Pediatric Medical Traumatic Stress in Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Pancreatitis, and Cystic Fibrosis

Hospital experiences and medical traumatic stress in adults with spina bifida

PurposeThis study examined hospital and emergency department (ED) experiences of adults with spina bifida (SB). It investigated the association between medical traumatic stress (MTS) and participant characteristics, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, and resiliency scores.MethodsAdults with SB who had a hospital or ED encounter within the last five years were recruited from a medical home clinic and completed a structured interview and validated questionnaires. Interview responses were characterized using qualitative theme analysis, questionnaires were scored using published guidelines, and MTS scores were reported per participant characteristic and emotional health questionnaire score counts and percentages.ResultsTwenty-five adults with SB were recruited, representing 37% of eligible patients. A majority of participants scored positive for at least one symptom cluster of MTS. No trends were noted within the demographic or SB data when compared to MTS scores. There was a trend of increased MTS symptom clusters associated with increased depression, anxiety, and PTSD, and a trend of decreased MTS symptom clusters associated with increased resilience. The narrative analysis yielded three distinct themes: negative hospital environment (sub-themes: feeling unheard, insufficient communication, care delays, and an uncomfortable adult healthcare environment), SB-related condition concerns and complications (sub-themes: adult providers lacking SB knowledge, multiple hospitalizations, pain, urology concerns, skin/bone infections, shunt/neurosurgery care, anxiety about needed procedures and illness severity, and MTS symptom clusters), and positive supports when in the hospital (sub-themes: self-advocacy, resilience, family support, positive patient/provider communication, and positive care outcome).ConclusionFurther research with a larger study population is necessary to draw significant conclusions about relationships between demographic and SB data, emotional health, and MTS. However, this study identified opportunities for improving healthcare experiences for this patient population, including facilitating communication, inquiring about potentially traumatic medical experiences, and promoting self-advocacy, self-efficacy, resilience, and familial support.

Understanding the Psychological Impact of Medical Care Experiences on Adults With Craniofacial Conditions: A Pilot Survey of Traumatic Stress Symptoms and Resilience

Craniofacial conditions often require extensive medical care and surgeries throughout childhood and adolescence. However, there is limited research investigating the psychological effects of craniofacial care, including risks for medical traumatic stress. This cross-sectional study investigated the medical care experiences of adults with craniofacial conditions, including the frequency of potentially traumatic medical events, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, and resilience. Participants (N=34; mean age 35.2 ± 12.2 y; 71% female) were recruited at 3 US pediatric hospitals and craniofacial support organizations. Participants completed the PTSD Checklist (PCL-5), Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, the Craniofacial Experiences Questionnaire, and open-ended questions about their medical care experiences. Most participants reported experiencing potentially traumatic medical experiences, such as prolonged and/or painful dental (79%) and medical treatments (73%) and hospitalization in the intensive care unit (70%). On the PCL-5, 21% met the criteria for PTSD, which is similar to other medical populations and higher than the 6% rate of PTSD in the general US population. Participants reported both stressors and positive aspects related to living with a craniofacial condition; however, resilience scores were lower relative to a US community sample. Qualitative analysis of open-ended responses identified themes including interactions with providers, medical treatment experiences, and psychosocial impacts. Adults with craniofacial conditions appear to be vulnerable to post-traumatic stress symptoms related to their medical care experiences, and report reduced resilience relative to community samples. Implications for clinical care and research include the integration of trauma-informed care approaches and strategies to support coping and resilience across the lifespan.

