A randomized trial of standard-dose versus half-dose rabeprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

Different dose of new generation proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: A meta-analysis

The evidence on whether high-dose new generation proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) including rabeprazole and esomeprazole achieve a higher eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori has not been assessed. The primary comparison was eradication and adverse events (AEs) rate of standard (esomeprazole 20 mg bid, rabeprazole 10 mg bid) versus high-dose (esomeprazole 40 mg bid, rabeprazole 20 mg bid) PPIs. Sub-analyses were performed to evaluate the eradication rate between Asians and Caucasians, clarithromycin-resistance (CAM-R) strains, and clarithromycin-sensitivity (CAM-S) strains of different dose PPIs. We conducted a literature search for randomized controlled trials comparing high-with standard-dose esomeprazole and rabeprazole for H. pylori eradication and AEs. A total of 12 trials with 2237 patients were included. The eradication rate of high-dose PPIs was not significantly superior to standard-dose PPIs regimens: 85.3% versus 84.2%, OR 1.09 (0.86–1.37), P = 0.47. The high dose induced more AEs than those of the standard dose, but didn’t reach statistical significance (OR 1.25, 95% CI: 0.99–1.56, P = 0.06). Subgroup analysis showed that the difference in eradication rate of PPIs between high- and standard-dose groups were not statistically significant both in Asians (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.75–1.32, P = 0.97) and Caucasians (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.84–1.92, P = 0.26). Furthermore, there were similar eradication rates in CAM-S (OR 1.2; 95% CI 0.58–2.5; P = 0.63) and CAM-R strains (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.45–2.56; P = 0.87) between the standard-and high-dose groups. High and standard dosages of new generation of the PPIs showed similar H. pylori eradication rates and AEs as well as between Asian versus Caucasian populations, with or without clarithromycin-resistance. However, further studies are needed to confirm.

The prolongation effect of ilaprazole-based standard triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection causes many diseases, such as peptic ulcers, gastritis and gastric cancer, and MALToma. It has been gradually accepted that all HP-infected patients should be treated because HP is regarded as an infection. Therefore, the importance of selecting the optimal treatment regimen has increased. Although the 14-day standard triple therapy (STT) is recommended in the current guidelines, prolonging treatment duration is controversial in real practice because of inconsistent results from previous data and the risk of adverse effects. Additionally, the effect of STT using ilaprazole has not been reported until now. We aimed to compare the eradication rate between 7 and 10 days STT using ilaprazole.

METHODS

A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted, which was divided into 2 treatment groups: the control group was 7 days of STT, and the test group was 10 days of STT. The eradication regimen was 10 mg ilaprazole, 500 mg clarithromycin, and 1000 mg amoxicillin twice daily. We included patients who were diagnosed with positive results of H pylori examination. We compared the HP eradication rate according to treatment duration, CYP2C19 subtype and endoscopic diagnosis.

RESULTS

We enrolled a total of 254 patients consisting of 127 patients in each treatment arm. The eradication rates of the control and test groups were 65.4% (82/127) and 74.8% (95/127), respectively, in the intention-to-treat analysis (P = .1). In the per-protocol analysis, 70.3% (83/118) and 82.6% (94/115) were eradicated in each group, which was statistically significant (P = .027). The CYP2C19 subtype was examined in 230 patients. The eradication rate was 79.2% (57/72), 75.4% (92/122), and 72.2% (26/36) in each group, which was not significantly different (P = .704).

CONCLUSION

Ten-day STT was more effective than 7-day STT for HP eradication. The eradication rate was not affected by the CYP2C19 genotype.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: Current and future insights

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is an important major cause of peptic ulcer disease and gastric malignancies such as mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma and gastric adenocarcinoma worldwide. H. pylori treatment still remains a challenge, since many determinants for successful therapy are involved such as individual primary or secondary antibiotics resistance, mucosal drug concentration, patient compliance, side-effect profile and cost. While no new drug has been developed, current therapy still relies on different mixture of known antibiotics and anti-secretory agents. A standard triple therapy consisting of two antibiotics and a proton-pump inhibitor proposed as the first-line regimen. Bismuth-containing quadruple treatment, sequential treatment or a non-bismuth quadruple treatment (concomitant) are also an alternative therapy. Levofloxacin containing triple treatment are recommended as rescue treatment for infection of H. pylori after defeat of first-line therapy. The rapid acquisition of antibiotic resistance reduces the effectiveness of any regimens involving these remedies. Therefore, adding probiotic to the medications, developing anti-H. pylori photodynamic or phytomedicine therapy, and achieving a successful H. pylori vaccine may have the promising to present synergistic or additive consequence against H. pylori, because each of them exert different effects.

