Stent insertion for inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Comparison of radioactive and normal stenting

Radioactive stent versus normal stent insertion for inoperable malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the comparative efficacy and safety of radioactive stents versus normal metal stents for the management of malignant biliary obstruction (MBO).

METHODS

A comprehensive search of databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase was conducted to identify pertinent studies up to June 2024. The primary focus of this meta-analysis is on stent patency, postoperative survival, and the incidence of complications.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of complications, such as bleeding (p = 0.32), cholangitis (P = 0.19), pancreatitis (P = 0.43), and cholecystitis (P = 0.99), between the two types of stents. However, the radioactive stent demonstrated a significant improvement in both stent patency time (HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.50-0.73; P < 0.001) and patient survival time (HR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.53-0.74, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that radioactive stents could present a more effective option compared to traditional stents for palliative management of malignant biliary obstruction, resulting in prolonged stent patency and potentially enhancing survival rates.

Endoscopic Stenting of a Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stent with a Hole in Each Cavity in Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction: A Preclinical Proof-of-Concept Study and Initial Human Experience

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Stent placement for biliary drainage in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) has been a topic of long-standing debate, and the best approach remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and removability of multi-hole fully covered self-expandable metal stents (MH-FCSEMSs) in a preclinical experiment using swine hilar bile duct obstruction (HBDO) models and to assess the feasibility and safety of stent placement in patients with MHBO.

METHODS

Three minipigs underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-guided endobiliary-radio frequency ablation (EB-RFA) to establish Bismuth type II hilar bile duct stenosis models. Four weeks after EB-RFA, 10-mm diameter and 4-cm length MH-FCSEMSs were endoscopically inserted into the left intrahepatic bile duct of the models. Stent patency and migration, as well as adverse events including cholangitis and endoscopic stent removability, were assessed three months after stent placement. Additionally, clinical applications of MH-FCSEMS were performed in two patients with MHBO to determine feasibility, safety, and stent patency.

RESULTS

MH-FCSEMSs were successfully inserted into the left main intrahepatic bile duct and common hepatic duct of the models under ERCP in all three animals without any technical difficulties. Cholangiograms performed 12 weeks after MH-FCSEMS placement showed no stent migration, and all were successfully removed from the animal models. The functional success rate, defined as a decrease in serum total bilirubin level of more than 50% at 12 weeks after stent placement, was 100%. Moreover, MH-FCSEMSs were successfully inserted in two patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. The procedures were technically feasible, and no major periprocedural complications were noted.

CONCLUSION

The preliminary long-term results of both preclinical and clinical pilot studies suggest that endoscopic biliary drainage using MH-FCSEMS may be a safe and effective treatment option for stenting and stent revision in the management of HBDO. Further studies comparing clinical outcomes to those of MH-FCSEMS without multi-hole in malignant hilar biliary obstruction will be needed to verify the clinical benefits.

Stent Insertion for Inoperable Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Comparison Between Unilateral Radioactive Stent and Bilateral Normal Stent

OBJECTIVE

To comparatively analyze the clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral radioactive stent (RS) insertion versus bilateral normal stent (NS) insertion in patients with inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with inoperable HC were treated in our hospital from January 2016 to December 2020. The treatment approach included the insertion of either unilateral RS or bilateral NS, evaluating the efficacy and safety of therapy in 2 distinct groups.

RESULTS

A total of 58 individuals experienced the insertion of a unilateral RS, whereas 57 patients underwent the insertion of bilateral NS. No statistically significant difference between the unilateral RS and bilateral NS groups was seen in the technical success rates (98.3% vs 94.7%, P = 0.598) and clinical success rates (98.2% vs 100%, P = 0.514). While there is no statistically significant difference in the rates of stent restenosis (19.3% vs 9.3%, P = 0.132) between the two groups, the unilateral RS group demonstrated substantially longer stent patency (202 vs 119 d, P = 0.016) and overall survival (229 vs 122 d, P = 0.004) compared with the bilateral NS group. Moreover, 8 patients (14.0%) in the unilateral RS group and 14 patients (25.9%) in the bilateral NS group had postoperative complications with no significant difference ( P = 0.116).

CONCLUSION

When inserting stents for inoperable HC, both unilateral RS and bilateral NS insertion procedures have demonstrated favorable therapeutic efficacy. Nevertheless, inserting a unilateral RS provided a longer duration of stent patency and overall survival than implantation of bilateral NS.

