The « race » correction in estimating glomerular filtration rate: an European point of view

Performance of the European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) creatinine-based equation in United States cohorts

Estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is important in daily practice to assess kidney function and adapting the best clinical care of patients with and without chronic kidney disease. The new creatinine-based European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equation is used to estimate GFR. This equation was developed and validated mainly in European individuals and based on a rescaled creatinine, with the rescaling factor (Q-value) defined as the median normal value of serum creatinine in a given population. The validation was limited in Non-Black Americans and absent in Black Americans. Here, our cross-sectional analysis included 12,854 participants from nine studies encompassing large numbers of both non-Black and Black Americans with measured GFR by clearance of an exogenous marker (reference method), serum creatinine, age, sex, and self-reported race available. Two strategies were considered with population-specific Q-values in Black and non-Black men and women (EKFCPS) or a race-free Q-value (EKFCRF). In the whole population, only the EKFCPS equation showed no statistical median bias (0.14, 95% confidence interval [-0.07; 0.35] mL/min/1.73m2), and the bias for the EKFCRF (0.74, [0.51; 0.94] mL/min/1.73m2) was closer to zero than that for the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI2021) equation (1.22, [0.99; 1.47]) mL/min/1.73m2]. The percentage of estimated GFR within 30% of measured GFR was similar for CKD-EPI2021 (79.2% [78.5%; 79.9%]) and EKFCRF (80.1% [79.4%; 80.7%]), but improved for the EKFCPS equation (81.1% [80.5%; 81.8%]). Thus, our EKFC equations can be used to estimate GFR in the United States incorporating either self-reported race or unknown race at the patient's discretion per hospital registration records.

Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation in Adults: Myths and Promises

BACKGROUND

In daily practice, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is estimated with equations including renal biomarkers. Among these biomarkers, serum creatinine remains the most used. However, there are many limitations with serum creatinine, which we will discuss in the current review. We will also discuss how creatinine-based equations have been developed and what we can expect from them in terms of performance to estimate GFR.

SUMMARY

Different creatinine-based equations have been proposed. We will show the advantages of the recent European Kidney Function Consortium equation. This equation can be used in children and adults. This equation can also be used with some flexibility in different populations.

KEY MESSAGES

GFR is estimated by creatinine-based equations, but the most important for nephrologists is probably to know the limitations of these equations.

Inequities in kidney health and kidney care

Health inequity refers to the existence of unnecessary and unfair differences in the ability of an individual or community to achieve optimal health and access appropriate care. Kidney diseases, including acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease, are the epitome of health inequity. Kidney disease risk and outcomes are strongly associated with inequities that occur across the entire clinical course of disease. Insufficient investment across the spectrum of kidney health and kidney care is a fundamental source of inequity. In addition, social and structural inequities, including inequities in access to primary health care, education and preventative strategies, are major risk factors for, and contribute to, poorer outcomes for individuals living with kidney diseases. Access to affordable kidney care is also highly inequitable, resulting in financial hardship and catastrophic health expenditure for the most vulnerable. Solutions to these injustices require leadership and political will. The nephrology community has an important role in advocacy and in identifying and implementing solutions to dismantle inequities that affect kidney health.

Early diagnosis of chronic kidney disease in patients with diabetes in France: multidisciplinary expert opinion, prevention value and practical recommendations

Diabetes is the leading cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), accounting for approximately 50% of patients starting dialysis. However, the management of these patients at the stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains poor, with fragmented care pathways among healthcare professionals (HCPs). Diagnosis of CKD and most of its complications is based on laboratory evidence. This article provides an overview of critical laboratory evidence of CKD and their limitations, such as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE), and serum potassium. eGFR is estimated using the CKD-EPI 2009 formula, more relevant in Europe, from the calibrated dosage of plasma creatinine. The estimation formula and the diagnostic thresholds have been the subject of recent controversies. Recent guidelines emphasized the combined equation using both creatinine and cystatin for improved estimation of GFR. UACR on a spot urine sample is a simple method that replaces the collection of 24-hour urine. Albuminuria is the preferred test because of increased sensitivity but proteinuria may be appropriate in some settings as an alternative or in addition to albuminuria testing. KFRE is a new tool to estimate the risk of progression to ESKD. This score is now well validated and may improve the nephrology referral strategy. Plasma or serum potassium is an important parameter to monitor in patients with CKD, especially those on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors or diuretics. Pre-analytical conditions are essential to exclude factitious hyperkalemia. The current concept is to correct hyperkalemia using pharmacological approaches, resins or diuretics to be able to maintain RAAS blockers at the recommended dose and discontinue them at last resort. This paper also suggests expert recommendations to optimize the healthcare pathway and the roles and interactions of the HCPs involved in managing CKD in patients with diabetes.

