Performing clinical 18F-FDG-PET/MRI of the mediastinum optimising a dedicated, patient-friendly protocol

Staging of esophageal cancer using PET/MRI: a systematic review with head-to-head comparison

PURPOSE

To evaluate the staging performance of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) for confirmed esophageal cancer based on the TNM classification system as well as compare it to other alternative modalities (e.g., endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), computed tomography (CT), MRI, and PET/CT) in a full head-to-head manner.

METHODS

Protocol was pre-registered a priori at ( http://osf.io/6qj5m/ ). We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies until September 10, 2024. The risk of bias was assessed using Modified Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-Comparative (QUADAS-C). The classification performance of PET/MRI in T, N, and M staging of esophageal cancer and resectability status were evaluated and compared to other relative modalities. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) was used for certainty evaluation.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included with 245 esophageal cancer patients. For T, N, and M staging, PET/MRI showed 9.1%, 2.0%, and 10.7% upstaging than the histopathological evaluation while these numbers were 19.4%, 12.4%, and 5.3% for downstaging. For direct comparison with PET/CT, PET/MRI showed 0.7% and 5.6% less downstaging and upstaging for N staging and 2.5% and 4.0% for M staging. As for predicting resectability status, pre-ADCmean and post-ADCmean were promising, unlike other parameters (i.e., ΔADCmean, pre-SUVmax, post-SUVmax, and ΔSUVmax).

CONCLUSION

With protocol adjustments, PET/MRI might be utilized in the future for preoperative staging of esophageal cancer.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

N/A.

Surveillance of Clinically Complete Responders Using Serial 18F-FDG PET/CT Scans in Patients with Esophageal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

Active surveillance for patients with esophageal cancer and a clinically complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is being studied. Active surveillance requires accurate clinical response evaluations. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT might be able to detect local tumor recurrence after nCRT as soon as the esophagus recovers from radiation-induced esophagitis. The aims of this study were to assess the value of serial ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans for detecting local recurrence in patients beyond 3 mo after nCRT and to determine when radiation-induced esophagitis has resolved. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included patients who had cCR after nCRT, who initially declined surgery, and who subsequently underwent active surveillance. Clinical response evaluations included ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, endoscopic biopsies, and endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration at regular intervals. SUV_max normalized for lean body mass (SUL_max) was measured at the primary tumor site. The percentage change in SUL_max (Δ%SUL_max) between the last follow-up scan and the scan at 3 mo after nCRT was calculated. Tumor recurrence was defined as biopsy-proven vital tumor at the initial tumor site. Results: Of 41 eligible patients, 24 patients had recurrent disease at a median of 6.5 mo after nCRT and 17 patients remained cancer free during a median follow-up of 24 mo after nCRT. Five of 24 patients with tumor recurrence had sudden intense SUL_max increases of greater than 180%. In 19 of 24 patients with tumor recurrence, SUL_max gradually increased (median Δ%SUL_max, +18%), whereas SUL_max decreased (median Δ%SUL_max, -12%) in patients with ongoing cCR (P < 0.001, independent-samples t test). In patients with ongoing cCR, SUL_max was lowest at 11 mo after nCRT. Conclusion: Serial ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT might be a useful tool for detecting tumor recurrence during active surveillance. In patients with ongoing cCR, the lowest SUL_max was reached at 11 mo after nCRT, suggesting that radiation-induced esophagitis had mostly resolved by that time. These findings warrant further evaluation in a larger cohort.

Comparison of gross target volumes based on four-dimensional CT, positron emission tomography-computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in thoracic esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

The application value of ¹⁸ F-FDG PET-CT combined with MRI in the radiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma was discussed by comparing the differences in position, volume, and the length of GTVs delineated on the end-expiration (EE) phase of 4DCT, ¹⁸ F-FDG PET-CT, and T₂ W-MRI.

METHODS

A total of 26 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer sequentially performed 3DCT, 4DCT, ¹⁸ F-FDG PET-CT, and MRI simulation for thoracic localization. All images were fused with the 3DCT images by deformable registration. GTV_CT and GTV_50% were delineated on 3DCT and the EE phase of 4DCT images, respectively. The GTV based on PET-CT images was determined by thresholds of SUV ≥ 2.5 and designated as GTV_PET2.5 . The images of T₂ -weighted sequence and diffusion-weighted sequence were referred as GTV_MRI and GTV_DWI , respectively. The length of the abnormality seen on the 4DCT, PET-CT, and DWI was compared.

RESULTS

GTV_PET2.5 was significantly larger than GTV_50% and GTV_MRI (P = .000 and 0.008, respectively), and the volume of GTV_MRI was similar to that of GTV_50% (P = .439). Significant differences were observed between the CI of GTV_MRI to GTV_50% and GTV_PET2.5 to GTV_50% (P = .004). The CI of GTV_MRI to GTV_CT and GTV_PET2.5 to GTV_CT were statistically significant (P = .039). The CI of GTV_MRI to GTV_PET2.5 was significantly lower than that of GTV_MRI to GTV_50% , GTV_MRI to GTV_CT , GTV_PET2.5 to GTV_50% , and GTV_PET2.5 to GTV_CT (P = .000-0.021). Tumor length measurements by endoscopy were similar to the tumor length as measured by PET and DWI scan (P > .05), and there was no significant difference between the longitudinal length of GTV_PET2.5 and GTV_DWI (P = .072).

CONCLUSION

The volumes of GTV_MRI and GTV_50% were similar. However, GTV_MRI has different volumes and poor spatial matching compared with GTV_PET2.5 .The MRI imaging could not include entire respiration. It may be a good choice to guide target delineation and construction of esophageal carcinoma by combining 4DCT with MRI imaging. Utilization of DWI in treatment planning for esophageal cancer may provide further information to assist with target delineation. Further studies are needed to determine if this technology will translate into meaningful differences in clinical outcome.