Systematic review and meta-analysis: full- vs. half-dose anti-microbials in clarithromycin-based regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND

Half-dose regimens may be equally effective but associated with diminished adverse events (AE) than standard-dose regimens.

AIM

To assess efficacy and safety of full- vs. half-dose clarithromycin in the treatment of H. pylori.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE and PubMed databases were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that meet eligibility criteria. Only parallel group RCTs with ≥ 2 arms were eligible. Studies comparing triple, quadruple or sequential therapy for 7-14 days were selected. Regimens had to contain the same drug combination, differing only in dosage; the comparison of full- vs. half-dose clarithromycin was required, regardless if other drugs were dose-reduced or not. Data extraction was performed for primary outcome [eradication by intent-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses] and secondary outcome (AE).

RESULTS

A total of 1622 articles were identified, of which 19 studies were eligible. Overall, eradication was achieved in 82.5% of half-dose (n = 2115) vs. 83.4% of full-dose recipients (n = 2109) on ITT (87.1% vs. 88.4% on PP respectively). Pooled relative risk in the half- vs. full-dose regimen was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95-1.02) on ITT and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97-1.01) on PP by the random effects model. Heterogeneity was significant (chi-squared statistic P = 0.05, I(2) = 37%). AE were reported in 29.3% of half- vs. 44.0% of full-dose recipients [pooled RR 0.67 (95% CI: 0.60-0.75)]. Pre-planned subgroup analyses of dose modification, sample size, study origin and treatment duration, as well as sensitivity analysis showed no significant differences between arms.

CONCLUSION

A half-dose clarithromycin-based regimen is equally effective yet better tolerated than its full-dose counterpart in the treatment of H. pylori.

Two-week triple therapy has a higher Helicobacter pylori eradication rate than 1-week therapy: A single-center randomized study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

To evaluate a high effective and practical regimen for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The 298 patients with H. pylori infection, diagnosed by biopsies performed during the endoscopy, were randomized into two groups. Group 1: Treated for one week with a combination of omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin (OAC), named by OAC-1 group (n = 143); Group 2: OAC-2 group (n = 155) treated for two weeks with OAC. The OAC-1 group was treated with triple therapy of omeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, and clarithromycin 500 mg bid for 1 week. OAC-2 group was treated likewise, but for two weeks. A 13C-urea breath test was used to monitor H. pylori after four to eight weeks following therapy.

RESULTS

The eradication of infection was 55% and 68% in the OAC-1 and OAC-2 groups, respectively. Moreover, the eradication rates in the two groups were 63% and 75%, respectively. Compared with the OAC-1 group, the efficacy of treatment in the OAC-2 group is significantly higher (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Two-week OAC regimen yields a higher eradication rate of H. pylori, which might be a practical regimen for the eradication of H. pylori.

Challenging the dogma: a randomized trial of standard vs. half-dose concomitant nonbismuth quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Current treatment of Helicobacter pylori consists of three or four drugs for 7-14 days with important associated cost and adverse events.

AIMS

This study compared efficacy and safety of standard dose vs. half-dose concomitant nonbismuth quadruple therapy (NBQT) for 7 days. The standard dose consisted of twice daily rabeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, metronidazole 500 mg, and clarithromycin 500 mg.

