Current state of the art in fat grafting: paradigm shift in surgical techniques and refinements in cleft and craniofacial reconstruction

Preconditioning Strategies for Improving the Outcome of Fat Grafting

Autologous fat grafting is a common procedure in plastic, reconstructive, and aesthetic surgery. However, it is frequently associated with an unpredictable resorption rate of the graft depending on the engraftment kinetics. This, in turn, is determined by the interaction of the grafted adipose tissue with the tissue at the recipient site. Accordingly, preconditioning strategies have been developed following the principle of exposing these tissues in the pretransplantation phase to stimuli inducing endogenous protective and regenerative cellular adaptations, such as the upregulation of stress-response genes or the release of cytokines and growth factors. As summarized in the present review, these stimuli include hypoxia, dietary restriction, local mechanical stress, heat, and exposure to fractional carbon dioxide laser. Preclinical studies show that they promote cell viability, adipogenesis, and angiogenesis, while reducing inflammation, fibrosis, and cyst formation, resulting in a higher survival rate and quality of fat grafts in different experimental settings. Hence, preconditioning represents a promising approach to improve the outcome of fat grafting in future clinical practice. For this purpose, it is necessary to establish standardized preconditioning protocols for specific clinical applications that are efficient, safe, and easy to implement into routine procedures.

Enhancing Philtrum Morphology Using Fat Grafting Combined with Percutaneous Rigottomy in Repaired Unilateral Cleft Lip

BACKGROUND

Improving the philtrum morphology of patients with a secondary cleft lip deformity has been a challenge in cleft care. Combining fat grafting with percutaneous rigottomy has been advocated for treatment of volumetric deficiency associated with a scarred recipient site. This study assessed the outcome of synchronous fat grafting and rigottomy for improvement of cleft philtrum morphology.

METHODS

Consecutive young adult patients ( n = 13) with a repaired unilateral cleft lip who underwent fat grafting combined with rigottomy expansion technique for enhancement of philtrum morphology were included. Preoperative and postoperative three-dimensional facial models were used for three-dimensional morphometric analyses including philtrum height, projection, and volume parameters. Lip scar was qualitatively judged by a panel composed by two blinded external plastic surgeons using a 10-point visual analogue scale.

RESULTS

Three-dimensional morphometric analysis revealed a significant (all P < 0.05) postoperative increase of the lip height-related measurements for cleft philtrum height, noncleft philtrum height, and central lip length parameters, with no difference ( P > 0.05) between cleft and noncleft sides. The postoperative three-dimensional projection of the philtral ridges was significantly ( P < 0.001) larger in cleft (1.01 ± 0.43 mm) than in noncleft sides (0.51 ± 0.42 mm). The average philtrum volume change was 1.01 ± 0.68 cm 3 , with an average percentage fat graft retention of 43.36% ± 11.35%. The panel assessment revealed significant ( P < 0.001) postoperative scar enhancement for the qualitative rating scale, with mean preoperative and postoperative scores of 6.69 ± 0.93 and 7.88 ± 1.14, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Synchronous fat grafting and rigottomy improved philtrum length, projection, and volume and lip scar in patients with repaired unilateral cleft lip.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Pyramidal multiple-theory (multi-type, multi-method and multi-layer) for facial fat grafting

BACKGROUND

Age-related changes to the face pertinent anatomy and important aspects of autologous fat grafting have been widely applied in facial rejuvenation. Various types of autologous fat products (Macrofat, Microfat, SEFF, nanofat, and SVF-gel) with different properties and applicabilities have been introduced and available for surgeons.

METHODS

Key differences between common techniques for fat processing and infiltration. Develop a plan for patients based on site-specific facial anatomical zones, we suggested a pyramidal multiple-theory (multi-type, multi-method and multi-layer) for facial fat grafting. Based on the complicated mechanism of the face decrepitude in different layers of facial soft tissue, autologous fat products with various particle sizes and components into different layers.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients underwent this facial fat grafting strategy from June 2020 to Jan 2022. All achieved cosmetic improvements, with higher patients' satisfaction, and minor complications. Our facial fat grafting strategy takes advantage of different fat products and is able to address the physiological tissue changes during aging, more properly and targetedly, than the traditional facial fat grafting.

