Comparison of 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scan in detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer

[18F]PSMA-1007 PET for biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer, a comparison with [18F]Fluciclovine

AIM

The objective of this study was to compare the detection rates of [18F]PSMA-1007 and [18F]Fluciclovine in early biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer, i.e. with low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (0.2-5.0 µg/L).

METHODS

This was a prospective, single-center (Radboudumc; Nijmegen, The Netherlands), comparative phase II diagnostic imaging study (NCT04239742). The main inclusion criteria were histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate, BCR after radical treatment with two consecutive (rising) PSA values (0.2-5.0 µg/L). Patients underwent both [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT and [18F]Fluciclovine PET/CT within two weeks. Both scans were blindly scored by three independent nuclear medicine physicians. Hereafter, a result per scan and region was generated by consensus. The primary outcome was to compare the detection rate on a patient and region level. Secondary objectives were to determine detection rate stratified for PSA value, inter-reader agreement, and SUV measurements. For lesion confirmation a composite reference score was established using follow-up data.

RESULTS

Data of fifty patients were included, median age of 71 (IQR: 67-74) years and median PSA value of 0.38 (IQR: 0.30-1.55) µg/L. Detection rates were 68% (34/50) for [18F]PSMA-1007 and 42% (21/50) for [18F]Fluciclovine on a patient level (p < 0.001). Detection rates stratified for PSA value of [18F]PSMA-1007 in comparison with [18F]Fluciclovine were for PSA 0.2-0.5 µg/L; 60.7% versus 25.0% (p = 0.002); and for PSA ≥ 0.5 µg/L; 77.3% versus 63.6% (p = 0.250). There was a trend for higher inter-reader agreement with [18F]PSMA-1007. SUVmax (p < 0.001) was significantly higher for [18F]PSMA-1007 in comparison to [18F]Fluciclovine.

CONCLUSION

In patients with early BCR of prostate cancer after radical surgery or radiotherapy, [18F]PSMA-1007 demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate than [18F]Fluciclovine. This is particularly relevant since earlier and more accurate detection of a BCR can guide salvage therapy into a tailored strategy which may improve outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04239742. Registered 02 January 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04239742 .

Effect of PSMA PET/CT on the Use of Bone Scintigraphy for Prostate Cancer at a University Hospital System

We observed at our university-based imaging centers that when prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT became available for staging and restaging prostate cancer, the volume of bone scanning on patients with prostate cancer (BS-P) markedly decreased. We aimed to study use patterns of PSMA PET/CT and BS-P at our imaging centers during the 4-y period around U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of PSMA PET/CT in December 2020. We tested the hypothesis that the rate of decline of BS-P accelerated after U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval, as physicians planned for use of PSMA PET/CT in their patients. Methods: Our clinical report system was searched for BS-P and PSMA PET/CT scans from January 2019 through June 2023. Numbers of scans were tabulated by quarter and year. Quantitative and statistical analyses were performed. Results: Annualized average monthly BS-P peaked at 53.7 scans/mo in 2021 and then decreased over time. There were 552 BS-Ps performed in 2019, 503 in 2020, 614 in 2021, 481 in 2022, and 152 in the first half of 2023. BS-P monthly averages declined by 22% from 2021 to 2022 and by 36% from 2022 to 2023, whereas monthly PSMA PET/CT scan averages increased by 1,416% from 2021 to 2022 and by 69% from 2022 to 2023. There was a significantly greater decline in BS-Ps from 2022 to 2023 than from 2021 to 2022 (36% vs. 22%, P < 0.0001). There were 30 PSMA PET/CT scans performed in 2021, 455 in 2022, and 384 in the first half of 2023. The greatest quarterly increase in these scans (400%) occurred at the outset of PSMA PET/CT implementation in quarter 4 of 2021. In quarter 2 of 2023, the percentage of total studies was higher for PSMA PET/CT than for BS-P (74% vs. 26%, P < 0.0001). Conclusion: At our university-based imaging centers, use of BS-P has declined in correlation with the timing of U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval and implementation of PSMA PET/CT. This study illustrates one instance of workflow changes that occur in the nuclear medicine clinic when new agents are introduced and affect clinical management options.

