Implementation of a Nurse-driven Educational Program Improves Management of Sorafenib’s Toxicities in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The Role of Nurses in the Management of Adverse Events in Patients Receiving First-Line Axitinib Plus Immuno-Oncology Agents for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The recent approval of first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor plus immuno-oncology agent combination therapy for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma offers substantially improved response rates and survival compared with the previous standard of care. This expansion of treatment options has also led to a greater range and complexity of potential treatment-related adverse events related to overlapping toxicities. The aim of this article is to discuss the management of common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) associated with axitinib plus immuno-oncology therapy, highlight the specific roles of oncology nurses in managing these events, and provide AE management resources to aid oncology nurses in their care of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

DATA SOURCES

Author experience, journal articles, and treatment guidelines were used.

CONCLUSION

The use of oncology nurses and nurse-led innovations to monitor and assess treatments can have a positive impact on the management of AEs in cancer patients by identifying those who are most at risk, providing regular assessment, appropriate patient education, and supporting the monitoring of patient safety.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Skilled oncology nurses should be a key part of a team that addresses the supportive care needs and management of AEs that are associated with novel cancer treatments. Early and ongoing communication between the patient and oncology nurses regarding the development of adverse events is a critical component of maximizing treatment outcomes and quality of life.

Home-based multidisciplinary interventions on skin adverse reactions in EGFR-TKI-treated patients with lung cancer: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Here, we provide a feasible, well-designed protocol of a randomised controlled trial for the assessment of the effects of a home-based multidisciplinary intervention on the severity of skin adverse drug reactions and health-related indicators in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) under epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The study will be a two-group, parallel randomised controlled trial conducted at patients' homes by a multidisciplinary team in Zhengzhou in Henan Province, China. Patients with NSCLC who received EGFR-TKI therapy and experienced adverse skin reactions will be randomised and receive either ordinary care or home-based multidisciplinary interventions. The intervention will be divided into an intensive stage (6 weeks) and a maintenance stage (6 weeks) with baseline and follow-up assessment. Interventions in the intensive stage will include general interventions such as health education, follow-up, behaviour guide and social support and targeted interventions such as skill training, coping with adverse drug reaction and problem-solving. The measures that will be carried out in maintenance stage are continuous interventions consisted of an intensive intervention. The multidisciplinary team will be responsible for managing skin adverse drug reactions as required at patients' homes. Data collection and analysis will be performed by researchers at baseline, the end of the sixth week of intervention and the third month after the intervention. The primary outcome is the degree of skin adverse drug reactions, while the secondary outcomes, for example, self-management ability, quality of life, outpatient visits and health economics indicators, will also be presented.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhengzhou University (No. ZZUIRB-2020-97). Findings will be available to patients, clinicians, nurses, pharmacists, community medical staff, funders and health policymakers through peer-reviewed publications, social media and patient support groups.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2000040643).

Patients' Experience of Systemic Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of the Impact on Quality of Life

Simple Summary

Hepatocellular carcinoma remains a serious disease for which curative treatment is only available for about 20% of patients. Because of the severity of the disease and the modest benefit of treatment, quality of life is of paramount importance, especially as its impact on the prognosis of the disease has been demonstrated. Systemic treatments have specific side effects for which close monitoring and symptomatic management improve quality of life.

Abstract

Quality of life (QoL) in oncology is an outcome becoming more and more important and relevant to explore. Some studies have demonstrated its prognostic impact in different cancers, such as colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers, but also in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Different tools have been developed for assessing quality of life, some general, such as EORTC QLQ-C30, but also specific tools depending on cancer origin which seem to be more pertinent for patients. Systemic treatments and specific symptoms due to cancer evolution could decrease quality of life. For approval of new systemic treatments, authorities ask for benefit in terms of efficacy but also benefit in quality of life, which is crucial for patients. This review reports data about QoL in HCC, including specific tools used, impact of systemic treatments and prognosis for QoL for HCC patients. Management of adverse events is essential to enhance compliance with treatment and quality of life. Assessing quality of life in clinical trials appears quite systematic, but its application in clinical routine requires development.

The role of nursing in the management of patients with renal and hepatic cancers: A systematic literature review

PURPOSE

This systematic literature review identified publications evaluating the role and benefits of nurse-led care in the management of patients with a diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance. Structured searches of the PubMed database and the EMCare nursing and allied health database were conducted (August 11, 2021). Eligible publications were English-language, full-text, peer-reviewed journal articles featuring HCC and/or RCC populations, interventions involving nurses, any/no comparators, and reporting any related healthcare outcomes. Data on study design and size, patient characteristics and impact of nursing care were extracted.

RESULTS

Fifty-six relevant articles were identified (43 on HCC; 10 on RCC; 3 on HCC and RCC). The literature described the role and impact of oncology nurses across a variety of care functions, including in health promotion and screening, care coordination, holistic oversight, symptom and adverse event monitoring and management, and emotional support. Twenty-nine empirical studies/case reports were identified demonstrating benefit of nurse-led interventions in HCC/liver cancer (n = 28) and RCC (n = 1). Benefits were achieved through: improved patient participation in screening programs; reduced time to diagnosis; improved treatment adherence, reduced treatment complications, dose reductions and outpatient visits, and potential cost savings.

