Newborn lamb as a new model for studying gastroesophageal reflux

Effects of upper airway obstruction or hypoxia on gastroesophageal reflux in newborn lambs

BACKGROUND

Although it is commonly accepted that upper airway obstruction (UAO) increases gastroesophageal reflux (GER), the link is poorly understood and insufficiently documented. In addition, while hypoxia is often encountered in infants with UAO, its consequences on GER are virtually unknown. The two aims of the present study were to characterize the effects of (1) UAO and (2) hypoxia on GER.

METHODS

Seventeen lambs underwent polysomnographic and esophageal impedance/pH-metry monitoring during UAO vs. a control condition (6 h, ten lambs) or 10% hypoxia vs. normoxic condition (3 h, seven other lambs).

RESULTS

Moderate-to-severe UAO was maintained throughout monitoring (inspiratory tracheal pressure of -13 (-15, -12) cm H₂O vs. -1 (-1, -1) cm H₂O in control condition, p = 0.005). While the number of GERs increased with UAO (2 (1, 4) vs. 0 (0, 3) in the control condition, p = 0.03), the increase was less than anticipated and inconsistent among the lambs. Also, sustained 10% hypoxia did not alter the number of GERs (2 (1, 3) vs. 0 (0, 5) in the control condition, p = 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of an UAO for 6 h mildly increased the number of GERs, whereas hypoxia for 3 h had no significant effect.

IMPACT

The effect of upper airway obstruction and hypoxia on gastroesophageal reflux is poorly documented in the neonatal period. A moderate-to-severe upper airway obstruction for 6 h results in a mild, inconsistent increase in the number of gastroesophageal refluxes. Overall, a hypoxia of 10% for 3 h had no significant impact on gastroesophageal reflux. The prescription of an antireflux medication in infants with upper airway obstruction must not be systematic but rely on objective signs of a pathologic gastroesophageal reflux.

Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation inhibits gastroesophageal reflux in the neonatal period

Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) in neonates is increasingly considered due to enhanced alveolar ventilation, absence of patient-ventilator asynchrony and lessened ventilator-induced lung injury. Although any type of non-invasive respiratory support can lead to gastric distension via esophageal air passage and thus promote gastroesophageal refluxes (GERs), we have shown that nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP; 6 cmH₂O) and intermittent positive pressure ventilation (15/4 cmH₂O) conversely inhibit GERs in lambs. The current objective was to test the hypothesis that nHFOV also inhibits GERs compared to spontaneous ventilation without respiratory support. Eight lambs underwent five hours of polysomnographic and esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance pHmetry recordings to assess GERs and air passage into the esophagus, with and without nHFOV (mean airway pressure = 8 cmH₂O, oscillation frequency = 8 Hz, amplitude ≈ 20 cmH₂O and I:E = 1:2). Results revealed that GERs were decreased with nHFOV (p = .03), despite an increase in gas-containing swallows (p = .01). In conclusion, similarly to nasal CPAP and intermittent positive pressure ventilation, nHFOV inhibits GERs in newborn lambs.

Inhibitory Effect of Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation on Gastroesophageal Reflux

Non-invasive intermittent positive pressure ventilation can lead to esophageal insufflations and in turn to gastric distension. The fact that the latter induces transient relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter implies that it may increase gastroesophageal refluxes. We previously reported that nasal Pressure Support Ventilation (nPSV), contrary to nasal Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (nNAVA), triggers active inspiratory laryngeal closure. This suggests that esophageal insufflations are more frequent in nPSV than in nNAVA. The objectives of the present study were to test the hypotheses that: i) gastroesophageal refluxes are increased during nPSV compared to both control condition and nNAVA; ii) esophageal insufflations occur more frequently during nPSV than nNAVA. Polysomnographic recordings and esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance pHmetry were performed in nine chronically instrumented newborn lambs to study gastroesophageal refluxes, esophageal insufflations, states of alertness, laryngeal closure and respiration. Recordings were repeated without sedation in control condition, nPSV (15/4 cmH₂O) and nNAVA (~ 15/4 cmH₂O). The number of gastroesophageal refluxes recorded over six hours, expressed as median (interquartile range), decreased during both nPSV (1 (0, 3)) and nNAVA [1 (0, 3)] compared to control condition (5 (3, 10)), (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the esophageal insufflation index did not differ between nPSV (40 (11, 61) h^-1) and nNAVA (10 (9, 56) h^-1) (p = 0.8). In conclusion, nPSV and nNAVA similarly inhibit gastroesophageal refluxes in healthy newborn lambs at pressures that do not lead to gastric distension. In addition, the occurrence of esophageal insufflations is not significantly different between nPSV and nNAVA. The strong inhibitory effect of nIPPV on gastroesophageal refluxes appears identical to that reported with nasal continuous positive airway pressure.

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure inhibits gastroesophageal reflux in newborn lambs

Background

Using esophageal pHmetry, nasal CPAP (nCPAP) has been shown to decrease acid gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in adult humans. Although both GER (mainly non-acid) and nCPAP use are very frequent in newborns, the effect of nCPAP on GER in early life is unknown. Having recently shown that the newborn lamb is a unique model for studying neonatal GER, our main objective was to assess the effect of nCPAP on GER in newborn lambs.

Methods

Eight newborn lambs, aged 2–3 days, were studied. Continuous esophageal pH-Impedance monitoring and polysomnography were performed for six hours during both spontaneous breathing and nCPAP application at 6 cmH₂O (nCPAP6), in a randomized order. Results were compared in the two experimental conditions, as well as without CPAP during the following 6 hours.

Results

i) nCPAP₆ virtually abolished GER [mean ±SD reflux number for 6 h = 9.1±8.6 without nCPAP₆ vs. 0.6±1 with nCPAP₆, P<0.05]; ii) GER number was also reduced during the 6 h-period following nCPAP6 application (18±16 without nCPAP₆ vs. 7±8.1 with nCPAP₆, P<0.05); iii) nCPAP₆ decreased the depth and duration of lower esophageal sphincter relaxation.

Conclusions

nCPAP inhibits GER in the newborn lamb. Further clinical studies using different levels of nasal CPAP are needed to confirm this result in human infants.