Cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Is Change in Hemoglobin Level a Predictive Biomarker of Tyrosine Kinase Efficacy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma? A Turkish Oncology Group Study

BACKGROUND

There are insufficient predictive markers for renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

METHODS

A total of 308 metastatic RCC patients were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The increased hemoglobin (Hb) group had significantly higher progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) compared with the decreased Hb group at 11.5 versus 6.35 months (p < .001) and 21.0 versus 11.36 months (p < .001) respectively. The 1- and 3-year OS rates were higher in the Hb increased group, i.e., 84% versus 64% and 52% versus 35% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that increased Hb levels after tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy could be a predictive marker of RCC.

Radical prostatectomy for locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer

The management of advanced prostate cancer remains challenging. Traditionally, radical prostatectomy was discouraged in patients with locally advanced or node positive disease owing to the increased complication rate and treatment related morbidity. However, technical advances and refinements in surgical techniques have enabled the outcomes for patients with high risk prostate cancer to be improved. More recently, the concept of cytoreductive prostatectomy has been described where surgery (often Combined with an extended lymph node dissection) is performed in the setting of metastatic disease. Indirect evidence suggests an advantage using the cytoreductive approach. Hypothetical explanations for this observed benefit include decreased tumour burden, immune modulation, improved response to secondary treatment and avoidance of secondary complications attributable to local tumour growth. Nevertheless, prospective trials are required to investigate this further.

The effect of the gastrectomy on survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a study of ASMO

AIM

To investigate the role of surgical resection of primary tumor on overall survival (OS) in advanced gastric cancer patients at the time of diagnosis.

PATIENTS & METHODS

The survival rates of metastatic gastric cancer patients whose gastric primary tumor was resected at time of diagnosis were compared with metastatic gastric cancer patients whose primary tumor was nonresected.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival and OS in operated and nonoperated group were 10 versus 6, 14 versus 9 months, respectively (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, gastric resection of primary tumor, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, second-line chemotherapy had a significant effect on OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.52 [95% CI: 0.38-0.71], HR: 0.57 [95% CI: 0.42-0.78], HR: 1.48 [1.09-2.01]; p ≤ 0.001, p = 0.001 and p = 0.012, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Subpopulations of patients with metastatic gastric cancer might benefit from surgical removal of primary tumor.

The necessity of cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma using antiangiogenic targeted therapy after interferon alfa-2b

BACKGROUND

Targeted therapy has improved the survival of patients with metastatic RCC. In the present study, we evaluated whether there was an effect of cytoreductive surgery on prognosis of patients with metastatic RCC using antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) agents.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 52 patients with metastatic RCC from Akdeniz University, Afyon Kocatepe University, and Medipol University participated in the study. All the patients had received targeted antiangiogenic therapy after interferon alfa-2b. According to previous CRN, the patients were divided into 2 groups as CRN (+) and CRN (-).

RESULTS

The CRN (+) group was younger than the CRN (-) group (P < .001) and the hemoglobin levels were significantly higher in the CRN (+) group (P = .023). The median progression-free survival time from the date of starting TKIs were 8.5 and 3.0 months for the CRN (+) and CRN (-) groups, respectively (P = .104). The median overall survival was 15.1 and 5.4 months for the CRN (+) and CRN (-) groups, respectively (P = .034).

CONCLUSION

We speculate that CRN is still an important part of treatment modalities in patients with metastatic RCC in modern era targeted therapy, which is currently the best systemic therapy. However, the indications of CRN might be limited to good-risk patients with metastatic RCC. Further randomized studies are warranted to clarify the necessity of CRN in patients with metastatic RCC.

