Babies breaking bad: neonatal and iatrogenic withdrawal syndromes

Maternal and iatrogenic neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome: Differences and similarities in recognition, management, and consequences

Opioids are potent analgesics used to manage pain in both young and old, but the increased use in the pregnant population has significant individual and societal implications. Infants dependent on opioids, either through maternal or iatrogenic exposure, undergo neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS), where they may experience withdrawal symptoms ranging from mild to severe. We present a detailed and original review of NOWS caused by maternal opioid exposure (mNOWS) and iatrogenic opioid intake (iNOWS). While these two entities have been assessed entirely separately, recognition and treatment of the clinical manifestations of NOWS overlap. Neonatal risk factors such as age, genetic predisposition, drug type, and clinical factors like type of opioid, cumulative dose of opioid exposure, and disease status affect the incidence of both mNOWS and iNOWS, as well as their severity. Recognition of withdrawal is dependent on clinical assessment of symptoms, and the use of clinical assessment tools designed to determine the need for pharmacotherapy. Treatment of NOWS relies on a combination of non-pharmacological therapies and pharmacological options. Long-term consequences of opioids and NOWS continue to generate controversy, with some evidence of anatomic brain changes, but conflicting animal and human clinical evidence of significant cognitive or behavioral impacts on school-age children. We highlight the current knowledge on clinically relevant recognition, treatment, and consequences of NOWS, and identify new advances in clinical management of the neonate. This review brings a unique clinical perspective and critically analyzes gaps between the clinical problem and our preclinical understanding of NOWS.

Incidence of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Epidemic and Associated Predictors in Nevada: A Statewide Audit, 2016-2018

Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is a postnatal withdrawal syndrome among neonates born to mothers with drug dependence disorders. NAS poses a significant public health challenge nationally, with a six-fold increase in incidence (1.2 to 6.7 per 1000 hospital births/year) from 2000–2016. Besides national data, it is critical to quantify NAS at the state-level to identify target areas for prevention. The objectives of this study were to ascertain statewide burden, including county and regional distribution of NAS in Nevada during 2016–2018, and to investigate potential factors associated with NAS. This study utilized hospital administrative data, and a total of 100,845 inpatient pediatric discharges were examined to identify NAS cases. Statistical analyses included estimation of crude incidence rates per 1000 hospital births and multilevel logistic regression modeling. NAS incidence in Nevada decreased slightly from 8.6 to 7.7 per 1000 hospital births between 2016 and 2018, but the overall incidence of 8 was substantially higher than earlier estimates (4.8/1000 hospital births) reported for 2013. Incidence was disproportionately higher among white newborns (12, 95% CI 11.0,13.0) and Medicaid enrollees (13.2, 95% CI 11.0,15.0). Southern Nevada had the highest incidence rate of 8.2 per 1000 hospital births. Nearly 75% of NAS cases were residents of Clark County. Incidence rates of NAS parallel the growing opioid prescription rates in Nevada and highlight the need for adopting opioid control prescribing practices to combat this drug epidemic. These findings might help in designing and evaluating state- and system-level interventions introduced to combat the opioid epidemic.

Implementation of an opioid weaning protocol to improve pain management, and to prevent or decrease iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome in the neonatal intensive care

AIM

The aim of this evidence implementation project was to improve pain assessment and management of the neonate receiving an opioid infusion, and to prevent or decrease the incidence of iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (IWS).

METHODS

The current project was carried out in two intensive care areas of a 79 bed tertiary Neonatal Unit in Australia. A pre/postaudit design was utilized. Patient charts were reviewed to collect baseline audit data on pain assessments and titration of opioids. A weaning protocol was developed and implemented along with targeted staff education to align current practice with best practice recommendations. A postimplementation audit was then conducted to evaluate changes in practice.

RESULTS

A total of 32 charts (13 pre/19 post) were reviewed to evaluate pain assessment, titration of opioids, and the identification of any signs and symptoms of IWS. The results demonstrated an improvement in the completion of pain assessments by 34%, and 100% compliance to withdrawal assessment following the introduction of an IWS assessment tool. For neonates receiving analgesics for less than 4 days, adherence to the weaning schedule occurred in 75%. No clinical signs of IWS were seen in this cohort. For neonates receiving analgesics for greater than 4 days, adherence to the weaning schedule occurred in only 55%. Of those neonates where the protocol was not followed, 67% developed clinical signs of IWS.

CONCLUSION

Although this project demonstrated improvements in pain assessment and the identification of IWS, lack of adherence to the pain management policy and weaning tool has increased awareness of the importance of collaboration within the multidisciplinary team to improve outcomes. Several barriers were identified prior to implementation and various methods were employed to overcome these. Despite this, consistency of practice and change-management remain a challenge in clinical care.

