Immunotherapy as a treatment modality for mucosal melanoma of the head and neck: A systematic review

Current Status and Molecular Mechanisms of Resistance to Immunotherapy in Oral Malignant Melanoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibodies, have initiated a new era in the treatment of malignant melanoma. ICIs can be used in various settings, including first-line, adjuvant, and neo-adjuvant therapy. In the scope of this review, we examined clinical studies utilizing ICIs in the context of treating oral mucosal melanoma, a rare disease, albeit with an extremely poor prognosis, with a specific focus on unraveling the intricate web of resistance mechanisms. The absence of a comprehensive review focusing on ICIs in oral mucosal melanoma is notable. Therefore, this review seeks to address this deficiency by offering a novel and thorough analysis of the current status, potential resistance mechanisms, and future prospects of applying ICIs specifically to oral malignant melanoma. Clarifying and thoroughly understanding these mechanisms will facilitate the advancement of effective therapeutic approaches and enhance the prospects for patients suffering from oral mucosal melanoma.

Differentiating sinonasal malignant melanoma from squamous cell carcinoma using DWI combined with conventional MRI

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in combination with conventional MRI features to differentiate sinonasal malignant melanoma (SNMM) from sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC).

METHODS

A total of 37 patients with SNMM and 44 patients with SNSCC were retrospectively reviewed. Conventional MRI features and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were evaluated independently by two experienced head and neck radiologists. ADCs were obtained from two different regions of interest (ROIs) including maximum slice (MS) and small solid sample (SSS). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify significant MR imaging features in discriminating between SNMM and SNSCC. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

SNMMs were more frequently located in the nasal cavity, with well-defined border, T1 Septate Pattern (T1-SP) and heterogeneous T1 hyperintensity, whereas SNSCCs were more frequently located in the paranasal sinus, with homogenous T1 isointensity, ill-defined border, reticular or linear T2 hyperintensity, and pterygopalatine fossa or orbital involvement (all p < 0.05). The mean ADCs of SNMM (MS ADC, 0.85 × 10^-3mm²/s; SSS ADC, 0.69 × 10^-3mm²/s) were significantly lower than those of SNSCC (MS ADC, 1.05 × 10^-3mm²/s; SSS ADC, 0.82 × 10^-3mm²/s) (p < 0.05). With a combination of location, T1 signal intensity, reticular or linear T2 hyperintensity, and a cut-off MS ADC of 0.87 × 10^-3mm²/s, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 97.3%, 68.2%, and 0.89, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DWI combined with conventional MRI can effectively improve the diagnostic performance in differentiating SNMM from SNSCC.

[Rare cancers of the head and neck on behalf of the REFCOR, part 2]

Among the 16,000 new cases of malignant tumors of the head and neck diagnosed in France each year, 10% are not conventional squamous cell carcinomas. These so-called rare cancers are distinguished by their presentation and patterns of failure, which is important to recognize in order to offer specific adapted management and maximize the chances of tumor control. These cancers can be rare by their histology as well as their anatomical location when arising from the paranasal sinuses, salivary glands and ear. The management of these heterogeneous rare diseases of complex treatment has considerably been structured over the last 15 years, in particular via the French ENT Cancer Expertise Network (REFCOR) and international networks and registries (EURACAN, etc.). Structuration also favors research with identification of new entities and setting up of specific therapeutic trials. A first article (part 1) discusses the diagnostic and therapeutic specificities of these rare cancers, and develops the recommendations of the REFCOR concerning rare epithelial tumors, i.e., salivary tumors, sinonasal tumors, variants of conventional squamous cell carcinomas, neuroendocrine carcinomas, malignant odontogenic tumors, and ear tumors. This second article (part 2) is focused on non-epithelial tumors (sarcomas, mucosal melanomas, lymphomas, tumors of uncertain or undetermined malignancy) and describes the organization and missions of the REFCOR.

Treatment outcomes of mucosal melanoma of head and neck: Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced disease

Background

Head and neck mucosal melanoma (HNMM) is a rare and aggressive subtype of melanoma. HNMM often develops as a recurrent or metastatic disease, and its prognosis is worse than that of cutaneous melanoma. Recent large-scale clinical studies have reported favorable outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for melanoma. However, these clinical trials included only a small number of HNMM cases. This study aimed to estimate treatment outcomes and prognostic predictors of ICIs for advanced HNMM.

Methods

Cases of advanced HNMM, defined as unresectable or metastatic HNMM at the initial diagnosis (five patients) or development of recurrent/metastatic HNMM after initial treatment (27 patients), were included in this study. Survival analysis and a search for prognostic factors were performed for these 32 patients. Furthermore, the detailed clinical course of patients who received ICI treatment was investigated.

Results

The median overall survival (OS) of 32 patients with advanced HNMM was 25.3 months. The estimated 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 68.4%, 42.8%, and 34.3%, respectively. Fourteen patients (43.7%) received ICIs, whereas 18 (56.3%) did not. Univariate analysis showed that ICI treatment was the only factor associated with a better 1-year OS. Patients who received ICI treatment had significantly longer OS (median OS: not reached, 1-year OS: 85.7%) than those who did not (median OS: 11.3 months, 1-year OS: 54.5%). The overall response and disease control rates of patients who received ICI treatment were 50% and 64.3%, respectively. Patients who achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to ICI treatment survived significantly longer (1-year OS: 100%) than those who did not (1-year OS: 71.4%). Among the five patients who discontinued ICI treatment due to severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs), four did not receive salvage treatments but showed durable treatment effects and survived for 9.8–54.2 months at the end of the follow-up period.

Conclusions

ICI treatment achieved a favorable OS for advanced HNMM. CR/PR to ICI treatment and discontinuation owing to severe irAEs were favorable predictors of OS.