Genitourinary vascularized composite allotransplantation

Ethical considerations regarding penis transplantation surgery in transgender men-an empirical ethics study

Background

The ongoing quest to surgically create the (nearly) ideal neophallus in transgender men has led to the continuous development of transgender medicine and the proposed introduction of penis transplantation. However, both technical and ethical issues arise when developing this treatment.

Aim

We sought to extract ethical considerations among different stakeholder groups regarding penile transplantation surgery in transgender men and to define preliminary clinical recommendations.

Methods

Three semistructured focus groups, consisting of different stakeholders, were organized to participate in discussions of ethical considerations retrieved from the ethics literature of transplantation and transgender medicine. Analysis of the results was performed according to empirical ethics.

Outcomes

Study outcomes were the identification of qualitative themes describing ethical considerations pertaining to penile transplantation in transgender men.

Results

Nineteen people participated in this qualitative study. The main domains that emerged included arguments in favor of and arguments against penile transplantation. Although the participants expressed positive attitudes toward developing this care, with acknowledgement of the current limitations stakeholders of all groups were reluctant to endorse the introduction of penile transplantation for transgender men at this point.

Clinical Implications

Under the present circumstances, all groups expressed both a wide variety of ethical considerations as well as a tendency to prefer developing alternative treatment options or improving the results of currently available treatments in relation to penile transplantation for transgender men.

Strengths and Limitations

This study was the first (empirical) study to focus on this topic and included a diversity of stakeholder perspectives. Limitations included the hypothetical nature of the discussion as well as the clinical setting in which the topic has been studied.

Conclusion

Introducing penile transplantation for transgender men, under the current circumstances, comes with a wide range of ethical considerations, which deal with personal identity, autonomy, medical risks, risk for transgender support and donor willingness, and issues regarding equality. Despite the present hesitancy to use penile transplantation, should the technical side of this treatment option develop, further research in the ethical field of penile transplantation for transgender men is recommended.

Ethical stakes of penile transplantation: A literature review

BACKGROUND

Vascularized composite allotransplantation has become an alternative reconstruction technique for patients with a severe loss of substance. Today, five human penile transplantations have been reported. The objective of this literature review is to offer an updated overview of the technical and ethical questions surrounding penile transplantation compared with conventional phalloplasty.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review was conducted of the literature from 2000 to 2020. A search of PubMed was performed using the keywords: "penile transplantation," "penis transplantation," and "penile vascularized composite allotransplantation." The criteria for the analysis were the type of study, surgical techniques, and ethical concerns.

RESULTS

Thirty-six articles were selected. These articles include reviews, case report, editorials, and preclinical studies. The first article was published in 2003, but the number of articles has increased after the second human transplantation in South Africa in 2014. Surgical techniques and the medication management specific to each team were successful in the 5 transplant cases, but several complications were noted.

CONCLUSION

Two decades of successful penile transplantations have proven the technique to be a viable solution to treat a penile amputation, allowing for a better esthetic and sensitive outcome paired with the possibility of natural urinary and erectile functions. Psychological impact of penile transplantation, selection of patients, complications of immunosuppressive therapies, and surgical technicity are the biggest penile transplantation challenges. Further experimental studies are necessary to produce standardized protocols to safely include penile transplantation in the conventional treatment of a penile amputation.