Current role of endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease diagnosis and management

Effect of Modulen vs budesonide on clinical response and mucosal healing in Crohn's patients

BACKGROUND

Mucosal healing has become an important goal of Crohn's disease (CD) treatments. Modulen, enriched with transforming growth factor-beta 2, and budesonide are commonly accepted treatments for mild-moderate CD. However, their effects on the small bowel (SB) mucosa remain underexplored.

AIM

To prospectively assess clinical and mucosal responses to Modulen vs budesonide in adults with CD, using SB capsule endoscopy.

METHODS

Thirty patients were divided into two groups: Modulen + home-based diet (21 patients) and budesonide (9 patients) for an eight-week intervention followed by four weeks of follow-up. Clinical, laboratory, and endoscopic responses were evaluated. The mucosal changes were assessed through SB capsule endoscopy.

RESULTS

Results indicated significant clinical improvement in the Modulen group with reduced CD activity index (P = 0.041) and improved inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire score (P = 0.016). Moreover, Modulen was associated with a significant SB mucosal improvement, evidenced by a decrease in Lewis score (P = 0.027). No significant changes were observed in calprotectin or other laboratory parameters. Conversely, budesonide exhibited more modest clinical effects, but it improved calprotectin, hemoglobin, and C-reactive protein levels (P = 0.051, P = 0.014, and P = 0.038, respectively). The capsule endoscopy did not reveal a significant mucosal response in the budesonide group.

CONCLUSION

Both interventions have a role in CD treatment. Yet, their effects differ and may complement each other: Modulen yields clinical and mucosal improvements, while budesonide primarily leads mainly to laboratory improvements.

Role of Device-Assisted Enteroscopy in Crohn's Disease

Crohn's Disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract, posing diagnostic and management challenges due to its potential involvement of any segment from the mouth to the anus. Device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) has emerged as a significant advancement in the management of CD, particularly for its ability to access the small intestine-a region difficult to evaluate with conventional endoscopic methods. This review discusses the pivotal role of DAE in the nuanced management of CD, emphasizing its enhanced diagnostic precision and therapeutic efficacy. DAE techniques, including double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE), single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE), and the now-withdrawn spiral enteroscopy, enable comprehensive mucosal assessment, targeted biopsies, and therapeutic interventions like stricture dilation, bleeding control, and foreign body removal. Despite its benefits, DAE carries risks such as perforation, bleeding, and pancreatitis, which require careful procedural planning and a skilled execution. The review highlights DAE's impact on reducing surgical interventions and improving patient outcomes through minimally invasive approaches, thereby enhancing the quality of life for patients with CD. Continuous improvement and research are essential in order to maximize DAE's utility and safety in clinical practice.

Characteristics and Endoscopic Classification of Ulcerative Lesions Affecting the Ileocecal Valve

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to propose an endoscopic classification system for ulcerative lesions on the ileocecal valve and investigate its relevance to the underlying etiology.

METHODS

Among the 60,325 patients who underwent colonoscopy at our hospital from January 2006 to December 2018, patients with ulcerative lesions on the ileocecal valve were included. The following data were obtained using the hospital's medical records: sex, age, clinical diagnosis, laboratory data, and endoscopic and histological findings. Patients who have ulcerative colitis and who were not evaluated by histological examination were excluded. Ulcerative lesions on the ileocecal valve were classified into 3 groups according to their endoscopic appearance: small shallow ulcerative lesions without edematous change (group A), lateral spreading shallow ulcerative lesions with edematous change (group B), and deep deformed ulcerative lesions (group C). The association between this endoscopic classification and its clinical diagnosis, clinical course, and the interobserver reliability were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 72 patients who were eligible for analysis, 18 were assigned to group A, 9 to group B, and 45 to group C. Infectious enteritis was mainly assigned to group A (group A, 12; group B, none; and group C, 6; p < 0.0001), inflammatory bowel disease was mainly assigned to group C (group A, none; group B, 5; and group C, 35; p < 0.0001), and malignant tumor was assigned to group C only. Interobserver reliability was extremely high among the 3 examining doctors (kappa value 0.7-0.8).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic classification was divided into 3 groups for ulcerative lesions on the ileocecal valve, and this system could be beneficial for presuming their clinical diagnoses.

Lactoferrin and Its Detection Methods: A Review

Lactoferrin (LF) is one of the major functional proteins in maintaining human health due to its antioxidant, antibacterial, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory activities. Abnormal levels of LF in the human body are related to some serious diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease, Alzheimer’s disease and dry eye disease. Recent studies indicate that LF can be used as a biomarker for diagnosis of these diseases. Many methods have been developed to detect the level of LF. In this review, the biofunctions of LF and its potential to work as a biomarker are introduced. In addition, the current methods of detecting lactoferrin have been presented and discussed. We hope that this review will inspire efforts in the development of new sensing systems for LF detection.

Fecal lactoferrin accurately reflects mucosal inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Studies have demonstrated a potential role for fecal biomarkers such as fecal calprotectin (FC) and fecal lactoferrin (FL) in monitoring inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) - Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). However, their correlation to endoscopic scores, disease severity and affected intestinal surface has not been extensively investigated.

