Diagnostic performance of 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET/computerized tomography in identifying bone marrow infiltration in new patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma

The Role of [18F]FDG PET and Clinicopathologic Factors in Detecting and Predicting Bone Marrow Involvement in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Background/Objectives: This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) using bone marrow biopsy (BMB) and clinical follow-up as reference standards. It further identifies predictive factors for bone marrow involvement (BMI) in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients. Methods: NHL patients who underwent [18F]FDG PET and BMB at diagnosis in a tertiary cancer center were included in this study. Diagnostic accuracy was analyzed, and logistic regression was performed to identify BMI predictors using Stata software version 17. A retrospective analysis of 262 NHL patients was conducted. Results: Concordance rates between [18F]FDG PET and BMB and between [18F]FDG PET and clinical follow-up were 75.6% and 88.1%, respectively. The primary cause of discordance between [18F]FDG PET and BMB was the detection of extra-iliac focal hypermetabolic bone marrow lesions by [18F]FDG PET, which were negative on BMB. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of [18F]FDG PET were 62.9%, 80%, and 75.6%, respectively, with BMB as a reference, and 74.1%, 97.5%, and 88.2%, respectively, with clinical follow-up as a reference. The focal bone marrow [18F]FDG pattern was the most reliable indicator of BMI. Univariate logistic regression showed that advanced NHL stage, elevated alkaline phosphatase, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase were significant predictors of BMI. Multivariate analysis revealed advanced NHL stage and thrombocytopenia as clinical predictors. Conclusions: [18F]FDG PET is a reliable tool for assessing BMI, providing comprehensive total-body evaluation and identifying extra-iliac involvement beyond the scope of BMB. The collective interpretation of molecular imaging, clinical, and biochemical factors is crucial for predicting BMI.

18F-FDG PET/CT versus bone marrow biopsy in detecting bone marrow infiltration in initial staging of pediatric lymphoma

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy of PET/CT using18F-FDG (18F-fluorodeoxyglucose) as a radiotracer compared to conventional bone marrow biopsy (BMB) in detecting infiltration to bone marrow (BM) in pediatric patients with lymphoma at the time of initial diagnosis.

METHODS

66 pediatric patients with lymphoma (47Hodgkin's and 19non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) were referred for initial staging by18F-FDG PET/CT study. All patients underwent bilateral iliac BMB and 18F-FDG PET/CT scan with no more than 2 weeks interval in-between. Follow-up for at least 6 months was used as a reference standard to compare diagnostic performance between two modalities in detecting bone marrow infiltration (BMI).

RESULTS

Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, as well as positive and negative predictive values of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting BMI were (80%, 86%, 85%, 63%, and 94%) in contrast to BMB (80%, 53%, 59%, 33%, and 90%) respectively. 18F-FDG PET/CT was concordant to BMB in 39/66 patients (59%).

CONCLUSION

18F-FDG PET/CT was more accurate and specific, with higher predictive values than BMB in detecting BMI during initial staging of pediatric lymphoma. In most pediatric lymphoma patients, 18F-FDG PET/CT can be used instead of BMB to determine BMI during their initial staging process.

Detection performance and prognostic value of initial bone marrow involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a single centre 18F-FDG PET/CT and bone marrow biopsy evaluation study

BACKGROUND

Detection of bone marrow involvement (BMI) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) typically relies on invasive bone marrow biopsy (BMB) that faces procedure limitations, while 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging offers a noninvasive alternative. The present study assesses the performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in DLBCL BMI detection, its agreement with BMB, and the impact of BMI on survival outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study analyzes baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT and BMB findings in145 stage II-IV DLBCL patients, evaluating both performance of the two diagnostic procedures and the impact of BMI on survival.

RESULTS

DLBCL BMI was detected in 38 patients (26.2%) using PET/CT and in 18 patients (12.4%) using BMB. Concordant results were seen in 79.3% of patients, with 20.7% showing discordant results. Combining PET/CT and BMB data, we identified 29.7% of patients with BMI. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of PET/CT for detecting DLBCL BMI were 88.4%, 100%, 100%, 95.3%, and 96.5%, respectively, while BMB showed lower sensitivity (41.9%) and NPV (46.8%). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached in any gender subgroup, with 5-year OS rates of 82% (total), 84% (female), and 80% (male) (p = 0.461), while different International Prognostic Index (IPI) groups exhibited varied 5-year OS rates: 94% for low risk (LR), 91% for low-intermediate risk (LIR), 84% for high-intermediate risk (HIR), and 65% for high risk (HR) (p = 0.0027). Bone marrow involvement did not impact OS significantly (p = 0.979).