Bone Metastasis in Prostate Cancer: Bone Scan Versus PET Imaging

Prostate cancer is the second most common cause of malignancy among men, with bone metastasis being a significant source of morbidity and mortality in advanced cases. Detecting and treating bone metastasis at an early stage is crucial to improve the quality of life and survival of prostate cancer patients. This objective strongly relies on imaging studies. While CT and MRI have their specific utilities, they also possess certain drawbacks. Bone scintigraphy, although cost-effective and widely available, presents high false-positive rates. The emergence of PET/CT and PET/MRI, with their ability to overcome the limitations of standard imaging methods, offers promising alternatives for the detection of bone metastasis. Various radiotracers targeting cell division activity or cancer-specific membrane proteins, as well as bone seeking agents, have been developed and tested. The use of positron-emitting isotopes such as fluorine-18 and gallium-68 for labeling allows for a reduced radiation dose and unaffected biological properties. Furthermore, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics techniques in medical imaging has shown significant advancements in reducing interobserver variability, improving accuracy, and saving time. This article provides an overview of the advantages and limitations of bone scan using SPECT and SPECT/CT and PET imaging methods with different radiopharmaceuticals and highlights recent developments in hybrid scanners, AI, and radiomics for the identification of prostate cancer bone metastasis using molecular imaging.

Traditional and novel imaging modalities for advanced prostate cancer: A critical review

Accurate detection of metastatic prostate cancer in the setting of preoperative staging as well as posttreatment recurrence is crucial to provide patients with appropriate and timely treatment of their disease. This has traditionally been accomplished with a combination of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and bone scan. Recently, more novel imaging techniques have been developed to help improve the detection of advanced and metastatic prostate cancer. This review discusses the efficacy of the traditional imaging modalities as well as the novel imaging techniques in detecting metastatic prostate cancer. Articles discussed were gathered through a formal PubMed search.

Molecular imaging of bone metastasis

Recent advances in molecularly targeted modular designs for in vivo imaging applications has thrusted open possibilities of investigating deep molecular interactions non-invasively and dynamically. The shifting landscape of biomarker concentration and cellular interactions throughout pathological progression requires quick adaptation of imaging agents and detection modalities for accurate readouts. The synergy of state of art instrumentation with molecularly targeted molecules is resulting in more precise, accurate and reproducible data sets, which is facilitating investigation of several novel questions. Small molecules, peptides, antibodies and nanoparticles are some of the commonly used molecular targeting vectors that can be applied for imaging as well as therapy. The field of theranostics, which encompasses joint application of therapy and imaging, is successfully leveraging the multifunctional use of these biomolecules [[1], [2]]. Sensitive detection of cancerous lesions and accurate assessment of treatment response has been transformative for patient management. Particularly, since bone metastasis is one of the dominant causes of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients, imaging can be hugely impactful in this patient population. The intent of this review is to highlight the utility of molecular positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in the context of prostate and breast bone metastatic cancer, and multiple myeloma. Furthermore, comparisons are drawn with traditionally utilized bone scans (skeletal scintigraphy). Both these modalities can be synergistic or complementary for assessing lytic- and blastic- bone lesions.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Post-Treatment Follow-up of Prostate Cancer: 2022 Update

Prostate cancer has a wide spectrum ranging between low-grade localized disease and castrate-resistant metastatic disease. Although whole gland and systematic therapies result in cure in the majority of patients, recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer can still occur. Imaging approaches including anatomic, functional, and molecular modalities are continuously expanding. Currently, recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer is grouped in three major categories: 1) Clinical concern for residual or recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy, 2) Clinical concern for residual or recurrent disease after nonsurgical local and pelvic treatments, and 3) Metastatic prostate cancer treated by systemic therapy (androgen deprivation therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy). This document is a review of the current literature regarding imaging in these settings and the resulting recommendations for imaging. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Whole body imaging in musculoskeletal oncology: when, why, and how

The use of whole-body imaging has become increasingly popular in oncology due to the possibility of evaluating total tumor burden with a single imaging study. This is particularly helpful in cases of widespread disease where dedicated regional imaging would make the evaluation more expensive, time consuming, and prone to more risks. Different techniques can be used, including whole-body MRI, whole-body CT, and PET-CT. Common indications include surveillance of cancer predisposing syndromes, evaluation of osseous metastases and clonal plasma cell disorders such as multiple myeloma, and evaluation of soft tissue lesions, including peripheral nerve sheath tumors. This review focuses on advanced whole-body imaging techniques and their main uses in musculoskeletal oncology.