New and old GFR equations: a European perspective

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is estimated in clinical practice from equations based on the serum concentration of endogenous biomarkers and demographic data. The 2009 creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI2009) was recommended worldwide until 2021, when it was recalibrated to remove the African-American race factor. The CKD-EPI2009 and CKD-EPIcr2021 equations overestimate GFR of adults aged 18-30 years, with a strong overestimation in estimated GFR (eGFR) at age 18 years. CKD-EPICr2021 does not perform better than CKD-EPI2009 in US population, overestimating GFR in non-Black subjects, and underestimating it in Black subjects with the same magnitude. CKD-EPICr2021 performed worse than the CKD-EPI2009 in White Europeans, and provides no or limited performance gains in Black European and Black African populations. The European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equation, which incorporates median normal value of serum creatinine in healthy population, overcomes the limitations of the CKD-EPI equations: it provides a continuity of eGFR at the transition between pediatric and adult care, and performs reasonably well in diverse populations, assuming dedicated scaling of serum creatinine (Q) values is used. The new EKFC equation based on cystatin C (EKFCCC) shares the same mathematical construction, namely, it incorporates the median cystatin C value in the general population, which is independent of sex and ethnicity. EKFCCC is therefore a sex-free and race-free equation, which performs better than the CKD-EPI equation based on cystatin C. Despite advances in the field of GFR estimation, no equation is perfectly accurate, and GFR measurement by exogenous tracer clearance is still required in specific populations and/or specific clinical situations.

2009 CKD-EPI glomerular filtration rate estimation in Black individuals outside the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The 2009 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation is the most used equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR), with race being a factor thereof, increasing GFR by 16% in self-identified Black persons compared with non-Black persons. However, recent publications indicate that it might overestimate GFR for Black adults outside the USA. In this meta-analysis, we assessed the accuracy, evaluated by the percentage of estimated GFR within 30% of measured GFR (P30), of the 2009 CKD-EPI equation in estimating GFR with and without the race coefficient in Black individuals outside the United States of America (USA).

Methods

We searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception to 9 July 2022, with no language restriction, supplemented by manual reference searches. Studies that assessed the CKD-EPI P30 accuracy with or without the race coefficient in Black adults outside the USA with an adequate method of GFR measurement were included. Data were extracted by independent pairs of reviewers and were pooled using a random-effects model.

Results

We included 11 studies, with a total of 1834 Black adults from South America, Africa and Europe. The race coefficient in the 2009 CKD-EPI equation significantly decreased P30 accuracy {61.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 53-70%] versus 72.9% [95% CI 66.7-78.3%]; P = .03}.

Conclusions

Outside the USA, the 2009 CKD-EPI equation should not be used with the race coefficient, even though the 2009 CKD-EPI equation is not sufficiently accurate either way (<75%). Thus we endorse the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines to use exogenous filtration markers when this may impact clinical conduct.

The new, race-free, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Consortium (CKD-EPI) equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate: is it applicable in Europe? A position statement by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

The EFLM recommends not to implement the race-free Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Consortium (CKD-EPI) equation in European laboratories and to keep the 2009 version of the CKD-EPI equation, without applying a race correction factor. This recommendation is completely in line with a recent Editorial published by the European Renal Association who has also proposed to change to a novel equation only when it has considerably better performance, trying to reach global consensus before implementing such a new glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation equation. In Europe, this equation could be for instance the new European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equation, which is population-specific, developed from European cohorts and accurate from infants to the older old. Beyond serum creatinine, the estimating equations based on cystatin C will probably gain in popularity, especially because cystatin C seems independent of race. Finally, we must keep in mind that all GFR equations remain an estimation of GFR, especially rough at the individual level. Measuring GFR with a reference method, such as iohexol clearance, remains indicated in specific patients and/or specific situations, and here also, the role of the clinical laboratories is central and should still evolve positively in the future.

