Do HIV-infected non-small cell lung cancer patients receive guidance-concordant care?

Disparities and Determinants of Cancer Treatment in Elderly Americans Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus/AIDS

Background

Previous studies suggest that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected cancer patients are less likely to receive cancer treatment. The extent to which this disparity affects the growing population of elderly individuals is unknown and factors that mediate these treatment differences have not been explored.

Methods

We studied 930359 Americans aged 66-99 years who were diagnosed with 10 common cancers. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare claims from 1991 to 2011 were used to determine HIV status and receipt of cancer treatment in 6 months following diagnosis. Mediation analysis was conducted to estimate the direct effect of HIV, and indirect effect through cancer stage at diagnosis and comorbidities, on cancer treatment.

Results

HIV-infected individuals (n = 687) were less likely to receive cancer treatment (70% vs 75% HIV uninfected; P < .01). This difference was larger in individuals aged 66-70 years, among whom only 65% were treated (vs 81% in HIV uninfected; P < .01), and time from cancer diagnosis to treatment was longer (median, 42.5 vs 36 days in HIV uninfected; P < .01). Accounting for potential confounders, HIV-infected individuals aged 66-70 years remained 20% less likely to receive cancer treatment (hazard ratio, 0.81 [95% confidence interval, .71-.92]). Seventy-five percent of this total effect was due to HIV itself, with a nonsignificant 24% mediated by cancer stage and comorbidities.

Conclusions

Lowest cancer treatment rates were seen in the younger subset of HIV-infected individuals, who would likely benefit most from treatment in terms of life expectancy.

The Changing Face of HIV-Associated Malignancies: Advances, Opportunities, and Future Directions

Because of tremendous advances in HIV care, the survival of many people living with HIV (PLWH) now approaches that of the general population. This has led to a shift in the types of malignancies diagnosed among PLWH from AIDS-defining cancers during the height of the HIV epidemic toward more non-AIDS-defining cancers and age-related incidental cancers in the last 2 decades. Despite these trends, positive cancer outcomes still lag behind patients without HIV, and many PLWH never receive appropriate cancer therapy. We explore the reasons for the epidemiologic shift that has been observed, as well as the factors that influence treatment disparities. Furthermore, several studies have demonstrated similar cancer survival rates when PLWH and certain cancers receive the same treatment as those who are HIV-negative. Among possible solutions to improve cancer outcomes include increasing the inclusion of PLWH in clinical trials, using guidelines specific for the treatment of HIV-associated malignancies, and incorporating a multidisciplinary approach to cancer management in PLWH.

Human immunodeficiency virus infection and mortality risk among lung cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have suggested that patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are at higher risk of lung cancer, but the impact of HIV infection on the risk of mortality among lung cancer patients is still unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the association between HIV infection and mortality risk among lung cancer patients.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase databases were searched to identify studies assessing the association between HIV infection and mortality risk among lung cancer patients. Only studies reporting adjusted relative risk (RR) of mortality among lung cancer patients with HIV infection were included. Meta-analysis of random-effect model was utilized to calculate the pooled RR with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Twelve cohort studies were finally included. Compared with lung cancer patients without HIV infection, the pooled RR of mortality among lung cancer patients with HIV infection was 1.48 (95% CI, 1.22-1.78, P < .001; I = 88.6%). After excluding 2 studies with low quality, HIV infection was still significantly associated with an elevated risk of mortality among lung cancer patients (RR = 1.51, 95% CI, 1.25-1.82, P < .001; I = 89.8%). Sensitivity analysis showed that the statistical significance of the pooled RR was not changed by excluding any one study.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes from the meta-analysis provide strong evidence for the elevated risk of mortality among lung cancer patients with HIV infection, and HIV infection is an important prognostic factor in lung cancer patients.

Cancer care disparities in people with HIV in the United States

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cancer is a growing problem in the HIV population, in large part because of aging of HIV-infected people treated with antiretroviral therapy. Overall and cancer-specific survival is worse in HIV-infected cancer patients compared with uninfected patients. One potential reason for the observed survival deficit is differences in cancer treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent population-based data suggest that HIV-infected cancer patients are less likely to receive cancer treatment compared with uninfected patients. This review describes these treatment disparities and their impact on patient outcomes, explores reasons for the disparity and highlights areas for future research.

