Reducing Inappropriate Antibiotics for Urinary Tract Infections in Long-Term Care: A Replication Study

Data Quality of Resident Documentation in Long-Term Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of interventions aimed at improving data quality in resident documentation in the residential long-term care setting, and to explore the experiences related with the implementation strategies and key determinants influencing data quality.

DESIGN

A systematic review.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Residential long-term care.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched from inception to January 2025. This search was supplemented with screening study registries, references, prospective citation searching, and reviewing gray literature. Studies were selected and data were abstracted by 2 researchers. A narrative synthesis and random effects meta-analyses were performed. The GRADE level of evidence was determined. A thematic analysis was conducted for the qualitative data.

RESULTS

A total of 30 studies were included. The introduction of electronic health records, educational strategies, incident reporting systems, and reminder strategies were associated with small to moderate improvements. The average effect across interventions was an improvement of 13% (95% CI, 7%-20%, I2 = 60%, very low GRADE) in data completeness. Overall data quality was improved in 3 studies, accuracy of data was improved in 1 study, and 1 study observed a nonsignificant improvement in reliability. Small effect sizes and very low-GRADE evidence were observed. Key determinants influencing data quality included the perceived usefulness of documentation systems, access to electronic health records, staff knowledge about clinical assessments, and perceptions of the appropriateness of quality indicators and data reliability. Implementation of interventions was supported by the following strategies: (1) identify and prepare champions, (2) audit and feedback on implementation, (3) provide ongoing consultation, and (4) disseminate implementation materials.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Small to moderate improvements in data quality were observed, with a very low GRADE of evidence. Most findings were limited to the completeness of documentation, although aspects such as timeliness and accuracy remain understudied. It remains unclear what interventions are effective in ensuring solid data quality.

Antimicrobial prescribing in French nursing homes and interventions for antimicrobial stewardship: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Overuse of antibiotics is frequent in nursing homes (NHs) leading to adverse events and selection of resistant bacteria. Antimicrobial stewardship interventions showed heterogeneous effects on reducing inappropriate use of antimicrobials in NHs.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed (1) to analyze antimicrobial prescribing determinants in NHs; (2) to identify which resources for antimicrobial prescribing are used by NHs' physicians (3) understand which antimicrobial stewardship interventions are required and how they should be implemented in NHs.

METHODS

We conducted individual semi-directed interviews with NHs' prescribing physicians in Ile-de-France, France. A thematic content analysis was conducted iteratively.

RESULTS

Thirteen interviews were conducted. Participants were mostly women, with a median age of 48 years and a median professional experience in NHs of three years. Participants included medical coordinators, general practitioners and salaried physicians. Main determinants of antimicrobial prescribing in NHs were the perceived risk of infectious complications and discomfort in residents, the difficulty in obtaining microbiological samples and the lack of healthcare professionals to monitor patients. Most participants reported using national guidelines and electronic decision support systems to guide their antimicrobial prescribing. Institutional constraints accentuate situations of doubt and prompt physicians to prescribe antimicrobials "just in case" despite the will to follow guidelines and the known risks of antimicrobial misuse. Physicians stated that proper antimicrobial use in NHs would require a major effort but was not judged a priority as compared to other medical issues. Producing guidelines tailored to the NH's context, performing good practice audits with feedback on antimicrobial prescribing, and reinforcing multidisciplinary relationships and discussions between city and hospital professionals were cited as potential interventions. The role of the medical coordinator was described as central. According to physicians, collaboration among stakeholders, providing support and training during the process might prove effective strategies to ensure successful implementation.

CONCLUSION

Antimicrobial prescribing is a complex decision-making process involving different factors and actors in NHs. Tailored guidelines, good practice audits, strengthened multidisciplinary collaboration were proposed as key AMS interventions. Physicians emphasized the central role of the medical coordinator supported by stakeholder engagement, collaboration, training and ongoing support for successful implementation.

Barriers to the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in long-term care facilities: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) present specific challenges for the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes. A growing body of literature is dedicated to AMS in LTCFs.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to summarize barriers to the implementation of full AMS programmes, i.e. a set of clinical practices, accompanied by recommended change strategies.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted through Ovid-MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and Cochrane Central. Studies addressing barriers to the implementation of full AMS programmes in LTCFs were included. Implementation barriers described in qualitative studies were identified and coded, and main themes were identified using a grounded theory approach.

RESULTS

The electronic search revealed 3904 citations overall. Of these, 57 met the inclusion criteria. All selected studies were published after 2012, and the number of references per year progressively increased, reaching a peak in 2020. Thematic analysis of 13 qualitative studies identified three main themes: (A) LTCF organizational culture, comprising (A1) interprofessional tensions, (A2) education provided in silos, (A3) lack of motivation and (A4) resistance to change; (B) resources, comprising (B1) workload and staffing levels, (B2) diagnostics, (B3) information technology resources and (B4) funding; and (C) availability of and access to knowledge and skills, including (C1) surveillance data, (C2) infectious disease/AMS expertise and (C3) data analysis skills.

CONCLUSIONS

Addressing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in LTCFs through AMS programmes is an area of growing interest. Hopefully, this review could be helpful for intervention developers and implementers who want to build on the most recent evidence from the literature.

Assessment of implementation strategies adopted for antimicrobial stewardship interventions in long-term care facilities: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) is influenced by multi-level factors (resident, organizational, and external) making their effectiveness sensitive to the implementation context.