CONCLUSIONS

The oncology nurse plays a multifaceted role in the care of patients with HCC and RCC, but more evidence from nurse-led interventions is required to guide optimal multidisciplinary care of patients with these conditions.

Nurse coordinator roles in the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A French national survey

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) mostly occurs in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). HCC treatment may have a direct impact on CLD prognosis. HCC management can therefore become complex, involving multiple health care providers, such as oncologists, hepatologists, radiologists, and surgeons. In France, dedicated nurses have been involved in patient care pathways. Their impact is poorly documented.

PURPOSE

To determine the country-wide distribution of HCC nurse coordinators in French health care settings and to describe their roles and responsibilities.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A survey using a multi-item questionnaire (including center characteristics, nurse coordinator characteristics, and quality indicators such as patient care pathway initiation timeline, scheduled length of hospital stay, diagnostic disclosure process) was conducted. All French liver cancer centers planning to participate in a prospective national cohort study for patients with HCC (CHIEF Cohort) were invited to take part in the survey. Bivariate analysis compared centers with a nurse coordinator to those without.

RESULTS

Among the 42 of 72 centers that replied, 14 treated fewer than 75 HCC patients. Treatment mostly took place in hepatology units (34/42). Sixteen nurse coordinators were part of the health care team in 13 of the 42 centers. Among these 13 centers, 11 were university hospitals and 11 followed more than 75 patients per year. The median number of patients followed in these centers was 300 (min-max 44-600) in 2017. All nurse coordinators were involved in providing patient information and counseling. Other roles included treatment monitoring (13/16), care coordination (12/16), psychological support (12/16) and treatment planning (11/16). Thirteen nurse coordinators conducted diagnostic disclosure nurse consultations; seven conducted initial patient contact consultations; and six held outpatient nurse consultations, with wide heterogeneity between centers. The presence of a nurse coordinator was associated with completion of the full diagnostic disclosure process (p = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

In France, nurse coordinators for HCC patient pathway management are present mainly in university hepatology units with a caseload of more than 75 patients per year. All provide patient information and counseling but their roles in care coordination, patient support and holistic assessment are heterogeneous and not standardized.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Targeted Anticancer Protein Kinase Inhibitors in Routine Clinical Use: A Critical Review

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic response to oral targeted anticancer protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) varies widely between patients, with insufficient efficacy of some of them and unacceptable adverse reactions of others. There are several possible causes for this heterogeneity, such as pharmacokinetic (PK) variability affecting blood concentrations, fluctuating medication adherence, and constitutional or acquired drug resistance of cancer cells. The appropriate management of oncology patients with PKI treatments thus requires concerted efforts to optimize the utilization of these drug agents, which have probably not yet revealed their full potential.

METHODS

An extensive literature review was performed on MEDLINE on the PK, pharmacodynamics, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of PKIs (up to April 2019).

RESULTS

This review provides the criteria for determining PKIs suitable candidates for TDM (eg, availability of analytical methods, observational PK studies, PK-pharmacodynamics relationship analysis, and randomized controlled studies). It reviews the major characteristics and limitations of PKIs, the expected benefits of TDM for cancer patients receiving them, and the prerequisites for the appropriate utilization of TDM. Finally, it discusses various important practical aspects and pitfalls of TDM for supporting better implementation in the field of cancer treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Adaptation of PKIs dosage regimens at the individual patient level, through a rational TDM approach, could prevent oncology patients from being exposed to ineffective or unnecessarily toxic drug concentrations in the era of personalized medicine.

Adverse reactions of targeted therapy in cancer patients: a retrospective study of hospital medical data in China

BACKGROUND

The adverse reactions (ADRs) of targeted therapy were closely associated with treatment response, clinical outcome, quality of life (QoL) of patients with cancer. However, few studies presented the correlation between ADRs of targeted therapy and treatment effects among cancer patients. This study was to explore the characteristics of ADRs with targeted therapy and the prognosis of cancer patients based on the clinical data.

METHODS

A retrospective secondary data analysis was conducted within an ADR data set including 2703 patients with targeted therapy from three Henan medical centers of China between January 2018 and December 2019. The significance was evaluated with chi-square test between groups with or without ADRs. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression with backward stepwise method were applied to assess the difference of pathological characteristics in patients with cancer. Using the univariate Cox regression method, the actuarial probability of overall survival was performed to compare the clinical outcomes between these two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 485 patients were enrolled in this study. Of all patients, 61.0% (n = 296) occurred ADRs including skin damage, fatigue, mucosal damage, hypertension and gastrointestinal discomfort as the top 5 complications during the target therapy. And 62.1% of ADRs were mild to moderate, more than half of the ADRs occurred within one month, 68.6% ADRs lasted more than one month. Older patients (P = 0.022) and patients with lower education level (P = 0.036), more than 2 comorbidities (P = 0.021), longer medication time (P = 0.022), drug combination (P = 0.033) and intravenous administration (P = 0.019) were more likely to have ADRs. Those with ADRs were more likely to stop taking (P = 0.000), change (P = 0.000), adjust (P = 0.000), or not take the medicine on time (P = 0.000). The number of patients with recurrence (P = 0.000) and metastasis (P = 0.006) were statistically significant difference between ADRs and non-ADRs group. And the patients were significantly poor prognosis in ADRs groups compared with non-ADRs group.

