Restoring antiviral immunity with adoptive transfer of ex-vivo generated T cells

The prospect of universal coronavirus immunity: characterization of reciprocal and non-reciprocal T cell responses against SARS-CoV2 and common human coronaviruses

T cell immunity plays a central role in clinical outcomes of Coronavirus Infectious Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and T cell-focused vaccination or cellular immunotherapy might provide enhanced protection for some immunocompromised patients. Pre-existing T cell memory recognizing SARS-CoV-2 antigens antedating COVID-19 infection or vaccination, may have developed as an imprint of prior infections with endemic non-SARS human coronaviruses (hCoVs) OC43, HKU1, 229E, NL63, pathogens of "common cold". In turn, SARS-CoV-2-primed T cells may recognize emerging variants or other hCoV viruses and modulate the course of subsequent hCoV infections. Cross-immunity between hCoVs and SARS-CoV-2 has not been well characterized. Here, we systematically investigated T cell responses against the immunodominant SARS-CoV-2 spike, nucleocapsid and membrane proteins and corresponding antigens from α- and β-hCoVs among vaccinated, convalescent, and unexposed subjects. Broad T cell immunity against all tested SARS-CoV-2 antigens emerged in COVID-19 survivors. In convalescent and in vaccinated individuals, SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific T cells reliably recognized most SARS-CoV-2 variants, however cross-reactivity against the omicron variant was reduced by approximately 47%. Responses against spike, nucleocapsid and membrane antigens from endemic hCoVs were significantly more extensive in COVID-19 survivors than in unexposed subjects and displayed cross-reactivity between α- and β-hCoVs. In some, non-SARS hCoV-specific T cells demonstrated a prominent non-reciprocal cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV-2 antigens, whereas a distinct anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunological repertoire emerged post-COVID-19, with relatively limited cross-recognition of non-SARS hCoVs. Based on this cross-reactivity pattern, we established a strategy for in-vitro expansion of universal anti-hCoV T cells for adoptive immunotherapy. Overall, these results have implications for the future design of universal vaccines and cell-based immune therapies against SARS- and non-SARS-CoVs.

The prospect of universal coronavirus immunity: a characterization of reciprocal and non-reciprocal T cell responses against SARS-CoV2 and common human coronaviruses

T cell immunity plays a central role in clinical outcomes of Coronavirus Infectious Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Therefore, T cell-focused vaccination or cellular immunotherapy might provide enhanced protection for immunocompromised patients. Pre-existing T cell memory recognizing SARS-CoV2 antigens antedating COVID-19 infection or vaccination, may have developed as an imprint of prior infections with endemic non-SARS human coronaviruses (hCoVs) OC43, HKU1, 229E, NL63, pathogens of "common cold". In turn, SARS-CoV2-primed T cells may recognize emerging variants or other hCoV viruses and modulate the course of subsequent hCoV infections. Cross-immunity between hCoVs and SARS-CoV2 has not been well characterized. Here, we systematically investigated T cell responses against the immunodominant SARS-CoV2 spike, nucleocapsid and membrane proteins and corresponding antigens from α- and β-hCoVs among vaccinated, convalescent, and unexposed subjects. Broad T cell immunity against all tested SARS-CoV2 antigens emerged in COVID-19 survivors. In convalescent and in vaccinated individuals, SARS-CoV2 spike-specific T cells reliably recognized most SARS-CoV2 variants, however cross-reactivity against the omicron variant was reduced by approximately 50%. Responses against spike, nucleocapsid and membrane antigens from endemic hCoVs were more extensive in COVID-19 survivors than in unexposed subjects and displayed cross-reactivity between α- and β-hCoVs. In some, non-SARS hCoVspecific T cells demonstrated a prominent non-reciprocal cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV2 antigens, whereas a distinct anti-SARS-CoV2 immunological repertoire emerged post-COVID-19, with relatively limited cross-recognition of non-SARS hCoVs. Based on this cross-reactivity pattern, we established a strategy for in-vitro expansion of universal anti-hCoV T cells for adoptive immunotherapy. Overall, these results have implications for the future design of universal vaccines and cell-based immune therapies against SARS- and non-SARS-CoVs.