Supervised Multidimensional Item Response Theory Modeling of Pediatric Iatrogenic Withdrawal Symptoms

Item‐level data from composite scales can be analyzed with pharmacometric item response theory (IRT) models to improve the quantification of disease severity compared with the use of total composite scores. However, regular IRT models assume unidimensionality, which is violated in the scale measuring iatrogenic withdrawal in children because some items are also affected by pain, undersedation, or delirium. Here, we compare regular IRT modelling of pediatric iatrogenic withdrawal symptom data with two new analysis approaches in which the latent variable is guided towards the condition of interest using numerical withdrawal severity scored by nurses as a “supervising variable:” supervised IRT (sIRT) and supervised multi‐dimensional (smIRT) modelling. In this example, in which the items scores are affected by multiple conditions, regular IRT modeling is worse to quantify disease severity than the total composite score, whereas improved performance compared with the composite score is observed for the sIRT and smIRT models.

Occupational Therapy Management Strategies for Infants With Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: Scoping Review

With opioid use in North America rising, there is a growing incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). Infants with NAS experience withdrawal signs that interfere with their occupational performance in activities of daily living. This scoping review aims to identify the non-pharmacologic interventions currently used in the treatment of infants with NAS that fall within the scope of the occupational therapy profession. Searching three databases, articles were independently reviewed by two authors to meet defined inclusion criteria. Forty-five articles were included, and the interventions identified and organized according to the Person-Environment-Occupation Model. The non-pharmacologic interventions identified fall within the scope of the occupational therapy profession. Initiating occupational therapy services in an acute care setting may have the potential to improve occupational performance and engagement for these infants from an early age.

Feeding Infants with Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: Finding the Sweet Spot

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to learn how caregivers who are expert in feeding infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) successfully feed these infants during withdrawal.

DESIGN/SAMPLE

Focus group methodology was used to gather information from self-identified experts from three large regional NICUs. Twelve NICU nurses and speech therapists participated in open-ended, recorded discussions. Detailed flip chart notes were taken, reviewed, and verified by the participants before the group ended.

RESULTS

Four major themes emerged verified by the participants: (1) optimal medication management, (2) follow the baby's cues, (3) calm and comfortable, and (4) nurture the relationship. Participants reported using both common and creative techniques. Keeping the infant calm was crucial to being successful, as well as maintaining good control of withdrawal signs. Feeding the infant facing away from them to avoid eye contact was used, as well as vertical rocking, continuous butt patting, bundling, "shhing" sound, and a novel feeding position.

Design considerations for point-of-care clinical trials comparing methadone and buprenorphine treatment for opioid dependence in pregnancy and for neonatal abstinence syndrome

RATIONALE

In recent years, the U.S. has experienced a significant increase in the prevalence of pregnant opioid-dependent women and of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), which is caused by withdrawal from in-utero drug exposure. While methadone-maintenance currently is the standard of care for opioid dependence during pregnancy, research suggests that buprenorphine-maintenance may be associated with shorter infant hospital lengths of stay (LOS) relative to methadone-maintenance. There is no "gold standard" treatment for NAS but there is evidence that buprenorphine, relative to morphine or methadone, treatment may reduce LOS and length of treatment.

DESIGN

Point-of-care clinical trial (POCCT) designs, maximizing external validity while reducing cost and complexity associated with classic randomized clinical trials, were selected for two planned trials to compare methadone to buprenorphine treatment for opioid dependence during pregnancy and for NAS. This paper describes design considerations for the Medication-assisted treatment for Opioid-dependent expecting Mothers (MOMs; estimated N = 370) and Investigation of Narcotics for Ameliorating Neonatal abstinence syndrome on Time in hospital (INFANTs; estimated N = 284) POCCTs, both of which are randomized, intent-to-treat, two-group trials. Outcomes would be obtained from participants' electronic health record at three participating hospitals. Additionally, a subset of infants in the INFANTs POCCT would be from mothers in the MOMs POCCT and, thus, potential interaction between medication treatment of mother and infant could be evaluated.

CONCLUSION

This pair of planned POCCTs would evaluate the comparative effectiveness of treatments for opioid dependence during pregnancy and for NAS. The results could have a significant impact on practice.

Neonatal pain

Effective management of procedural and postoperative pain in neonates is required to minimize acute physiological and behavioral distress and may also improve acute and long-term outcomes. Painful stimuli activate nociceptive pathways, from the periphery to the cortex, in neonates and behavioral responses form the basis for validated pain assessment tools. However, there is an increasing awareness of the need to not only reduce acute behavioral responses to pain in neonates, but also to protect the developing nervous system from persistent sensitization of pain pathways and potential damaging effects of altered neural activity on central nervous system development. Analgesic requirements are influenced by age-related changes in both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response, and increasing data are available to guide safe and effective dosing with opioids and paracetamol. Regional analgesic techniques provide effective perioperative analgesia, but higher complication rates in neonates emphasize the importance of monitoring and choice of the most appropriate drug and dose. There have been significant improvements in the understanding and management of neonatal pain, but additional research evidence will further reduce the need to extrapolate data from older age groups. Translation into improved clinical care will continue to depend on an integrated approach to implementation that encompasses assessment and titration against individual response, education and training, and audit and feedback.