Efficiency of minimal oblique resection of the uncinate process during an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Preoperative Radiographic Simulation for Partial Uncinate Process Resection during Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion to Achieve Adequate Foraminal Decompression and Prevention of Vertebral Artery Injury

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective radiographic study.

PURPOSE

This study aims to demonstrate the proper resection trajectory of a partial posterior uncinate process resection combined with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and evaluate whether foraminal stenosis or uncinate process degeneration increases the risk of vertebral artery (VA) injury.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Appropriate resection trajectory that could result in sufficient decompression and avoid vertebral artery injury is yet unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent cervical magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography angiography for preoperative ACDF evaluation. The segments were classified according to the presence of foraminal stenosis. The height, thickness, anteroposterior length, horizontal distance from the uncinate process to the VA, and vertical distance from the uncinate process baseline to the VA of the uncinate process were measured. The distance between the uncinate anterior margin and the resection trajectory (UAM-to-RT) was measured.

RESULTS

There were no VA injuries or root injuries among the 101 patients who underwent ACDF (163 segments, mean age of 56.3±12.2). Uncinate anteroposterior length was considerably longer in foramens with foraminal stenosis, whereas uncinate process height, thickness, and distance between the uncinate process and VA were not significantly associated with foraminal stenosis. There were no significant differences in radiographic parameters based on uncinate degeneration. The UAM-to-RT distances for adequate decompression were 1.6±1.4 mm (range, 0-4.8 mm), 3.4±1.7 mm (range, 0-7.1 mm), 4.0±1.7 mm (range, 0-9.0 mm), and 4.5±1.2 mm (range, 2.5-7.5 mm) for C3-C4, C4-C5, C5-C6, and C6-C7, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

More than half of the uncinate process in the anteroposterior plane should be removed for adequate neural foramen decompression. Foraminal stenosis or uncinate degeneration did not alter the relative anatomy of the uncinate process and the VA and did not impact VA injury risk.

Feasibility of total and partial uncinectomy during anterior cervical approach: MRI-based analysis of 176 patients regarding vertebral artery location

PURPOSE

To determine the technical feasibility of uncinate process (UP) resection (uncinectomy) during anterior cervical approach with risk-avoidance of vertebral artery (VA) injury.

METHODS

One hundred and seventy-six magnetic resonance imaging images with cervical spondylosis were evaluated. The diameter between UP and VA (UP-VA distance), the presence of a fat plane, and the VA's anterior-posterior position relative to UP (anterior[A], middle[M], posterior[P]) at C3-4 to C6-7 segments were investigated. Subsequently, easy-to-use classifications were developed according to the feasibility of total and partial uncinectomy. Total uncinectomy: easy (distance: > 2 mm); moderate (distance: ≤ 2 and fat plane: +); advanced (no fat plane). Partial uncinectomy: easy (distance: > 2 mm and P, A, or M position); moderate (distance: ≤ 2; fat plane: + and P position), and advanced (no fat plane and P position).

RESULTS

UP-VA distance of C5-6 on the right side (left/right: 0.41/0.31 mm) was the smallest. The ratio of no fat plane of C5-6 (46.6%/49.4%) was the highest. C5-6 had a high rate of P position (7.4%/8.5%) while C6-7 had a high rate of A position (19.3%/18.2%). More than 90% individuals were classified as easy for partial uncinectomy at any vertebral segment (C3-7), while more than 30% were classified as advanced at C4-7 with the highest rate at C5-6 for total uncinectomy.

CONCLUSION

When performing uncinectomy during the anterior cervical approach, the C5-6 segment may be at the greatest risk of VA injury. Hence, preoperative MR images should be thoroughly evaluated to avoid VA injury.