Comparison of intraluminal brachytherapy combined with and without stent placement for treatment of obstructive jaundice induced by tumor thrombus

PURPOSE

To compare the safety and efficacy of intraluminal brachytherapy with iodine-125 (125I) seed strand implantation combined with and without stent placement to treat patients with obstructive jaundice induced by tumor thrombus.

METHODS

Between January 2018 and June 2022, 42 patients with malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ) induced by tumor thrombus were included. 20 patients received 125I seed strand implantation and stent placement (group A). The remaining 22 patients, implanted 125I seed strands only, served as control (group B). The two groups' overall survival and jaundice-free survival were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, the mean survival time of group A was 38.0 ± 4.1 months (95%CI, 30.0-46.1 months), while that of group B was 25.1 ± 2.8 (95% CI, 19.5-30.6 months) (p = 0.406). The mean survival rates of 12 months for all patients, group A, and group B was 66.7%, 65%, and 68%, respectively. The mean jaundice-free survival of group A and group B were 34.0 ± 3.6 months (95% CI, 27.9-41.2months) and 22.9 ± 2.7 months (95%CI, 17.5-28.2months) (p = 0.254), respectively. Two PTBD drainage tube infection cases occurred in group A and group B separately.

CONCLUSIONS

125I intraluminal brachytherapy is an effective and safe therapy for treating patients with obstructive jaundice induced by tumor thrombus.

Radioactive stent insertion for inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Introduction

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) is the leading cause of hilar biliary obstruction. Radioactive stent insertion has been utilized extensively for inoperable HC patients.

Aim

To assess the relative clinical outcomes of inoperable HC patients who underwent either normal or radioactive stent insertion.

Material and methods

This single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label study enrolled 90 inoperable HC patients from April 2021 to March 2022 and randomly assigned them to normal or radioactive stent groups (n = 45/group), with clinical data then being compared between these groups.

Results

Technical success rates in the normal and radioactive stent insertion groups were 93.3% and 97.9%, respectively (p = 1.000), and clinical success rates were similarly consistent in both groups (95.3% vs. 97.7%, p = 0.983). Individuals in the radioactive stent group exhibited significantly longer median stent patency as compared to the normal stent group (195 days vs. 115 days, p < 0.001), and median overall survival (OS) was also significantly increased in the normal stent group (242 days vs. 125 days, p = 0.002). In the normal stent insertion group, 6 (14.3%) and 5 (11.9%) patients experienced early and late postoperative complications, respectively. Additionally, early and late postoperative complications impacted 7 (16.3%) and 8 (18.6%) patients in the radioactive stent insertion group, respectively. Complication rates were comparable in these 2 patient groups.

Conclusions

Radioactive stent insertion represents a safe and effective strategy for patients with inoperable HC, potentially contributing to prolonged stent patency and OS relative to normal stent insertion.

Outcomes of two types of iodine-125 seed delivery with metal stents in treating malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To conduct a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of two types of iodine-125 (I-125) seed delivery with metal stents (the study group) versus conventional metal stents (the control group) in patients with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO).

METHODS

Our team systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant studies published from January 2012 up to July 2021. Survival time and stent dysfunction were the primary measured outcomes. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to the type of I-125 seed delivery.

RESULTS

Eleven studies, including 1057 patients in total, were pooled for stent dysfunction. The study group showed a lower risk of stent dysfunction than the control group [odds ratio (OR): 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.81, P = 0.001]. The pooled results of six studies reporting overall survival (OS) showed that the study group had a better survival outcome than the control group [hazard ratio (HR): 0.34, 95% CI: 0.28-0.42, P < 0.001]. In the subgroup analyses, the I-125 seed stent group had significantly less stent dysfunction than the control group (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.31-0.76, P = 0.002). Meanwhile, the metal stents + I-125 radioactive seed strand group showed significantly more improvement in OS than the control group (HR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.26-0.42, P < 0.001). Moreover, our analysis suggests that using I-125 seeds did not result in increasing related adverse events compared with using metal stents alone (all P > 0.05). The study group was significantly superior to the control group, with better survival and decreased stent dysfunction. Meanwhile, the delivery of I-125 seeds did not increase adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The delivery of I-125 with metal stents may be considered a preferable technique for MBO.