Comparative efficacy of pegylated interferons α-2a and 2b in the treatment of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B infection

Addition of nucleoside analogues to peg-IFNα-2a enhances virological response in chronic hepatitis B patients without early response to peg-IFNα-2a: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Current treatments for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) include pegylated interferon alpha (PEG-IFN-α) which is an immune modulator, and nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) which directly inhibit HBV DNA polymerase. With the limited efficacy of PEG-IFN-α and prolonged treatment periods associated with NAs, there is an urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies, especially for patients with a poor early response to anti-viral therapy.

METHODS

In this study, 178 patients with chronic hepatitis B (n = 131) and compensated (n = 47) HBV-induced cirrhosis were enrolled, 120 patients with HBeAg (+). All the patients were treated for 12 weeks with PEG-IFN-α. Among them, a total of 138 patients with a poor virological response after 12 weeks were treated for an additional 48 weeks with Peg-IFNα-2a (control) (n = 43), with Peg-IFNα-2a + entecavir (ETV) (n = 49), or Peg-IFNα-2a + adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) (n = 46), and were followed for 48 weeks after therapy. Early virological response was defined as undetectable HBV DNA after anti-viral therapy for 12 weeks. Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as no change in therapeutic effectiveness after 6 months follow-up, and no recurrence.Therapeutic efficacy was determined by evaluating HBV DNA levels, serum and liver HBsAg levels, liver function tests and liver histology.

RESULTS

Patients in the Peg-IFNα-2a + ETV and Peg-IFNα-2a + ADV groups showed a significantly greater decrease in HBV DNA levels over time, and a significantly higher SVR compared to patients receiving Peg-INFα-2a monotherapy (both P values <0.05). Although patients receiving combination therapy had a significantly higher change in serum HBsAg levels compared to the monotherapy group, there was no significant difference in liver HBsAg levels between the three treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that in patients with a poor virological response after 12 weeks of treatment with Peg-IFNα-2a alone, addition of ADV or ETV significantly reduced HBV DNA levels, serum HBsAg levels, and increased SVR. Individualization of anti-viral therapy would ensure that only patients who do not respond to Peg-IFNα-2a would receive combination therapy. Our data have important implications for the treatment of CHB patients who fail to show an early response to Peg-IFNα-2a monotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was retrospectively registered on 2012 May 24 at the China Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR-OCC-12002196).

Effectiveness of entecavir or telbivudine therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection pre-treated with interferon compared with de novo therapy with entecavir and telbivudine

Little is known about the optimal treatment following the initial failure of interferon therapy and the potential different efficacy with de novo therapy with entecavir (ETV) or telbivudine (LDT) and following the interferon therapy failure.ETV or LDT therapy following the interferon therapy failure was compared with that of de novo therapy with ETV or LDT in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Treatment parameters included virological response, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization.Of 180 patients studied, 56 received de novo telbivudine monotherapy (LDT group); 45 received entecavir monotherapy (ETV group); 40 received LDT following interferon (interferon-telbivudine [IFN-LDT] group); and 39 received ETV following interferon (interferon-entecavir [IFN-ETV] group). At week 52, virological response occurred in significantly more patients in the IFN-ETV group than the ETV group (87.2% vs 57.8%, P = .003). At week 104, HBeAg seroconversion occurred in significantly more patients in the IFN-ETV group than the ETV group (44.4% vs 22.2%, P = .03). At week 52, virological response was achieved by significantly more patients in the IFN-LDT group than the LDT group (85.0% vs 64.3%, P = .02).This study showed that switch to rescue therapy with ETV or LDT therapy after failure of interferon therapy resulted in more rapid virologic response than with de novo treatment with either ETV or LDT; rescue therapy with ETV resulted in a greater HBeAg seroconversion rate.

Comparison of adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alpha-2a treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients

OBJECTIVE:

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pegylated interferon alpha 2a and adefovir dipivoxil treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients.

METHODS:

This study was performed on patients treated for chronic hepatitis B in the Infectious Disease Clinic of Eskişehir Osmangazi University between 01.09.2005 and 31.03.2008. A total of 30 patients aged between 18 and 65 years constituted the study group. One of patient groups received (10 HBeAg negative, 4 HBeAg positive) PEG-IFN alpha 2a at a dose of 180 μg/once a week, whereas the other group (11 HBeAg negative, 5 HBeAg positive) received daily oral doses of 10 mg ADV. Treatment responses were evaluated at week 48.

RESULTS:

Reductions in serum HBV DNA levels at the end of 48 weeks were 4.8 log10 copy/ml and 4.2 log10 copy/ml in HBeAg negative patients who received ADV or PEG-IFN alpha 2a, respectively. Biochemical response rates were 60% and 91% in PEG-IFN alpha 2a and ADV groups, respectively. Among HBeAg positive patients, reductions in serum HBV DNA levels were 3. 2 log10 copy/ml and 4 log10 copy/ml in ADV and PEG-IFN alpha 2a groups, at week 48, respectively. Biochemical response rates were 50% and 40% in PEG-IFN alpha 2a and ADV groups, respectively. No significant difference was determined in biochemical and virological responses in HBeAg positive and negative patients between PEG-IFN alpha 2a and ADV groups, at week 48. When both treatment groups were evaluated for side effects, it was observed that side effects were significantly common in PEG-IFN alpha 2a group.

CONCLUSION:

When we compared PEG-IFN alpha 2a and ADV treatment in both HBeAg positive and negative patients, biochemical and virological response rates at 48 weeks were similar.

Dynamic comparison between Daan real-time PCR and Cobas TaqMan for quantification of HBV DNA levels in patients with CHB

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels are crucial for managing chronic hepatitis B (CHB). It was unclear whether Daan real-time polymerase chain reaction test (Daan test) or COBAS TaqMan HBV DNA Test (Cobas TaqMan) was superior in measuring different HBV DNA levels in clinical specimens.

METHODS

We enrolled 67 treatment-naïve, HBV surface antigen-positive CHB patients (high baseline viral levels) who received either lamivudine/adefovir or entecavir. Serum samples were tested at baseline and treatment week 24 using the Daan test and Cobas TaqMan.

RESULTS

In the 67-baseline samples, the HBV DNA levels with the Cobas TaqMan (7.90 ± 0.73 log10 IU/mL) were significantly greater than those of the Daan test (7.11 ± 0.44 log10 IU/mL; P < 0.001). Of the 67 24-week samples (low viral levels), the Cobas TaqMan detected 59 (88.1%; 8 undetected); the Daan test detected 33 (49.3%; 34 undetected; P < 0.001). The Cobas TaqMan detected HBV DNA in 26 of 34 samples undetectable by the Daan test (range, 1.4-3.7 log10 IU/mL) or 38% of samples (26/67). The reductions in viral load after 24 weeks of oral antiviral treatment in the 33 samples that were positive for both the Daan test and the Cobas TaqMan test were significantly different (3.59 ± 1.11 log10 IU/mL versus 4.87 ± 1.58 log10 IU/mL, respectively; P = 0.001). Spearman correlation analysis showed positive correlation between results from two tests (rp = 0.602,P<0.001). The HBV genotypes and the anti-viral treatment did not affect the measurements of the HBV DNA by the Daan assay and the Cobas Taqman assay.

CONCLUSION

The Cobas Taqman was more sensitive at low viral loads than the Daan test and the change from complete to partial virological response could affect clinical decisions. The Cobas Taqman may be more appropriate for detection of HBV DNA levels.