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the strategies adopted for the implementation of AMS interventions in LTCFs, whether they considered organizational characteristics, and their effectiveness.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases until April 2022.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Articles covering implementation of AMS interventions in LTCFs.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for empirical studies.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

Data were collected on AMS interventions and context characteristics (e.g. type of facility, staffing, and residents). Implementation strategies and outcomes were mapped according to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework and validated taxonomy for implementation outcomes. Implementation and clinical effectiveness were assessed according to the primary and secondary outcomes results provided in each study.

RESULTS

Among 48 studies included in the analysis, 19 (40%) used implementation strategies corresponding to one to three ERIC domains, including education and training (n = 36/48, 75%), evaluative and iterative strategies (n = 24/48, 50%), and support clinicians (n = 23/48, 48%). Only 8/48 (17%) studies made use of implementation theories, frameworks, or models. Fidelity and sustainability were reported respectively in 21 (70%) and 3 (10%) of 27 studies providing implementation outcomes. Implementation strategy was considered effective in 11/27 (41%) studies, mainly including actions to improve use (n = 6/11, 54%) and education (n = 4/11, 36%). Of the 42 interventions, 18/42 (43%) were deemed clinically effective. Among 21 clinically effective studies, implementation was deemed effective in four and partially effective in five. Two studies were clinically effective despite having non-effective implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of AMS interventions in LTCFs largely differed according to the interventions' content and implementation strategies adopted. Implementation frameworks should be considered to adapt and tailor interventions and strategies to the local context.

Nursing Staff's Role in Detecting Urinary Tract Infections in Nursing Homes: An Integrative Review

Despite evidence-based protocols, inappropriate antibiotic use still presents a systemic global threat to health care in nursing homes (NHs). Nursing staff are responsible for recognizing signs and symptoms that may indicate urinary tract infections (UTIs). The current integrative review was designed to examine the state of the literature related to the role of nursing staff in UTI identification and care in NHs. This review, which includes 19 articles published between 2011 and 2020, identified that, although prescribers are the experts in UTI management, nursing staff in NHs were the individuals who recognized changes and communicated residents' needs to prescribers. Further research is required to understand nursing staff's decision making and unique perspectives and determine if evidence-based protocols align with current practice in the NH setting. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 48(5), 43-50.].

A retrospective comparison of guidelines to assess hospital-diagnosed urinary tract infection in nursing home residents

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate antibiotic treatments for urinary tract infection (UTI) in nursing home (NH) residents are common and contribute to antibiotic resistance. Published guidelines aim to improve accurate assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of UTIs. This study assessed whether records from hospitalized NH residents diagnosed with UTI, while comparing the Cooper Tool and Stone criteria, supported appropriate treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted using electronic medical record (EMR) data from residents of 3 NHs who were diagnosed with UTI when hospitalized over a 3-year period. The Cooper Tool and Stone criteria were used to assess treatment appropriateness.

RESULTS

Of 79 hospitalized residents treated for UTI, 11 (13.9%) were appropriately treated according to the Cooper Tool and 9 (11.4%) according to Stone. The 2 criteria agreed in 9 of the cases including 100% of those with catheters. Urinalysis was documented in 72% of residents and 24% had documentation of culture and sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate UTI treatment rates using both tools were low but much higher in those with catheters. Future research is necessary to validate the use of these tools in the hospital setting which have the potential to improve treatment accuracy and reduce unnecessary antibiotics use.

Nurse Decision-making for Suspected Urinary Tract Infections in Nursing Homes: Potential Targets to Reduce Antibiotic Overuse

OBJECTIVES

To determine what information is most important to registered nurses' (RNs) decisions to call clinicians about suspected urinary tract infections (UTIs) in nursing home residents.

DESIGN

Web-based discrete choice experiment with 19 clinical scenarios.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Online survey with a convenience sample of RNs (N = 881) recruited from a health care research panel.

METHODS

Clinical scenarios used information from 10 categories of resident characteristics: UTI risk, resident type, functional status, mental status, lower urinary tract status, body temperature, physical examination, urinalysis, antibiotic request, and goals of care. Participants were randomized into 2 deliberation conditions (self-paced, n = 437 and forced deliberation, n = 444). The degree to which evidence- and non-evidence-based information was important to decision-making was estimated using unconditional multinomial logistic regression.

RESULTS

For all nurses (22.8%) and the self-paced group (24.1%), lower urinary tract status had the highest importance scores for the decision to call a clinician about a suspected UTI. For the forced-deliberation group, body temperature was most important (23.7%), and lower urinary tract status was less important (21%, P = .001). The information associated with the highest odds of an RN calling about a suspected UTI was painful or difficult urination [odds ratio (OR) 4.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.16-5.65], obvious blood in urine (OR 4.66, 95% CI 3.99-5.44), and temperature at 101.5° (OR 3.80, 95% CI 3.28-4.42). For the self-paced group, painful or difficult urination (OR 5.65, 95% CI 4.53-7.04) had the highest odds, whereas obvious blood in urine (OR 4.39, 95% CI 3.53-5.47) had highest odds for the forced-deliberation group.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

This study highlighted the importance of specific resident characteristics in nurse decision-making about suspected UTIs. Future antimicrobial stewardship efforts should aim to not only improve the previously studied overprescribing practices of clinicians, but to improve nurses' assessment of signs and symptoms of potential infections and how they weigh resident information.