METHODS

This was a prospective randomized trial. (14)C-urea breath test was performed ≥4 weeks after treatment and ≥2 weeks off acid suppressive therapy. Compliance and adverse events were monitored during treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 200 consecutive treatment-naïve patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, with 15.5% of subjects reporting prior macrolide use. Eradication occurred in 78% (95% CI 68.6-85.7%) in both groups on intention-to-treat analysis. Per-protocol rates were 82.1 vs. 83.9% for standard-dose patients vs. half-dose patients, respectively (p = NS). Adverse events (only mild) were reported in 57 vs. 41% of standard-dose patients vs. half-dose patients (p = 0.024), with metallic taste and nausea notably less frequent in the latter (36 vs. 12% and 18 vs. 7%, respectively; p < 0.05 for both). Overall, eradication failed in 38.7% of prior macrolide users vs. 18.9% without such exposure (p = 0.019). On multivariate logistic regression, prior macrolide exposure was the only factor associated with failed eradication (OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.06-6.39; p = 0.038). Treatment was cheaper with the half-dose regimen.

INTERPRETATION

A 50% reduction in antibiotic dosage does not diminish efficacy of concomitant nonbismuth quadruple therapy but leads to significant reduction in cost and adverse events. Seven-day concomitant NBQT is suboptimal for H. pylori independent of prior macrolide exposure.

Efficacy and pharmacological mechanism of pronase-enhanced low-dose antibiotics for Helicobacter pylori eradication

This study examined the efficacy and pharmacological mechanism of pronase-assisted low-dose antibiotics for eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Mongolian gerbils infected with H. pylori received 7-day treatment (omeprazole, different concentrations of pronase, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin), and the efficacy was assessed using the eradication rate and the colonization of H. pylori. In Mongolian gerbils orally administered pronase, the thickness of the gastric mucous layer (GML) was examined using immunohistochemical and alcian blue staining, and the concentrations of amoxicillin in gastric tissue and serum were detected using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The eradication rates were 80.0% (12/15) in the high-pronase quadruple group (HPQG) and 86.7% (13/15) in the high-antibiotic group (HAG) (P = 1.000). The antibiotic dose in the HPQG was only 1/20 that in the HAG. Thirty minutes after oral treatment with pronase, the sticky protein of the GML was hydrolyzed, and the GML became thinner. Higher amoxicillin concentrations in both the gastric tissue and serum were observed in the pronase group than in the Am10 group. The concentration of amoxicillin in the Am10-plus-Pr108 group in gastric tissue was 3.8 times higher than in the Am10 group in 5 min. Together, these data suggest that pronase significantly reduced the dose of antibiotics used in H. pylori eradication. The pharmacological mechanism is likely pronase removal of the mucus layer, promoting chemical factor (i.e., gastric acid and pepsinogen) distribution and increasing the antibiotic concentrations in the deep GML, which acted on H. pylori collectively. Thus, pronase may enhance the level of antibiotics for eradication of H. pylori in the clinic.

Non-microbial approach for Helicobacter pylori as faster track to prevent gastric cancer than simple eradication

Although the International Agency for Research on Cancer declared Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) as a definite human carcinogen in 1994, the Japanese Society for Helicobacter Research only recently (February 2013) adopted the position that H. pylori infection should be considered as an indication for either amelioration of chronic gastritis or for decreasing gastric cancer mortality. Japanese researchers have found that H. pylori eradication halts progressive mucosal damage and that successful eradication in patients with non-atrophic gastritis most likely prevents subsequent development of gastric cancer. However, those who have already developed atrophic gastritis/gastric atrophy retain potential risk factors for gastric cancer. Because chronic perpetuated progression of H. pylori-associated gastric inflammation is associated with increased morbidity culminating in gastric carcinogenesis, a non-microbial approach to treatment that provides long-term control of gastric inflammation through nutrients and other interventions may be an effective way to decrease this morbidity. This non-microbial approach might represent a new form of prerequisite "rescue" therapy that provides a quicker path to the prevention of gastric cancer as compared to simple eradication.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection 2012

Helicobacter pylori resistance rates to antibiotics vary in different countries and even in different regions of the same country. Choice of treatment is strongly dependent on antibiotic resistance rates. In some countries, triple therapy with a proton-pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin is still the best option, but eradication results fall short of what would be desired (90-95%) in countries with clarithromycin resistance >20%, bismuth-containing quadruple therapy, or nonbismuth sequential or concomitant therapies may then be the preferred option. Newer antibiotic regimens are awaited. Vaccination would be the best option, especially for developing countries, but little progress has been made in designing a vaccine.