Monitoring and long-term outcomes in vascularized composite allotransplantation

The current state of tolerance induction in vascularized composite allotransplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Significant advancements have been made in the field of vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA); however, like solid organ transplantation, bypassing the recipient's immune response remains a significant obstacle to long-term allograft survival. Therefore, strategies to overcome acute and chronic rejection and minimize immunosuppressive therapy are crucial for the future of VCA. This review highlights recent attempts to induce tolerance in VCA and discusses key findings through a clinical lens.

RECENT FINDINGS

Promising VCA tolerance protocols are being investigated, with five recent studies illustrating various successes. These preclinical approaches demonstrate a correlation between the presence of donor-derived T cells and VCA tolerance, the importance of using clinically available reagents within preclinical protocols, and the ability to induce sustained tolerance through nonmyeloablative methods. Furthermore, environmental factors, such as NB-UVB light are being investigated for their immunomodulation properties and may influence VCA graft rejection.

SUMMARY

To widen the scope of VCA, minimization of immunosuppression is needed. Overall, tolerance induction protocols should have a low-toxicity level, minimally invasive induction therapies, and utilize short-term immunosuppressive medications. By examining the milestones of recent studies, researchers can gain new technical approaches to immune modulation and make data-driven amendments to tolerance protocols in preparation for clinical translation.

Immunosuppressant drug monitor: A non-invasive device to measure tacrolimus level in the saliva of transplanted patients

Solid organ and vascularized composite allograft transplantation are pivotal in enhancing both life expectancy and quality of life. However, the significant risk of donor tissue rejection requires lifelong immunosuppressive therapy. Tacrolimus, a common component of immunosuppressive regimens, offers effectiveness in preventing organ rejection but poses challenges due to its narrow therapeutic window and toxicity, making it essential to carefully monitor its concentration. Tacrolimus trough levels are currently measured in blood, requiring frequent blood draws from patients, and results are available after 3 to 6 h. To address the need for a fast, minimally-invasive, and simple method to monitor tacrolimus concentrations, we have assessed a new device for at-home analysis, the Immunosuppressant Drug Monitor (IDM) that can extract, identify and quantify tacrolimus in saliva within 15 min. We included males and females hospitalized at Massachusetts General Hospital Transplant Unit, between the ages of 21 and 65 years, and treated with Tacrolimus. Informed consent, demographic and treatment data were collected. Each subject was asked to provide a 5 mL saliva sample that was de-identified and processed by the IDM, while a 5 mL blood sample was drawn and supplied to the MGH clinical lab for analysis by the current standard, immunoassays. The predicted tacrolimus concentration found in saliva was compared to the blood trough level results. 62 samples from 31 different patients were obtained. The male to female ratio and ethnicity distribution were well balanced. The majority of patients were within 30 days of initiating tacrolimus treatment. After IDM calibration and exclusion, 21 samples were measured by the IDM. Using an exponential function fit, the IDM showed a correlation of R2 = 0.39 between the saliva Test Line absorption and the measured tacrolimus concentration in blood, with an average absolute error of 1.8 ng/mL. Our results demonstrate a clear correlation between blood and saliva measurements. The IDM provided promising results to monitor immunosuppressant drug concentrations in patients after transplantation. Future larger studies will further develop the correlation, and the IDM's potential impact on patient outcomes.

Biomaterials-based immunomodulation enhances survival of murine vascularized composite allografts

Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) is a restorative option for patients suffering from severe tissue defects not amenable to conventional reconstruction. However, the toxicities associated with life-long multidrug immunosuppression to enable allograft survival and induce immune tolerance largely limit the broader application of VCA. Here, we investigate the potential of targeted immunomodulation using CTLA4-Ig combined with a biological porcine-derived extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffold that elicits a pro-regenerative Th2 response to promote allograft survival and regulate the inflammatory microenvironment in a stringent mouse orthotopic hind limb transplantation model (BALB/c to C57BL/6). The median allograft survival time (MST) increased significantly from 15.0 to 24.5 days (P = 0.0037; Mantel-Cox test) after adding ECM to the CTLA4-Ig regimen. Characterization of the immune infiltration shows a pro-regenerative phenotype prevails over those associated with inflammation and rejection including macrophages (F4/80^hi+CD206^hi+MHCII^low), eosinophils (F4/80^lowSiglec-F⁺), and T helper 2 (Th2) T cells (CD4⁺IL-4⁺). This was accompanied by an increased expression of genes associated with a Type 2 polarized immune state such as Il4, Ccl24, Arg1 and Ym1 within the graft. Furthermore, when ECM was applied along with a clinically relevant combination of CTLA4-Ig and Rapamycin, allograft survival was prolonged from 33.0 to 72.5 days (P = 0.0067; Mantel-Cox test). These studies implicate the clinical exploration of combined regimens involving local application of pro-regenerative, immunomodulatory biomaterials in surgical wound sites with targeted co-stimulatory blockade to reduce adverse effects of immunosuppression and enhance graft survival in VCA.

