1
|
Hill RE, Fardell JE, Mercieca-Bebber R, Wakefield CE, Signorelli C, Webber K, Johnston KA, Cohn RJ. Survivorship care plan utilization in Australia and New Zealand: survivors', parents' and healthcare providers' perspectives. Support Care Cancer 2025; 33:182. [PMID: 39937313 PMCID: PMC11821783 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-025-09238-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2025] [Indexed: 02/13/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE As part of survivorship care, many health authorities recommend survivorship care plans (SCPs). The aim of this study was to understand survivors' SCP receipt and use, clinical/demographic factors associated with use, and providers' SCP practices. METHODS We surveyed Australian and New Zealand survivors of adult and childhood cancer (including parent proxies for survivors aged < 16 years). We fitted binomial logistic regression models to examine the relationship between survivors' clinical and sociodemographic characteristics, and SCP receipt. We also surveyed oncology health providers regarding current SCP provision practices, perceived receipt, and usefulness. RESULTS We recruited 1123 cancer survivors (499 adult cancer survivors and 624 childhood cancer survivors, including 222 parent proxies) and 21 healthcare providers. 10.7% of adult and 22.0% of childhood cancer survivors recalled receiving SCPs. SCP receipt was more likely for adult cancer survivors diagnosed with prostate cancer, low-risk cancer diagnoses and older at study participation, and childhood cancer survivors treated with chemotherapy or younger at study participation. Across both groups, a higher level of education attainment was predictive of SCP use. Most healthcare providers estimated that < 15% of adult and > 75% of childhood cancer survivors received SCPs. CONCLUSIONS Few survivors of adult or childhood cancer reported receiving a SCP, and there were sociodemographic and clinical differences in those who did and did not receive and use their SCP. SCP recipients used and valued them, but healthcare providers indicated potential areas for improvement with SCP provision. Consideration may be needed regarding SCP format, presentation and content.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca E Hill
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
- Kids Cancer Centre, Behavioural Sciences Unit, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney , NSW, Australia.
| | - Joanna E Fardell
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Behavioural Sciences Unit, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney , NSW, Australia
| | | | - Claire E Wakefield
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Behavioural Sciences Unit, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney , NSW, Australia
| | - Christina Signorelli
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Behavioural Sciences Unit, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney , NSW, Australia
| | - Kate Webber
- School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Monash, VIC, Australia
- Medical Oncology Department, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Karen A Johnston
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Behavioural Sciences Unit, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney , NSW, Australia
| | - Richard J Cohn
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Behavioural Sciences Unit, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney , NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hill RE, Mercieca‐Bebber R, Fardell JE, Wakefield CE, Signorelli C, Webber K, Cohn RJ, ANZCHOG Study Group. Relationship between survivorship care plans and unmet information needs, quality of life, satisfaction with care, and propensity to engage with, and attend, follow-up care. Cancer 2023; 129:3820-3832. [PMID: 37566341 PMCID: PMC10952368 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of survivorship care plans (SCPs) on the proximal and distal outcomes of adult and childhood cancer survivors, and parent proxies, is unclear. This study aimed to determine the relationship between SCP receipt and these outcomes. METHODS A cross-sectional survey of adult and childhood cancer survivors (and parent proxies for survivors aged younger than 16 years) across Australia and New Zealand was conducted. Multivariate regression models were fitted to measure the impact of SCP receipt on proximal (unmet information needs and propensity to engage with, and attend, cancer-related follow-up care) and distal outcomes (quality of life and satisfaction with cancer-related follow-up care) with control for cancer history and sociodemographic factors. RESULTS Of 1123 respondents, 499 were adult cancer survivors and 624 were childhood cancer survivors (including 222 parent proxies). We found that SCP receipt was predictive of greater attendance at, and awareness of, cancer-related follow-up care (adult: odds ratio [OR], 2.46; 95% CI, 1.18-5.12; OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.07-5.29; child/parent: OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.63-4.17; OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.06-2.50; respectively). SCP receipt also predicted fewer unmet information needs related to "follow-up care required" and "possible late effects" (adult: OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20-0.96; OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13-0.64; child/parent: OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30-0.72; OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.85; respectively). In terms of distal outcomes, SCP receipt predicted a better global quality of life for adult cancer survivors (β, 0.08; 95% CI, -0.01-7.93), proxy-reported health-related quality of life (β, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.44-7.12), and satisfaction with follow-up care for childhood cancer survivors (OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.64-5.23). CONCLUSIONS Previous studies have shown little impact of SCPs on distal end points. Results suggest that SCPs may be beneficial to cancer survivors' proximal and distal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca E. Hill
- Discipline of Paediatrics & Child HealthSchool of Clinical MedicineUniversity of New South Wales (UNSW) Medicine and HealthUNSW SydneyRandwickNew South WalesAustralia
- Behavioural Sciences UnitKids Cancer CentreSydney Children’s HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Rebecca Mercieca‐Bebber
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials CentreThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Joanna E. Fardell
- Discipline of Paediatrics & Child HealthSchool of Clinical MedicineUniversity of New South Wales (UNSW) Medicine and HealthUNSW SydneyRandwickNew South WalesAustralia
- Behavioural Sciences UnitKids Cancer CentreSydney Children’s HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Claire E. Wakefield
- Discipline of Paediatrics & Child HealthSchool of Clinical MedicineUniversity of New South Wales (UNSW) Medicine and HealthUNSW SydneyRandwickNew South WalesAustralia
- Behavioural Sciences UnitKids Cancer CentreSydney Children’s HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Christina Signorelli
- Discipline of Paediatrics & Child HealthSchool of Clinical MedicineUniversity of New South Wales (UNSW) Medicine and HealthUNSW SydneyRandwickNew South WalesAustralia
- Behavioural Sciences UnitKids Cancer CentreSydney Children’s HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Kate Webber
