Sentinel lymph node identification in breast cancer: a comparison study of deep versus superficial injection of radiopharmaceutical

Ultrasound-guided sentinel node procedure for nonpalpable breast carcinoma

PURPOSE

Peritumoral and periareolar tracer injection techniques lead to different lymphatic drainage in sentinel lymph node biopsy procedures. In a prospective study, the visualization and identification rates of the ultrasound (US)-guided tracer injection technique for palpable and nonpalpable breast tumors were evaluated.

METHODS

In 1262 consecutive patients with cT₁₋₂N0 breast cancer, sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed following peritumoral tracer injection. In the case of nonpalpable breast lesions, Tc-99m nanocolloid injections were given using a 7.5 MHz US probe. In the case of ultrasonographically nonvisible microcalcifications, the US-guided injection technique was wire guided.

RESULTS

In 331 patients with nonpalpable breast lesions (26.2%), the lymphoscintigraphic visualization and surgical retrieval rates of axillary sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were 98.5 and 99.4%, respectively. For internal mammary (IM) SLNs, these rates were 21.1 and 17.8%, respectively. These rates were similar in patients with palpable and nonpalpable tumors. Axillary metastases were detected in 38.7% of the patients with palpable tumors versus 16.5% of those with nonpalpable tumors (P<0.001), whereas IM metastases were found in 4.8 and 3.0% of patients, respectively (P=0.165).

CONCLUSION

In nonpalpable breast lesions, the US-guided injection technique is an accurate technique for SLN identification and retrieval. The substantial rates of IM metastases in both palpable and nonpalpable lesions favor a peritumoral tracer injection technique.

Current status of sentinel lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer

Axillary node status is the most important prognostic indicator for patients with invasive breast cancer. Sentinel lymph-node biopsy (SLNB) is widely accepted and the preferred procedure for identifying lymph-node metastasis. SLNB allows focused excision and pathological examination of the most likely axillary lymph nodes to receive tumor metastases while avoiding morbidities associated with complete axillary nodal dissection. Since its introduction in the early 1990s, the process of SLNB has undergone continual modification and refinement; however, the procedure varies between institutions and controversies remain. In this review, we examine the technical issues that influence the success of lymph node mapping, discuss the controversies, and summarize the indications and contraindications for axillary node mapping and biopsy in clinical practice.

Added value of intraoperative real-time imaging in searches for difficult-to-locate sentinel nodes

Localization of sentinel lymph nodes can be challenging if they are in difficult anatomic locations or near high radiotracer activity. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of intraoperative real-time imaging using a portable gamma-camera in conjunction with a conventional gamma-counting probe when it is difficult to localize the sentinel node.

METHODS

After (99m)Tc-nanocolloid injection, patients with various malignancies underwent presurgical lymphoscintigraphy followed by surgery (usually the next day). We evaluated 20 patients who required sentinel lymph node biopsy and in whom the location or other characteristics of the sentinel node would make intraoperative retrieval difficult. During surgery, the sentinel node was localized using a portable gamma-camera together with a hand-held gamma-probe. A (153)Gd pointer or (125)I seed was used to better depict the sentinel node location in real time.

RESULTS

Using only a conventional hand-held gamma-probe, surgeons were able to definitively localize the sentinel node in 15 of 20 patients. Intraoperatively, the portable gamma-camera showed uptake by the definite sentinel node in 19 of 20 patients and helped to precisely localize the node with the hand-held gamma-probe in 4 patients. In 1 of these patients, the sentinel node was metastatic.

CONCLUSION

The combination of a standard hand-held gamma-probe and real-time imaging provided by a portable gamma-camera offers a high intraoperative detection rate in patients with difficult sentinel node localization as assessed by presurgical lymphoscintigraphy.