Imaging techniques to study diabetic bone disease

Assessment of fracture risk in diabetic patients

Patients with diabetes often experience reduced bone strength, resulting in a higher fracture risk. This decline and increased susceptibility stem from intricate interactions within the bone microstructure. However, current gold standard methods for assessing bone strength, such as bone mineral density, and widely-used fracture risk assessment tools do not accurately predict fracture risk in diabetic patients. Therefore, it is crucial to incorporate additional indicators that evaluate bone quality and specific markers relevant to diabetes to enhance the accuracy of predictive models. Moreover, the selection of appropriate algorithms for model construction is essential. This review aims to introduce indicators from both imaging examinations and laboratory indicators that hold significant value for inclusion in fracture risk prediction models for diabetic patients. Additionally, this study provides an overview of the research progress in fracture risk prediction models for diabetic patients, serving as a valuable reference for clinical practice.

Cross-Disciplinary Approach of Adrenal Tumors: Insights into Primary Aldosteronism-Related Mineral Metabolism Status and Osteoporotic Fracture Risk

Our objective was to overview the novel aspects in the field of adrenal gland neoplasms, namely, the management of bone status with respect to primary aldosteronism (PA). In the current narrative review, a PubMed study was conducted from inception until June 2023. The inclusion criteria were: human (clinically relevant) studies of any study design (at least 10 patients per study); English papers; and the following combination of key words within the title and/or abstract: "aldosterone" AND "bone", "skeleton", "osteoporosis", "fracture", "calcium", "parathyroid", "DXA", "osteocalcin", "P1NP", "alkaline phosphatase", "bone marker", "trabecular bone score", or "FRAX". The exclusion criteria were in vitro or animal studies, reviews, and case reports/series. We screened 1027 articles and finally included 23 studies (13 of case-control type, 3 cross-sectional, 5 prospective, 1 observational cohort, and 1 retrospective study). The assessments provided in these studies were as follows: nine studies addressed Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), another study pointed out a bone microarchitecture evaluation underlying trabecular bone score (TBS), and seven studies investigated the bone turnover markers (BTMs) profile. Moreover, 14 studies followed the subjects after adrenalectomy versus medical treatment, and 21 studies addressed secondary hyperparathyroidism in PA patients. According to our study on published data during a period of almost 40 years (n = 23, N = 3965 subjects aged between 38 and 64, with a mean age 56.75, and a female-to-male ratio of 1.05), a higher PTH in PA versus controls (healthy persons or subjects with essential hypertension) is expected, secondary hyperparathyroidism being associated in almost half of the adults diagnosed with PA. Additionally, mineral metabolism anomalies in PA may include lower serum calcium and higher urinary calcium output, all these three parameters being reversible under specific therapy for PA, regardless medical or surgical. The PA subgroup with high PTH seems at higher cardiovascular risk, while unilateral rather than bilateral disease was prone to this PTH anomaly. Moreover, bone mineral density (BMD) according to central DXA might show a higher fracture risk only in certain adults, TBS being a promising alternative (with a still unknown perspective of diabetes' influence on DXA-TBS results in PA). However, an overall increased fracture prevalence in PA is described in most studies, especially with respect to the vertebral site, the fracture risk that seems correctable upon aldosterone excess remission. These data recommend PA as a cause of secondary osteoporosis, a treatable one via PA intervention. There is still an area of debate the way to address BMTs profile in PA, the case's selection toward specific bone evaluation in every day practice, and further on, the understanding of the potential genetic influence at the level of bone and mineral complications in PA patients.

Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Updated Review

Bone fragility is a complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) that has been identified in recent decades. Trabecular bone score (TBS) appears to be more accurate than bone mineral density (BMD) in diabetic bone disease, particularly in menopausal women with T2DM, to independently capture the fracture risk. Our purpose was to provide the most recent overview on TBS-associated clinical data in T2DM. The core of this narrative review is based on original studies (PubMed-indexed journals, full-length, English articles). The sample-based analysis (n = 11, N = 4653) confirmed the use of TBS in T2DM particularly in females (females/males ratio of 1.9), with ages varying between 35 and 91 (mean 65.34) years. With concern to the study design, apart from the transversal studies, two others were prospective, while another two were case-control. These early-post-pandemic data included studies of various sample sizes, such as: males and females (N of 245, 361, 511, and 2294), only women (N of 80, 96, 104, 243, 493, and 887), and only men (N = 169). Overall, this 21-month study on published data confirmed the prior profile of BMD-TBS in T2DM, while the issue of whether checking the fracture risk is mandatory in adults with uncontrolled T2DM remains to be proven or whether, on the other hand, a reduced TBS might function as a surrogate marker of complicated/uncontrolled T2DM. The interventional approach with bisphosphonates for treating T2DM-associated osteoporosis remains a standard one (n = 2). One control study on 4 mg zoledronic acid showed after 1 year a statistically significant increase of lumbar BMD in both diabetic and non-diabetic groups (+3.6%, p = 0.01 and +6.2%, p = 0.01, respectively). Further studies will pinpoint additive benefits on glucose status of anti-osteoporotic drugs or will confirm if certain glucose-lowering regimes are supplementarily beneficial for fracture risk reduction. The novelty of this literature research: these insights showed once again that the patients with T2DM often have a lower TBS than those without diabetes or with normal glucose levels. Therefore, the decline in TBS may reflect an early stage of bone health impairment in T2DM. The novelty of the TBS as a handy, non-invasive method that proved to be an index of bone microarchitecture confirms its practicality as an easily applicable tool for assessing bone fragility in T2DM.

High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography: research or clinical practice?

High-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) is a low-dose three-dimensional imaging technique, originally developed for in vivo assessment of bone microarchitecture at the distal radius and tibia in osteoporosis. HR-pQCT has the ability to discriminate trabecular and cortical bone compartments, providing densitometric and structural parameters. At present, HR-pQCT is mostly used in research settings, despite evidence showing that it may be a valuable tool in osteoporosis and other diseases. This review summarizes the main applications of HR-pQCT and addresses the limitations that currently prevent its integration into routine clinical practice. In particular, the focus is on the use of HR-pQCT in primary and secondary osteoporosis, chronic kidney disease (CKD), endocrine disorders affecting bone, and rare diseases. A section on novel potential applications of HR-pQCT is also present, including assessment of rheumatic diseases, knee osteoarthritis, distal radius/scaphoid fractures, vascular calcifications, effect of medications, and skeletal muscle. The reviewed literature seems to suggest that a more widespread implementation of HR-pQCT in clinical practice would offer notable opportunities. For instance, HR-pQCT can improve the prediction of incident fractures beyond areal bone mineral density provided by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. In addition, HR-pQCT may be used for the monitoring of anti-osteoporotic therapy or for the assessment of mineral and bone disorder associated with CKD. Nevertheless, several obstacles currently prevent a broader use of HR-pQCT and would need to be targeted, such as the small number of installed machines worldwide, the uncertain cost-effectiveness, the need for improved reproducibility, and the limited availability of reference normative data sets.

Novel techniques for assessment of bone tissue material properties

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review will be to shed light on novel techniques for assessment of bone tissue material properties.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently there has been an increase in modalities to investigate bone tissue material properties. Historically, clinicians treating patients with bone disorders have relied upon the use of bone mineral density (BMD) as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Although DXA provides an ability to screen at a large-scale population level, it only explains about 60% of the fracture risk. Recent advances include the use of imaging modalities, responses to load, and novel infrared (IR) techniques.

SUMMARY

These newer techniques have not reached a point for population level screening; however, they may inform the science of bone biology further and help discern various bone disease states.