Large Animal Models of Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: A Review of Immune Strategies to Improve Allograft Outcomes

Over the past twenty years, significant technical strides have been made in the area of vascularized composite tissue allotransplantation (VCA). As in solid organ transplantation, the allogeneic immune response remains a significant barrier to long-term VCA survival and function. Strategies to overcome acute and chronic rejection, minimize immunosuppression and prolong VCA survival have important clinical implications. Historically, large animals have provided a valuable model for testing the clinical translatability of immune modulating approaches in transplantation, including tolerance induction, co-stimulation blockade, cellular therapies, and ex vivo perfusion. Recently, significant advancements have been made in these arenas utilizing large animal VCA models. In this comprehensive review, we highlight recent immune strategies undertaken to improve VCA outcomes with a focus on relevant preclinical large animal models.

Multiphase Assembly of Small Molecule Microcrystalline Peptide Hydrogel Allows Immunomodulatory Combination Therapy for Long-Term Heart Transplant Survival

Combination therapies that target multiple pathways involved in immune rejection of transplants hold promise for patients in need of restorative surgery. Herein, a noninteracting multiphase molecular assembly approach is developed to crystallize tofacitinib, a potent JAK1/3 inhibitor, within a shear-thinning self-assembled fibrillar peptide hydrogel network. The resulting microcrystalline tofacitinib hydrogel (MTH) can be syringe-injected directly to the grafting site during surgery to locally deliver the small molecule. The rate of drug delivered from MTH is largely controlled by the dissolution of the encapsulated microcrystals. A single application of MTH, in combination with systemically delivered CTLA4-Ig, a co-stimulation inhibitor, affords significant graft survival in mice receiving heterotopic heart transplants. Locoregional studies indicate that the local delivery of tofacitinib at the graft site enabled by MTH is required for the observed enhanced graft survival.

A Call to Accountability: Reporting Outcomes in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

Because nearly all the vascularized composite allotransplants performed in the United States have been proposed and carried out as research, the ethical duty to report outcomes pertains. This duty is set forth in several international statements, including the World Health Organization’s Statement on Public Disclosure of Clinical Trial Results, the 2013 Helsinki Declaration, and the Singapore Statement on Research Integrity. These international statements call for the reporting of negative and inconclusive outcomes as well as positive outcomes, and for the reporting of results from previously unreported past research. In 2014, the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network vascularized composite allotransplant committee proposed mandatory data collection and submission requirements for transplants, but only for those which took place in September 2015 or later. Reporting of data for the allotransplants which took place before September 2015 was regarded as optional, even though the pre-September 2015 transplants represent the majority of vascularized composite allotransplants in the United States and all the long-term outcome data. We encourage the American Society of Reconstructive Transplantation and the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network committee to embrace the international ethical standards and to hold all vascularized composite allotransplant programs in the United States accountable for reporting data on outcomes of pre-September 2015 transplants.

Technical, Immunological, and Ethical Similarities and Differences Between Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation and Solid Organ Transplantation in Current Practice

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) is a surgical method used as the gold standard in end-term organ failure. Following SOT, successful results have also been achieved in vascularized composite tissue transplantation, which improves the quality of life with the success of solid organ transplants and the development of modern immunosuppressive regimens. This review discusses the preoperative, operative, postoperative, and immunological differences between vascularized tissue transplantation and SOT.

Donor-specific antibodies and antibody-mediated rejection in vascularized composite allotransplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) increases the risk of graft failure. Although DSA characteristics, human leukocyte antigen class specificity, mean fluorescence intensity and immunoglobulin G subclasses, and their impact on the graft are quite well studied in solid organ transplants, very little information is known about their impact on vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA). The aim of this review is to highlight recent publications regarding occurrence and effects of DSA, their follow-up and treatment in the field of VCA.