Effect of Anterior Cervical Decompression Fusion and Partial Resection of Uncinate Vertebra Joint on Cervical Sagittal Sequence in Patients with Non-Single-Segment Radiculopathy and its Correlation with Curative Effect: A Retrospective Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Analyze the effect of preservation or resection of the partial uncinate joint on the sagittal sequence of the cervical vertebrae in patients with non-single-segment radiculopathy and the correlation between the sagittal sequence of the cervical vertebrae and the long-term effect after surgery, we explored whether it is necessary to perform partial resection of the uncinate joint in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy undergoing anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

The study retrospectively analyzed 96 patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy with more than two segments from August 2016 to January 2021, who underwent ACDF (ACDF group, 45 patients) or ACDF combined with partial uncinate joint resection (ACDF + UT group, 51 patients). Partial resection of the uncinate joint indicated removal of part of the uncinate joint and osteophyte based on the compression of the nerve root during surgery, whereas the uncinate joints in the ACDF group were retained completely. The imaging data and functional scores of the two groups were recorded before surgery, 1 month after surgery, and at the last follow-up. A paired t-test or rank sum test was applied to analyze the data. In addition, the correlation between the imaging parameters and functional scores was validated using the Pearson's test.

RESULTS

All 96 patients successfully completed the surgery and were followed up for at least 12 months, with an average follow-up time of 14 months. At the last follow-up, the pain visual analog scale (VAS), neck disability index (NDI), and neck pain and disability scale (NPAD) scores of the two groups were significantly lower than those before surgery, and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score was significantly higher than that before surgery. At the last follow-up, compared with the ACDF+UT group, the NDI and NPAD scores in the ACDF group decreased more significantly (p < 0.05), and C2-7SVA, △C2-7SVA (the difference between C2-7 SVA at last follow-up and before operation), and T1S values decreased significantly (p < 0.05). The C2-7 Cobb angle was positively correlated with the JOA score and T1S (p < 0.05) and negatively correlated with the VAS, NDI, and NPAD scores and CGH-C7SVA (p < 0.05). C2-7SVA was positively correlated with CGH-C7SVA and T1S (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with non-single-segmental cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and ACDF with or without uncinate joint resection can have effective improvement in the clinical effect and sagittal balance; however, partial uncinate joint resection has a certain negative impact on the long-term reconstruction of sagittal balance and long-term effects in patients after surgery.

Effect of ACDF combined with different degrees of partial resection of uncovertebral joints on cervical stability and degeneration: a three-dimensional finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the influence of the resection of different amounts of the uncovertebral joints on the stability of the cervical spine by comparing and analyzing the stress distribution and peak displacement characteristics of the internal fixation structures and endplates.

METHODS

After obtaining the CT data of a 34-year-old male healthy cervical spine, a three-dimensional finite element model was established and verified. The three-dimensional finite element method was used to establish the models of anterior cervical compression fusion and internal fixation surgical implants and anterior cervical compression fusion and internal fixation combined with the partial resection of different amounts of the unilateral or bilateral uncovertebral joints. The models were tested under six working conditions: flexion, extension, left bending, right bending, left rotation, and right rotation. The surgical models were compared regarding the stress distribution of the titanium mesh, titanium plate and screw, and endplate, and the peak displacement of the vertebral body.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the stress distribution and peak displacement of the vertebral body of ACDF combined with different amounts of uncovertebral joint resection in the states of flexion and extension. However, there were significant increases in the stress distribution and peak displacement of the vertebral body in the states of left and right bending and rotation. In the states of left and right bending and rotation, the stress distribution and peak displacement of the vertebral body were significantly greater in the models with bilateral partial resection of the uncovertebral joints than in the models with unilateral partial resection of the uncovertebral joints. Bilateral resection of the uncovertebral joints by 30-40% and unilateral resection of the uncovertebral joints by 40-50% resulted in the greatest increases in the maximum stress distribution of the titanium plate and screw and the peak displacement of the vertebral body.

CONCLUSION

Finite element analysis of the biomechanical changes in the cervical spine showed that anterior cervical compression fusion and internal fixation combined with bilateral resection of less than 30% of the uncovertebral joints or unilateral resection of less than 40% of the uncovertebral joints had little effect on the stability of the cervical spine.

