Review of the role of MRI and 18 F-sodium fluoride PET/computed tomography in the characterisation of spinal bone metastases in a cohort of patients with breast cancer

Diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities for detection of spinal metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Detecting spinal metastases is highly relevant in patients with oncological disorders as it can affect the staging and treatment of their disease. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, bone scintigraphy (BS), and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for spinal metastases detection.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science were systematically searched until March 2024 for diagnostic accuracy studies on spinal metastases detection (PROSPERO-registration: CRD42024540139). Data extraction and quality assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool were performed by two independent reviewers. Using bivariate random effects modeling, pooled sensitivities, specificities, and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) were calculated, and hierarchical summary operating curves were constructed.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies (49 datasets), encompassing 3102 patients were included. Per-patient pooled sensitivities of CT, MRI, PET/CT, BS and SPECT were 70%, 93%, 82%, 75%, and 84%, respectively. Pooled specificities were 74%, 85%, 75%, 92%, and 81%, respectively. Per-lesion pooled sensitivities of CT, MRI, PET/CT, BS and SPECT were 76%, 91%, 92%, 77%, and 92%, respectively. Pooled specificities were 91%, 94%, 85%, 52%, and 86%, respectively. MRI had the highest DOR in per patient and lesion analyses.

CONCLUSION

MRI had highest diagnostic accuracy for spinal metastases detection on patient and lesion level, suggesting a broader use in addition to the routine staging CT, at least in patients at high risk and where the detection of a spinal metastasis could alter therapy decisions. Herein, results should be considered with the limitations of each modality.

Diagnosing Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis on Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies of 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT, 18F-NaF-PET/CT, MRI, Contrast-Enhanced CT, and Bone Scintigraphy

This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT, 18F-NaF-PET/CT, MRI, contrast-enhanced CT, and bone scintigraphy for diagnosing bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Following PRISMA-DTA guidelines, we reviewed studies assessing 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT, 18F-NaF-PET/CT, MRI, contrast-enhanced CT, and bone scintigraphy for diagnosing bone metastases in high-stage primary breast cancer (stage III or IV) or known primary breast cancer with suspicion of recurrence (staging or re-staging). A comprehensive search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Embase was conducted until February 2024. Inclusion criteria were original studies using these imaging methods, excluding those focused on AI/machine learning, primary breast cancer without metastases, mixed cancer types, preclinical studies, and lesion-based accuracy. Preference was given to studies using biopsy or follow-up as the reference standard. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. Screening, bias assessment, and data extraction were independently performed by two researchers, with discrepancies resolved by a third. We applied bivariate random-effects models in meta-analysis and network meta-analyzed differences in sensitivity and specificity between the modalities. Forty studies were included, with 29 contributing to the meta-analyses. Of these, 13 studies investigated one single modality only. Both 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT (sensitivity: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.89-0.97; specificity: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.96-0.99), MRI (0.94, 0.82-0.98; 0.93, 0.87-0.96), and 18F-NaF-PET/CT (0.95, 0.85-0.98; 1, 0.93-1) outperformed the less sensitive modalities CE-CT (0.70, 0.62-0.77; 0.98, 0.97-0.99) and bone scintigraphy (0.83, 0.75-0.88; 0.96, 0.87-0.99). The network meta-analysis of multi-modality studies supports the comparable performance of 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT and MRI in diagnosing bone metastases (estimated differences in sensitivity and specificity, respectively: 0.01, -0.16 - 0.18; -0.02, -0.15 - 0.12). The results from bivariate random effects modelling and network meta-analysis were consistent for all modalities apart from 18F-NaF-PET/CT. We concluded that 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT and MRI have high and comparable accuracy for diagnosing bone metastases in breast cancer patients. Both outperformed CE-CT and bone scintigraphy regarding sensitivity. Future multimodality studies based on consented thresholds are warranted for further exploration, especially in terms of the potential role of 18F-NaF-PET/CT in bone metastasis diagnosis in breast cancer.