CONCLUSIONS

Fat grafting to the face aids in volume restoration and rejuvenation, thereby addressing soft-tissue atrophy associated with the aging face, acquired conditions, or congenital malformations. The technique described as "lipo-tumescence" has been successfully used in the breast and other regions of the body that have radiation damage and is discussed in this article specifically for the face and neck.

Refining Orthognathic Surgery Results by Synchronous Cheek Fat Compartment Augmentation with Fat Grafting in Adult Females with Class III Skeletal Profiles

SUMMARY

Patients with maxillomandibular disharmony may present with a flat to concave midface. The effects of orthognathic surgery concomitant with midface fat grafting on facial appearance and midface volumetric and positional change have not formally been assessed to date. The authors' approach for synchronous orthognathic surgery and fat grafting is described and evaluated. Adult female patients (n = 20) who underwent synchronous two-jaw orthognathic surgery and cheek-specific fat grafting (1.9 ± 0.6 cm3 per side) for correction of skeletal class III deformity and anteromedial cheek deficiency were prospectively included. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were appraised by 42 blinded raters using facial appearance scales for beauty, attractiveness, and pleasantness parameters. The three-dimensional midface soft-tissue volume change and postoperative cheek mass position were computed. Facial imaging data from gender-, ethnic-, and facial pattern-matched adult patients (n = 20) who underwent isolated two-jaw orthognathic surgery (n = 20) were included for comparison. The three-dimensional facial norms database-derived cheek mass position information (2.19 ± 1.31mm) was also adopted for analysis. Patients treated with the synchronous procedure had significantly (p < 0.001) increased facial appearance-related perception change for beauty (2.9 ± 1.6), attractiveness (2.8 ± 1.8), and pleasantness (3.0 ± 1.5) parameters, three-dimensional midface volume change (1.8 ± 0.5 cm3), and postoperative cheek mass position (2.16 ± 0.47 mm) in comparison with those treated with the isolated procedure (2.0 ± 1.5, 1.9 ± 1.6, 2.3 ± 1.6, 0.6 ± 0.2 cm3, and 1.84 ± 0.43 mm, respectively). Healthy female individuals had similar and larger cheek mass position than patients treated with synchronous (p > 0.05) and isolated (p < 0.001) procedures, respectively. Synchronous orthognathic surgery and check-specific fat grafting resulted in superior enhancement of facial appearance and midface volume and position compared with isolated orthognathic surgery.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Cheek soft tissue prediction in cleft orthognathic surgery: A 3D computer-assisted investigation with comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

The Le Fort I maxillary advancement and rotational movement have been adopted to treat patients with cleft-related skeletal Class III pattern and anteromedial cheek soft tissue deficiency, but cleft-specific cheek soft tissue prediction data are insufficient. This 3D imaging-based study addressed the issue.

METHODS

3D craniofacial soft tissue and bone models were created from 32 consecutive patients who received computer-aided two-jaw orthognathic surgery for the correction of cleft-related Class III deformity and cheek soft tissue deficiency. Using superimposed 3D models, the cheek volumetric change, the cheek sagittal movement, and the 3D cheek mass position were calculated. 3D data from orthognathic surgery-treated patients with no cleft (noncleft cohort) and individuals with no facial deformity (3D norm value) were retrieved for comparative analysis.

RESULTS

Surgical maxillary advancement (p < 0.001) but not maxillary clockwise rotation (p > 0.05) had a significant impact on the cheek soft tissue change, with prediction models showing that maxillary advancement elucidated 77 and 79% of this change on the cleft and noncleft sides, respectively. Cleft cohort (0.46±0.12) had a significantly (p < 0.001) smaller cheek soft-to-hard tissue ratio than that of the noncleft cohort (0.73±0.13). Cleft maxillary advancements >4 mm resulted in a 3D cheek mass position (2.1±1.1 mm) similar (p > 0.05) to the 3D norm value (2.2±1.2 mm), but different (p = 0.037) from the noncleft cohort (2.38±0.7 mm).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that maxillary advancement but not the maxillary rotation affects the cheek soft tissue change, and the predictive values and comparative data could assist the orthodontist-surgeon interaction during preoperative planning and patient counseling.