Management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with poor-risk features: current status and future perspectives

With seven agents approved for renal cell carcinoma within the past few years, there has undoubtedly been progress in treating this disease. However, patients with poor-risk features remain a challenging and difficult-to-treat population, with the mTOR inhibitor, temsirolimus, the only agent approved in the first-line setting. Phase III trial data are still lacking VEGF-pathway inhibitors in patients with poor prognostic features. Poor-risk patients need to be considered as a heterogeneous population. Further understanding of biomarkers can lead to a better selection of patients who may benefit the most from treatment and improvements in prognosis. The presence of poor Karnofsky scores and liver or CNS disease may affect the outcome of these patients much more than other identified factors. This consideration may provide the rationale to further stratify poor-risk patients further subgroups destined to receive either cure or palliation.

Targeted therapies for non-clear renal cell carcinoma

The treatment of advanced and metastatic kidney cancer has been revolutionized by the development of targeted systemic therapies. Despite the growing number of available agents approved for use against clear cell renal cell carcinoma, patients with non-clear histologies, constituting approximately 1 in 4 cases of kidney cancer, have not received the same attention. The majority of clinical trials testing novel targeted therapies have excluded non-clear subtypes, providing limited therapeutic options for patients with these diagnoses and their oncologists. This review will focus on the use of targeted therapies against the non-clear histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma: papillary I and II, chromophobe, and collecting duct. The unique genetic and molecular profiles of each distinct non-clear kidney cancer subtype will be described, as these differences are integral to the development and effectiveness of the novel agents used to treat them. Trials focusing on non-clear kidney cancer, or those that treated clear cell tumors along with significant numbers of non-clear subtypes, will be discussed. The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy and the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant targeted therapy will be reviewed. Lastly, areas of future research will be highlighted.

[Is the cytoreductive nephrectomy still necessary in case of metastases?]

Cytoredutive nephrectomy is a component of metastatic renal cell carcinoma management. This procedure can induce a spontaneous regression of metastases in a small number of cases. It increases the overall survival of correctly selected patients treated with immunotherapy. However, we still do not know if this benefit remains for patient treated with targeted therapies. In the three main prospective randomized studies evaluating targeted therapies, the majority of included patients have had prior nephrectomy. However, this surgical procedure is not without risk and could delay initiation of medical treatment. Age of patient, comorbidities, histologic pattern and surgical difficulties should be taken into account. Until results of prospective studies, the cytoreductive nephrectomy should be still considered as component of the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Prognostic factors in renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a very heterogeneous disease with widely varying prognosis. An accurate knowledge of the individual risk of disease progression and mortality after treatment is essential to counsel patients, plan individualized surveillance protocols and select patients for adapted treatment schedules and new clinical trials.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature on prognostic factors of localized and metastatic RCC was performed.

RESULTS

Prognostic factors in RCC include anatomical (TNM classification, tumor size), histological (Fuhrman grade, histologic subtype), clinical (symptoms and performance status), and molecular features. All these features are not perfectly accurate when used alone. Therefore an increasing number of prognostic models or nomograms that include several combined prognostic features have been designed in order to improve predictive accuracy. UCLA Integrated Staging System (UISS) and the Mayo Clinic's SSIGN score are the two most used prognostic models for localized RCC. In the setting of metastatic RCC the classical anatomical and histological tumor features have little predictive value. However, accurate prognostic models have been designed to predict response to therapy, and progression-free and overall survival. The two most used tools to predict response to immunotherapy are the model designed by the French Group of Immunotherapy and the Motzer's model. The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and antiangiogenic drugs have deeply changed the treatment of metastatic RCC. Predictive tools that are adapted to the modern targeted therapies are now needed.

CONCLUSION

There is increasing knowledge on prognostic factors of localized and metastatic RCC. Several predictive models have been developed by combining different prognostic features and are valuable tools for patient counseling, treatment decision-making and trial design. Further research is needed to assess whether the combination of classical prognostic factors with molecular features and information from gene and protein expression profiling can increase the predictive accuracy of the current prognostic models.

