60) antibody, anti-sicca syndrome A (Ro52) antibody, anti-sicca syndrome (SSB) antibody, anti-centromere protein B (Cenp-B) antibody, anti-DNA topoisomerase 1 (Scl-70) antibody, anti-histidyl tRNA synthetase (Jo-1) antibody, and anti-mitochondrial M2 (AMA-M2) antibody was performed using CLIA and LIA. The detection rates, compliance rates, and diagnostic performance for SLE were compared between the two methodologies, followed by developing a novel diagnostic model for SLE.

RESULTS

CLIA and LIA exhibited essentially comparable detection rates for anti-dsDNA antibody, anti-Histone antibody, anti-Nuc antibody, anti-Sm antibody, anti-Rib-P antibody, anti-Ro60 antibody, anti-Ro52 antibody, anti-SSB antibody, anti-Cenp-B antibody, anti-DNAScl-70 antibody, anti-Jo-1 antibody and anti-AMA-M2 antibody (P > 0.05). The two methods displayed identical results for the detection of anti-dsDNA antibody, anti-Histone antibody, anti-Nuc antibody, anti-Sm antibody, anti-Ro60 antibody, anti-Ro52 antibody, anti-SSB antibody, anti-Cenp-B antibody, anti-Scl-70 antibody, and anti-AMA-M2 antibody (Kappa > 0.7, P < 0.05), but showed a moderate agreement for the detection of anti-Rib-P antibody and anti-Jo-1 antibody (Kappa = 0.671 and 0.665; P < 0.05). In addition, the diagnostic performance of these antibodies detected by both methods was similar for SLE. The diagnostic model's area under the curve values, sensitivity, and specificity, including an anti-dsDNA antibody and an anti-Ro60 antibody detected by CLIA, were 0.997, 0.962, and 0.978, respectively. These values were higher than the diagnostic performance of individual antibodies.

CONCLUSION

CLIA and LIA demonstrated excellent overall consistency in detecting ANA profiles. A diagnostic model based on CLIA-detected antibodies can successfully contribute to developing a novel technique for detecting SLE.

Profiling of Myositis Specific Antibodies and Composite Scores as an Aid in the Differential Diagnosis of Autoimmune Myopathies

(1) Background: Myositis specific antibodies (MSA) represent important diagnostic and stratification tools in idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM) patients. Here we aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of MSA profiled by a novel particle based multi-analyte technology (PMAT) in IIM and subsets thereof. (2) Methods: 264 IIM patients and 200 controls were tested for MSA using PMAT (Inova Diagnostics, research use only). Diagnostic performance was analyzed and composite scores were generated. (3) Results: The sensitivity/specificity of the individual MSA were: 19.7%/100% (Jo-1), 7.2%/100.0% (Mi-2), 3.0%/99.0% (NXP2), 3.8%/100.0% (SAE), 2.7%/100.0% (PL-7), 1.9%/99.5 (PL-12), 1.1%/100.0% (EJ), 15.5%/99.5% (TIF1γ), 8.3%/98.5% (MDA5), 6.1%/99.0% (HMGCR) and 1.9%/98.5% (SRP). Of all IIM patients, 180/264 tested positive for at least one of the MSAs. In the individual control group, 12/200 (6.0%) tested positive for at least one MSA, most of which had levels close to the cut-off (except one SRP and one PL-12). Only 6/264 (2.3%) IIM patients were positive for more than one antibody (MDA5/HMGCR, EJ/PL-7, 2 x MDA5/TIF1γ, EJ/SAE, SAE/TIF1γ). The overall sensitivity was 68.2% paired with a specificity of 94.0%, leading to an odds ratio of 33.8. The composite scores showed good discrimination between subgroups (e.g., anti-synthetase syndrome). (4) Conclusion: MSA, especially when combined in composite scores (here measured by PMAT), provide value in stratification of patients with IIM.