Personalized treatment approach to gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a medical oncologist's perspective

Distinctive features of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms exhibiting an increment in proliferative activity during the course of the disease

PURPOSE

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) differ in their biological behavior and growth potential in a way that can be predicted using histological classification and grading systems. A subset of pancreatic NENs (pNENs) may develop a more aggressive phenotype during the course of the disease, associated with an increase in the Ki-67 proliferation index (PI). The purpose of the study was to present the clinical characteristics of these patients.

METHODS

Using re-biopsy of growing lesions, we investigated the increase in Ki-67 PI sufficient to change initial grading (G).

RESULTS

Of 264 patients with well differentiated (WD) pNENs who showed progressive disease during follow-up, 15 (6%) exhibited an increase in Ki-67 PI at a median time 36.8 (9.3-255.8) months. All neoplasms had WD-morphology: five had G1 (Ki-67 median value 1%), nine G2 (median value 5%), one G3 (25%) grades. Upon change of Ki-67 PI, 3 patients had G2 (8%) and 12 G3 (57.5%) NENs, while all retained their WD-morphology. At last follow-up, eight patients were alive with a median overall survival (OS) of 52.5 (9.5-264.3) months. Μedian OS was shorter in patients who had a change in Ki-67 PI before 36 months compared to those who had a change of Ki-67 PI at a later stage (27.5 95%CI: 11.88-43.06 vs. 120.87 95%CI: 96.05-145.69; log-rank p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

During the course of their disease, 6% patients with progressive pNENs develop an increase in Ki-67 PI resulting in an increase in grading status while maintaining their morphology. This process is associated with worse OS when it occurs at an early stage.

Is it possible NET-redifferentiation after chemotherapy? 68Ga DOTA-peptide imaging as a game-changer in therapy management

A 64-year-old man with pancreatic grade III neuroendocrine carcinoma underwent ⁶⁸Ga DOTANOC PET/CT scan for staging. The pancreatic lesion, multiple peripancreatic lymph nodes and multiple gross metastases in both hepatic lobes were revealed with intense uptake. After 3 cycles of chemotherapy containing cisplatin and etoposide the primary and metastatic lesions were decreased in size, however showing higher uptake on follow-up ⁶⁸Ga DOTANOC PET/CT scan. Another biopsy from liver demonstrated a significant decrease in Ki-67 proliferation index from 35 to 1%. The patient received 2 cycles of peptide receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy with ¹⁷⁷Lu DOTANOC.

Immunotherapy and the Interventional Oncologist: Challenges and Opportunities-A Society of Interventional Oncology White Paper

Interventional oncology is a subspecialty field of interventional radiology that addresses the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and cancer-related problems by using targeted minimally invasive procedures performed with image guidance. Immuno-oncology is an innovative area of cancer research and practice that seeks to help the patient's own immune system fight cancer. Both interventional oncology and immuno-oncology can potentially play a pivotal role in cancer management plans when used alongside medical, surgical, and radiation oncology in the care of cancer patients.

Treatment Strategies for Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Gastrointestinal Tract

OPINION STATEMENT

The therapeutic landscape of gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) has evolved significantly in recent years. Current and emerging treatment options include somatostatin analogs, radiolabeled somatostatin analogs, the mTOR inhibitor everolimus, and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib. Although high-quality data from phase III trials are lacking, cytotoxic agents are commonly used for the treatment of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas and well-differentiated NETs originating in the pancreas. Hepatic-directed therapies are recommended for patients with slow-growing, liver-predominant disease but have never been compared to systemic agents. Telotristat ethyl, a novel serotonin synthesis inhibitor, has recently demonstrated efficacy in palliating diarrhea in patients with poorly controlled carcinoid syndrome. In the absence of definite predictive biomarkers, therapeutic decisions in most cases rely on clinical and pathological criteria. However, navigating the current therapeutic algorithm may be challenging, and future trials need to address several important questions: what is the best sequence of treatment? Is there a role for combination therapies in GEP-NETs? Are neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or maintenance strategies safe and effective? Do all NET patients require active treatment? What new molecular targets can be clinically exploited? A tight integration between basic and clinical research is needed to further advance the field of NETs.

WOMEN IN CANCER THEMATIC REVIEW: Systemic therapies in neuroendocrine tumors and novel approaches toward personalized medicine

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a group of heterogenous neoplasms. Evidence-based treatment options for antiproliferative therapy include somatostatin analogues, the mTOR inhibitor everolimus, the multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177-Lu-octreotate. In the absence of definite predictive markers, therapeutic decision making follows clinical and pathological criteria. As objective response rates with targeted drugs are rather low, and response duration is limited in most patients, numerous combination therapies targeting multiple pathways have been explored in the field. Upfront combination of drugs, however, is associated with increasing toxicity and has shown little benefit. Major advancements in the molecular understanding of NET based on genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic analysis have been achieved with prognostic and therapeutic impact. New insight into molecular alterations has paved the way to biomarker-driven clinical trials and may facilitate treatment stratification toward personalized medicine in the near future. However, an improved understanding of the complexity of pathway interactions is required for successful treatment. A systems biology approach is one of the tools that may help to achieve this endeavor.