Incidence, epidemiology, radiology, and classification of metastatic spine tumors: WFNS Spine Committee recommendations

Spinal metastasis (SMs) are the most encountered tumors of the spine. Their occurrence is expected roughly around one to two years after primary tumor diagnosis. Since the advent of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), this technology has been considered the gold standard for SMs diagnosis and characterization due to its precise ability to comprehend the rate of soft tissue compression/invasion (dural sac/nervous tissue), which is one of the main drivers of management strategies. Computed Tomography (CT) remains unbeatable when a detailed bony anatomy and instability assessment is searched. Nuclear medicine technologies may have a role in diagnosis when standard MR or CT study findings are inconclusive or when the extent of the systemic metastatic disease is studied. The main objective of this study is to offer an update on the epidemiology and radiology of spinal metastasis (SMs), endorsed by the WFNS Spine Committee. A systematic review of the literature of the last ten years gave 1531 results with "spine/spinal metastatic tumors/metastasis AND radiology OR imaging OR classification" as search strings in all fields, of which 56 papers were fully analyzed. The results were discussed and voted on in two consensus meetings of the WFNS (World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies) Spine Committee, reaching a positive or negative consensus using the Delphi method. The committee stated nine recommendations on two main topics: (1) Incidence and epidemiology of SMs; (2) Radiology and classifications of SMs.

18F-Fluoride PET/CT-Updates

Sodium Fluoride-18 production started in the 1940s and was described clinically for the first time in 1962 as a bone-imaging agent. However, its use became dormant with the development of conventional bone scintigraphy, especially due to its low cost. Conventional bone scintigraphy has been the most utilized Nuclear Medicine technique for identifying osteoblastic bone metastases, especially in prostate and breast cancers for decades and is also employed to identify benign bone disease, especially in the orthopedic setting. While bone scintigraphy is highly sensitive, it lacks adequate specificity. With the advent of high-quality 3D Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT), images, Sodium Fluoride-18 imaging with PET/CT (Fluoride PET/CT) re-emerged. This PET/CT bone-imaging agent provides higher sensitivity and specificity to detect bone lesions in both the oncological scenario as well as to identify benign bone and joint disorders. PET/CT bone-imaging provides a precise view of the bone metabolism remodeling processes at a molecular level, throughout the skeleton, and combines anatomical information, enhancing diagnostic specificity and accuracy. This article review will explore the updates on clinical applications of Fluoride PET/CT in oncology and benign conditions encompassing orthopedic, inflammatory and cardiovascular conditions and treatment response assessment.

Role of 18F-NaF PET/CT in bone metastases

The use of 18F sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) in positron emission tomography (PET/CT) is increasing. This resurgence of an old tracer has been driven by several factors, including its superior diagnostic performance over standard 99mTc-based bone scintigraphy (BS), availability of PET/CT imaging systems, a shortened examination time and an increase in the number of regional commercial PET radiotracer distribution. In this special article, we aimed to highlight the current place of the 18F-NaF PET/CT in the imaging of bone metastases (BM) in a variety of malignancies. A special focus is given to the following ones: breast cancer (BC), prostate cancer (PCa). Also, other malignancies such as bladder cancer, lung cancer, thyroid cancer, multiple myeloma, head and neck cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma have been addressed. At last, we summarize the advantages and limits of the 18F-NaF PET/CT compared to other imaging modalities in these settings.

MRI-Conditional Breast Tissue Expander: First In-Human Multi-Case Assessment of MRI-Related Complications and Image Quality

This study aims to assess potential complications and effects on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image quality of a new MRI-conditional breast tissue expander (Motiva Flora^®) in its first in-human multi-case application. Twenty-four patients with 36 expanders underwent non-contrast breast MRI with T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences on a 3 T unit before breast tissue expander exchange surgery, being monitored during and after MRI for potential complications. Three board-certified breast radiologists blindly and independently reviewed image quality using a four-level scale ("poor", "sufficient", "good", and "excellent"), with inter-reader reliability being assessed with Kendall's τ_b. The maximum diameters of RFID-related artifacts on T1-weighted and DWI sequences were compared with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. All 24 examinations were completed without patient-related or device-related complications. The T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences of all the examinations had "excellent" image quality and a median 11 mm (IQR 9-12 mm) RFID artifact maximum diameter, significantly lower (p < 0.001) than on the DWI images (median 32.5 mm, IQR 28.5-34.5 mm). DWI quality was rated at least "good" in 63% of the examinations, with strong inter-reader reliability (Kendall's τ_b 0.837, 95% CI 0.687-0.952). This first in-human study confirms the MRI-conditional profile of this new expander, which does not affect the image quality of T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences and moderately affects DWI quality.