Evaluating the Sorption Affinity of Low Specific Activity 99Mo on Different Metal Oxide Nanoparticles

99Mo/99mTc generators are mainly produced from 99Mo of high specific activity generated from the fission of 235U. Such a method raises proliferation concerns. Alternative methods suggested the use of low specific activity (LSA) 99Mo to produce 99mTc generators. However, its applicability is limited due to the low adsorptive capacity of conventional adsorbent materials. This study attempts to investigate the effectiveness of some commercial metal oxides nanoparticles as adsorbents for LSA 99Mo. In a batch equilibration system, we studied the influence of solution pH (from 1–8), contact time, initial Mo concentration (from 50–500 mg∙L−1), and temperature (from 298–333 K). Moreover, equilibrium isotherms and thermodynamic parameters (changes in free energy ΔG0, enthalpy change ΔH0, and entropy ΔS0) were evaluated. The results showed that the optimum pH of adsorption ranges between 2 and 4, and that the equilibrium was attained within the first two minutes. In addition, the adsorption data fit well with the Freundlich isotherm model. The thermodynamic parameters prove that the adsorption of molybdate ions is spontaneous. Furthermore, some investigated adsorbents showed maximum adsorption capacity ranging from 40 ± 2 to 73 ± 1 mg Mo∙g−1. Therefore, this work demonstrates that the materials used exhibit rapid adsorption reactions with LSA 99Mo and higher capacity than conventional alumina (2–20 mg Mo∙g−1).

The Continuum of Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Interpreting PSMA PET Findings in Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Conventional imaging has been the standard imaging modality for assessing prostate cancer recurrence and is utilized to determine treatment response to therapy. Molecular imaging with PSMA PET-CT has proven to be more accurate, sensitive, and specific at identifying pelvic or distant metastatic disease, resulting in earlier diagnosis of advanced disease. Since advanced disease may not be seen on conventional imaging, due to its lower sensitivity, but can be identified by molecular imaging, this reveals that metastatic prostate cancer occurs on a continuum from negative PSMA PET-CT and negative conventional imaging to positive PSMA PET-CT and positive conventional imaging. Understanding this continuum, the accuracy of these modalities, and treatment related outcomes based on imaging, will allow the clinician to counsel patients on management. This review will highlight the differences in conventional and molecular imaging in prostate cancer and how PSMA PET-CT can be used for the management of prostate cancer patients in different clinical scenarios, while providing cautionary notes for overtreatment.

Comparison of Different Machine Learning Models in Prediction of Postirradiation Recurrence in Prostate Carcinoma Patients

After primary treatment of localized prostate carcinoma (PC), up to a third of patients have disease recurrence. Different predictive models have already been used either for initial stratification of PC patients or to predict disease recurrence. Recently, artificial intelligence has been introduced in the diagnosis and management of PC with a potential to revolutionize this field. The aim of this study was to analyze machine learning (ML) classifiers in order to predict disease progression in the moment of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) elevation during follow-up. The study cohort consisted of 109 PC patients treated with external beam radiotherapy alone or in combination with androgen deprivation therapy. We developed and evaluated the performance of two ML algorithms based on artificial neural networks (ANN) and naïve Bayes (NB). Of all patients, 72.5% was randomly selected for a training set while the remaining patients were used for testing of the models. The presence/absence of disease progression was defined as the output variable. The input variables for models were conducted from the univariate analysis preformed among two groups of patients in the training set. They included two pretreatment variables (UICC stage and Gleason's score risk group) and five posttreatment variables (nadir PSA, time to nadir PSA, PSA doubling time, PSA velocity, and PSA in the moment of disease reevaluation). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and predictive accuracy was calculated to test the models' performance. The results showed that specificity was similar for both models, while NB achieved better sensitivity then ANN (100.0% versus 94.4%). The ANN showed an accuracy of 93.3%, and the matching for NB model was 96.7%. In this study, ML classifiers have shown potential for application in routine clinical practice during follow-up when disease progression was suspected.

The "Ultimate Triple PET": 68Ga-DOTATATE, 18F-FDG, and 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT Findings in a Single Patient With Metastatic Abdominal Carcinoid and Prostate Cancer

ABSTRACT

A 71-year-old man with a history of carcinoid and prostate adenocarcinoma underwent 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT to evaluate new mediastinal lymphadenopathy. The scan revealed new carcinoid metastases, but the mediastinal nodes were not avid. 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed to evaluate for cardiac and mediastinal sarcoidosis, revealing a lack of cardiac sarcoidosis, but probable mediastinal sarcoidosis. 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT was then performed for possible prostate metastases, revealing the patient's known prostate cancer. Three different PET radiopharmaceuticals revealed 3 different processes in a single patient within a 195-day period, demonstrating the power of nuclear medicine diagnostics.