CONCLUSIONS

18F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared to BMB. While other studies reported poorer overall and BMI 5-year OS in DLBCL, our findings demonstrated favourable survival data.

Diagnostic performance of integrated whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI for detecting bone marrow involvement in indolent lymphoma: Comparison with 18F-FDG PET or MRI alone

Purpose

To investigate the diagnostic performance of integrated whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI for detecting bone marrow involvement (BMI) in indolent lymphoma compared with 18F-FDG PET or MRI alone.

Methods

Patients with treatment-naive indolent lymphoma who underwent integrated whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI and bone marrow biopsy (BMB) were prospectively enrolled. Agreement between PET, MRI, PET/MRI, BMB, and the reference standard was assessed using kappa statistics. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of each method were calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the area under the curve (AUC). AUCs of PET, MRI, PET/MRI, and BMB were compared using the DeLong test.

Results

Fifty-five patients (24 males and 31 females; mean age: 51.1 ± 10.1 years) were included in this study. Of these 55 patients, 19 (34.5%) had BMI. Two patients were upstaged as extra bone marrow lesions were detected via PET/MRI. 97.1% (33/34) of participants were confirmed as BMB-negative in the PET-/MRI-group. PET/MRI (parallel test) and BMB showed excellent agreement with the reference standard (k = 0.843, 0.918), whereas PET and MRI showed moderate agreement (k = 0.554, 0.577). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV for identifying BMI in indolent lymphoma were 52.6%, 97.2%, 81.8%, 90.9%, and 79.5%, respectively, for PET; 63.2%, 91.7%, 81.8%, 80.0%, and 82.5%, respectively, for MRI; 89.5%, 100%, 96.4%, 100%, and 94.7%, respectively, for BMB; and 94.7%, 91.7%, 92.7%, 85.7%, and 97.1%, respectively, for PET/MRI (parallel test). According to ROC analysis, the AUCs of PET, MRI, BMB, and PET/MRI (parallel test) for detecting BMI in indolent lymphomas were 0.749, 0.774, 0.947, and 0.932, respectively. The DeLong test showed significant differences between the AUCs of PET/MRI (parallel test) and those of PET (P = 0.003) and MRI (P = 0.004). Regarding histologic subtypes, the diagnostic performance of PET/MRI for detecting BMI in small lymphocytic lymphoma was lower than that in follicular lymphoma, which was in turn lower than that in marginal zone lymphoma.

Conclusion

Integrated whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI showed excellent sensitivity and accuracy for detecting BMI in indolent lymphoma compared with 18F-FDG PET or MRI alone, demonstrating that 18F-FDG PET/MRI is an optimal method and a reliable alternative to BMB.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05004961 and NCT05390632)

FDG PET/CT versus Bone Marrow Biopsy for Diagnosis of Bone Marrow Involvement in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Systematic Review

The management of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients requires the identification of bone marrow involvement (BMI) using a bone marrow biopsy (BMB), as recommended by international guidelines. Multiple studies have shown that [18F]FDG positron emission tomography, combined with computed tomography (PET/CT), may provide important information and may detect BMI, but there is still an ongoing debate as to whether it is sensitive enough for NHL patients in order to replace or be used as a complimentary method to BMB. The objective of this article is to systematically review published studies on the performance of [18F]FDG PET/CT in detecting BMI compared to the BMB for NHL patients. A population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) search in PubMed and Scopus databases (until 1 November 2021) was performed. A total of 41 studies, comprising 6147 NHL patients, were found to be eligible and were included in the analysis conducted in this systematic review. The sensitivity and specificity for identifying BMI in NHL patients were 73% and 90% for [18F]FDG PET/CT and 56% and 100% for BMB. For aggressive NHL, the sensitivity and specificity to assess the BMI for the [18F]FDG PET/CT was 77% and 94%, while for the BMB it was 58% and 100%. However, sensitivity and specificity to assess the BMI for indolent NHL for the [18F]FDG PET/CT was 59% and 85%, while for the BMB it was superior, and equal to 94% and 100%. With regard to NHL, a [18F]FDG PET/CT scan can only replace BMB if it is found to be positive and if patients can be categorized as having advanced staged NHL with high certainty. [18F]FDG PET/CT might recover tumors missed by BMB, and is recommended for use as a complimentary method, even in indolent histologic subtypes of NHL.