Incidents and risk factors of biliary complications after orthotropic liver transplantation

Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signs of Chronic Liver Rejection: A Case-Control Study

OBJECTIVE

In liver transplantation, chronic rejection is still poorly studied. This study aimed to investigate the role of imaging in its recognition.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective observational case-control series. Patients with histologic diagnosis of chronic liver transplant rejection were selected; the last imaging examination (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging) before the diagnosis was evaluated. At least 3 controls were selected for each case; radiological signs indicative of altered liver function were analyzed. χ 2 Test with Yates correction was used to compare the rates of radiologic signs in the case and control groups, also considering whether patients suffered chronic rejection within or after 12 months. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.050.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients were included in the study (27 in the case group and 91 in the control group). Periportal edema was appreciable in 19 of 27 cases (70%) and in 6 of 91 controls (4%) ( P < 0.001); ascites and hepatomegaly were present in 14 of 27 cases (52%) and 12 of 27 cases (44%), respectively, and in 1 of 91 controls (1%) ( P < 0.001); splenomegaly was present in 13 of 27 cases (48%) and in 8 of 91 controls (10%) ( P < 0.001); and biliary tract dilatation was present in 13 of 27 cases (48%) and in 11 of 91 patients controls (5%) ( P < 0.001). In the controls, periportal edema was significantly less frequent beyond 12 months after transplant (1% vs 11%; P = 0.020); the other signs after 12 months were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The identification of periportal edema, biliary dilatation, ascites, and hepatosplenomegaly can serve as potential warning signs of ongoing chronic liver rejection. It is especially important to investigate periportal edema if it is present 1 year or more after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Choledochoduodenostomy continues to be a safe alternative for biliary reconstruction in deceased-donor liver transplantation

Debate continues as to whether choledochoduodenostomy (CDD) can be used instead of Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy (CDJ) when duct-to-duct (DTD) is not an option. We hypothesized that CDD and CDJ had similar rates of complications. All deceased-donor liver transplantations from September 2011 to March 2020 were categorized by biliary reconstruction. Primary outcomes were bleeding, bile leak, anastomotic stricture, and cholangitis. Of the 1,086 patients, 812 (74.8%) received a DTD; 225 (20.7%) received a CDD; and 49 (4.5%) received a CDJ. Cholangitis was significantly higher in CDJ compared to DTD and CDD (26.5% vs 6% vs 13.8%, p < 0.0001). When controlling for significant confounders, CDJ had 10.2 higher odds of cholangitis (95% CI 4.4-23.2) compared to DTD, and 3.3 higher odds compared to CDD (95% CI 1.4-7.8). When compared to DTD, CDJ and CDD had significantly lower odds of stricture. CDD continues to be a safe alternative for biliary reconstruction in deceased-donor liver transplantation.

Concurrent Change in Serum Cholinesterase Activity and Midregional-Proadrennomedullin Level Could Predict Patient Outcome following Liver Transplantation

Background: After liver transplantation (LTX), patients are susceptible to opportunistic infections resulting in reduced outcomes within the early post-transplantation period. The postoperative monitoring of LTX patients has gained much importance in recent years. However, reliable plasmatic markers predicting 90-day outcomes are still lacking. Methods: In the post hoc analysis of a prospective, observational study, butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM), as well as conventional inflammatory markers (procalcitonin, C-reactive protein) were evaluated in 93 patients at seven consecutive timepoints within the first 28 days following LTX. Results: Persistently reduced activity of BChE and elevated MR-proADM levels indicated reduced 90-day survival following LTX. Furthermore, reduced BChE and increased MR-proADM activity could indicate early post-transplantation bacterial infections, whereas conventional inflammatory biomarkers showed no diagnostic efficacy within the observation period. Conclusion: Concurrent assessment of BChE and MR-proADM activity might serve as a bedside diagnostic tool for early bacterial infections following liver transplantation. Thus, a combined utilization of the two biomarkers may be a useful tool in the risk evaluation of patients following liver transplantation.