Systematic review & meta-analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scan in the diagnosis of prostate lesions

Background

To date, the results of studies into the effectiveness of positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (CT) and bone scan (BS) in the diagnosis of malignant prostate lesions have been inconsistent, and the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods cannot be accurately judged.

Methods

Articles were retrieved from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database, Wan Fang Medical Network, PubMed, Excerpta Medica data BASE (EMBASE), Medline, and Cochrane database. The keywords used in the search were: ⁶⁸Ga-prostate specific membrane antibody (⁶⁸Ga-PSMA), PET/CT, prostate lesions, prostate adenocarcinoma, bone metastasis, and BS.

Results

Ultimately, 3 publications were selected for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A total of 215 patients were considered in the 3 articles that met the inclusion criteria. All of the included articles were small sample studies, with sample sizes ranging from 28 to 113 cases. In this study, from the 3 randomized controlled trials, only 2 (66.67%) randomized controls described the correct randomized allocation method, and only 1 (33.33%) described the hidden allocation scheme in detail. The highest sensitivity for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT was 0.96, with 95% CI: 0.87, 1.00, and the highest specificity was 1.00, with 95% CI: 0.96, 1.00. The highest sensitivity and specificity of BS were 0.92 with 95% CI: 0.81, 0.98 and 0.96 with 95% CI: 0.78, 1.00, respectively. The results of meta-analysis of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT diagnosis with confirmation by surgical and histopathological examination showed that the area under the summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) curve (AUC) =0.826 and standard error (SE) (AUC) =0.0425. The results of meta-analysis of BS diagnosis with confirmation by surgical and histopathological examination showed that the area under the SROC curve (AUC) =0.714 and SE (AUC) =0.0034.

Discussion

The meta-analysis showed that ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT has clear advantages over BS in the diagnosis of bone metastases of malignant prostate tumors, and could improve the diagnostic accuracy of bone metastases.

Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Treatment of Bone Metastases

Bone and bone marrow are among the most frequent metastatic sites of cancer. The occurrence of bone metastasis is frequently associated with a dismal disease outcome. The prevention and therapy of bone metastases is a priority in the treatment of cancer patients. However, current therapeutic options for patients with bone metastatic disease are limited in efficacy and associated with increased morbidity. Therefore, most current therapies are mainly palliative in nature. A better understanding of the underlying molecular pathways of the bone metastatic process is warranted to develop novel, well-tolerated and more successful treatments for a significant improvement of patients' quality of life and disease outcome. In this review, we provide comparative mechanistic insights into the bone metastatic process of various solid tumors, including pediatric cancers. We also highlight current and innovative approaches to biologically targeted therapy and immunotherapy. In particular, we discuss the role of the bone marrow microenvironment in the attraction, homing, dormancy and outgrowth of metastatic tumor cells and the ensuing therapeutic implications. Multiple signaling pathways have been described to contribute to metastatic spread to the bone of specific cancer entities, with most knowledge derived from the study of breast and prostate cancer. However, it is likely that similar mechanisms are involved in different types of cancer, including multiple myeloma, primary bone sarcomas and neuroblastoma. The metastatic rate-limiting interaction of tumor cells with the various cellular and noncellular components of the bone-marrow niche provides attractive therapeutic targets, which are already partially exploited by novel promising immunotherapies.

Comparison of PET/CT and MRI in the Diagnosis of Bone Metastasis in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Network Analysis of Diagnostic Studies

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis of bone metastasis status of prostate cancer (PCa) is becoming increasingly more important in guiding local and systemic treatment. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have increasingly been utilized globally to assess the bone metastases in PCa. Our meta-analysis was a high-volume series in which the utility of PET/CT with different radioligands was compared to MRI with different parameters in this setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three databases, including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library, were searched to retrieve original trials from their inception to August 31, 2019 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed by two independent investigators utilizing Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using an arm-based model. Absolute sensitivity and specificity, relative sensitivity and specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and superiority index, and their associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess the diagnostic value.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies with 2,843 patients and 4,263 lesions were identified. Network meta-analysis reveals that 68Ga-labeled prostate membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) PET/CT has the highest superiority index (7.30) with the sensitivity of 0.91 and specificity of 0.99, followed by 18F-NaF, 11C-choline, 18F-choline, 18F-fludeoxyglucose (FDG), and 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT. The use of high magnetic field strength, multisequence, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and more imaging planes will increase the diagnostic value of MRI for the detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer patients. Where available, 3.0-T high-quality MRI approaches 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was performed in the detection of bone metastasis on patient-based level (sensitivity, 0.94 vs. 0.91; specificity, 0.94 vs. 0.96; superiority index, 4.43 vs. 4.56).