RECENT FINDINGS

The latest publications dealing with antibody-mediated rejection in VCA are mainly case presentations and reports embedded in reviews. The most important findings shown were the demonstration of the severe clinical impact of de-novo DSA and the urgent need of finding a therapeutic strategy for patients with acute antibody-mediated rejection. Suggested protocols for desensitization of possible candidates for reconstructive transplantation have been published, as these individuals are often highly sensitized and not appropriate patients for a standard surgical procedure because of their major tissue defects.

SUMMARY

The functional outcome of reconstructive transplantation has clearly exceeded the results achieved with conventional surgical techniques. The recipients' immune response, particularly development of DSA and the long-term adherence, which is probably associated with the occurrence of chronic rejection, remain a challenge.

Reflections on a Decade of Face Transplantation

On November 27, 2005, Isabelle Dinoire underwent the world's first partial face transplant in Amiens (France) after a dog attack had left her face severely disfigured. The abrupt surgical leap found the medical community and society unprepared to deal with the scientific, ethical, and societal implications of a surgical procedure that was striving to transition from sci-fi novels to science. Today, 10 years and over 35 transplants later, public opinion has become accustomed to the concept of "face restoration" through transplantation. However, face transplantation is far from being a safe "routine" surgery and the science behind it is still mostly unknown. Patients and multidisciplinary teams of physicians confront daily medical challenges, life-threatening risks, and personal struggle that only in part come to light. Could (or should) this be the laborious, uncertain, and high-risk trajectory of disruptive medical innovation? Over the last decade, some medical discoveries and surgical advancements in the field have been closely accompanied by partial regulatory frameworks, intense ethical discussions, and meaningful changes in social beliefs across cultures and continents. Yet, a very long way is to come and the questions we still have today greatly outweigh the answers we can offer. Here, we take the chance of the 10-year anniversary of face transplantation to reflect on the path traveled and to look forward to the challenges lying ahead.

Face transplant: long-term follow-up and results of a prospective open study

BACKGROUND

More than 30 face transplantations have been done worldwide since 2005 but no documented long-term follow-up has been reported in the literature. We aimed to answer remaining question about the long-term risks and benefits of face transplant.

METHODS

In this single-centre, prospective, open study, we assessed 20 patients presenting with facial defects. Ten patients were selected, and, after three were secondarily excluded, seven were transplanted: two with neurofibromatosis 1, one with a burn, and four with self-inflicted facial gunshot injuries. We report the long-term outcomes of six face allotransplant recipients at an average of 6 years (range 3·4-9 years) after the transplantation. All admissions to hospital except for planned revisions and immunosuppressive follow-up therapy were reported as adverse events (safety endpoint). Predefined immunological, metabolic, surgical, and social integration endpoints were collected prospectively. Patients underwent quantitative health-related quality of life assessments through Short Form 36 health questionnaires. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00527280.

FINDINGS

Two of seven patients died: one at 65 days due to transplant destruction with concomitant pseudomonas infection and the second at 3·4 years after transplantation by suicide. The six patients alive at long-term follow-up presented with functional transplants. Safety endpoints were related to infection in the first month, acute rejection from 1 day to 7 years after transplantation, or side-effects of immunosuppressive therapy. Recurrent rejection episodes justified maintenance therapy with high-dose steroids at high levels in all patients at last follow-up, yet none of the patients developed diabetes. Three patients were found to have hypertension with one requiring therapy. All patients had a noticeable reduction in glomerular filtration rate. All recipients and their families accepted their transplant. Improvements in social integration and quality of life were highly variable among the patients and depended on baseline levels and psychiatric comorbidities.

INTERPRETATION

These long-term results show the crucial effect of patients' social support and pre-existing psychiatric conditions on the risk-benefit ratio of facial transplantation. Careful preoperative patient selection and long-term postoperative follow-up programmes under strict institutional review board controls should be used for any future grafts of this type.

FUNDING

Protocole Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (PHRC) National.

Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: Medical Complications

The objective of this review is to summarize the collective knowledge regarding the risks and complications in vascularized composite tissue allotransplantation (VCA), focusing on upper extremity and facial transplantation. The field of VCA has entered its second decade with an increasing experience in both the impressive good outcomes, as well as defining challenges, risks, and experienced poor results. The limited and selective publishing of negative outcomes in this relatively new field makes it difficult to conclusively evaluate outcomes of graft and patient survival and morbidities. Therefore, published data, conference proceedings, and communications were summarized in an attempt to provide a current outline of complications. These data on the medical complications of VCA should allow for precautions to avoid poor outcomes, data to better provide informed consent to potential recipients, and result in improvements in graft and patient outcomes as VCA finds a place as a therapeutic option for selected patients.

Advancing biomaterials of human origin for tissue engineering

Biomaterials have played an increasingly prominent role in the success of biomedical devices and in the development of tissue engineering, which seeks to unlock the regenerative potential innate to human tissues/organs in a state of deterioration and to restore or reestablish normal bodily function. Advances in our understanding of regenerative biomaterials and their roles in new tissue formation can potentially open a new frontier in the fast-growing field of regenerative medicine. Taking inspiration from the role and multi-component construction of native extracellular matrices (ECMs) for cell accommodation, the synthetic biomaterials produced today routinely incorporate biologically active components to define an artificial in vivo milieu with complex and dynamic interactions that foster and regulate stem cells, similar to the events occurring in a natural cellular microenvironment. The range and degree of biomaterial sophistication have also dramatically increased as more knowledge has accumulated through materials science, matrix biology and tissue engineering. However, achieving clinical translation and commercial success requires regenerative biomaterials to be not only efficacious and safe but also cost-effective and convenient for use and production. Utilizing biomaterials of human origin as building blocks for therapeutic purposes has provided a facilitated approach that closely mimics the critical aspects of natural tissue with regard to its physical and chemical properties for the orchestration of wound healing and tissue regeneration. In addition to directly using tissue transfers and transplants for repair, new applications of human-derived biomaterials are now focusing on the use of naturally occurring biomacromolecules, decellularized ECM scaffolds and autologous preparations rich in growth factors/non-expanded stem cells to either target acceleration/magnification of the body's own repair capacity or use nature's paradigms to create new tissues for restoration. In particular, there is increasing interest in separating ECMs into simplified functional domains and/or biopolymeric assemblies so that these components/constituents can be discretely exploited and manipulated for the production of bioscaffolds and new biomimetic biomaterials. Here, following an overview of tissue auto-/allo-transplantation, we discuss the recent trends and advances as well as the challenges and future directions in the evolution and application of human-derived biomaterials for reconstructive surgery and tissue engineering. In particular, we focus on an exploration of the structural, mechanical, biochemical and biological information present in native human tissue for bioengineering applications and to provide inspiration for the design of future biomaterials.

The potential role for regulatory T-cell therapy in vascularized composite allograft transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Vascularized composite allograft (VCA) transplantation restores defects to a degree not possible by conventional techniques. However, it is limited by the need for long-term immunosuppression and high rates of acute rejection directed against skin. There is therefore a need for a therapy that may shift the risk-benefit ratio in favour of VCA transplantation. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are a subset of T cells with potent immunoregulatory properties and the potential to promote immunosuppression-free allograft survival. In this review, we consider the evidence for Treg therapy in VCA transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

CD4 Tregs are the best-studied immunoregulatory cell type, and a large amount of experimental and clinical data is emerging to endorse their use in VCA transplantation. Data from animal and humanized models are particularly encouraging and demonstrate the potent efficacy of Treg at preventing skin allograft rejection. Moreover, central tolerance induction techniques in VCA transplantation models are demonstrating a dependence on Tregs for graft survival.

SUMMARY

An improvement in outcomes after VCA transplantation has the potential to revolutionize the field. Several effective therapeutic strategies have demonstrated great promise experimentally, and there is now a need to assess their safety and efficacy in a clinical setting.

Vascularized Composite Allografts: Procurement, Allocation, and Implementation

Vascularized composite allotransplantation is a continuously evolving area of modern transplant medicine. Recently, vascularized composite allografts (VCAs) have been formally classified as 'organs'. In this review, key aspects of VCA procurement are discussed, with a special focus on interaction with the procurement of classical solid organs. In addition, options for a matching and allocation system that ensures VCA donor organs are allocated to the best-suited recipients are looked at. Finally, the different steps needed to promote VCA transplantation in society in general and in the medical community in particular are highlighted.