Early outcomes of endoscopic endonasal approach pituitary adenomas resection with minimal nasal injury

Comparison of Sinonasal Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Uni-nostril and Bi-nostril Endoscopic Trans-sphenoidal Excision of Pituitary Adenomas: A Prospective Study

Background  Prospective studies comparing quality-of-life and olfaction in patients undergoing endoscopic uni-nostril versus bi-nostril trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery have not been published. Methods  We prospectively compared olfaction and quality-of-life at baseline and at 3 to 6 months follow-up using the Anterior Skull Base Nasal Inventory-12 (ASK-12) questionnaire, composite olfaction score, and Lund-Kennedy Endoscopic Score (LKES) in 43 patients who underwent endoscopic excision of pituitary adenoma with either a uni-nostril (24 patients) or a bi-nostril (19 patients) approach. Results  Baseline data for both groups were comparable. In the uni-nostril group, ASK-12 and LKES scores were not significantly different at follow-up when compared with the preoperative scores. In the bi-nostril group, there was a significant postoperative worsening of ASK-12 scores (mean: 3.2 vs. 5.3; p  = 0.04) and the LKES (mean: 2.9 vs. 6.6; p  = 0.01). Composite olfaction score was not significantly affected postoperatively with either approach. Nasal complications were also more in the bi-nostril group (5/18, 27.8% vs. 1/23, 4.3%) but this was not statistically significant ( p  = 0.07). Conclusion  Both approaches preserve olfactory function but the uni-nostril approach is associated with better postoperative quality-of-life and endoscopic scores and subjective olfaction outcomes. At least in short term, the postoperative morbidity is higher in the bi-nostril approach compared with the uni-nostril approach. Although preference for a particular approach is related to a surgeon's preference, preoperative counselling of the patients regarding sinonasal morbidity is important.

Intradural fat graft packing is not indispensable in preventing postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage in endoscopic endonasal pituitary adenoma surgeries

Objectives

Is intradural fat graft packing indispensable in preventing postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage in endoscopic endonasal pituitary adenoma surgeries? This study aimed to review the methods and outcomes of our graded sellar floor reconstruction strategy without fat graft packing in endoscopic endonasal pituitary adenoma surgeries.

Methods

From March 2018 to December 2022, 200 patients underwent endoscopic endonasal pituitary adenoma resection by a single author in our institute. We applied different graded skull base reconstruction strategies in different periods. Intradural fat graft packing was used to reconstruct the skull base in the early period, from March 2018 to June 2019, but fat graft was not used in the late period, from January 2020 to December 2022. The effect of these different graded skull base reconstruction strategies and whether intradural fat graft packing is necessary were evaluated by observing the incidence of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak.

Results

In the early period, fat graft was used to reconstruct skull base when the intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage existed. There were two patients who suffered from postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak in this group. In the late period, fat graft was not used to reconstruct the skull base, and no patient suffered from postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage in this group.

Conclusions

Intradural fat graft packing is unnecessary in the endoscopic endonasal pituitary adenoma resection. The outcome of our graded sellar floor reconstruction strategy is satisfactory.

Analysis of neuroendoscopy for the treatment of macroadenomas and giant pituitary adenomas

Objective

This study investigated the use and effectiveness of endoscopic transnasal, transsphenoidal surgery, a minimally invasive method for the treatment of macroadenomas and giant pituitary a denomas, in a medical setting. The surgical results of 429 patients who received neuroendoscopic treatment of macroadenomas or giant pituitary adenomas were evaluated, and the experiences and lessons learned from treatment complications were assessed.

Patients and methods

From January 2012 to December 2021, 429 patients with macroadenomas or giant pituitary adenomas, including 60 patients with giant adenomas (diameter ≥4 cm) and 369 patients with macroadenomas (diameter 1–4 cm), received a 3D head CT, a MRI with contrast enhancement, and an endocrinology examination prior to surgery. Preoperative clinical and radiological features, visual measurements, hormone levels, length of stay, length of surgery, postoperative stay, visual and hormone outcomes, resection range, complication and recurrence rates, and routine patient information were recorded. The patients were followed up for 6–72 months (median = 40 months).

Results

Of 429 patients with macroadenomas or giant pituitary adenomas who received neuroendoscopic treatment, 348 (81.12%) had gross-total resections (GTR), 53 (12.35%) had near-total resections (NTR), and 28 (6.53%) had subtotal resections. There were 138 cases of post-operative diabetes insipidus (32.17%), including 7 cases of permanent diabetes insipidus (1.63%), 16 cases of nasal hemorrhage (3.73%), 39 cases of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage (9.09%), 4 cases of intracranial infection (0.9%), 16 cases of hypophysis (3.7%), and 15 cases of anosmia (3.50%). The clinical symptoms and endocrinology indices of the patients improved after surgery, and all patients were discharged 5–18 days (8.36 ± 2.65) postop.

Conclusion

Neuroendoscopy is a safe operation with a short recovery period and hospital stay and is thus an effective method to treat macroadenomas and giant pituitary adenomas. Preoperative evaluation and prediction can help to accurately address possible intraoperative situations and improve GTR.