CONCLUSION

The high incidence of ADRs would affect the treatment and prognosis of patients with cancer. We should pay more attention to these ADRs and develop effective management strategies.

Adverse events of targeted therapies reported by patients with cancer treated in primary care

Background

Targeted Therapies (TT) are among the therapeutic innovations for cancer treatment in outpatient settings. TT-related Adverse Events (AEs) are a source of loss of opportunity for patients if their management is inappropriate.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to describe the AE frequency and severity as reported by patients with cancer who received TT in ambulatory settings. A second objective was to describe the role of the general practitioner (GP) in the management of AEs.

Methods

All patients who started TT at a French Regional Cancer Centre in 2017–2018 were eligible for this 12-month prospective study. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed at inclusion and returned after three months. In the questionnaire, patients listed all AEs that occurred during this period and rated their severity. Occurrence and severity were compared with the rating by a specialised nurse. Patients also indicated the health professional they contacted first for the reported AE.

Results

Among the 247 eligible patients, 15 were excluded and 144 responded to the questionnaire. Fourteen different TTs have been prescribed. Asthenia (92.4%) and anorexia (64.6%) were the most frequent AE. Patients’ AE severity rating was more severe than the nurse’s rating for all drugs (p < 0.001). Patients first contacted their GP for 15.6% of AEs, whereas 20.7% of AEs were not reported to any health professional.

Conclusion

Patients experienced an average of 4 AEs. AE severity rating was significantly different between patients and nurses. Patients do not always communicate AEs to health care professionals.

Sorafenib in pediatric hepatocellular carcinoma from a clinician perspective

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is a rare tumor in children and normally carries poor outcomes. The most frequently employed chemotherapy regimen includes cisplatin and doxorubicin (PLADO), but this combination offers limited efficacy. Sorafenib is a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor which, following positive studies in adults with HCC, has begun to be introduced in conjunction with PLADO in pediatric oncology with some encouraging results. Based on these findings, the use of sorafenib is become more common in children with unresectable and/or metastatic HCC. The care of patients receiving sorafenib requires appropriate expertise and standardized pediatric guidelines are lacking. An increasing number of children with HCC are expected to receive sorafenib in the years to come. Pediatric oncology clinicians have a key role in identifying side effects early and clinicians caring for children receiving sorafenib need to be familiar with these. This review article provides suitable and practical information on sorafenib for educational development to optimize clinical care and facilitate enhanced patient/parent education. The article addresses specific areas including mechanisms of action, pre-clinical and clinical evidence, dosing and drug administration and toxicities of sorafenib. Clinical research and recommendations for managing sorafenib-related side effects are discussed. Underpinned by research, this article provides pediatric oncology clinicians with the knowledge required to deliver optimal care to children receiving sorafenib.

Quality of Life after Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using a Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Tool

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measurements are important for patient care, and emerging bundles in value-based care are placing an increasing emphasis on tying reimbursement to patient surveys. A multicenter pilot study was carried out to assess the efficacy of an automated digital patient engagement (DPE) platform for collecting HRQoL measurements at baseline and at 2- to 4-week intervals through 90 days after transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y) treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The results revealed a survey completion of 78.4% and demonstrated only 4 of 35 individual symptom instances across all time points of transient worsening relative to baseline. Most importantly, the DPE platform provided an effective means for deploying and collecting patient-reported outcome measures.

Management of adverse events associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Improving outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of primary liver cancer. Sorafenib, regorafenib, lenvatinib and cabozantinib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that target, in part, vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, and are approved in various regions of the world for the treatment of advanced HCC. All these agents are associated with a range of adverse events (AEs) that can have a substantial impact on patients' health-related quality of life. Fatigue, diarrhoea, hand-foot skin reaction, nausea, vomiting, decreased appetite, hypertension and weight loss are among the most common AEs experienced with these four TKIs. In this review, we discuss strategies for the management of these AEs in patients with advanced HCC, with the aim of maximizing treatment benefits and minimizing the need for TKI treatment discontinuation. We also consider potential TKI-drug interactions and discuss the use of TKIs in patients with liver dysfunction or who have experienced tumour recurrence after liver transplantation. Use of appropriate AE management strategies and avoidance of contraindicated drugs should help patients with advanced HCC to achieve optimal outcomes with TKIs.