CONCLUSIONS

68Ga-PSMA PET/CT is recommended for the diagnosis of bone metastasis in prostate cancer patients. Where available, 3.0-T high-quality MRI approaches 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT should be performed in the detection of bone metastasis.

Prostate cancer: Molecular imaging and MRI

The role of molecular imaging in initial evaluation of men with presumed or established diagnosis of prostate cancer and work up of biochemical recurrence and metastatic disease is rapidly evolving due to superior diagnostic performance compared to anatomic imaging. However, variable tumor biology and expression of transmembrane proteins or metabolic alterations poses a challenge. We review the evidence and controversies with emphasis on emerging PET radiopharmaceuticals and experience on clinical utility of PET/CT and PET/MRI in diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.

Ring Sclerosis in Prostate Cancer: Circle of Malignancy or Benignity?

ABSTRACT

Prostate cancer osteoblastic metastases may have different morphologies, and some of these may overlap with certain benign bone lesions. In this series of 5 prostate cancer patients, we describe bone lesions with central lucency and surrounding peripheral sclerosis and their varying appearances on different imaging modalities. Although prostate cancer metastases are commonly associated with sclerotic lesions, they can also present as osteolytic or lucent lesions, and these lesions should be carefully evaluated. The findings emphasize the importance of correlation with prior imaging, comparing findings on different imaging techniques and follow-up to differentiate benign disease from metastatic disease in these situations.

18F-Fluciclovine Positron Emission Tomography in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis

Background: to explore the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-Fluciclovine positron-emission tomography (PET) in prostate cancer (PCa), considering both primary staging prior to radical therapy, biochemical recurrence, and advanced setting. Methods: A systematic web search through Embase and Medline was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies performed from 2011 to 2020 were evaluated. The terms used were “PET” or “positron emission tomography” or “positron emission tomography/computed tomography” or “PET/CT” or “positron emission tomography-computed tomography” or “PET-CT” and “Fluciclovine” or “FACBC” and “prostatic neoplasms” or “prostate cancer” or “prostate carcinoma”. Only studies reporting about true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP) and false negative (FN) findings of 18F-fluciclovine PET were considered eligible. Results: Fifteen out of 283 studies, and 697 patients, were included in the final analysis. The pooled sensitivity for 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT for diagnosis of primary PCa was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80–0.86), the specificity of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.74–0.80). The pooled sensitivity for preoperative LN staging was 0.57 (95% CI: 0.39–0.73) and specificity of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.94–1.00). The pooled sensitivity for the overall detection of recurrence in relapsed patients was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.63–0.73), and specificity of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.60–0.75). Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed promising results in term of sensitivity and specificity for 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT to stage the primary lesion and in the assessment of nodal metastases, and for the detection of PCa locations in the recurrent setting. However, the limited number of studies and the broad heterogeneity in the selected cohorts and in different investigation protocols are limitation affecting the strength of these results.

99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT Versus 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the Evaluation of Metastatic Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

99mTc-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) SPECT/CT is less expensive and readily available modality compared with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for imaging prostate cancer (PC). The aim of this study is to compare the value of these 2 modalities in patients confirmed or suspicious to have metastatic prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-two patients with the mean age of 66.6 ± 10.1 years were studied using 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, with less than 7 days interval between the 2 imaging procedures. Whole-body PET/CT was done 60 minutes after IV injection of 185 MBq (5 mCi) of 68Ga-PSMA. 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT was performed 3 hours after IV injection of 555 to 740 MBq (15-20 mCi) of 99mTc-PSMA. The images of each modality were interpreted independently, and the results were compared according to patient-based as well as region-based analyses.