Performance of creatinine-based equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate in White and Black populations in Europe, Brazil and Africa

BACKGROUND

A new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation without the race variable has been recently proposed (CKD-EPIAS). This equation has neither been validated outside USA nor compared with the new European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) and Lund-Malmö Revised (LMREV) equations, developed in European cohorts.

METHODS

Standardized creatinine and measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from the European EKFC cohorts (n = 13 856 including 6031 individuals in the external validation cohort), from France (n = 4429, including 964 Black Europeans), from Brazil (n = 100) and from Africa (n = 508) were used to test the performances of the equations. A matched analysis between White Europeans and Black Africans or Black Europeans was performed.

RESULTS

In White Europeans (n = 9496), both the EKFC and LMREV equations outperformed CKD-EPIAS (bias of -0.6 and -3.2, respectively versus 5.0 mL/min/1.73 m², and accuracy within 30% of 86.9 and 87.4, respectively, versus 80.9%). In Black Europeans and Black Africans, the best performance was observed with the EKFC equation using a specific Q-value (= concentration of serum creatinine in healthy males and females). These results were confirmed in matched analyses, which showed that serum creatinine concentrations were different in White Europeans, Black Europeans and Black Africans for the same measured GFR, age, sex and body mass index. Creatinine differences were more relevant in males.

CONCLUSION

In a European and African cohort, the performances of CKD-EPIAS remain suboptimal. The EKFC equation, using usual or dedicated population-specific Q-values, presents the best performance in the whole age range in the European and African populations included in this study.

Removing race and body surface area indexation for estimated kidney function based drug dosing: Aminoglycosides as justification of these principles

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The use of race in medicine can contribute to health inequity. Updated equations for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) without race have been published. Likewise, de-indexation of eGFR to body surface area (BSA) has been recommended by regulatory guidance for drug dosing in renal impairment. Clinical data justifying these recommendations for drug dosing are sparse. We examined the gain or loss of precision in drug dosing with estimated creatinine clearance (eCLcr) and eGFR using serum creatinine (eGFRcr) with and without race and BSA indexation by evaluating the population pharmacokinetics of the aminoglycosides as a classic drug class to probe kidney function.

DESIGN

Medical records from adult patients treated with gentamicin or tobramycin over a 13-year period were queried. Population pharmacokinetic analyses were performed using a 1-compartment base structural model. Models compared body size descriptors as covariates of the volume of distribution (V). Estimated creatinine clearance and eGFRcr using multiple contemporary equations with and without BSA indexation were tested as covariates of clearance (CL).

MAIN RESULTS

The final data set included 2968 patients treated with either gentamicin (20.2%) or tobramycin (79.8%). Patients self-identified as Caucasian (82%), African-American (10%), or other. The median [5th, 95th percentile] weight and BSA were 80.5 [49.4, 136] kg and 1.94 [1.48, 2.56] m² , respectively. Models of eCLcr and eGFRcr without indexation to BSA had a better model fit than eGFRcr indexed to BSA for aminoglycoside CL. The 2021 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) eGFRcr equation (no race, no BSA indexation) provided a comparable model fit to the 2009 CKD-EPI eGFRcr equation (with race, no BSA indexation) for aminoglycoside CL.

CONCLUSIONS

Race is not a relevant covariate of aminoglycoside CL. The 2021 CKD-EPI eGFR equation without race and BSA indexation is a better method for gentamicin and tobramycin CL estimation. Confirmation of these results for other drugs can support the harmonization of dosing by kidney function.

