1
|
Jones Berkeley SB, Johnson AM, Mormer ER, Ressel K, Pastva AM, Wen F, Patterson CG, Duncan PW, Bushnell CD, Zhang S, Freburger JK. Referral to Community-Based Rehabilitation Following Acute Stroke: Findings From the COMPASS Pragmatic Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2024; 17:e010026. [PMID: 38189125 PMCID: PMC10997162 DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.123.010026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies on care transitions following acute stroke have evaluated whether referral to community-based rehabilitation occurred as part of discharge planning. Our objectives were to describe the extent to which patients discharged home were referred to community-based rehabilitation and identify the patient, hospital, and community-level predictors of referral. METHODS We examined data from 40 North Carolina hospitals that participated in the COMPASS (Comprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services) cluster-randomized trial. Participants included adults discharged home following stroke or transient ischemic attack (N=10 702). In this observational analysis, COMPASS data were supplemented with hospital-level and county-level data from various sources. The primary outcome was referral to community-based rehabilitation (physical, occupational, or speech therapy) at discharge. Predictor variables included patient (demographic, stroke-related, medical history), hospital (structure, process), and community (therapist supply) measures. We used generalized linear mixed models with a hospital random effect and hierarchical backward model selection procedures to identify predictors of therapy referral. RESULTS Approximately, one-third (36%) of stroke survivors (mean age, 66.8 [SD, 14.0] years; 49% female, 72% White race) were referred to community-based rehabilitation. Rates of referral to physical, occupational, and speech therapists were 31%, 18%, and 10%, respectively. Referral rates by hospital ranged from 3% to 78% with a median of 35%. Patient-level predictors included higher stroke severity, presence of medical comorbidities, and older age. Female sex (odds ratio, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.12-1.38]), non-White race (2.20 [2.01-2.44]), and having Medicare insurance (1.12 [1.02-1.23]) were also predictors of referral. Referral was higher for patients living in counties with greater physical therapist supply. Much of the variation in referral across hospitals remained unexplained. CONCLUSIONS One-third of stroke survivors were referred to community-based rehabilitation. Patient-level factors predominated as predictors. Variation across hospitals was notable and presents an opportunity for further evaluation and possible targets for improved poststroke rehabilitative care. REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02588664.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara B Jones Berkeley
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health (S.B.J.B., A.M.J., F.W., S.Z.)
| | - Anna M Johnson
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health (S.B.J.B., A.M.J., F.W., S.Z.)
| | - Elizabeth R Mormer
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (E.R.M., K.R., C.G.P., J.K.F.)
| | - Kristin Ressel
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (E.R.M., K.R., C.G.P., J.K.F.)
| | - Amy M Pastva
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Doctor of Physical Therapy Division and Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University School of Medicine (A.M.P.)
| | - Fang Wen
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health (S.B.J.B., A.M.J., F.W., S.Z.)
| | - Charity G Patterson
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (E.R.M., K.R., C.G.P., J.K.F.)
- Department of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine (P.W.D., C.D.B.)
| | - Pamela W Duncan
- Department of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine (P.W.D., C.D.B.)
| | | | - Shuqi Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health (S.B.J.B., A.M.J., F.W., S.Z.)