- School of Clinical Sciences at Monash HealthFaculty of MedicineMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
| | - Richard J. Cohn
- Discipline of Paediatrics & Child HealthSchool of Clinical MedicineUniversity of New South Wales (UNSW) Medicine and HealthUNSW SydneyRandwickNew South WalesAustralia
- Behavioural Sciences UnitKids Cancer CentreSydney Children’s HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
von Werthern M, Grigorakis G, Sweet R, Soon K. The Continuity of Cancer: Children and Adolescent's Experiences of Ending Cancer Treatment - A Systematic Review. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2022; 32:2006-2018. [PMID: 36190313 DOI: 10.1177/10497323221128860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
As the research and treatment of childhood cancer steadily progresses, so has the interest in children's needs, not only throughout such treatment but also following completion. Whilst there is increased literature focussing on the long-term psychosocial impact of treatment completion, little is currently known about how children and young people (CYP) experience the more immediate end of their cancer treatment. The current review seeks to examine CYP's experiences of the end of their cancer treatment. Sixteen studies were retrieved using a systematic search strategy across five databases, all of which used qualitative methodology. Thematic synthesis was chosen to analyse the data. Four overarching themes were generated, which encompassed 'the continuity of cancer', 'ambivalence of needs', 'making sense of the cancer experience' and 'sense of self following the ending'. The end of treatment is a time of complexity for CYP, yet it is currently largely overlooked. In order to scaffold these endings for CYP, increased emphasis and thought needs to be placed on the end of treatment and the support that is provided within it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Kristina Soon
- 4919University College London, London, UK
- 4956Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Michel G, Mulder RL, van der Pal HJH, Skinner R, Bárdi E, Brown MC, Vetsch J, Frey E, Windsor R, Kremer LCM, Levitt G. Evidence-based recommendations for the organization of long-term follow-up care for childhood and adolescent cancer survivors: a report from the PanCareSurFup Guidelines Working Group. J Cancer Surviv 2019; 13:759-772. [DOI: 10.1007/s11764-019-00795-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
5
|
Adult childhood cancer survivors' narratives of managing their health: the unexpected and the unresolved. J Cancer Surviv 2016; 10:711-25. [PMID: 26833205 PMCID: PMC4920835 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-016-0517-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2015] [Accepted: 01/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Currently, 80 % of children diagnosed with cancer will be cured. However, many of these survivors go on to develop long-term health problems or late effects related to their previous cancer and therapy and require varying degrees of lifelong follow-up care. The purpose of this study was to identify the different ways that adult survivors of childhood cancer manage their medical and psychological challenges. Methods Data from in-depth interviews with 30 adult survivors of a childhood cancer (9 to 38 years after diagnosis, currently 22 to 43 years of age, 60 % women) were analyzed using qualitative, thematic narrative analysis methods. Results The survivors had not expected the medical, psychological, and social challenges that arose over time and that often remained unresolved. Five narrative themes revealed distinct ways that survivors managed their health challenges: (1) trying to forget cancer, (2) trusting the system to manage my follow-up care, (3) being proactive about my health, (4) stumbling from one problem to the next, and (5) struggling to find my way. Conclusions Variation exists in the ways in which childhood cancer survivors frame their health, their perceived significance of health challenges, strategies used to manage health, interactions with healthcare professionals and the health system, and parental involvement. Implications for Cancer Survivors This research provides novel insights that can be used to inform the development of patient-centered health services that promote the assessment and tailoring of care to the diverse ways survivors enact their agency, as well as their psychoeducational coping styles, therapeutic relationship needs, and information needs.
Collapse
|
6
|
Lie HC, Loge JH, Fosså SD, Hamre HM, Hess SL, Mellblom AV, Ruud E, Finset A. Providing information about late effects after childhood cancer: lymphoma survivors' preferences for what, how and when. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2015; 98:604-611. [PMID: 25704291 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2014] [Revised: 01/08/2015] [Accepted: 01/21/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Childhood cancer survivors need information about risks of late effects to manage their health. We studied how and when adult, long-term survivors prefer to receive information about late effects. METHODS Five focus-groups with adult survivors of childhood lymphomas who had completed routine follow-up care and participated in a preceding follow-up study (n = 34, 19 females, mean age = 39). We used thematic analysis to identify themes regarding providing late effects information. RESULTS The survivors wanted information about late effects (symptoms, prevention and treatment), lifestyle and social security rights. Information should be tailored, carefully timed, given "face-to-face" and in written format. Many expressed ambivalence regarding receiving information as adolescents, but it was seen as essential "to know" once a late effect occurred. A "re-information" consultation about late effects around age 25 was suggested as beneficial. CONCLUSION Although ambivalent, all survivors wanted information about late effects. They preferred individualized information, disclosed "step-by-step" and in a "re-information consultation" when reaching young adulthood. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Providing information about late effects should be an on-going process across the cancer care trajectory. (Re-)Informing survivors when older would enhance their understanding of their health risks and could aid better health self-management beyond completion of follow-up care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanne C Lie
- Department of Behavioural Sciences in Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; National Advisory Unit on Late Effects after Cancer Treatment, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Jon H Loge
- Department of Behavioural Sciences in Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; National Advisory Unit on Late Effects after Cancer Treatment, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sophie D Fosså
- National Advisory Unit on Late Effects after Cancer Treatment, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hanne M Hamre
- National Advisory Unit on Late Effects after Cancer Treatment, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Siri L Hess
- National Advisory Unit on Late Effects after Cancer Treatment, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anneli V Mellblom
- Department of Behavioural Sciences in Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ellen Ruud
- Department of Paediatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arnstein Finset
- Department of Behavioural Sciences in Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|