RESULTS

In patient-based evaluation, both 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans were positive in 95.45% (21/22). In region-based evaluation, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT detected 53 regions (median of 2 regions per patient; range, 0-5), whereas 43 (median of 2 regions per patient; range, 0-5) were detected by 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT. Most of these differences could be explained by lower detection rate of 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT in prostate bed (n = 6). PET/CT detected more involved regions than SPECT/CT (P = 0.007), whereas similar frequency of extraprostatic lesions were diagnosed in both modalities (P = 0.102). Significant correlation was also demonstrated between serum prostate-specific antigen level and imaging parameters of disease extension detected by 2 modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT could be a potential substitute for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in high-risk patients, except when evaluation of prostate bed is of major concern.

Patterns of Recurrence, Detection Rates, and Impact of 18-F Fluciclovine PET/CT on the Management of Men With Recurrent Prostate Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the characteristics of FACBC PET/CT in detecting recurrent prostate cancer after radiation or prostatectomy. The secondary aim was to determine the impact of FACBC PET/CT on radiation treatment recommendations in men with biochemical recurrence postprostatectomy.

METHODS

This is a single center retrospective study of men who underwent an FACBC PET/CT for rising PSA after definitive prostate cancer therapy. Detection rates in men with recurrence following any definitive treatment were compared at different PSA levels and anatomical sites. Radiotherapy treatment recommendations for patients postprostatectomy based on conventional imaging findings were compared to recommendations based on FACBC PET/CT findings.

RESULTS

A total of 103 men underwent imaging with FACBC PET/CT. 74.8% (77) had lesions consistent with sites of prostate cancer recurrence. At PSA thresholds of <1, 1-2, and >2 ng/mL lesions were detected in 35.5%, 63.6%, and 95.2% of patients respectively (P <.001). The most common site of recurrence was outside of the pelvis (37). Detection of extraprostatic or extrapelvic recurrence was observed in 45.5% of men in the PSA tertile <1ng/mL. FACBC PET/CT results led to changes to the recommended radiotherapy treatment plan in 44.1% (15/34) of men with recurrence following radical prostatectomy.

CONCLUSION

FACBC PET/CT demonstrated increased detection of recurrent prostate cancer with increasing PSA levels. Most recurrences were found outside the pelvis. Results of FACBC PET/CT changed radiotherapy management decisions in men treated with prostatectomy, supporting its use in localizing sites of disease recurrence in men with prostate cancer.

Is There Any Role for 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT in the Presence of Undetectable PSA in Prostate Cancer Patients After Definitive Treatment?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of F-fluciclovine PET/CT in the evaluation of prostate cancer (PC) patients after definitive treatment in the presence of undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in PC patients who had undetectable PSA level and underwent fluciclovine PET/CT within a 2-week interval of PSA examination and without interval treatment or other cancer. Patient and tumor characteristics at initial diagnosis, treatment regimens, and findings on fluciclovine PET/CT were collected. Comparisons between groups of positive and negative fluciclovine PET/CT were done by using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 34 fluciclovine PET/CTs from 34 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 4 positive (11.8%) and 30 negative fluciclovine PET/CTs (88.2%). All of the patients with positive results had an initial Gleason score of 7 or higher and locally advanced tumor (T3-T4). More common features at the time of diagnosis among positive study patients as compared with negative ones were atypical histologic variants (25% vs 0%) and very high-risk PC (50% vs 30%). Most of the patients with positive study received second-line hormonal therapy (HT) (50%), whereas patients with negative results received first-line HT (53.3%). Chemotherapy naivety was less common among positive patients (75% vs 96.7%). Sites of involvement on positive fluciclovine PET/CTs were pelvic lymph nodes (2/4, 50%), lung and mediastinal lymph node (1/4, 25%), and prostatectomy bed (1/4, 25%).

CONCLUSIONS

In the presence of undetectable PSA in PC patients after definitive treatment, fluciclovine PET/CT would benefit most to patients with Gleason score of 7 or higher, high disease burden (T3-T4), and atypical histologic variants at the time of diagnosis, and the ones who have history of second-line HT and/or chemotherapy.

Role of metabolic imaging in diagnosis of primary, metastatic, and recurrent prostate cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present review describes the current role of metabolic imaging techniques such as multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI), hyperpolarized MRSI, and positron emission tomography (PET) in the diagnosis of primary prostate cancer, surveillance of low-grade disease, detection of metastases, and evaluation of biochemical recurrence after therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

The natural history of prostate cancer ranges from indolent disease that is optimally monitored by active surveillance, to highly aggressive disease that can be lethal. Current diagnostic methods remain imperfect in noninvasively distinguishing between silent versus aggressive tumors. Hence, there is a high demand for noninvasive imaging techniques that offer insight into biological behavior of prostate cancer cells. Characterization of prostate cancer metabolism is a promising area to provide such insights.