| | - Janet K Freburger
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (E.R.M., K.R., C.G.P., J.K.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Palin V, Van Staa TP, Steels S, Troxel AB, Groenwold RHH, MacDonald TM, Torgerson D, Faries D, Mancini P, Ouwens M, Frith LJ, Tsirtsonis K, MacLennan G, Nordon C. A first step towards best practice recommendations for the design and statistical analyses of pragmatic clinical trials: a modified Delphi approach. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2022; 88:5183-5201. [PMID: 35701368 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) are randomised trials implemented through routine clinical practice, where design parameters of traditional randomised controlled trials are modified to increase generalizability. However, this may introduce statistical challenges. We aimed to identify these challenges and discuss possible solutions leading to best practice recommendations for the design and analysis of PCTs. METHODS A modified Delphi method was used to reach consensus among a panel of 11 experts in clinical trials and statistics. Statistical issues were identified in a focused literature review and aggregated with insights and possible solutions from expert collected through a series of survey iterations. Issues were ranked according to their importance. RESULTS 27 articles were included and combined with experts' insight to generate a list of issues categorized into: participants; recruiting sites; randomisation, blinding and intervention; outcome (selection and measurement); and data analysis. Consensus was reached about the most important issues: risk of participants' attrition; heterogeneity of "usual care" across sites; absence of blinding; use of a subjective endpoint; and data analysis aligned with the trial estimand. Potential issues should be anticipated and preferably be addressed in the trial protocol. The experts provided solutions regarding data collection and data analysis, which were considered of equal importance. DISCUSSION A set of important statistical issues in PCTs was identified and approaches were suggested to anticipate and/or minimize these through data analysis. Any impact of choosing a pragmatic design feature should be gauged in the light of the trial estimand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Palin
- Division of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, Manchester Environmental Research Institute, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Tjeerd P Van Staa
- Division of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, Manchester Environmental Research Institute, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Stephanie Steels
- Department of Social Care and Social Work, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea B Troxel
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU, USA
| | - Rolf H H Groenwold
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, The Netherlands
| | - Tom M MacDonald
- MEMO Research, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - David Torgerson
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, United Kingdom
| | - Douglas Faries
- Global Statistical Sciences, Eli Lilly & Co., Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Graham MacLennan
- The Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Clementine Nordon
- formally LASER Research, Paris, France; currently AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lutz BJ, Kucharska-Newton AM, Jones SB, Psioda MA, Gesell SB, Coleman SW, Johnson AM, Radman MD, Levy S, Bettger JP, Freburger JK, Chou A, Celestino J, Rosamond WD, Bushnell CD, Duncan PW. Familial caregiving following stroke: findings from the comprehensive post-acute stroke services (COMPASS) pragmatic cluster-randomized transitional care study. Top Stroke Rehabil 2022; 30:436-447. [PMID: 35603644 DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2022.2077520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stroke patients discharged home often require prolonged assistance from caregivers. Little is known about the real-world effectiveness of a comprehensive stroke transitional care intervention on relieving caregiver strain. OBJECTIVES To describe the effect of the COMPASS transitional care (COMPASS-TC) intervention on caregiver strain and characterize the types, duration, and intensity of caregiving. METHODS The cluster-randomized COMPASS pragmatic trial evaluated the effectiveness of COMPASS-TC versus usual care with patients with mild stroke and TIA at 40 hospitals in North Carolina, USA. Of 5882 patients enrolled, 4208 (71%) identified a familial caregiver. A follow-up Caregiver Questionnaire, including the Modified Caregiver Strain Index, was administered at approximately three months post-discharge. Demographics and frequency, duration, and intensity of caregiving were compared between groups. RESULTS 1228 caregivers (29%) completed the questionnaire. Completion was positively associated with older patient age, white race, and spousal relationship. One-third of the caregivers provided ≥30 hours of care per week and 889 (79%) provided care ≥9 weeks. Average standardized caregiver strain was 21.9 (0-100), increasing with stroke severity and comorbidity burden. Women caregivers reported higher strain than men. Treatment allocation was not associated with caregiver strain. CONCLUSIONS This sample of mild stroke and TIA survivors received significant assistance from familial caregivers. However, caregiver strain was relatively low. Findings support the importance of familial caregiving in stroke, the continued disproportionate burden on women within the family, and the need for future research on caregiver support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara J. Lutz
- School of Nursing, College of Health and Human Services, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anna M. Kucharska-Newton
- College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sara B. Jones
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Matthew A. Psioda
- Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sabina B. Gesell
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sylvia W. Coleman
- Department of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anna M. Johnson
- College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Meghan D Radman
- Department of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Samantha Levy
- Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Janet K Freburger
- Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Aileen Chou
- Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Joan Celestino
- Department of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Wayne D. Rosamond
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Cheryl D. Bushnell
- Department of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Pamela W. Duncan
