The rationality of combining second-generation antiandrogens with 177Lu-PSMA or its alpha-emitting congeners for better and durable results: will this dominate the therapeutic landscape and be an upfront consideration in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the coming years?

Combined 177 Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT and abiraterone acetate versus 177 Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT monotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: An observational study comparing the response and durability

OBJECTIVE

The aim of present study was to determine and compare the overall response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and clinical toxicity of the combination of 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy (PRLT) and abiraterone acetate (AA) versus 177Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT as monotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The mCRPC patients who received at least one cycle of ¹⁷⁷ Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT with or without AA therapy, were included and analyzed in the present study. The patients were divided into two major groups. Group 1 received only ¹⁷⁷ Lu-PSMA PRLT and Group 2 received combined ¹⁷⁷ Lu-PSMA PRLT + AA therapy. Therapeutic dose of ¹⁷⁷ Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT was 4.4-5.55 GBq per patient per cycle administered at intervals of 10-12 weeks in both groups. The Group 2 patients additionally received a dose of 1000 mg of AA once daily and 5 mg of prednisone twice daily. Treatment response in two groups was evaluated under four broad categories (a) symptomatic, (b) biochemical (serum prostate-specific antigen level), (c) objective molecular imaging (⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA-11 and ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/CT), and (d) objective anatomical imaging (computed tomography). For assessing treatment response, patients in two groups were categorized into responders (complete response [CR], partial response [PR], and stable disease [SD]) and nonresponders (progressive disease [PD]). The Kaplan-Meier product-limit method was used to calculate PFS and OS following first ¹⁷⁷ Lu-PSMA PRLT in the two groups. Univariate analysis was used to compare the patients' characteristics in two groups using a χ² or Fisher exact test. The Kaplan-Meier curves of PFS and OS between two groups were compared by using the log-rank test (p < 0.05 significant).

RESULTS

A total of 58 mCRPC patients (Group 1, 38 patients and Group 2, 20 patients) were included in this study analysis. The clinical and demographic characteristics of these patients (age, Gleason score, FDG avid disease, metastatic disease burden, and average number of ¹⁷⁷ Lu-PSMA PRLT cycles) in two groups were compared and found to be similar (p > 0.05). Post-treatment, symptomatic, biochemical, molecular, and anatomic imaging responders were found in 22 patients (58%) and 17 patients (85%), 22 patients (58%) and 16 patients (80%), 19 patients (54%) and 14 patients (78%), and 19 patients (54%) and 14 patients (78%) in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. The median PFS of 7 months and median OS of 8 months were documented in Group 1, whereas median PFS was not reached and median OS of 16 months registered in Group 2. Transient hematological toxicity of Grades 1 and 2 was found in total seven patients (five patients in Group 1 and two patients in Group 2). On comparison of the treatment outcome between two groups, significant p value was found for symptomatic responders (58% in Group 1 vs. 85% in Group 2), median PFS (7 months in Group 1 vs. not reached in Group 2), and median OS (8 months in Group 1 vs. 16 months in Group 2), with better outcome in Group 2 patients for these variables.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, the combination of ¹⁷⁷ Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT and AA therapy showed significant improvement in mCRPC patients' symptomatic response, PFS, and OS as compared to ¹⁷⁷ Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT monotherapy.

Concept proposal for a six-tier integrated dual tracer PET-CT (68Ga-PSMA and FDG) image scoring system ('Pro-PET' score) and examining its potential implications in metastatic castration-resistant prostate carcinoma theranostics and prognosis

OBJECTIVES

To develop and examine a scoring system in metastatic castration-resistant prostate carcinoma (mCRPC) that integrates findings of both 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and flurodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET-CT imaging in a single combined parameter and referred to as the 'Pro-PET' score.

METHODS

A six-tier integrated dual tracer PET-CT (68Ga-PSMA and FDG) Image Scoring System ('Pro-PET' score) was conceptualized, based on the findings of both 68Ga-PSMA-11 and FDG PET-CT in patients of mCRPC. This proposed integrated scoring was examined in a retrospective analytical study assessing mCRPC patients (n = 47) referred for 177Lu-PSMA-617 peptide receptor radioligand therapy (PRLT) and had both FDG and 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT undertaken within 15 days of each other without any interim treatment intervention. The 'Pro-PET' score grades and subgrades were assigned and compared with clinical data, such as histopathology, Gleason score, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), treatment response (symptomatic, biochemical, metabolic and anatomical) and survival [overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS)].

RESULTS

The Pro-PET score significantly correlated with symptomatic (P = 0.05), biochemical (P = 0.05), metabolic (P = 0.001) and anatomical (P = 0.012) responses, PFS (P = 0.03) and OS (P = 0.027). On multivariate analysis, histopathology, Gleason score and PSA as individual parameters were not significantly associated with OS and PFS, whereas the Pro-PET score was found to have a significant association (P = 0.001 for PFS and 0.011 for OS).

CONCLUSION

The 'Pro-PET' scoring system integrating dual tracer PET-CT imaging findings in a single parameter appeared as a potentially promising prognostic marker that has the potential to enhance the objectivity and scientific basis of prostate carcinoma theranostics and prognostication.

177Lu-PSMA Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

The aim of this narrative review is to evaluate the current status of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA (prostate specific membrane antigen) therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the light of the current literature. We also addressed patient preparation, therapy administration and side effect profiles. ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA therapy efficacy was assessed by using prospective trials, meta-analyses and major retrospective trials. Predictors of efficacy were also mentioned. Although there are some different approaches regarding the use of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA therapy in different countries, this type of therapy is generally safe, with a low toxicity profile. From the oncological point of view, a PSA (prostate specific antigen) decline of ≥50% was seen in 10.6-69% of patients with mCRPC; whereas progression-free survival (PFS) was reported to be 3-13.7 months in different studies. Consequently, ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA therapy is a promising treatment in patients with mCRPC, with good clinical efficacy, even in heavily pretreated patients with multiple lines of systemic therapy. Currently, there are ongoing clinical trials in the United States, including a phase III multicenter FDA registration trial.