AIM

To correlate FL, and for comparison white blood cell (WBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP), with endoscopic scores, disease extent and location in CD and UC.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis in 188 patients who had FL, CRP and WBC determined within 30 d of endoscopy. Disease location, disease extent (number of intestinal segments involved), disease severity (determined by endoscopic scores), timing of FL testing in relation to colonoscopy, as well as the use of effective fast acting medications (steroids and biologics) between colonoscopy and FL measurement, were recorded.

RESULTS

In 131 CD and 57 UC patients, both CRP and FL - but not WBC - distinguished disease severity (inactive, mild, moderate, severe). In patients receiving fast-acting (steroids or biologics) treatment in between FL and colonoscopy, FL showed a higher correlation to endoscopic scores when tested before vs after the procedure (r = 0.596, P < 0.001, vs r = 0.285, P = 0.15 for the Simple Endoscopic Score for CD; and r = 0.402, P = 0.01 vs r = 0.054 P = 0.84 for Disease Activity Index). Finally, FL was significantly correlated with the diseased mucosal surface (colon-ileocolon > small bowel) and the number of inflamed colon segments.

CONCLUSION

FL and CRP separated disease severity categories with FL showing lower discriminating P-values. FL showed a close correlation with the involved mucosal surface and with disease extent and was more closely correlated to endoscopy when determined before the procedure – this indicating that inflammatory activity changes associated with therapy might be rapidly reflected by FL levels. FL can accurately and timely characterize intestinal inflammation in IBD.

The accuracy of intestinal ultrasound compared with small bowel capsule endoscopy in assessment of suspected Crohn's disease in patients with negative ileocolonoscopy

BACKGROUND

Small bowel involvement in Crohn's disease (CD) is frequently proximal to the ileocecal valve and inaccessible by conventional ileocolonoscopy (IC). Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is among the prime modalities for assessment of small bowel disease in these patients. Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is an accurate bedside fast and low-cost diagnostic modality utilized in CD for both diagnosis and monitoring. The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of IUS in patients with suspected CD after a negative IC, and to evaluate the correlation of IUS with SBCE, inflammatory biomarkers and other cross-sectional imaging techniques.

METHODS

Prospective single center study in which patients with suspected CD underwent IUS and SBCE examinations within 3 days. IUS results were blindly compared with SBCE that served as the gold standard. A post hoc comparison was performed of IUS and SBCE results and available cross-sectional imaging results (computed tomography or magnetic resonance enterography) as well as inflammatory biomarkers if measured. The study cohort was followed for 1 year. In case of discordance between the IUS and SBCE results, the diagnosis at 1 year was reported.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included in the study. The diagnostic yield of both IUS and SBCE for the diagnosis of small bowel CD was 38%. The IUS findings significantly correlated to small bowel inflammation detected by SBCE (r = 0.532, p < 0.001), with fair sensitivity and specificity (72% and 84%). Cross-sectional imaging results significantly correlated to IUS as well (r = 0.46, p = 0.018). Follow up was available in 8 of the 10 cases of discordance between IUS and SBCE. In all of these cases, diagnosis of CD was not fully established at the end of the follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic yield of CE and IUS for detection of CD in patients with negative ileocolonoscopy was similar. IUS can be a useful diagnostic tool in suspected CD when IC is negative.

Practice patterns and clinical significance of use of capsule endoscopy in suspected and established Crohn's disease

Background/Aims

Although the role of capsule endoscopy (CE) in Crohn's disease (CD) has expanded, CE is not used routinely for diagnosing and evaluating CD in Korea. We aimed to investigate current patterns of practice and evaluate the clinical significance of the use of CE in CD in Korean patients.

Methods

Among 651 CE procedures performed for various indications, we retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients who underwent CE in 57 cases of suspected CD (sCD) and 14 cases of established CD (eCD).

Results

In the sCD group, CE was most commonly used for the initial diagnosis of CD (54.4%). Capsule retention was found in only 1 patient in the eCD group (1/71, 1.4%). In the sCD group, 28.1% of patients were diagnosed with CD on the basis of CE findings; other diseases diagnosed included tuberculous enteritis (7.0%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced enteropathy (5.3%), and other enteritis (17.5%). Only 11.5% of patients with eCD (14/122) underwent CE. The indication for CE in the 14 patients with eCD was to assess disease extent and activity. The overall diagnostic yield of CE was 59.7%. Therapeutic strategies were changed in 70.2% of patients in the sCD group and 50% of those in the eCD group based on CE findings.

Conclusions

In clinical practice, CE was most commonly indicated for the initial diagnosis of CD and was not generally performed in patients with eCD. CE appears to be an effective diagnostic modality for evaluating sCD and is useful for determining therapeutic strategies for patients with sCD and those with eCD.