New systemic treatment options for metastatic renal-cell carcinoma in the era of targeted therapies

Advances in understanding the biology and genetics of renal-cell carcinomas have led to the development of novel targeted therapies for the treatment of metastatic renal-cell cancer. Previously the systemic approaches were limited to cytokine therapies that were modest in their clinical benefits and at the expense of significant toxicities. Investigational treatments with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation were equally toxic and resulted in significant morbidity and mortality. The development of targeted therapy has revolutionized the treatment of metastatic renal-cell cancer with more meaningful outcomes. This review aims to provide a detailed discussion of the clinical benefits of targeted therapies such as sunitinib, sorafenib, temsirolimus, everolimus, bevacizumab, and some of the newer agents in clinical trial development. The efficacy of these compounds in terms of response, survival and clinical benefit are explored as well as their toxicities. The role of surgery in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma is reviewed in the context of cytoreductive therapy and resection of solitary and oligometastatic disease. Ongoing studies in the adjuvant setting following curative resection are also reviewed. The availability of targeted therapies has led to their rapid adoption as frontline therapy over traditional cytokine therapy, thus bringing more optimistic and hopeful therapeutic options in a condition where historically, systemic treatments have been relatively unsatisfactory and disappointing.

Use of systemic therapy and factors affecting survival for patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To present a multi-institutional experience evaluating the use of systemic therapy in patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN), as prospective randomized trials showed a survival benefit for CN in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immunotherapy, and these data have been extrapolated to support CN in the era of targeted therapy, but the likelihood that patients with metastatic kidney cancer who undergo CN will receive systemic treatment afterward remains poorly defined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 141 patients who underwent CN between 1990 and 2008 were identified from our Institutional Kidney Cancer Registries. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression models were used to assess the effect of clinicopathological and perioperative variables on patients' subsequent receipt of systemic therapy, and survival after CN.

RESULTS

Overall, 98 of the 141 patients (69.5%) received postoperative systemic treatment, at a median (range) of 2.5 (0.1-61.5) months after CN. In this group, 52 (53%) patients received immunotherapy, 34 (35%) targeted agents, and 12 (12%) other regimens. By contrast, 43 patients (31%) did not receive systemic therapy, because of rapid disease progression (13, 30%), decision for surveillance by medical oncology (nine, 21%), patient refusal (10, 23%), perioperative death (eight, 19%), and unknown reasons in three (7%). The median (range) survival after CN was 16.7 (0-120) months. The risk of death after surgery correlated with the number of metastatic sites (P = 0.012) and symptoms (P = 0.001) at presentation, poor performance status (P = 0.001), high tumour grade (P = 0.006), and presence of sarcomatoid features (P < 0.024).

CONCLUSION

Nearly a third of patients undergoing CN did not receive systemic treatment. While some were electively observed or declined therapy, others did not receive treatment due to rapidly progressive disease. Further investigation is warranted to identify those patients at highest risk of rapid postoperative disease progression who might benefit instead from an initial approach to treatment with systemic therapy.

Cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic RCC in the era of targeted therapy

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has traditionally been associated with a poor prognosis with few effective treatments. In the multimodal treatment of metastatic RCC, cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) became the standard of care after two randomized trials demonstrated a benefit in overall survival in patients who received CN prior to treatment with interferon. More recently, several agents (sunitinib, sorafenib, temsirolimus, everolimus and bevacizumab) have been developed that target angiogenesis and the cellular growth pathways involved in metastatic RCC. These targeted agents have demonstrated improved outcomes compared to cytokine therapy, and have transformed metastatic RCC treatment. Targeted agents are being used as a first-line systemic treatment in patients with metastatic RCC with unprecedented success, and many studies are now focusing on the role of CN in combination with these agents for patients with metastatic RCC.

Integration of surgery and systemic therapy in the management of metastatic renal cancer

Integration of surgery and systemic therapies represents the best management option for most patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cytoreductive nephrectomy, metastasectomy, and consolidative surgery can all play a vital role in this challenging patient population. Relevant issues in this era relate to the timing of surgery, the role of cytoreduction as systemic therapies become more effective, management of the residual mass, and surgical safety after targeted therapy.