An integrated view of immune monitoring in vascularized composite allotransplantation

Mucosa and Rejection in Facial Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Facial vascularized composite allotransplantation (fVCA) presents an established approach to restore form and function of patients with catastrophic facial defects. Skin is one of the target tissues of the rejection process, and due to its easy accessibility has become the gold standard in the diagnosis of rejection. Mucosal rejection frequently occurs; however, the added value of mucosal rejection assessment for patient management is unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of manuscripts listed in the MEDLINE/PubMed and GoogleScholar databases to identify articles that provide data on mucosal rejection following fVCA. For inclusion, papers had to be available as full-text and written in English. Non-VCA studies and animal studies were excluded. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

We included 17 articles that described changes in allotransplanted mucosa of fVCAs. These articles yielded data on 168 BANFF graded biopsies of corresponding skin and mucosa biopsies. Rejection grades were consistently higher in mucosal biopsies. Concordance between allograft skin and mucosa biopsy grades increased with an increasing skin-BANFF grade. Mucosa rejection grades were on average lower in the early stages of the posttransplant period (<postoperative mo 12, time of motor, and sensory recovery) when compared to the later stages (>postoperative mo 12).

CONCLUSIONS

The mucosa of facial allotransplants is one of the primary targets of rejection. The data indicates that higher-grade skin rejection does not occur in absence of mucosal rejection. Further investigations are needed to elucidate the exact role of mucosal biopsies for fVCA patient management.

The Evolving Clinical Presentation of Acute Rejection in Facial Transplantation

Importance

Acute rejection is one of the most frequent complications in facial transplantation, with potentially severe consequences for the recipient if overlooked. Clinical signs, such as erythema or edema, are helpful to diagnose acute rejection in the early follow-up stage; however, it is not well known whether these clinical signs remain reliable markers of acute rejection beyond the second posttransplant year.

Objective

To determine the diagnostic value of clinical signs of acute rejection after facial transplantation over time.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted of patients who underwent facial transplantation at Brigham and Women's Hospital between April 2009 and October 2014, with up to an 8-year follow-up. Medical records were reviewed until September 30, 2017. The medical records from 104 encounters with 7 patients who underwent partial or full facial transplantation were analyzed for symptoms of rejection, immunosuppressive therapy, and histopathologic findings.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The occurrence of 5 clinical signs of acute rejection were evaluated: erythema, edema, exanthema, suture line erythema, and mucosal lesions. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to determine the statistically significant association of these signs with the histopathologic diagnosis of rejection. In addition, tacrolimus blood levels, as a surrogate marker of immunosuppressive therapy, were evaluated.

Results

Of the 7 patients included in the study, 5 were men. The mean follow-up was 66 months (range, 35-101). Of 104 clinical encounters, 46 encounters (44.2%) represented rejection episodes and 58 encounters (55.8%) represented no-rejection episodes. Beyond 2 years posttransplantation, only erythema (OR, 6.53; 95% CI, 1.84-20.11; P = .004) and exanthema (OR, ∞; 95% CI, 2.2-∞; P = .004) were demonstrated to be reliable clinical signs of acute rejection in facial transplantation. There was also a statistically significant association of subtherapeutic tacrolimus levels with late rejection episodes (OR, 3.79; 95% CI, 1.25-12.88; P = .03). In addition, the occurrence of subclinical rejection was more frequent during later follow-up times (7 [24.1%] late rejections vs 1 [5.9%] early rejection). Five of 8 subclinical rejections (62.5%) were associated with subtherapeutic tacrolimus levels.

Conclusions and Relevance

Clinical signs of acute rejection in facial transplantation appear to be of limited diagnostic value, particularly after the second postoperative year. Until alternative biomarkers for rejection are identified, protocol skin biopsies will remain necessary for guiding assessments of allograft rejection.

Level of Evidence

3.

Sensitization in Heart Transplantation: Emerging Knowledge: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Sensitization, defined as the presence of circulating antibodies, presents challenges for heart transplant recipients and physicians. When present, sensitization can limit a transplantation candidate’s access to organs, prolong wait time, and, in some cases, exclude the candidate from heart transplantation altogether. The management of sensitization is not yet standardized, and current therapies have not yielded consistent results. Although current strategies involve antibody suppression and removal with intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, and antibody therapy, newer strategies with more specific targets are being investigated.

Infections after upper extremity allotransplantation: a worldwide population cohort study, 1998-2017

Risk-to-benefit analysis of upper extremity allotransplantation (UEA) warrants a careful assessment of immunosuppression-related complications. This first systematic report of infectious complications after UEA aimed to compare incidence and pattern of infections to that observed after kidney transplantation (KT). We conducted a matched cohort study among UEA and KT recipients from the International Registry on Hand and Composite Tissue Transplantation and the French transplant database DIVAT. All UEA recipients between 1998 and 2016 were matched with KT recipients (1:5) regarding age, sex, cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus and induction treatment. Infections were analyzed at three posttransplant periods (early: 0-6 months, intermediate: 7-12 months, late: >12 months). Sixty-one UEA recipients and 305 KT recipients were included. Incidence of infection was higher after UEA than after KT during the early period (3.27 vs. 1.95 per 1000 transplant-days, P = 0.01), but not statistically different during the intermediate (0.61 vs. 0.45/1000, P = 0.5) nor the late period (0.15 vs. 0.21/1000, P = 0.11). The distribution of infectious syndromes was significantly different, with mucocutaneous infections predominating after UEA, urinary tract infections and pneumonia predominating after KT. Incidence of infection is high during the first 6 months after UEA. After 1 year, the burden of infections is low, with favorable patterns.

Accommodation and related conditions in vascularized composite allografts

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The outcome of vascularized composite allografts (VCA) often appear unrelated to the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in blood of the recipient or deposition of complement in the graft. The attenuation of injury and the absence of rejection in other types of grafts despite manifest donor-specific immunity have been explained by accommodation (acquired resistance to immune-mediated injury), adaptation (loss of graft antigen) and/or enhancement (antibody-mediated antigen blockade). Whether and how accommodation, adaptation and/or enhancement impact on the outcome of VCA is unknown. Here we consider how recent observations concerning accommodation in organ transplants might advance understanding and resolve uncertainties about the clinical course of VCA.

RECENT FINDINGS

Investigation of the mechanisms through which kidney allografts avert antibody-mediated injury and rejection provide insights potentially applicable to VCA. Interaction of DSA can facilitate replacement of donor by recipient endothelial cells, modulate or decrease synthesis of antigen, mobilize antigen that in turn blocks further immune recognition and limit the amount of bound antibody, allowing accommodation to ensue. These processes also can explain the apparent dissociation between the presence and levels of DSA in blood, deposition of C4d in grafts and antibody-mediated rejection. Over time the processes might also explain the inception of chronic graft changes.

SUMMARY

The disrupted tissue in VCA and potential for repopulation by endothelial cells of the recipient establish conditions that potentially decrease susceptibility to acute antibody-mediated rejection. These conditions include clonal suppression of donor-specific B cells, and adaptation, enhancement and accommodation. This setting also potentially highlights heretofore unrecognized interactions between these 'protective' processes.