The impact of panenteric capsule endoscopy on the management of Crohn's disease

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disease, in most patients involving the small and large bowel. In recent years, with the use of small bowel video capsule endoscopy (SBCE), it has become clear that in 50% or more of adults with established CD there is not only distal but also proximal small bowel involvement that suggests poor prognosis. A great deal of effort has been put into early diagnosis and stratification of patients into low versus high risk, thus directing treatment from step-up, or accelerated step-up, to top-down therapies. SBCE has been used for assessment of small bowel pathologies for over 15 years, mainly for occult gastrointestinal bleeding and suspected CD. In recent years, a colonic capsule, with cameras on both sides and a wider angle of view, has been developed and is used by some to survey both small and large bowel. Recently the same capsule, with adjustments, has been released in Europe, concentrating (with specialized software) on inflammatory bowel disease. In this review I summarize the new data regarding the use of SBCE as well as the small bowel colon (SBC) versions of capsule endoscopy in established CD and the ways these could alter the management of such patients.

Detection of Small Bowel Mucosal Healing and Deep Remission in Patients With Known Small Bowel Crohn's Disease Using Biomarkers, Capsule Endoscopy, and Imaging

OBJECTIVES

Mucosal healing (MH) and deep remission (DR) are associated with improved outcomes in Crohn's disease (CD). However, most of the current data pertain to colonic MH and DR, whereas the evidence regarding the prevalence and impact of small bowel (SB) MH is scarce. The aim of this study was to to evaluate the prevalence of SBMH and DR in quiescent SBCD.

METHODS

Patients with known SBCD in clinical remission (CDAI<150) or with mild symptoms (CDAI<220) were prospectively recruited and underwent video capsule endoscopy after verification of SB patency. Inflammation was quantified using the Lewis score (LS). SBMH was defined as LS<135, whereas a significant inflammation was defined as LS>790. Clinico-biomarker remission was defined as a combination of clinical remission and normal biomarkers. DR was defined as a combination of clinico-biomarker remission and MH.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients with proven SB patency were enrolled; 52 (92.9%) patients were in clinical remission and 21 (40.4%) in clinico-biomarker remission. SBMH was demonstrated in 8/52 (15.4%) of patients in clinical remission. Moderate-to-severe SB inflammation was demonstrated in 11/52 (21.1%) of patients in clinical remission and in 1/21 (4.7%) of patients in clinical and biomarker remission. Only 7/52 (13.5%) patients were in DR.

CONCLUSIONS

SB inflammation is detected in the majority of CD patients in clinical and biomarker remission. SBMH and DR were rare and were independent of treatment modality. Our findings represent the true inflammatory burden in quiescent patients with SBCD.

Infliximab and azathioprine combination therapy vs monotherapy for inflammatory bowel disease: A meta-analysis

AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of infliximab (IFX) and azathioprine (AZA) combination therapy vs monotherapy in moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Ovid, Google, Wanfang database, Vip database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure database (CNKI) and the Chinese biomedical literature database of randomized controlled clinical trials about IFX and AZA in IBD. Data of the included studies were extracted and their quality was evaluated to conduct a meta-analysis.

RESULTS: Based on the inclusion criteria, 6 prospective randomized controlled clinical studies were included in this study. Clinical remission rate and endoscopic remission rate were significantly improved in the combination group when compared with IFX or AZA monotherapy. However, there was no significant statistical difference in overall adverse reactions between the two groups.

CONCLUSION: For patients with moderate to severe IBD who failed the first-line treatment, combination of IFX and AZA is superior to monotherapy. Combination therapy can improve clinical remission and endoscopic mucosal healing efficacy, although overall adverse reactions show no significant difference compared with monotherapy.

The multidisciplinary health care team in the management of stenosis in Crohn's disease

Background

Stricture formation is a common complication of Crohn’s disease (CD), occurring in approximately one-third of all patients with this condition. Our aim was to summarize the available epidemiology data on strictures in patients with CD, to outline the principal evidence on diagnostic imaging, and to provide an overview of the current knowledge on treatment strategies, including surgical and endoscopic options. Overall, the unifying theme of this narrative review is the multidisciplinary approach in the clinical management of patients with stricturing CD.

Methods

A Medline search was performed, using “Inflammatory Bowel Disease”, “stricture”, “Crohn’s Disease”, “Ulcerative Colitis”, “endoscopic balloon dilatation” and “strictureplasty” as keywords. A selection of clinical cohort studies and systematic reviews were reviewed.

Results

Strictures in CD are described as either inflammatory or fibrotic. They can occur de novo, at sites of bowel anastomosis or in the ileal pouch. CD-related strictures generally show a poor response to medical therapies, and surgical bowel resection or surgical strictureplasty are often required. Over the last three decades, the potential role of endoscopic balloon dilatation has grown in importance, and nowadays this technique is a valid option, complementary to surgery.

Conclusion

Patients with stricturing CD require complex clinical management, which benefits from a multidisciplinary approach: gastroenterologists, pediatricians, radiologists, surgeons, specialist nurses, and dieticians are among the health care providers involved in supporting these patients throughout diagnosis, prevention of complications, and treatment.