Addressing pain in people living with cystic fibrosis: Cystic fibrosis foundation evidence-informed guidelines

Even as many outcomes for people living with cystic fibrosis (PLwCF) improve, individuals still experience extensive symptom burdens. From birth, many PLwCF experience both pain as a symptom of their CF disease and procedural pain, posing detriments to health, functioning, and quality of life. Despite its prevalence and impact, there is no CF-specific guidance for the assessment and management of pain. Similarly, no guidance exists regarding communication with PLwCF about their pain experiences or its impact on their lives. Therefore, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) assembled an expert panel of clinicians, researchers, PLwCF, and caregivers to develop consensus recommendations for pain management in CF. We utilized literature review and expert opinion to develop 13 recommendations addressing pain assessment, management, and communication. Recommendations are centered on guiding principles of utilizing a multimodal approach to pain management, offering age and developmentally appropriate assessment and interventions, concurrently treating underlying conditions causing, contributing to, and/or exacerbated by pain, considering societal stigma of the pain experience, particularly for minoritized and marginalized people, and sensitivity to issues of access and cost. These recommendations are intended to guide clinicians in managing pain and improving quality of life for PLwCF with pain at all stages of illness and development.

The factors associated with paediatric medical post-traumatic stress: A systematic review

We examined and synthesised existing literature on factors associated with paediatric medical-related posttraumatic stress among children and their parents. Children experiencing a broad spectrum of medical conditions, diseases and injuries were of interest. A search of relevant literature concerning PMTS in children and their parents, as well as factors associated with PMTS, was conducted using Medline, PubMed and Scopus. Only studies published in English between January 2018 and November 2023 were included. Twelve articles met inclusion criteria. A broad range of correlates of PMTS were identified for children and parents, which were thematically organised into six key areas: hospital practices and environments; the parent-child relationship; parental mental wellbeing; psychological factors; sociodemographic factors; and the physical consequences of the condition. Bearing in mind constraints on causal inference due to the design of the included studies, knowledge of the factors associated with PMTS may enable clinicians to identify at-risk children and parents, with a view to intervention.

Preventing Pediatric Medical Traumatic Stress in a Pediatric Urology Outpatient Setting: Application of the Pediatric Psychosocial Preventative Health Model (PPPHM)

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this topical review are to (1) increase understanding of pediatric medical traumatic stress (PMTS) in pediatric urology populations through literature review, (2) identify a theoretical model to guide prevention of PMTS in this population, and (3) provide clinical care recommendations based on the model identified. Authors introduce a new term "uropsychology" to describe psychological practice that specializes in the treatment of urology patients.

METHODS

Pediatric uropsychologists from 5 pediatric medical care centers gathered to discuss their experience with treating PMTS in their settings and to review existing literature related to PMTS in pediatric urology, PMTS in other populations, and established models for prevention. Authors provide recommendations based on literature review for preventing PMTS in a pediatric urology population.

RESULTS

Gaps in the evidence base for preventing PMTS in this population are identified. Authors provide a series of clinical care recommendations, utilizing clinical experience, and the Pediatric Psychosocial Preventative Health Model (PPPHM) as a framework.

CONCLUSIONS

While there is limited research on PMTS in pediatric urology populations, urologic interventions can be perceived as invasive, painful, distressing, and traumatic. Application of the PPPHM can guide prevention and intervention efforts. Future research is needed to characterize PMTS in this population, evaluate the efficacy of trauma-informed prevention and intervention practices, and develop screening measures that accurately identify at-risk patients. Authors recommend intradisciplinary collaboration among uropsychologists, urology specialists, and patients and families to create formal standards of care, avenues for other future research, and equitable access to uropsychology care.

Variability of Psychosocial Services Within the ImproveCareNow Learning Health System: Opportunities for Optimization

Care for youth with pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is the focus of ImproveCareNow (ICN), an international learning health system devoted to quality care and improved outcomes through collaboration, data sharing, and research. Known to be significantly disruptive to normative social development and quality of life, pediatric IBD significantly increases the risk of internalizing distress and secondary developmental sequelae. While multidisciplinary support including psychosocial care (from social workers and pediatric psychologists) is growing, this evidence-based and beneficial set of services is not universally available to youth with IBD. In a survey sent to the more than 100 established ICN centers, psychosocial providers attempted to identify the coverage and practice scope of psychosocial providers within the network. Results indicated that support varies widely by service type and availability of providers. Recommendations for further research and considerations for centers seeking to expand supports are considered.