- Department of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bushnell CD, Kucharska-Newton AM, Jones SB, Psioda MA, Johnson AM, Daras LC, Halladay JR, Prvu Bettger J, Freburger JK, Gesell SB, Coleman SW, Sissine ME, Wen F, Hunt GP, Rosamond WD, Duncan PW. Hospital Readmissions and Mortality Among Fee-for-Service Medicare Patients With Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: Findings From the COMPASS Cluster-Randomized Pragmatic Trial. J Am Heart Assoc 2021; 10:e023394. [PMID: 34730000 PMCID: PMC9075395 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.121.023394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background Mortality and hospital readmission rates may reflect the quality of acute and postacute stroke care. Our aim was to investigate if, compared with usual care (UC), the COMPASS-TC (Comprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services Transitional Care) intervention (INV) resulted in lower all-cause and stroke-specific readmissions and mortality among patients with minor stroke and transient ischemic attack discharged from 40 diverse North Carolina hospitals from 2016 to 2018. Methods and Results Using Medicare fee-for-service claims linked with COMPASS cluster-randomized trial data, we performed intention-to-treat analyses for 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year unplanned all-cause and stroke-specific readmissions and all-cause mortality between INV and UC groups, with 90-day unplanned all-cause readmissions as the primary outcome. Effect estimates were determined via mixed logistic or Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for age, sex, race, stroke severity, stroke diagnosis, and documented history of stroke. The final analysis cohort included 1069 INV and 1193 UC patients (median age 74 years, 80% White, 52% women, 40% with transient ischemic attack) with median length of hospital stay of 2 days. The risk of unplanned all-cause readmission was similar between INV versus UC at 30 (9.9% versus 8.7%) and 90 days (19.9% versus 18.9%), respectively. No significant differences between randomization groups were seen in 1-year all-cause readmissions, stroke-specific readmissions, or mortality. Conclusions In this pragmatic trial of patients with complex minor stroke/transient ischemic attack, there was no difference in the risk of readmission or mortality with COMPASS-TC relative to UC. Our study could not conclusively determine the reason for the lack of effectiveness of the INV. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02588664.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna M Kucharska-Newton
- Department of Epidemiology College of Public Health University of Kentucky Lexington KY.,Department of Epidemiology Gillings School of Global Public Health University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill NC
| | - Sara B Jones
- Department of Epidemiology Gillings School of Global Public Health University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill NC
| | - Matthew A Psioda
- Department of Biostatistics Gillings School of Global Public Health University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill NC
| | - Anna M Johnson
- Department of Epidemiology Gillings School of Global Public Health University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill NC
| | | | - Jacqueline R Halladay
- Department of Family Medicine University of North Carolina School of Medicine Chapel Hill NC
| | | | - Janet K Freburger
- Department of Physical Therapy School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences University of Pittsburgh PA
| | - Sabina B Gesell
- Division of Public Health Sciences Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy Wake Forest School of Medicine Winston-Salem NC
| | - Sylvia W Coleman
- Department of Neurology Wake Forest Baptist Health Winston-Salem NC
| | - Mysha E Sissine
- Department of Neurology Wake Forest Baptist Health Winston-Salem NC
| | - Fang Wen
- Department of Epidemiology Gillings School of Global Public Health University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill NC
| | - Gary P Hunt
- Cecil G Sheps Center for Health Services Research University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill NC
| | - Wayne D Rosamond
- Department of Epidemiology Gillings School of Global Public Health University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill NC
| | - Pamela W Duncan
- Department of Neurology Wake Forest Baptist Health Winston-Salem NC
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Parry C, Johnston-Fleece M, Johnson MC, Shifreen A, Clauser SB. Patient-Centered Approaches to Transitional Care Research and Implementation: Overview and Insights From Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute's Transitional Care Portfolio. Med Care 2021; 59:S330-S335. [PMID: 34228014 PMCID: PMC8263147 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This Special Issue, Future Directions in Transitional Care Research, focuses on the approaches used and lessons learned by researchers conducting care transitions studies funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). PCORI's approach to transitional care research augments prior research by encouraging researchers to focus on head-to-head comparisons of interventions, the use of patient-centered outcomes, and the engagement of stakeholders throughout the research process. OBJECTIVES This paper introduces the themes and topics addressed by the articles that follow, which are focused on opportunities and challenges involved in conducting patient-centered clinical comparative effectiveness research in transitional care. It provides an overview of the state of the care transitions field, a description of PCORI's programmatic objectives, highlights of the patient and stakeholder engagement activities that have taken place during the course of these studies, and a brief overview of PCORI's Transitional Care Evidence to Action Network, a learning community designed to foster collaboration between investigators and their research teams and enhance the collective impact of this body of work. CONCLUSIONS The papers in this Special Issue articulate challenges, lessons learned, and new directions for measurement, stakeholder engagement, implementation, and methodological and design approaches that reflect the complexity of transitional care comparative effectiveness research and seek to move the field toward a more holistic understanding of transitional care that integrates social needs and lifespan development into our approaches to improving care transitions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly Parry
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC
| | | | | | - Aaron Shifreen
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC
| | | |
Collapse
|