Immunosuppressants: what's new?

Cancer risk in heart or lung transplant recipients: A comprehensive analysis of 21 prospective cohorts

We performed a meta-analysis to determine cancer risks at multiple sites and their associations with tumor mutation burden (TMB), an index for immunogenicity, in heart or lung transplant recipients. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Medline was conducted. Random effects models were used to calculate standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) versus the general population and to determine the risks of different cancers. Weighted linear regression (WLR) was used to analyze the associations between the SIRs and TMBs. (PROSPERO CRD42020159599). Data from 21 studies including 116,438 transplant recipients (51,173 heart transplant recipients and 65,265 lung transplant recipients) with a total follow-up of 601,330.7 person-years were analyzed. Compared with the general population, heart transplant recipients displayed a 3.13-fold higher cancer risk [SIR: 3.13; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.38-4.13; p < 0.001]; lung transplant recipients displayed a 4.28-fold higher cancer risk [SIR: 4.28; 95% CI: 3.18-5.77; p < 0.001]. The correlation coefficients were 0.54 (p = 0.049) and 0.79 (p < 0.001) in heart and lung transplant recipients, respectively, indicating that 29% and 63% of the differences in the SIRs for cancer types might be explained by the TMBs. Our study demonstrated that both heart and lung transplant recipients displayed a higher risk of certain site-specific cancers. These findings can provide individualized guidance for clinicians for detection of cancer among heart or lung transplantation recipients. In addition, we provided evidence that increased risks of post-transplant cancers can be attributed to immunosuppression.

A risk assessment model of acute liver allograft rejection by genetic polymorphism of CD276

Background

Liver transplantation is an effective therapy for end‐stage liver diseases and acute liver failure. After the operation, however, recipients may suffer grafts loss induced by alloimmune reaction, which is termed as acute allograft rejection. The interaction between costimulatory molecules, CD276, and its ligand, TREML2, promotes T cell‐mediated immune response, as well as acute or chronic allograft rejection. Our research aimed at correlating genetic polymorphisms of CD276/TREML2 with acute rejection, and evaluating its prognostic value of acute rejection after liver transplantation.

Methods

The study enrolled a total of 388 recipients. Among them, acute allograft rejection was observed in 54 cases. We performed single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping of CD276, including rs11072431, rs11574495, rs12593558, rs12594627, rs2127015, rs3816661 and rs7176654, and TREML2, including rs4714431, rs6915083, rs7754593, and rs9394767 from preoperative peripheral blood genome DNA.

Results

We found rs2127015 of CD276, rs6915083 and rs7754593 of TREML2, and HBV infection as well were associated with acute rejection. And, rs2127015 influences CD276 expression. Moreover, we established a risk assessment model, composited by statistically proved risk factors.

Conclusion

By integrating both clinical and genetic variables, liver transplant recipients can be categorized into different risk groups, and might benefit from individualized therapies.

Skin-induced tolerance as a new needle free therapeutic strategy

This article summarizes current knowledge about a new subject called "skin induced tolerance". Suppression is induced via epicutaneous (EC) immunization with a protein antigen and is described in Th1, Tc1 and NK mediated contact hypersensitivity (CHS) reactions. The subject of skin-induced suppression is also described in the regulation of experimental models of autoimmune diseases like experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), collagen induced arthritis (CIA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and finally in an animal model of graft rejection. The potential clinical use of this approach to regulate human diseases is also discussed.

Tacrolimus without or with the addition of conventional immunosuppressive treatment in juvenile autoimmune hepatitis

AIM

To investigate tacrolimus (Tac)-based treatment in juvenile autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Twenty patients (13 girls; age, 8-17 years; median, 13.25 years) with AIH were treated with two daily oral doses of Tac. Six of them had advanced liver disease and/or cirrhosis.

METHODS

Drug concentrations in blood were measured regularly, and the target trough levels were 2.5-5 ng/mL. The patients were followed up for 1 year. Their clinical, biochemical, immunological and histological status was obtained at baseline and after 1 year.

RESULTS

In three cases, Tac alone led to complete remission. In 14 cases, additional low doses of prednisolone or azathioprine were used for a short time to achieve remission. In two cases, the treatment was discontinued: in one because of therapeutic failure, in another because of a suspected but unverified adverse event. Ten patients reported headache and/or recurrent abdominal pain. Two patients developed inflammatory bowel disease. Renal function remained intact.

CONCLUSION

Tac is a promising alternative first line of treatment for AIH. Although monotherapy with Tac is usually not sufficient to achieve complete remission, the prednisolone and azathioprine doses can be drastically reduced, and most of their side effects avoided.