The Échancrure of the Uncovertebral Joint: A Forgotten Structure of the C3-C7 Cervical Vertebral Bodies

Introduction The échancrure (a French term meaning "indentation") of the cervical vertebrae is the poorly defined articular part on the inferolateral aspect of the cervical spine body, which, with the uncinate processes of the associated caudal vertebra, makes up the joints of Luschka (uncovertebral joint). With no known previous studies on the échancrure, the present anatomical study aimed to better elucidate this structure, its prevalence, and its relationships to the adjacent intervertebral foramen and uncinate process. Methods We observed 50 adult cervical spines (100 sides) for the presence of an énchancrure. When an énchancrure was identified, its morphometry was documented and photographed. Measurements included the width and height of the énchancrure. The relationship with the adjacent uncinate process was also studied. Any correlation between the size and shape of the adjacent uncinate process and the énchancrure was recorded. Results Anénchancrure was found at all levels of the cervical vertebrae except at C1 and C7 and was clearly visible on 88% of the sides. The énchancrure, more or less, conformed to the reciprocal shape of the uncinate process, which was found on all sides. The shapes were roughly arched, ovoid, or linear. These structures were always in an anterolateral position on the body of the vertebra and just outside the apophyseal ring. The mean height of the énchancrure was 2.1 mm. The length of the uncinate process correlated positively (r=0.8) to the size of the adjacent énchancrure. The height of the énchancrure was inversely related to the diameter of the adjacent intervertebral foramen. The mean width was 8.3 mm. These structures tended to be largest at C3 and C4 vertebral levels and were smallest at C5 and C6 levels. The énchancrure was most in contact with the uncinate process with lateral flexion of the cervical spine and in specimens with a longer uncinate process, e.g., C6. The énchancrure was also found to be wider in cases of cervical spine degeneration involving the body of the cervical vertebrae. Degeneration of the uncovertebral joint was most often seen at the énchancrure and not at the adjacent uncinate process. Conclusions We found that the énchancrure is found in the majority of cervical spines. These structures tended to be largest at C3 and C4 vertebral levels and were smallest at C5 and C6 levels, and they had more prominence when the adjacent uncinate process was enlarged. The énchancrure should be considered a normal feature of the inferolateral aspect of the cervical vertebrae. Future clinical studies are necessary to better elucidate their functional significance.

Safety and Efficacy of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Uncinate Process Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

This is a meta-analysis and systematic review of the available literature.

OBJECTIVE

In the case of severe foraminal stenosis, conducting uncinate process resection (UPR) during ACDF could achieve complete nerve root decompression and significant relief of neurological symptoms for CR. However, there is some controversy regarding its necessity and safety. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of ACDF with UPR and ACDF.

METHODS

The following electronic databases were searched: Medline, PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Evidence Based Medicine Reviews, VIP, and CNKI. And the following data items were considered: baseline demographics, efficacy evaluation indicators, radiographic outcome, and surgical details.

RESULTS

10 studies were finally identified, including 746 patients who underwent ACDF with UPR compared to 729 patients who underwent ACDF. The group of ACDF with UPR had statistically longer intraoperative time (95% CI: 4.83, 19.77, P = .001) and more intraoperative blood loss (95% CI: 12.23, 17.76, P < .001). ACDF with UPR obtained a significantly better improvement of Arm VAS at postoperative first follow-up (95% CI: -1.85, -.14 P = .02). There was no significant difference found in improvement of Neck VAS at postoperative latest follow-up (95% CI: -.88, .27, P = .30), improvement of Arm VAS at postoperative latest follow-up (95% CI: -.59, -.01, P = .05), improvement of NDI (95% CI: -2.34, .33, P = .14), JOA (95% CI: -.24, .43, P = .56), change of C2-C7 lordosis (95% CI: -.87, 1.33, P = .68), C2-C7 SVA (95% CI: -.73, 5.08, P = .14), T1 slope (95% CI: -2.25, 1.51, P = .70), and fusion rate (95% CI: .83, 1.90 P = .29).

CONCLUSION

ACDF with UPR is an effective and necessary surgical method for CR patients with severe foraminal stenosis.