SUMMARY

Metabolic imaging may allow for greater detection and ultimately characterization of tumor based on aggressiveness and spread. Hence, it has the potential to monitor tumor activity, predict prognostic outcomes, and guide individualized therapies.

Positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers for prostate cancer imaging

Imaging plays an increasing role in prostate cancer diagnosis and staging. Accurate staging of prostate cancer is required for optimal treatment planning. In detecting extraprostatic cancer and sites of early recurrence, traditional imaging methods (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, radionuclide bone scan) have suboptimal performance. This leaves a gap between known disease recurrence as indicated by rising prostate-specific antigen and the ability to localize the recurrence on imaging. Novel positron emission tomography (PET) agents including radiolabeled choline, fluciclovine (¹⁸F-FACBC), and agents targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen are being developed and tested to increase diagnostic performance of non-invasive prostate cancer localization. When combined with CT or MRI, these tracers offer a combination of functional information and anatomic localization that is superior to conventional imaging methods. These PET radiotracers have varying mechanisms and excretion patterns affecting their pharmacokinetics and diagnostic performance, which will be reviewed in this article.

Fluorine-18-Labeled Fluciclovine PET/CT in Primary and Biochemical Recurrent Prostate Cancer Management

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to review the utility of ¹⁸F-fluciclovine PET/CT in the evaluation of recurrent prostate cancer. CONCLUSION. Fluorine-18-labeled fluciclovine PET/CT has shown promise in the evaluation of recurrent prostate cancer. Its performance has been superior to that of other imaging modalities. It has had good diagnostic accuracy, especially in the detection of extra-prostatic disease recurrence, and the findings have an impact on treatment planning. Gallium-68-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT has also had excellent performance in the detection of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer with detection rates superior to those of fluciclovine PET/CT.

Molecular Imaging of Bone Metastases and Their Response to Therapy

Bone metastases are common, especially in more prevalent malignancies such as breast and prostate cancer. They cause significant morbidity and draw on health-care resources. Molecular and hybrid imaging techniques, including SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging, have improved diagnostic accuracy in staging the skeleton compared with previous standard imaging methods, allowing earlier tailored treatment. With the introduction of several effective treatment options, it is now even more important to detect and monitor response in bone metastases accurately. Conventional imaging, including radiographs, CT, MRI, and bone scintigraphy, are recognized as being insensitive and nonspecific for response monitoring in a clinically relevant time frame. Early reports of molecular and hybrid imaging techniques, as well as whole-body MRI, promise an earlier and more accurate prediction of response versus nonresponse but have yet to be adopted routinely in clinical practice. We summarize the role of new molecular and hybrid imaging methods, including SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and whole-body MRI. These modalities are associated with improvements in diagnostic accuracy for the staging and response assessment of skeletal metastases over standard imaging methods, being able to quantify biologic processes related to the bone microenvironment as well as tumor cells. The described improvements in the imaging of bone metastases and their response to therapy have led to adoption of some of these methods into routine clinical practice in some centers. These methods also provide a better way to assess the treatment response of bone metastases in clinical trials.

Imaging for Metastasis in Prostate Cancer: A Review of the Literature

Background: Initial staging and assessment of treatment activity in metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) patients is controversial. Indications for the various available imaging modalities are not well-established due to rapid advancements in imaging and treatment.

Methods: We conducted a critical literature review of the main imaging abnormalities that suggest a diagnosis of metastasis in localized and locally advanced PCa or in cases of biological relapse. We also assessed the role of the various imaging modalities available in routine clinical practice for the detection of metastases and response to treatment in metastatic PCa patients.

Results: In published clinical trials, the most commonly used imaging modalities for the detection and evaluation of therapeutic response are bone scan, abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT), and pelvic and bone magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For the detection and follow-up of metastases during treatment, modern imaging techniques i.e., choline-positron emission tomography (PET), fluciclovine-PET, or Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET provide better sensitivity and specificity. This is particularly the case of fluciclovine-PET and PSMA-PET in cases of biochemical recurrence with low values of prostate specific antigen.

Conclusions: In routine clinical practice, conventional imaging still have a role, and communication between imagers and clinicians should be encouraged. Present and future clinical trials should use modern imaging methods to clarify their usage.