SUMMARY

Cancer is the leading cause of non-AIDS death in HIV-infected individuals. Understanding the underlying cancer treatment disparity between HIV-infected patients and their uninfected counterparts, and developing solutions to address the problem, is of great importance to improve cancer outcomes in this growing patient population.

Lung cancer in persons with HIV

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lung cancer is emerging as a leading cause of death in HIV-infected persons. This review will discuss the latest scientific evidence regarding the mechanisms driving lung cancer risk in HIV infection, the clinical presentation of lung cancer in HIV-infected persons and recent data regarding the outcomes, treatment and prevention of lung cancer in this group.

RECENT FINDINGS

Increased risk of lung cancer in HIV-infected persons is primarily due to higher smoking rates, but emerging evidence also implicates immunosuppression and inflammatory processes. Lung cancer outcomes may be worse in HIV-infected persons in the antiretroviral era, but this may stem, in part, from treatment disparities. Early detection of lung cancer using chest computed tomography (CT) is being increasingly adopted for smokers in the general population, and recent studies suggest that it may be safe and efficacious in HIV-infected smokers.

SUMMARY

Lung cancer is an important complication associated with chronic HIV infection. It is associated with unique HIV-related causal mechanisms, and may be associated with worse outcomes in some HIV-infected persons. Smoking cessation and early cancer detection with chest CT are likely to benefit HIV-infected smokers.

Disparities in Lung Cancer Care and Outcomes among Elderly in a Medically Underserved State Population-A Cancer Registry-Linked Database Study

Despite availability of guidelines for lung cancer care, variations in lung cancer care among the elderly exist across the nation and are a cause for concern in rural and medically underserved areas. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the patterns of lung cancer care and associated health outcomes among elderly residing in a rural and medically underserved area. The authors identified 1924 elderly lung cancer patients from the West Virginia Cancer Registry-Medicare linked database (2002-2007) and categorized them by receipt of guideline-concordant (appropriate and timely) care using guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians, British Thoracic Society, and the RAND Corporation. Hierarchical generalized logistic models were constructed to identify variables associated with receipt of guideline-concordant care. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to compare 3-year survival outcomes. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to estimate lung cancer mortality risk associated with nonreceipt of guideline-concordant care. Although guideline-concordant appropriate care was received by fewer than half of all patients (46.5%), of those receiving care, 78.7% received it in a timely manner. Delays in diagnosis and treatment varied significantly. Survival outcomes significantly improved with appropriate care (799 vs. 366 days; P≤0.05), but did not improve with timely care. This study highlights the critical need to address disparities in receipt of guideline-concordant lung cancer care among the elderly residing in rural and medically underserved areas. Although lung cancer diagnostic and management services are covered under the Medicare program, underutilization of these services is a concern. (Population Health Management 2016;19:109-119).

Guideline-concordant lung cancer care and associated health outcomes among elderly patients in the United States

OBJECTIVES

In the United States (US), the elderly carry a disproportionate burden of lung cancer. Although evidence-based guidelines for lung cancer care have been published, lack of high quality care still remains a concern among the elderly. This study comprehensively evaluates the variations in guideline-concordant lung cancer care among elderly in the US.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database (2002-2007), we identified elderly patients (aged ≥65 years) with lung cancer (n = 42,323) and categorized them by receipt of guideline-concordant care, using evidence-based guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians. A hierarchical generalized logistic model was constructed to identify variables associated with receipt of guideline-concordant care. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Log Rank test were used for estimation and comparison of the three-year survival. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to estimate lung cancer mortality risk associated with receipt of guideline-discordant care.

RESULTS

Only less than half of all patients (44.7%) received guideline-concordant care in the study population. The likelihood of receiving guideline-concordant care significantly decreased with increasing age, non-white race, higher comorbidity score, and lower income. Three-year median survival time significantly increased (exceeded 487 days) in patients receiving guideline-concordant care. Adjusted lung cancer mortality risk significantly increased by 91% (HR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.82-2.00) among patients receiving guideline-discordant care.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the critical need to address disparities in receipt of guideline-concordant lung cancer care among elderly. Although lung cancer diagnostic and management services are covered under the Medicare program, underutilization of these services is a concern.