BK virus-specific T cells for immunotherapy of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: an open-label, single-cohort pilot study

BACKGROUND

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, a rare disease of the CNS caused by JC virus and occurring in immunosuppressed people, is typically fatal unless adaptive immunity is restored. JC virus is a member of the human polyomavirus family and is closely related to the BK virus. We hypothesised that use of partly HLA-matched donor-derived BK virus-specific T cells for immunotherapy in progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy would be feasible and safe.

METHODS

We did an open-label, single-cohort pilot study in patients (aged 18 years or older) with clinically definite progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and disease progression in the previous month at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center (Bethesda, MD, USA). Overlapping peptide libraries derived from large T antigen and major capsid protein VP1 of BK virus with high sequence homology to JC virus counterparts were used to generate polyomavirus-specific T cells cross-recognising JC virus antigens. Polyomavirus-specific T cells were manufactured from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of first-degree relative donors aged 18 years or older. These cells were administered to patients by intravenous infusion at 1 × 10⁶ polyomavirus-specific T cells per kg, followed by up to two additional infusions at 2 × 10⁶ polyomavirus-specific T cells per kg. The primary endpoints were feasibility (no manufacturing failure based on meeting release criteria, achieving adequate numbers of cell product for clinical use, and showing measurable antiviral activity) and safety in all patients. The safety monitoring period was 28 days after each infusion. Patients were followed up with serial MRI for up to 12 months after the final infusion. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02694783.

FINDINGS

Between April 7, 2016, and Oct 19, 2018, 26 patients were screened, of whom 12 were confirmed eligible and received treatment derived from 14 matched donors. All administered polyomavirus-specific T cells met the release criteria and recognised cognate antigens in vitro. 12 patients received at least one infusion, ten received at least two, and seven received a total of three infusions. The median on-study follow-up was 109·5 days (range 23-699). All infusions were tolerated well, and no serious treatment-related adverse events were observed. Seven patients survived progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy for longer than 1 year after the first infusion, whereas five died of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy within 3 months.

INTERPRETATION

We showed that generation of polyomavirus-specific T cells from healthy related donors is feasible, and these cells can be safely used as an infusion for adoptive immunotherapy of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Although not powered to assess efficacy, our data provide additional support for this strategy as a potential life-saving therapy for some patients.

FUNDING

Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the NIH.

Development of T-cell immunity in a liver and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient following coronavirus disease 2019 infection

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has disproportionately affected patients with comorbidities, including recipients of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplants (SCT). Upon recovery from COVID-19, the degree of the immunological protection from reinfection remains unclear. Here we describe a 33-year-old patient with erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP) who had undergone liver transplantation with splenectomy followed by allogeneic SCT in 2013 after an initial failed liver and umbilical cord transplant. The patient developed mild upper respiratory symptoms in the spring of 2020 and was found to have anti-SARS-CoV2 antibodies suggesting past infection. A comprehensive analysis of T cell functionality in peripheral blood from this patient revealed robust in vitro responses against SARS CoV2 antigens Spike (S) 1 and 2, membrane (M) and nucleoprotein (NP), comparable to the reactivity against common antigens from CMV, EBV, Ad and BK viruses, while only low reactivity was seen in healthy donors without documented history of COVID-19. Moreover, the patient displayed a marked recognition of counterpart antigens from related human coronaviruses (hCoVs) 229E, OC43, NL63 and HKU1. Thus, despite lifelong immunosuppression, this survivor of COVID-19 retained a remarkable degree of immunocompetence and showed broad-spectrum T cell memory specific for SARS-CoV2 and related hCoVs including less studied hCoV M and NP antigens. The study highlights the role of cellular immunity after natural COVID-19 infection, suggesting broader use of T cell assays as a tool for risk stratification, measurement of immunocompetence and/or post-infection or post-vaccination protection, and possible T cell-based adoptive immunotherapy strategies in high-risk patients.

