1
|
Kudelka J, Ollenschläger M, Dodel R, Eskofier BM, Hobert MA, Jahn K, Klucken J, Labeit B, Polidori MC, Prell T, Warnecke T, von Arnim CAF, Maetzler W, Jacobs AH. Which Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) instruments are currently used in Germany: a survey. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:347. [PMID: 38627620 PMCID: PMC11022468 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-04913-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) records geriatric syndromes in a standardized manner, allowing individualized treatment tailored to the patient's needs and resources. Its use has shown a beneficial effect on the functional outcome and survival of geriatric patients. A recently published German S1 guideline for level 2 CGA provides recommendations for the use of a broad variety of different assessment instruments for each geriatric syndrome. However, the actual use of assessment instruments in routine geriatric clinical practice and its consistency with the guideline and the current state of literature has not been investigated to date. METHODS An online survey was developed by an expert group of geriatricians and sent to all licenced geriatricians (n = 569) within Germany. The survey included the following geriatric syndromes: motor function and self-help capability, cognition, depression, pain, dysphagia and nutrition, social status and comorbidity, pressure ulcers, language and speech, delirium, and frailty. Respondents were asked to report which geriatric assessment instruments are used to assess the respective syndromes. RESULTS A total of 122 clinicians participated in the survey (response rate: 21%); after data cleaning, 76 data sets remained for analysis. All participants regularly used assessment instruments in the following categories: motor function, self-help capability, cognition, depression, and pain. The most frequently used instruments in these categories were the Timed Up and Go (TUG), the Barthel Index (BI), the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Limited or heterogenous assessments are used in the following categories: delirium, frailty and social status. CONCLUSIONS Our results show that the assessment of motor function, self-help capability, cognition, depression, pain, and dysphagia and nutrition is consistent with the recommendations of the S1 guideline for level 2 CGA. Instruments recommended for more frequent use include the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and the WHO-5 (depression). There is a particular need for standardized assessment of delirium, frailty and social status. The harmonization of assessment instruments throughout geriatric departments shall enable more effective treatment and prevention of age-related diseases and syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Kudelka
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Kiel, 24105, Germany
| | - Malte Ollenschläger
- Department of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (AIBE), Machine Learning and Data Analytics Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Molecular Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Richard Dodel
- Chair of Geriatric Medicine, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Bjoern M Eskofier
- Department of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (AIBE), Machine Learning and Data Analytics Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus A Hobert
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Kiel, 24105, Germany
| | - Klaus Jahn
- Schön Klinik Bad Aibling, Neurology and Geriatrics, Bad Aibling, Germany
- German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders (DSGZ), Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU) of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jochen Klucken
- Department of Molecular Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
- Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Esch-Sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
- Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), Strassen, Luxembourg
- Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg (CHL), Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Bendix Labeit
- Department of Neurology With Institute of Translational Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - M Cristina Polidori
- Ageing Clinical Research, Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- CECAD, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Tino Prell
- Department of Geriatrics, Halle University Hospital, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Tobias Warnecke
- Department of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, Klinikum Osnabrueck - Academic teaching hospital of the University of Muenster, Osnabrueck, Germany
| | | | - Walter Maetzler
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Kiel, 24105, Germany.
| | - Andreas H Jacobs
- Department of Geriatrics & Neurology, Johanniter Hospital Bonn, Johanniter Strasse 1-3, Bonn, 53113, Germany.
- Centre for Integrated Oncology (CIO) of the University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging (EIMI) of the Westfälische Wilhelms University (WWU), Münster, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Y, Du W, Yang X, Yan J, Sun W, Bai J, Zhou J, Zhou A, Niu J, Li C, Wang J. Diagnosis and differential diagnosis flow diagram of Chinese post-stroke aphasia types and treatment of post-stroke aphasia. Aging Med (Milton) 2021; 4:325-336. [PMID: 34964014 PMCID: PMC8711225 DOI: 10.1002/agm2.12183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
This review aimed to explore the concept, etiology, classification, classical cortical mapping, assessment, diagnosis and differential diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, mechanism, recovery, prognosis, and influencing factors for Chinese post-stroke aphasia (PSA). The review emphasized the necessity and significance of neuroimaging assessment of brain and blood vessels and neuropsychological assessment in diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Chinese PSA. In addition, it suggested and recommended to use "dichotomies of internal and external, and anterior and posterior" as a starting point, based on the anatomic location of brain and blood vessels and their relationship with language area and language disorder. As a result, the formulated Chinese PSA classification was more suitable to guide the clinical treatment of cerebral stroke. Diagnosis, classification, and differential diagnosis of Chinese PSA types were performed according to the "dichotomy" and "four elements." The formulated "flow diagram" enabled to determine the classification of Chinese PSA types. It was beneficial for patients to establish targeted and individualized rehabilitation training plans. This review introduced the use of memantine, piracetam, donepezil, etc. in PSA treatment, evaluated clinical studies conducted in China and abroad, investigated the mechanism of action related to the use of drugs in PSA treatment, and explored the therapeutic mechanism of rehabilitation training. It suggested the use drugs of memantine, piracetam, donepezil, etc. combine with non-pharmacotherapy and rehabilitation training in clinical studies on PSA treatment and also in practical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinhua Wang
- Department of NeurologyPeking University First HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Wanliang Du
- Department of NeurologyBeijing Tiantan HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Xiaona Yang
- Department of Neurology & PsychiatryBeijing Shijitan HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Jun Yan
- NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University)National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital)Peking University Sixth HospitalPeking University Institute of Mental HealthBeijingChina
| | - Wei Sun
- Department of NeurologyPeking University First HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Jing Bai
- Department of NeurologyPeking University First HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Jiong Zhou
- Department of NeurologyThe Second Affiliated HospitalSchool of MedicineZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
| | - Aihong Zhou
- Department of NeurologyXuanwu HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Jianping Niu
- Department of NeurologyThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen Medical CollegeXiamenChina
| | - Chuanling Li
- Department of NeurologyXuzhou Central HospitalXuzhouChina
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of PsychologyGuang’anmen HospitalBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|