The New 2021 CKD-EPI Equation Without Race in a European Cohort of Renal Transplanted Patients

BACKGROUND

Whether the new chronic kidney disease-epidemiology (CKD-EPI) equation without the race variable remains accurate enough for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation in non-US kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is unclear. We sought to compare the predictive performance between this equation and the classical CKD-EPI equation in a French cohort of KTRs. We also evaluated the performance of the European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equation, an estimate that has proved very accurate in nontransplant patients and that does not include race variable.

METHODS

We retrospectively selected 489 KTRs for whom GFR was measured by inulin clearance. Performances of GFR equations were compared according to median bias, imprecision, and accuracy within 30% (P30) and 20% (P20). Differences in P20/P30 were tested using the exact McNemar test.

RESULTS

Although the 4 equations exhibited a similar level of imprecision, the bias of the new CKD-EPI equation was +5.5 (4.0; 6.6) mL/min/1.73 m², much higher than the bias of the classical CKD-EPI, EKFC, and Modified Diet in Renal Diseases (MDRD) equation (2.4 [1.7;3.5], 2.2 [1.1;3.1], and -0.5 [-1.5; 1.0] mL/min/1.73 m², respectively). The new CKD-EPI equation was significantly less accurate with a P30 of 68.3% as compared with 74.2%, 75.3%, and 77.1% for the classical CKD-EPI, EKFC, and MDRD equation, respectively. The EKFC equation outperformed both versions of the CKD-EPI equation in terms of P20.

CONCLUSIONS

The new CKD-EPI equation is suboptimal for the care and follow-up of European transplanted patients. The EKFC equation shows at least a similar performance to the MDRD and the classical CKD-EPI equation. Further validation of the EKFC equation in KTRs from a diverse ethnic background is needed.

The race coefficient in glomerular filtration rate-estimating equations and its removal

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review new publications about the use of the race coefficient in glomerular filtration rate (GFR)-estimating equations since this topic was last reviewed a year ago in Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension .

RECENT FINDINGS

Accounting for race (or genetic ancestry) does improve the performance of GFR-estimating equations when serum creatinine (SCr) is used as the filtration marker but not when cystatin C is used. The National Kidney Foundation (NKF)-American Society of Nephrology (ASN) Task Force on Reassessing the Inclusion of Race in Diagnosing Kidney Disease recommended immediate adoption of a new refitted SCr-based equation without race and increased use of cystatin C. This report has created consensus but the endorsed new SCr equation without race underestimates GFR in Black Americans and overestimates GFR in non-Black Americans, which may result in diminished ability to detect racial disparities.

SUMMARY

The approach recommended by the NKF-ASN Task Force represents a compromise attempting to balance a number of competing values, including racial justice, benefit of classifying more Black Americans as having (more severe) chronic kidney disease, accuracy compared with measured GFR, and financial cost. The full implications of adopting the race-free refitted CKD-EPI SCr equation are yet to be known.

Point of care creatinine derived eGFR measurement in capillary blood for identifying patients at risk

Introduction

The aim of the study was to assess the clinical reliability of eGFR values estimated with a creatinine measurement from a point of care (StatSensor®) compared with measured GFR (mGFR) by a gold standard method.

Methods

We prospectively included 113 patients undergoing renal function assessment. We compared eGFR using creatinine from capillary blood or venous blood measured by StatSensor® and measured GFR (mGFR) by Passing Bablok regression. Performance of eGFR was estimated by biais, precision and accuracy.

Results

A total of 113 subjects were included. Median eGFR values were 59 (10–132), 52 (10–123) and 51 (10–131) ml/min/1.73 m² for enzymatic, capillary and venous measurements, respectively. There was no difference between P30 and P10 for the three eGFR values (p = 0.11 and p = 0.1 respectively). StatSensor® eGFR tended to be underestimated compared to mGFR. For CKD stage 4/5 patients, concordance was 79 and 84% for eGFR with capillary creatinine and venous creatinine respectively. For mGFR< 60 ml/min/1.73 m², concordance was 84 and 88% with capillary creatinine and venous creatinine respectively.

Conclusion

The use of a handheld blood creatinine monitoring system with eGFR calculation provides a good estimation of GFR and allow to identify patients at high risk of acute kidney injury.