Impact of anti-cancer therapy on disease severity and mortality in cancer patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Cancer patients are more vulnerable to Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and have a higher risk of adverse outcomes than the general population. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate whether anti-cancer therapies such as surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy will increase the severity and mortality of cancer patients with COVID-19.Methods: Relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). The search time was from December 1, 2019 to January 23, 2021. Meta-analysis was conducted using Revman 5.3 statistical software.Results: A total of 26 studies were included in this meta-analysis, involving 5571 cancer patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Meta-analysis showed that surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and targeted therapy were not associated with disease severity or mortality (107/688, OR =1.30, 95% CI[0.79, 2.13], P =0.30; 1956/2674, OR =1.27, 95% CI [0.95, 1.69], P =0.10; 342/1455, OR =1.20, 95% CI [0.90, 1.61], P =0.21; 503/1378, OR =0.92, 95% CI [0.72, 1.19], P =0.54, respectively).Conclusion: In cancer patients with COVID-19, anti-cancer therapy had no adverse effect on disease severity or mortality. Further research is necessary to determine the complex interrelationship between anti-cancer therapy, particularly chemotherapy, and COVID-19.

Efficient Generation of iPSC-Derived Hematoendothelial Progenitors and Specification Toward T cell Lineage

One of the major obstacles for adoptive cell transfer (ACT) of T cells is the loss of effector function and proliferative ability of isolated antigen-specific T cells after prolonged ex vivo expansion. To overcome this issue, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), which have unlimited proliferation and differentiation potential, can be used to generate a large number of antigen-specific T cells. Here, we describe an efficient differentiation protocol for the generation of cytotoxic CD8⁺ T cells from human T cell-derived iPSCs (T-iPSCs). The protocol consists of three main steps including differentiation of T-iPSCs toward hematoendothelial progenitors (HEPs), co-culture of HEPs with OP9-DL1 cells, and stimulation of T cell receptor (TCR) signaling to obtain CD8 single-positive (SP) T cells. This culture system is simple and efficient; therefore, will offer a powerful tool for studying T cell development and applications in adoptive immunotherapy.

Role of CD4+ T Cells in the Control of Viral Infections: Recent Advances and Open Questions

CD4+ T cells orchestrate adaptive immune responses through their capacity to recruit and provide help to multiple immune effectors, in addition to exerting direct effector functions. CD4+ T cells are increasingly recognized as playing an essential role in the control of chronic viral infections. In this review, we present recent advances in understanding the nature of CD4+ T cell help provided to antiviral effectors. Drawing from our studies of natural human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) control, we then focus on the role of high-affinity T cell receptor (TCR) clonotypes in mediating antiviral CD4+ T cell responses. Last, we discuss the role of TCR affinity in determining CD4+ T cell differentiation, reviewing the at times divergent studies associating TCR signal strength to the choice of a T helper 1 (Th1) or a T follicular helper (Tfh) cell fate.

Mobilization and collection of cells in the hematologic compartment for cellular therapies: Stem cell collection with G-CSF/plerixafor, collecting lymphocytes/monocytes

An essential and influential first step in all cellular therapies is collecting donor or patient cells. In hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation, autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) are collected from either the bone marrow or the peripheral blood. Peripheral blood collection by apheresis requires mobilization with chemotherapy, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), plerixafor, or a combination. The modalities of mobilization and collection each carry a unique set of risks and benefits for both the donor and the recipient. In other types of cell therapy, most notably chimeric antigen receptor T cells, lymphocytes or monocytes are collected from the peripheral blood. The risks of collecting these cells by apheresis are similar to HPCs, but less is known about the composition, timing and qualitative cell characteristics which contribute to an optimal collection. Here, we review the mobilization and collection of HPCs and the collection of lymphocytes and monocytes. Donor safety is of primary importance when collecting material for any type of cell therapy. Every aspect of mobilization and collection can be studied and potentially optimized to improve patient outcomes.